https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/

On 20/07/2017 19:13, harry wrote:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/


That's unusual, harry posting a link that goes against man made global
warming.

I wonder if he read it?

On 20-Jul-17 7:33 PM, dennis@home wrote:
On 20/07/2017 19:13, harry wrote:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/


That's unusual, harry posting a link that goes against man made global
warming.

I wonder if he read it?

Why would he change the habits of a lifetime?

--
--

Colin Bignell

In article . com,
"dennis@home" writes
On 20/07/2017 19:13, harry wrote:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/


That's unusual, harry posting a link that goes against man made global
warming.

I wonder if he read it?
No need to wonder - he never does.
--
bert

On Thursday, 20 July 2017 19:33:42 UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:
On 20/07/2017 19:13, harry wrote:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/


That's unusual, harry posting a link that goes against man made global
warming.

I wonder if he read it?

Clearly you didn't.

On 21-Jul-17 8:36 AM, harry wrote:
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 19:33:42 UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:
On 20/07/2017 19:13, harry wrote:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/


That's unusual, harry posting a link that goes against man made global
warming.

I wonder if he read it?

Clearly you didn't.


As a general rule Harry, anything published by that source is not going
to support your views. If you think it does, you either have not read it
or have not understood it.

--
--

Colin Bignell

On 21/07/2017 10:07, Nightjar wrote:
On 21-Jul-17 8:36 AM, harry wrote:
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 19:33:42 UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:
On 20/07/2017 19:13, harry wrote:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/


That's unusual, harry posting a link that goes against man made global
warming.

I wonder if he read it?

Clearly you didn't.


As a general rule Harry, anything published by that source is not going
to support your views. If you think it does, you either have not read it
or have not understood it.


I don't think he understands the bit about us coming out of an iceage or
that sea levels aren't rising very fast.

On 7/20/2017 7:13 PM, harry wrote:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/

It's an interesting link. I don't see any reason for the ad hominem
attacks on Harry. In fact his posts and links away from *those subjects*
are often very good (imho).

On 22-Jul-17 7:45 PM, newshound wrote:
On 7/20/2017 7:13 PM, harry wrote:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/

It's an interesting link. I don't see any reason for the ad hominem
attacks on Harry. In fact his posts and links away from *those subjects*
are often very good (imho).

You do realise that Harry posted the link in the belief that it
supported climate change?

--
--

Colin Bignell

On 7/23/2017 9:10 AM, Nightjar wrote:
On 22-Jul-17 7:45 PM, newshound wrote:
On 7/20/2017 7:13 PM, harry wrote:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/

It's an interesting link. I don't see any reason for the ad hominem
attacks on Harry. In fact his posts and links away from *those
subjects* are often very good (imho).

You do realise that Harry posted the link in the belief that it
supported climate change?

Just think it is slightly odd to be discussing the poster rather than
the link.

On 23/07/17 10:30, newshound wrote:
On 7/23/2017 9:10 AM, Nightjar wrote:
On 22-Jul-17 7:45 PM, newshound wrote:
On 7/20/2017 7:13 PM, harry wrote:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/

It's an interesting link. I don't see any reason for the ad hominem
attacks on Harry. In fact his posts and links away from *those
subjects* are often very good (imho).

You do realise that Harry posted the link in the belief that it
supported climate change?

Just think it is slightly odd to be discussing the poster rather than
the link.
You muust be new.


--
The lifetime of any political organisation is about three years before
its been subverted by the people it tried to warn you about.

Anon.

On 7/23/2017 11:00 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 23/07/17 10:30, newshound wrote:
On 7/23/2017 9:10 AM, Nightjar wrote:
On 22-Jul-17 7:45 PM, newshound wrote:
On 7/20/2017 7:13 PM, harry wrote:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/07/20/sea-level/

It's an interesting link. I don't see any reason for the ad hominem
attacks on Harry. In fact his posts and links away from *those
subjects* are often very good (imho).

You do realise that Harry posted the link in the belief that it
supported climate change?

Just think it is slightly odd to be discussing the poster rather than
the link.
You muust be new.


:-)