[TimW]

Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

[TimW]

On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!

[alan_m]

On 09/06/2017 01:41, TimW wrote:
On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!


The result of too many people voting Labour is that we will end up with
Boris as Prime Minister

--
mailto: news {at} admac {dot] myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

[bm[_2_]]

"alan_m" wrote in message
...
On 09/06/2017 01:41, TimW wrote:
On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!


The result of too many people voting Labour is that we will end up with
Boris as Prime Minister

I've been looking for my black armband.

[T i m]

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 02:15:08 +0100, alan_m
wrote:

On 09/06/2017 01:41, TimW wrote:
On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!


The result of too many people voting Labour is that we will end up with
Boris as Prime Minister

Getting up again (stuff on my mind, 0% of it to do with any election
g) I see that Lab look like they are in the lead (189 V 178) so does
that mean they are on their way to winning and the whole time and
effort wasting debacle changes again?

Cheers, T i m

[alan_m]

On 09/06/2017 03:40, T i m wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 02:15:08 +0100, alan_m
wrote:

On 09/06/2017 01:41, TimW wrote:
On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!


The result of too many people voting Labour is that we will end up with
Boris as Prime Minister

Getting up again (stuff on my mind, 0% of it to do with any election
g) I see that Lab look like they are in the lead (189 V 178) so does
that mean they are on their way to winning and the whole time and
effort wasting debacle changes again?



Worse than that. Con will have most seats but no majority. Brexit
postponed as there will be no-one to lead the negotiations and another
general election due soon. The UK currency has crashed as a result of
people voting Labour.


--
mailto: news {at} admac {dot] myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

[T i m]

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 04:09:58 +0100, alan_m
wrote:

snip

Getting up again (stuff on my mind, 0% of it to do with any election
g) I see that Lab look like they are in the lead (189 V 178) so does
that mean they are on their way to winning and the whole time and
effort wasting debacle changes again?



Worse than that.

Great, just what we need after already kicking the hornets nest in the
world arena.

Con will have most seats but no majority.

That always sounds crazy to me. Is FPTP better?

Brexit
postponed

So there is some good to come out of this then. That should give us
chance so see what the deal might be before deciding on it.

as there will be no-one to lead the negotiations

I'm not sure 1 V 26 was ever going to be a real 'negotiation' was it?

and another
general election due soon.

yawn

The UK currency has crashed as a result of
people voting Labour.

Great again / not

Cheers, T i m.

[Rod Speed]

"alan_m" wrote in message
...
On 09/06/2017 03:40, T i m wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 02:15:08 +0100, alan_m
wrote:

On 09/06/2017 01:41, TimW wrote:
On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!


The result of too many people voting Labour is that we will end up with
Boris as Prime Minister

Getting up again (stuff on my mind, 0% of it to do with any election
g) I see that Lab look like they are in the lead (189 V 178) so does
that mean they are on their way to winning and the whole time and
effort wasting debacle changes again?

Worse than that.

We'll see...

Con will have most seats but no majority.

Yes.

Brexit postponed as there will be no-one to lead the negotiations

Even sillier than you usually manage. The majority
will want to leave and thats all that matters.

and another general election due soon.

Not a chance, you watch.

The UK currency has crashed as a result of people voting Labour.

Doesnt matter a damn, thats good for the economy, stupid.

[tim...]

"alan_m" wrote in message
...
On 09/06/2017 03:40, T i m wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 02:15:08 +0100, alan_m
wrote:

On 09/06/2017 01:41, TimW wrote:
On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!


The result of too many people voting Labour is that we will end up with
Boris as Prime Minister

Getting up again (stuff on my mind, 0% of it to do with any election
g) I see that Lab look like they are in the lead (189 V 178) so does
that mean they are on their way to winning and the whole time and
effort wasting debacle changes again?



Worse than that. Con will have most seats but no majority. Brexit
postponed

oh if that were possible

but it isn't

tim

[Dave Plowman (News)]

In article ,
alan_m wrote:
The UK currency has crashed as a result of
people voting Labour.

But Brexiteers told us this was a good thing when it happened after that
result. But a real crash then rather than a couple of percent.

--
*On the seventh day He brewed beer *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

[Clive George]

On 09/06/2017 03:40, T i m wrote:

Getting up again (stuff on my mind, 0% of it to do with any election
g) I see that Lab look like they are in the lead (189 V 178) so does
that mean they are on their way to winning and the whole time and
effort wasting debacle changes again?

Labour always get more seats earlier on since they tend to have urban
constituencies whereas the tories have the rural ones.

(massive generalisation of course - look how early the Caithness etc one
declared...)

[T i m]

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 05:11:35 +0100, Clive George
wrote:

On 09/06/2017 03:40, T i m wrote:

Getting up again (stuff on my mind, 0% of it to do with any election
g) I see that Lab look like they are in the lead (189 V 178) so does
that mean they are on their way to winning and the whole time and
effort wasting debacle changes again?

Labour always get more seats earlier on since they tend to have urban
constituencies whereas the tories have the rural ones.

Makes sense.

(massive generalisation of course - look how early the Caithness etc one
declared...)

Sure, but looking at the map that does seem to be the case:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2017/results

I wonder what the stats are on the recounts ... if they are more
prevalent in the rural areas (where counting may not be their strong
point). weg

Watching it play out as a non gambling man (so I didn't place my bet
on any of them) it all seems to be a farce.

So, someone became the Prime Minister even though we didn't vote her
in and then she voluntary decided to hold a snap election to prove how
much support her party had, only to find out that she / they were
wrong.

So, we are still a very spit country suggesting to me at least that
not enough of us are happy with what is on offer and so just as with
the Brexit vote, maybe we need to think outside the box.

Question. If you look at all the things promised by all the parties
.... and got a shrewd business person to tick all the things that would
be considered as both positive and viable (eg. no point promising
stuff we can't be guaranteed to get (like a positive Brexit deal) or
can afford (giving the NHS money we don't have), and testing the
electorate on their ability to understand what is going on before they
are allowed to vote [1] ... we might stop wasting all this time and
energy and actually get somewhere?

Are there any examples of this sort of system working well anywhere
round the world? (Absolute monarchy, dictatorship, oligarchy or some
other authoritarian political system etc).

Cheers, T i m

[1] Like I wouldn't ask my Mum if an AMD or Intel processor would be
better for my new PC or my Aunty Mary what sand type and cement ratio
would be best for the pointing on my house.

[Rod Speed]

"T i m" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 02:15:08 +0100, alan_m
wrote:

On 09/06/2017 01:41, TimW wrote:
On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!

The result of too many people voting Labour is
that we will end up with Boris as Prime Minister

Getting up again (stuff on my mind, 0% of it to do with any election g)

We know you ****ed the bed, again...

I see that Lab look like they are in the lead (189 V 178)
so does that mean they are on their way to winning

Nope, just that Labour seats tend to get the counting completed earlier.

and the whole time and effort wasting debacle changes again?

Nope. Even you lot aint quite THAT stupid.

[tim...]

"T i m" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 02:15:08 +0100, alan_m
wrote:

On 09/06/2017 01:41, TimW wrote:
On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!


The result of too many people voting Labour is that we will end up with
Boris as Prime Minister

Getting up again (stuff on my mind, 0% of it to do with any election
g) I see that Lab look like they are in the lead (189 V 178) so does
that mean they are on their way to winning and the whole time and
effort wasting debacle changes again?

It's always like that

Their urban seats always declare before the Tory shires

tim

[tim...]

"alan_m" wrote in message
...
On 09/06/2017 01:41, TimW wrote:
On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!


The result of too many people voting Labour is that we will end up with
Boris as Prime Minister

and given the alternatives,

just why is that a bad thing?

tim

[Mike Tomlinson]

En el artículo , tim...
escribió:

[Boris as PM]

just why is that a bad thing?

*rolls eyes*

http://www.shaunriordan.com/wp-conte...07/image6.jpeg

--
(\_/)
(='.'=) "Between two evils, I always pick
(")_(") the one I never tried before." - Mae West

[alan_m]

On 09/06/2017 07:06, tim... wrote:


"alan_m" wrote in message
...


The result of too many people voting Labour is that we will end up
with Boris as Prime Minister

and given the alternatives,

just why is that a bad thing?


Boris and Trump in power at the same time - shudder.

--
mailto: news {at} admac {dot] myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

[Rod Speed]

"tim..." wrote in message
news


"alan_m" wrote in message
...
On 09/06/2017 01:41, TimW wrote:
On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!


The result of too many people voting Labour is that we will end up with
Boris as Prime Minister

and given the alternatives,

just why is that a bad thing?

It would certainly be interesting to watch with the Article 50
'negotiations'

Unlikely that May will have the balls to fall on her darning scissors tho.

[tim...]

"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...


"tim..." wrote in message
news


"alan_m" wrote in message
...
On 09/06/2017 01:41, TimW wrote:
On 09/06/17 03:18, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

Stoney silence. Ha ha ha!


The result of too many people voting Labour is that we will end up with
Boris as Prime Minister

and given the alternatives,

just why is that a bad thing?

It would certainly be interesting to watch with the Article 50
'negotiations'

Unlikely that May will have the balls to fall on her darning scissors tho.

if 15% ask her to go, she goes

tim

[Bob Eager[_5_]]

On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 03:18:19 +0300, TimW wrote:

Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

So am I.




--
My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
*lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

[Andy Burns[_13_]]

Bob Eager wrote:

TimW wrote:

Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.

So am I.

She clung on by skin of her teeth ... Amber vs Boris for leader?

The DUP webmaster should have ordered up some more web capacity ...

[tim...]

"Andy Burns" wrote in message
...
Bob Eager wrote:

TimW wrote:

Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.

So am I.

She clung on by skin of her teeth ... Amber vs Boris for leader?

However bad Boris might be, I can't see Rudd being even 10% as good

tim

[Martin Brown[_2_]]

On 09/06/2017 07:18, tim... wrote:

"Andy Burns" wrote in message
...
Bob Eager wrote:

TimW wrote:

Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.

So am I.

She clung on by skin of her teeth ... Amber vs Boris for leader?

However bad Boris might be, I can't see Rudd being even 10% as good

I dunno. At least she had the balls to turn up for a TV debate.

Boris will be a bad hair day for everyone!

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

[Rod Speed]

"Martin Brown" wrote in message
news
On 09/06/2017 07:18, tim... wrote:

"Andy Burns" wrote in message
...
Bob Eager wrote:

TimW wrote:

Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.

So am I.

She clung on by skin of her teeth ... Amber vs Boris for leader?

However bad Boris might be, I can't see Rudd being even 10% as good

I dunno. At least she had the balls to turn up for a TV debate.

Boris will be a bad hair day for everyone!

Not for those who want a hard brexit.

[Rod Speed]

"tim..." wrote in message
news


"Andy Burns" wrote in message
...
Bob Eager wrote:

TimW wrote:

Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.

So am I.

She clung on by skin of her teeth ... Amber vs Boris for leader?

However bad Boris might be, I can't see Rudd being even 10% as good

And I can't see even the stupid Torys going for
someone in that marginal a seat as the leader.

Corse they can just find her a better seat and parachute her into that.

[GMM[_4_]]

On 09/06/2017 02:52, Bob Eager wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 03:18:19 +0300, TimW wrote:

Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

So am I.




Sadly that was not to be, but we do have the consolation that the vile
pestilence that was UKIP has now been consigned to the murkier depths of
history once and for all. Let's hope we never see or hear from them again.

[Dave Plowman (News)]

In article ,
GMM wrote:
Sadly that was not to be, but we do have the consolation that the vile
pestilence that was UKIP has now been consigned to the murkier depths of
history once and for all. Let's hope we never see or hear from them
again.

You didn't see Farage on TV last night saying he might be forced to make a
comeback?

--
*Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

[GMM[_4_]]

On 09/06/2017 14:10, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
GMM wrote:
Sadly that was not to be, but we do have the consolation that the vile
pestilence that was UKIP has now been consigned to the murkier depths of
history once and for all. Let's hope we never see or hear from them
again.

You didn't see Farage on TV last night saying he might be forced to make a
comeback?

I did, but what are his chances? UKIP has torn itself apart and has
lost its core support, so he'll have an uphill struggle. Where he could
do well would be if he and Boris took over the Monster Raving Loony
Party. They were first to propose many UKIP policies, so are well
'ahead' of them in their thinking, and the pair of them would fit in
perfectly.

[Dave Plowman (News)]

In article ,
GMM wrote:
On 09/06/2017 14:10, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
GMM wrote:
Sadly that was not to be, but we do have the consolation that the
vile pestilence that was UKIP has now been consigned to the murkier
depths of history once and for all. Let's hope we never see or hear
from them again.

You didn't see Farage on TV last night saying he might be forced to
make a comeback?

I did, but what are his chances? UKIP has torn itself apart and has
lost its core support, so he'll have an uphill struggle. Where he could
do well would be if he and Boris took over the Monster Raving Loony
Party. They were first to propose many UKIP policies, so are well
'ahead' of them in their thinking, and the pair of them would fit in
perfectly.

IMHO there was no such thing as UKIP. Just a vehicle for Farage.

--
*A backward poet writes inverse.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

[Rod Speed]

"GMM" wrote in message
news
On 09/06/2017 02:52, Bob Eager wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 03:18:19 +0300, TimW wrote:

Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

So am I.




Sadly that was not to be, but we do have the consolation that the vile
pestilence that was UKIP has now been consigned to the murkier depths of
history once and for all.

Only if Britain leaves the EU on reasonable terms.

If Britain ends up outside the EU with nothing
else changed, they'll be back, you watch.

Let's hope we never see or hear from them again.

Then you had better ensure that Britain doesnt
end up with what Norway and Switzerland have.

[Adam Aglionby]

On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 1:18:21 AM UTC+1, TimW wrote:
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

on to Turd Recount at mo

[Brian Gaff]

Not quite but close.
I see the architect of the Conservative manifesto lost his.
Brian

--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please!
"TimW" wrote in message
news
Staying up hoping to see Amber Rudd lose her seat.
TW

[The Natural Philosopher[_2_]]

On 09/06/17 09:25, Brian Gaff wrote:
Not quite but close.
I see the architect of the Conservative manifesto lost his.

well deserved

Brian



--
Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early
twenty-first centurys developed world went into hysterical panic over a
globally average temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and,
on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer
projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to
contemplate a rollback of the industrial age.

Richard Lindzen