Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
At least the windfarms will be of some use for once. 5.76GW at time of writing (0800) -- (\_/) (='.'=) systemd: the Linux version of Windows 10 (")_(") |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
Probabably be the wrong type of wind.
Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! "Mike Tomlinson" wrote in message ... At least the windfarms will be of some use for once. 5.76GW at time of writing (0800) -- (\_/) (='.'=) systemd: the Linux version of Windows 10 (")_(") |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On Friday, 23 December 2016 07:57:25 UTC, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
At least the windfarms will be of some use for once. 5.76GW at time of writing (0800) Certainly won't be getting much from solar. It's so gloomy here I think I'll stick fairy lights in my eyeballs to offset SAD. Owain |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On 23/12/2016 07:57, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
At least the windfarms will be of some use for once. 5.76GW at time of writing (0800) I wouldn't bet on it. They can't be used if it's *too* windy! -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On 23/12/2016 11:53, Roger Mills wrote:
On 23/12/2016 07:57, Mike Tomlinson wrote: At least the windfarms will be of some use for once. 5.76GW at time of writing (0800) I wouldn't bet on it. They can't be used if it's *too* windy! My thoughts exactly. They are designed to shut down in those very high winds. It has to be the *right* type of wind ...... lol. |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On 23/12/16 09:57, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
At least the windfarms will be of some use for once. 5.76GW at time of writing (0800) 7GW now. |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:55:48 -0000, Bod wrote:
On 23/12/2016 11:53, Roger Mills wrote: On 23/12/2016 07:57, Mike Tomlinson wrote: At least the windfarms will be of some use for once. 5.76GW at time of writing (0800) I wouldn't bet on it. They can't be used if it's *too* windy! My thoughts exactly. They are designed to shut down in those very high winds. It has to be the *right* type of wind ...... lol. Early days yet, they'll improve them so they can handle more wind. Anyway, I have loads of them on the hills near me, and almost every time I've gone running up there, they're all spinning. -- Bumper sticker seen on a B-2 Stealth Bomber: "IF YOU CAN READ THIS, THEN WE WASTED 50 BILLION BUCKS." |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
It seems gusty wind is often the issue. If its constant they can be adjusted
to suit but variable direction or gusts are a death to a wind turbine, at least the ones I know about. It takes a lot longer for pitch and direction of the blades to be adjusted than it does for the wind to change so after a certain point they just put them into the safest config and stop them. I often wonder if a huge array of smaller more responsive devices might work better, after all across the span of on of those giants the air currents could be vastly different, putting a strain on the mountings. Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! "Roger Mills" wrote in message ... On 23/12/2016 07:57, Mike Tomlinson wrote: At least the windfarms will be of some use for once. 5.76GW at time of writing (0800) I wouldn't bet on it. They can't be used if it's *too* windy! -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
Does anyone recall the vertical rotating type, kind of like a centrifugal
blower in reverse. The good thing about it was that wind from any direction worked though i understand its not as efficieint as thos based on blades and aerofoils, and still has issues with gusts. I remember those kites we used to have when young where they looked like planes but the wings spun as the wind went over them. Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message news On 23/12/16 09:57, Mike Tomlinson wrote: At least the windfarms will be of some use for once. 5.76GW at time of writing (0800) 7GW now. |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On 24/12/16 11:40, Brian Gaff wrote:
It seems gusty wind is often the issue. If its constant they can be adjusted to suit but variable direction or gusts are a death to a wind turbine, at least the ones I know about. It takes a lot longer for pitch and direction of the blades to be adjusted than it does for the wind to change so after a certain point they just put them into the safest config and stop them. I often wonder if a huge array of smaller more responsive devices might work better, after all across the span of on of those giants the air currents could be vastly different, putting a strain on the mountings. Brian well no. the smaller ones would be vastly more expensive. Anyway the issue is the old Irishism: If you want to generate reliable electricity don't start with wind turbines. |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On 24/12/16 11:45, Brian Gaff wrote:
Does anyone recall the vertical rotating type, kind of like a centrifugal blower in reverse. The good thing about it was that wind from any direction worked though i understand its not as efficieint as thos based on blades and aerofoils, and still has issues with gusts. Yep. I am sure that all these options have been thoroughly explored by engineers trying to make the best possible turbines. Unfortunately even the best possible turbines are total crapp. I remember those kites we used to have when young where they looked like planes but the wings spun as the wind went over them. Brian I thught they looked like hummingbirds. |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On 24/12/2016 09:45, Brian Gaff wrote:
Does anyone recall the vertical rotating type, kind of like a centrifugal blower in reverse. The good thing about it was that wind from any direction worked though i understand its not as efficieint as thos based on blades and aerofoils, and still has issues with gusts. There is one of those installed here However its the only one I have seen and it doesn't go around very frequently. Its not really in a good place AFAICS. |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 18:56:58 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
Anyway, I have loads of them on the hills near me, and almost every time I've gone running up there, they're all spinning. Under wind or grid power? -- Cheers Dave. |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:57:03 +0000, dennis@home wrote:
There is one of those installed here https://www.google.co.uk/maps/ @52.5374947,-2.0168682,3a,37.5y,346.53h,85.37t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4! 1sHn3oSPYiTB9M-2x8scruwA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 However its the only one I have seen and it doesn't go around very frequently. Its not really in a good place AFAICS. There's a group of 4 beside the M25 he data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-Dq1Yy_ZdJe7lZkb1r-oVg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 Perhaps they harness the turbulence from passing traffic (when it isn't static!) -- TOJ. |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 4:00:56 PM UTC, The Other John wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:57:03 +0000, dennis@home wrote: There is one of those installed here https://www.google.co.uk/maps/ @52.5374947,-2.0168682,3a,37.5y,346.53h,85.37t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4! 1sHn3oSPYiTB9M-2x8scruwA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 However its the only one I have seen and it doesn't go around very frequently. Its not really in a good place AFAICS. There's a group of 4 beside the M25 he data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-Dq1Yy_ZdJe7lZkb1r-oVg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 Perhaps they harness the turbulence from passing traffic (when it isn't static!) -- TOJ. here is an alternative alternative, kite turbine https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/f...rbine-energy#/ |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
Brian Gaff wrote
Does anyone recall the vertical rotating type, kind of like a centrifugal blower in reverse. Yes. The good thing about it was that wind from any direction worked Yes. though i understand its not as efficieint as thos based on blades and aerofoils, Yes, if only because the area intercepted isnt as great. and still has issues with gusts. I remember those kites we used to have when young where they looked like planes but the wings spun as the wind went over them. Don’t recall any of those myself. "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message news On 23/12/16 09:57, Mike Tomlinson wrote: At least the windfarms will be of some use for once. 5.76GW at time of writing (0800) 7GW now. |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Storm Barbara
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:14:45 -0000, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 18:56:58 -0000, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: Anyway, I have loads of them on the hills near me, and almost every time I've gone running up there, they're all spinning. Under wind or grid power? Why would they spin from grid power? Are they trying to make Scotland windier? -- Interesting fact number 923: Half the world's population has seen at least one Bond movie. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is Barbara Bush an alcoholic? | Metalworking | |||
Barbara Boxer meets her match | Metalworking | |||
They're coming for you, Barbara! | Electronic Schematics | |||
They're coming for you, Barbara! | Electronic Schematics | |||
Barbara Walters in Kabul.... | Metalworking |