Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Car battery
On 20/09/16 23:18, Fredxxx wrote:
On 20/09/2016 23:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 20/09/16 19:16, ARW wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message AS I keep pointing out Darwin is not survival of the fittest,. it is merely propagation of those not sufficiently dysfunctional to fail to generate offspring. Are you suggesting that the ability to get an erection should require a certain level of intelligence? NO, I am saying that the reverse is true. The ability to impregnate women and have babies requires no intelligence at all, otherwise the human race would probably have died out years ago. Except that there are studies that support the concept that intelligence is inherited, and unfortunately less intelligent families have more offspring. We're doomed!!! Yup. Idiocracy -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzbWXgM0ygU -- Adrian C |
#42
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Car battery
On 20/09/16 23:18, Fredxxx wrote:
On 20/09/2016 23:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 20/09/16 19:16, ARW wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 19/09/16 22:13, Huge wrote: On 2016-09-19, ARW wrote: "Huge" wrote in message ... On 2016-09-18, ARW wrote: Had any ******s view the car or phone up asking stupid questions? Yep. "Will you accept a Merc in p/x". The ad says "No p/x". The world would, IMHO, be a better place if breathing required a minimum amount of intelligence. Indeed. AS I keep pointing out Darwin is not survival of the fittest,. it is merely propagation of those not sufficiently dysfunctional to fail to generate offspring. Are you suggesting that the ability to get an erection should require a certain level of intelligence? NO, I am saying that the reverse is true. The ability to impregnate women and have babies requires no intelligence at all, otherwise the human race would probably have died out years ago. Except that there are studies that support the concept that intelligence is inherited, and unfortunately less intelligent families have more offspring. We're doomed!!! Idiocracy. That was the whole point of classical warfare. To cull the population of young stupid males. -- Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas? Josef Stalin |
#43
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Car battery
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 20/09/16 23:18, Fredxxx wrote: On 20/09/2016 23:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 20/09/16 19:16, ARW wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 19/09/16 22:13, Huge wrote: On 2016-09-19, ARW wrote: "Huge" wrote in message ... On 2016-09-18, ARW wrote: Had any ******s view the car or phone up asking stupid questions? Yep. "Will you accept a Merc in p/x". The ad says "No p/x". The world would, IMHO, be a better place if breathing required a minimum amount of intelligence. Indeed. AS I keep pointing out Darwin is not survival of the fittest,. it is merely propagation of those not sufficiently dysfunctional to fail to generate offspring. Are you suggesting that the ability to get an erection should require a certain level of intelligence? NO, I am saying that the reverse is true. The ability to impregnate women and have babies requires no intelligence at all, otherwise the human race would probably have died out years ago. Except that there are studies that support the concept that intelligence is inherited, and unfortunately less intelligent families have more offspring. We're doomed!!! Idiocracy. That was the whole point of classical warfare. To cull the population of young stupid males. Trouble with that line is that anyone who has ever had anything to do with breeding knows that you have to cull the females, its useless to cull the males, because any male can **** lots of females and presumably lots of that kept happening with some of the males away at the war. |
#44
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Car battery
On 21/09/16 21:40, Janok wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 20/09/16 23:18, Fredxxx wrote: On 20/09/2016 23:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 20/09/16 19:16, ARW wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 19/09/16 22:13, Huge wrote: On 2016-09-19, ARW wrote: "Huge" wrote in message ... On 2016-09-18, ARW wrote: Had any ******s view the car or phone up asking stupid questions? Yep. "Will you accept a Merc in p/x". The ad says "No p/x". The world would, IMHO, be a better place if breathing required a minimum amount of intelligence. Indeed. AS I keep pointing out Darwin is not survival of the fittest,. it is merely propagation of those not sufficiently dysfunctional to fail to generate offspring. Are you suggesting that the ability to get an erection should require a certain level of intelligence? NO, I am saying that the reverse is true. The ability to impregnate women and have babies requires no intelligence at all, otherwise the human race would probably have died out years ago. Except that there are studies that support the concept that intelligence is inherited, and unfortunately less intelligent families have more offspring. We're doomed!!! Idiocracy. That was the whole point of classical warfare. To cull the population of young stupid males. Trouble with that line is that anyone who has ever had anything to do with breeding knows that you have to cull the females, its useless to cull the males, because any male can **** lots of females and presumably lots of that kept happening with some of the males away at the war. You missed my pointy. The smart males stayed at home. Prior to WWII there wasn't an absolute population problem. Disease and poverty kept numbers down. -- Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas? Josef Stalin |
#45
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Car battery
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 21/09/16 21:40, Janok wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 20/09/16 23:18, Fredxxx wrote: On 20/09/2016 23:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 20/09/16 19:16, ARW wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 19/09/16 22:13, Huge wrote: On 2016-09-19, ARW wrote: "Huge" wrote in message ... On 2016-09-18, ARW wrote: Had any ******s view the car or phone up asking stupid questions? Yep. "Will you accept a Merc in p/x". The ad says "No p/x". The world would, IMHO, be a better place if breathing required a minimum amount of intelligence. Indeed. AS I keep pointing out Darwin is not survival of the fittest,. it is merely propagation of those not sufficiently dysfunctional to fail to generate offspring. Are you suggesting that the ability to get an erection should require a certain level of intelligence? NO, I am saying that the reverse is true. The ability to impregnate women and have babies requires no intelligence at all, otherwise the human race would probably have died out years ago. Except that there are studies that support the concept that intelligence is inherited, and unfortunately less intelligent families have more offspring. We're doomed!!! Idiocracy. That was the whole point of classical warfare. To cull the population of young stupid males. Trouble with that line is that anyone who has ever had anything to do with breeding knows that you have to cull the females, its useless to cull the males, because any male can **** lots of females and presumably lots of that kept happening with some of the males away at the war. You missed my pointy. The smart males stayed at home. Very few of them ever got to do that with classical warfare. Prior to WWII there wasn't an absolute population problem. Disease and poverty kept numbers down. Not in China or India it didnt. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Opened laptop battery to replace lithium ion cells (Lenovo X61tablet PC) -- Where do I get replacement battery cells? | Home Repair | |||
Opened laptop battery to replace lithium ion cells (Lenovo X61tablet PC) -- Where do I get replacement battery cells? | Electronics Repair | |||
Battery drill external battery pack | Metalworking | |||
Leave an unplugged battery charger connected to lead-acid battery? | Home Repair | |||
alarm system battery backup, battery replacement question | Home Repair |