Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Laying a patio
I have been given two basic recommendations for laying a patio (circular nature stone, with curving path of stone paviors laid in stretcher bond):
1. Lay on compacted soil, 100 mm compacted hardcore, followed by 50 mm of 5:1 sand and cement mix, and then jointed with mortar mix. 2. Similar, but use ballast rather than sand for the natural stone to create a concrete bed rather than a sand/cement. Any comments on which is the better approach? Andrew. |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Laying a patio
Andrew Haylett wrote:
I have been given two basic recommendations for laying a patio (circular nature stone, with curving path of stone paviors laid in stretcher bond): 1. Lay on compacted soil, 100 mm compacted hardcore, followed by 50 mm of 5:1 sand and cement mix, and then jointed with mortar mix. 2. Similar, but use ballast rather than sand for the natural stone to create a concrete bed rather than a sand/cement. Any comments on which is the better approach? Andrew. I have used 3" of 8:1 sand and cement mix directly on top of a clay soil. Still flat after 30 years. Only problem is the ants excavate some of the sand and the odd slab needs resetting every 15 years. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Laying a patio
On Wednesday, 13 April 2016 00:19:01 UTC+2, Andrew Haylett wrote:
I have been given two basic recommendations for laying a patio (circular nature stone, with curving path of stone paviors laid in stretcher bond): 1. Lay on compacted soil, 100 mm compacted hardcore, followed by 50 mm of 5:1 sand and cement mix, and then jointed with mortar mix. 2. Similar, but use ballast rather than sand for the natural stone to create a concrete bed rather than a sand/cement. Any comments on which is the better approach? See www.pavingexpert.com. As a general rule of thumb, if you follow his advice it will be built like a brick ****-house. If you are happy with a lower quality finish, you can afford to skimp. |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Laying a patio
On 4/13/2016 1:10 PM, Martin Bonner wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 April 2016 00:19:01 UTC+2, Andrew Haylett wrote: I have been given two basic recommendations for laying a patio (circular nature stone, with curving path of stone paviors laid in stretcher bond): 1. Lay on compacted soil, 100 mm compacted hardcore, followed by 50 mm of 5:1 sand and cement mix, and then jointed with mortar mix. 2. Similar, but use ballast rather than sand for the natural stone to create a concrete bed rather than a sand/cement. Any comments on which is the better approach? See www.pavingexpert.com. As a general rule of thumb, if you follow his advice it will be built like a brick ****-house. If you are happy with a lower quality finish, you can afford to skimp. Beat me to it! Laid indian sandstone last year on top of *very* well compacted earth, minimum 50 mm ballast, then up to 50 mm of 5:1. Used a plate compactor on the ballast. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
patio (re-) laying | UK diy | |||
Patio Laying | UK diy | |||
Laying down a patio | UK diy | |||
Laying down a patio | UK diy | |||
Laying down a patio | UK diy |