Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , rick
writes On 03/06/2015 21:24, Adam Aglionby wrote: From same `paper` as the B&Q banning http://www.richmondandtwickenhamtime...13216610.VIDEO Not condoning the actions of the driver, but the comment about cycle lanes in the story from Tim Lennon, from the Richmond Cycling Campaign: "...on a road like this, which should probably only be used for cycling and for local access anyway, local councils could do much more to make their boroughs safer and more inviting." Apart from providing the empty and unused cycle lane what exactly else do you think should be done with council tax payers cash then one wonders? where I live there is a several miles coastal dual carriageway ... with purpose built cycles tracks on both side. Just because they are purpose built , doesn't necessarily mean they are fit for use as such. Cyclists simply do not use them I suspect some do. However, the sorts of cyclists who might be found cycling in groups along this route might not want to. ........ when questioned as top why they are riding 2 or 3 abreast totally blocking one lane of dual carriageway ... and not on cycle track ... they respond its their right to ride where they want. As it is, and as I said elsewhere if they considered the cycle track was suitable they would probably ride on that. Without insurance Sure lots of cyclists won't have, but how do you know? I have third party insurance by dint of my membership of cycling organisation. Most cyclist who are part of a club or organisation of some sort will have such. and without contributing directly to roads via Excise license. Vehicle tax, as it seems to be called by the government nowadays isn't used to directly fund roads, it goes into the general tax pot. And most cyclists are probably also vehicle owners and so will pay vehicle tax anyway. -- Chris French |
#42
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Jethro_uk wrote: On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 10:16:07 +0100, CB wrote: On 04/06/2015 09:06, Jethro_uk wrote: The bottom line is simple. Cyclists and cars *don't mix*· (In fact cyclists and all other forms of road user don't mix) Anyone who thinks it's a good idea to have road traffic with a speed differential in excess of 30mph mixing it up is a ****ing idiot. Quite aside from the fact that the kerbside of most urban roads is so cratered it's impossible to ride a bike there, even if you wanted. I noticed with interest in Almeria, Spain (can't speak for the rest) that the main (new) coastal road had been built with the cycle path separated from the road by a few metres. I the reflected on the fact that the UK probably paid for it .... And when we build them in the UK most lycra louts wont use them. Most of them don't use this one https://www.google.co.uk/maps/ @51.155755,-1.773616,3a,66.8y,68.2h,85.27t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2! 1sj9cLXt6gOS1E4xEPapEhsg!2e0 Is that a dedicated cycle lane ? Sorry, the Spanish have the right idea data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sqo1jZXCm-GB4tEch92kvgA!2e0!6m1!1e1 So theirs is two empty lanes instead of one. BFD. Now explain where the cycle lane is going to go in this instance: /data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1suIeBe0J07Wdo8iakAiQXRg!2e0 If the URL worked I might try. |
#43
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Tim+ wrote: Death is final. A new battery pack for a Tesla is reputed to cots $30,000 plus. Which, IIRC, Tesla will replace gratis. After all the bad publicity regarding "bricked" cars due to incorrectly stored or charged batteries, they decided to replace packs irrespective of the cause. Even old age? One of the early stories was you couldn't part up a Tesla at say the airport while you went on holiday for say 3 weeks, unless left plugged in. Which seemed odd to me, as even a lead acid battery on a normal car will last at least that under quiescent drain, with all the toys. -- *(on a baby-size shirt) "Party -- my crib -- two a.m Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#44
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 12:59:51 +0100
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: One of the early stories was you couldn't part up a Tesla at say the airport while you went on holiday for say 3 weeks, unless left plugged in. Careful of the fat finger, leading to a different meaning. 'Part up a Tesla'? -- Davey. |
#45
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Tim+ wrote: Death is final. A new battery pack for a Tesla is reputed to cots $30,000 plus. Which, IIRC, Tesla will replace gratis. After all the bad publicity regarding "bricked" cars due to incorrectly stored or charged batteries, they decided to replace packs irrespective of the cause. Even old age? One of the early stories was you couldn't part up a Tesla at say the airport while you went on holiday for say 3 weeks, unless left plugged in. Which seemed odd to me, as even a lead acid battery on a normal car will last at least that under quiescent drain, with all the toys. I found that after 2 weeks near Heathrow, The electric unlocking wouldn't work. There was barely enough charge left to turn the engine over. -- From KT24 in Surrey Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18 |
#46
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/06/15 14:10, charles wrote:
One of the early stories was you couldn't part up a Tesla at say the airport while you went on holiday for say 3 weeks, unless left plugged in. Which seemed odd to me, as even a lead acid battery on a normal car will last at least that under quiescent drain, with all the toys. I found that after 2 weeks near Heathrow, The electric unlocking wouldn't work. There was barely enough charge left to turn the engine over. I'm not surprised - Teslas don't have engines... |
#47
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Davey wrote: On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 12:59:51 +0100 "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: One of the early stories was you couldn't part up a Tesla at say the airport while you went on holiday for say 3 weeks, unless left plugged in. Careful of the fat finger, leading to a different meaning. 'Part up a Tesla'? ;-) Part out. There will probably be somewhere doing just that in the US. -- *Your kid may be an honours student, but you're still an idiot. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#48
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
charles wrote: One of the early stories was you couldn't part up a Tesla at say the airport while you went on holiday for say 3 weeks, unless left plugged in. Which seemed odd to me, as even a lead acid battery on a normal car will last at least that under quiescent drain, with all the toys. I found that after 2 weeks near Heathrow, The electric unlocking wouldn't work. There was barely enough charge left to turn the engine over. Yes - remember reading somewhere the battery in a BMW wasn't covered by warranty if parked up for more than 3 weeks. Of course if the battery fails, so does the alarm, so you might as well just disconnect the battery. ;-) -- *How do you tell when you run out of invisible ink? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#49
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/06/2015 21:24, Adam Aglionby wrote:
From same `paper` as the B&Q banning http://www.richmondandtwickenhamtime...st_and_driver/ Not condoning the actions of the driver, but the comment about cycle lanes in the story from Tim Lennon, from the Richmond Cycling Campaign: "...on a road like this, which should probably only be used for cycling and for local access anyway, local councils could do much more to make their boroughs safer and more inviting." Apart from providing the empty and unused cycle lane what exactly else do you think should be done with council tax payers cash then one wonders? Absolutely nothing. Cyclists make no contribution via specific extra taxes in order to use their vehicles on the road and are an insignificant minority, only accounting for 1% of passenger miles traveled. |
#50
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Tim Watts wrote: On 06/06/15 14:10, charles wrote: One of the early stories was you couldn't part up a Tesla at say the airport while you went on holiday for say 3 weeks, unless left plugged in. Which seemed odd to me, as even a lead acid battery on a normal car will last at least that under quiescent drain, with all the toys. I found that after 2 weeks near Heathrow, The electric unlocking wouldn't work. There was barely enough charge left to turn the engine over. I'm not surprised - Teslas don't have engines... ;-) But they have a battery many many times the capacity of a normal car, so what's taking all the current? Surely wouldn't self discharge that quickly? -- *A journey of a thousand sites begins with a single click * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#51
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , charles wrote: One of the early stories was you couldn't part up a Tesla at say the airport while you went on holiday for say 3 weeks, unless left plugged in. Which seemed odd to me, as even a lead acid battery on a normal car will last at least that under quiescent drain, with all the toys. I found that after 2 weeks near Heathrow, The electric unlocking wouldn't work. There was barely enough charge left to turn the engine over. Yes - remember reading somewhere the battery in a BMW wasn't covered by warranty if parked up for more than 3 weeks. Of course if the battery fails, so does the alarm, so you might as well just disconnect the battery. ;-) It was probably the alsrma nd teh radio together which were draining the battery -- From KT24 in Surrey Using a RISC OS computer running v5.18 |
#52
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim Watts" wrote in message ... On 06/06/15 14:10, charles wrote: One of the early stories was you couldn't part up a Tesla at say the airport while you went on holiday for say 3 weeks, unless left plugged in. Which seemed odd to me, as even a lead acid battery on a normal car will last at least that under quiescent drain, with all the toys. I found that after 2 weeks near Heathrow, The electric unlocking wouldn't work. There was barely enough charge left to turn the engine over. I'm not surprised - Teslas don't have engines... Electric cars have a 12volt system to power all the accesories. Also need to charge the main battery and start the car. It won't move if the 12 volt battery is flat. |
#53
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
charles wrote: In article , Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , charles wrote: One of the early stories was you couldn't part up a Tesla at say the airport while you went on holiday for say 3 weeks, unless left plugged in. Which seemed odd to me, as even a lead acid battery on a normal car will last at least that under quiescent drain, with all the toys. I found that after 2 weeks near Heathrow, The electric unlocking wouldn't work. There was barely enough charge left to turn the engine over. Yes - remember reading somewhere the battery in a BMW wasn't covered by warranty if parked up for more than 3 weeks. Of course if the battery fails, so does the alarm, so you might as well just disconnect the battery. ;-) It was probably the alsrma nd teh radio together which were draining the battery Even my 20 year old BMW has some form of can bus switching. Which almost certainly means bits of it are consuming current when doing nothing. Even plain old central locking has a timer circuit which will take some current. And it all adds up. -- *I used to be a banker, but then I lost interest.* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#54
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/06/2015 17:49, David Lang wrote:
On 03/06/2015 21:24, Adam Aglionby wrote: From same `paper` as the B&Q banning http://www.richmondandtwickenhamtime...st_and_driver/ Not condoning the actions of the driver, but the comment about cycle lanes in the story from Tim Lennon, from the Richmond Cycling Campaign: "...on a road like this, which should probably only be used for cycling and for local access anyway, local councils could do much more to make their boroughs safer and more inviting." Apart from providing the empty and unused cycle lane what exactly else do you think should be done with council tax payers cash then one wonders? Absolutely nothing. Cyclists make no contribution via specific extra taxes in order to use their vehicles on the road Neither does any other road user. Car drivers pay for the pollution they emit these days as can be seen by the zero rate on cars that (supposedly) produce little pollution. |
#55
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 17:41:06 +0100
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: One of the early stories was you couldn't part up a Tesla at say the airport while you went on holiday for say 3 weeks, unless left plugged in. Careful of the fat finger, leading to a different meaning. 'Part up a Tesla'? ;-) Part out. There will probably be somewhere doing just that in the US. Yep. In any of the major cities, just look for the nearest Chop Shop. -- Davey. |
#56
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/06/2015 19:28, dennis@home wrote:
On 06/06/2015 17:49, David Lang wrote: On 03/06/2015 21:24, Adam Aglionby wrote: From same `paper` as the B&Q banning http://www.richmondandtwickenhamtime...st_and_driver/ Not condoning the actions of the driver, but the comment about cycle lanes in the story from Tim Lennon, from the Richmond Cycling Campaign: "...on a road like this, which should probably only be used for cycling and for local access anyway, local councils could do much more to make their boroughs safer and more inviting." Apart from providing the empty and unused cycle lane what exactly else do you think should be done with council tax payers cash then one wonders? Absolutely nothing. Cyclists make no contribution via specific extra taxes in order to use their vehicles on the road Neither does any other road user. Motorists pay £46 billion a year in specific extra taxes in order to use their vehicles on the road. Car drivers pay for the pollution they emit these days as can be seen by the zero rate on cars that (supposedly) produce little pollution. Simply a sop to the green loonies. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rage against remotes | Home Repair | |||
Gritting drives and lanes | UK diy | |||
Road rage, yet again | Home Repair | |||
Road rage camera | UK diy | |||
O.T. freeway lanes and metalwork postings | Metalworking |