http://www.breitbart.com/national-se...eu-bureaucrat/

Typical control freak socialist.

On 12/02/2015 21:43, harryagain wrote:
http://www.breitbart.com/national-se...eu-bureaucrat/

Typical control freak socialist.

If the British public were sufficiently well informed to make a rational
decision over EU membership, we wouldn't be talking about having a
referendum in the first place.

--
Colin Bignell

In message , harryagain
writes
http://www.breitbart.com/national-se...s-too-ignorant
-to-choose-their-european-fate-says-eu-bureaucrat/


To justify it's headline the article says that she:

'implied that UK voters €œsimply cannot€� make an €œinformed
decision€� over the future of the UKs role in the European Union'

But doesn't in any of the quotes say what she did say to imply those
--
Chris French

On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:19:38 +0000, Nightjar "cpb"@ wrote:

http://www.breitbart.com/national-se.../11/brits-too-
ignorant-to-choose-their-european-fate-says-eu-bureaucrat/

Typical control freak socialist.

If the British public were sufficiently well informed to make a rational
decision over EU membership, we wouldn't be talking about having a
referendum in the first place.

I'd quite like to see a transcript of what she _actually_ said...

As a source, I trust Breitbart about as far as I trust Harry. Even the
Daily Mail's probably more reliable.

Nightjar.me.uk" "cpb"@ insert my surname here wrote
harryagain wrote

http://www.breitbart.com/national-se...eu-bureaucrat/

Typical control freak socialist.

If the British public were sufficiently well informed to make a rational
decision over EU membership,

No public ever is.

we wouldn't be talking about having a referendum in the first place.

Bull****.

Nightjar cpb@ wrote:
On 12/02/2015 21:43, harryagain wrote:
http://www.breitbart.com/national-se...eu-bureaucrat/


Typical control freak socialist.

If the British public were sufficiently well informed to make a rational
decision over EU membership, we wouldn't be talking about having a
referendum in the first place.


You're right, we'd have had it and left.

On 13/02/15 15:16, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Chris French
wrote:

In message , harryagain
writes
http://www.breitbart.com/national-se...s-too-ignorant
-to-choose-their-european-fate-says-eu-bureaucrat/


To justify it's headline the article says that she:

'implied that UK voters €œsimply cannot€� make an €œinformed decision€�
over the future of the UKs role in the European Union'

Ultimately that's true for all electors at all elections. Basically
it's EU code for "we don't think electors should have any say in what
we, the EU, do."

Which is why of course they ;eave all the decision making to an
unelected unsackable elite of EU commissioners. Or Politburo as its
generally known.


--
Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except for the
rare story of which you happen to have first-hand knowledge. €“ Erwin Knoll

On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:53:05 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 13/02/15 15:16, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Chris French
wrote:

In message , harryagain
writes
http://www.breitbart.com/national-se.../11/brits-too-
ignorant
-to-choose-their-european-fate-says-eu-bureaucrat/


To justify it's headline the article says that she:

'implied that UK voters €œsimply cannot€� make an €œinformed decision€�
over the future of the UKs role in the European Union'

Ultimately that's true for all electors at all elections. Basically
it's EU code for "we don't think electors should have any say in what
we, the EU, do."

Which is why of course they ;eave all the decision making to an
unelected unsackable elite of EU commissioners. Or Politburo as its
generally known.

Anyway, repeated referenda are invariably required to get the 'correct'
outcome.