Seems to be a topic taxing some here.

Twenty five times more is spent subsidising fossil fuels compared with
renewables.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2473633/Global-warming-costs-world-billion-dollars-DAY--DOUBLE-needed-combat-climate-change-claims-report.html?ico=sciencetech^headlines

On 24/10/2013 18:48, harryagain wrote:
Seems to be a topic taxing some here.

Twenty five times more is spent subsidising fossil fuels compared with
renewables.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2473633/Global-warming-costs-world-billion-dollars-DAY--DOUBLE-needed-combat-climate-change-claims-report.html?ico=sciencetech^headlines



Where does it say that?

Not here

"IEA this year estimated that fossil fuel subsidies in 2011 reached
approximately $523 billion for developing and emerging economies alone.


By way of comparison, the same study estimated global renewables
subsidies of $88 billion, including $20-22 billion for biofuels."


And that is not about developed nations like ours.

On 24/10/13 19:33, dennis@home wrote:
On 24/10/2013 18:48, harryagain wrote:
Seems to be a topic taxing some here.

Twenty five times more is spent subsidising fossil fuels compared with
renewables.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2473633/Global-warming-costs-world-billion-dollars-DAY--DOUBLE-needed-combat-climate-change-claims-report.html?ico=sciencetech^headlines




Where does it say that?

Not here

"IEA this year estimated that fossil fuel subsidies in 2011 reached
approximately $523 billion for developing and emerging economies alone.

by way of tax breaks rather than subisdies in developed coountroes.

Its just more green spin.


By way of comparison, the same study estimated global renewables
subsidies of $88 billion, including $20-22 billion for biofuels."


And that is not about developed nations like ours.




--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a
diminishing number of producers.