Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
Hello,
Sorry if this is a stunningly basic question, but humour me... How is the safety of something worked out from half-lives? That probably sounds horribly worded, but I was reading something about pesticides and one comment said: "Half life of Imidacloprid-1-4 hours....so by the time I go to eat the food all of it is gone. Thiamethoxam half life=4 days." So, how do you work out how many half-lives until something is safe? Thanks in advance, David Paste. |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
paste wrote:
So, how do you work out how many half-lives until something is safe? The starting concentration and the poisonous concentration. If you start with 1000 units and anything over 100 units is poisonous then 3.5 half lives will get you down to 100 units (three halvings of 1000 is 125). If you start with 1000 units and anything over 10 units is poisonous then 7 half lives will get you down to 10 units (seven halvings of 1000 is 7.5somthing) The easy thing to remember is as 2^10 is 1024, ten half lives will get you to less than 1/10% of the original quantity. JGH |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
On Sunday, 21 July 2013 23:50:06 UTC+1, wrote:
Hello, Sorry if this is a stunningly basic question, but humour me... How is the safety of something worked out from half-lives? That probably sounds horribly worded, but I was reading something about pesticides and one comment said: "Half life of Imidacloprid-1-4 hours....so by the time I go to eat the food all of it is gone. Thiamethoxam half life=4 days." So, how do you work out how many half-lives until something is safe? Thanks in advance, David Paste. Two different meanings of half-life here. In the radioactive element sense, the half-life is the time taken for half the amount of that element to decay into other elements in its decay series.. Varies from the tiniest fraction of a second, to thousands of year. In the pharmaceutical sense, it's the time for the human body to digest/excrete half the amount of the drug taken. Some drugs may take several weeks to be eliminated to the extent that the residual levels in the body are sufficiently low to avoid a drug interaction. I'm guessing that the latter sense is also applied to cumulative poisons in the human body. Remember several half-lives may be necessary to eliminate enough of the substance for the residual levels to be inconsequential. |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
wrote in message ... Hello, Sorry if this is a stunningly basic question, but humour me... How is the safety of something worked out from half-lives? That probably sounds horribly worded, but I was reading something about pesticides and one comment said: "Half life of Imidacloprid-1-4 hours....so by the time I go to eat the food all of it is gone. Thiamethoxam half life=4 days." So, how do you work out how many half-lives until something is safe? Thanks in advance, It is a way or measuring a rate of change and is applied to some processes that are not linear. In practice the effect/change continues forever but getting smaller and smaller. In the case you mention, the stuff never completely disappears. Half remains in 4 days Quarter remains in 8 days one eigth remains in 12 days. One sixteenth remains in 16 days One thirtysecond remainds in 20 days And so forth |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
|
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
|
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
Yes I've often wondered this. After all if its half the amount, the there is
never going to be nothing there. Its the old joke about every day you get half as close but never actually arrive. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active wrote in message ... Hello, Sorry if this is a stunningly basic question, but humour me... How is the safety of something worked out from half-lives? That probably sounds horribly worded, but I was reading something about pesticides and one comment said: "Half life of Imidacloprid-1-4 hours....so by the time I go to eat the food all of it is gone. Thiamethoxam half life=4 days." So, how do you work out how many half-lives until something is safe? Thanks in advance, David Paste. |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
"harryagain" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... Hello, Sorry if this is a stunningly basic question, but humour me... How is the safety of something worked out from half-lives? That probably sounds horribly worded, but I was reading something about pesticides and one comment said: "Half life of Imidacloprid-1-4 hours....so by the time I go to eat the food all of it is gone. Thiamethoxam half life=4 days." So, how do you work out how many half-lives until something is safe? Thanks in advance, It is a way or measuring a rate of change and is applied to some processes that are not linear. In practice the effect/change continues forever but getting smaller and smaller. In the case you mention, the stuff never completely disappears. Half remains in 4 days Quarter remains in 8 days one eigth remains in 12 days. One sixteenth remains in 16 days One thirtysecond remainds in 20 days And so forth Though we are working with integer mathematics You will eventually get to a point where the number of molecules remaining is 1 and that will decay to zero tim |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
On 22/07/2013 09:15, tim..... wrote:
Though we are working with integer mathematics You will eventually get to a point where the number of molecules remaining is 1 and that will decay to zero Tell that to the homeopathists. |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
|
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... Yes I've often wondered this. After all if its half the amount, the there is never going to be nothing there. Its the old joke about every day you get half as close but never actually arrive. I think there's a point where it decays enough to become insignificant to human health, and then reaches the further point where it's so insignificant as to be regarded as "nothing". It reminds me of the old scenario (in reverse) about putting one grain of sand on a chess square, 2 on the next, then 4, 8, 16, 32 etc etc and you end up with 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 grains of sand on the board. Which is rather a lot and totally unfeasible, but just shows how the doubling or halving of something can reach either stupidly huge or relatively insignificant proportions pretty quickly. |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
On Monday, July 22, 2013 12:33:12 PM UTC+1, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... Yes I've often wondered this. After all if its half the amount, the there is never going to be nothing there. Its the old joke about every day you get half as close but never actually arrive. I think there's a point where it decays enough to become insignificant to human health, and then reaches the further point where it's so insignificant as to be regarded as "nothing". It reminds me of the old scenario (in reverse) about putting one grain of sand on a chess square, 2 on the next, then 4, 8, 16, 32 etc etc Was it not a grain of rice rather than sand? The inventor of chess was asked by the rajah what reward he would like. He asked for one grain of rice on the first square, 2 on the next, 4 on the next and so on. the rajah foolishly agreed... |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
On 22/07/2013 00:05, Tim Streater wrote:
F'rinstance, Polonium 210, which did for that Russian, has a half life of 138 days. But I could carry a bottle of say polonium nitrate around in my pocket, no problem, because the radiation given off won't even penetrate a sheet of paper. But drink it, and because it looks to the body like calcium, off it goes to the bone marrow, where the radiation is able to kill your bone marrow cells, and then you. But wait 5 years and there'll be only 1/8000 of it left in the bottle. You might then get away with drinking it. That would depend on how much you drank. So the answer is, it depends on a number of factors, of which half life is one. Another factor is the decay product. If a radioactive ultimately decays to a stable Pb isotope, you could die from conventional lead-poisoning. -- Reentrant |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
On 22/07/2013 14:15, Reentrant wrote:
On 22/07/2013 00:05, Tim Streater wrote: F'rinstance, Polonium 210, which did for that Russian, has a half life of 138 days. But I could carry a bottle of say polonium nitrate around in my pocket, no problem, because the radiation given off won't even penetrate a sheet of paper. But drink it, and because it looks to the body like calcium, off it goes to the bone marrow, where the radiation is able to kill your bone marrow cells, and then you. But wait 5 years and there'll be only 1/8000 of it left in the bottle. You might then get away with drinking it. That would depend on how much you drank. So the answer is, it depends on a number of factors, of which half life is one. Another factor is the decay product. If a radioactive ultimately decays to a stable Pb isotope, you could die from conventional lead-poisoning. Not in the case of Polonium. IIRC the lethal ingested dose is around 1 microgram, but a microgram of lead is nothing. |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
On 22/07/2013 09:04, Brian Gaff wrote:
Yes I've often wondered this. After all if its half the amount, the there is never going to be nothing there. Its the old joke about every day you get half as close but never actually arrive. Brian Well actually, since everything is made from atoms and molecules, you do arrive at nothing eventually. |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
|
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
tim..... wrote:
"harryagain" wrote in message In the case you mention, the stuff never completely disappears. Half remains in 4 days Quarter remains in 8 days one eigth remains in 12 days. One sixteenth remains in 16 days One thirtysecond remainds in 20 days And so forth Though we are working with integer mathematics You will eventually get to a point where the number of molecules remaining is 1 and that will decay to zero Sort of like the Ford Orion. -- Adam |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
GB wrote:
On 22/07/2013 09:15, tim..... wrote: Though we are working with integer mathematics You will eventually get to a point where the number of molecules remaining is 1 and that will decay to zero Tell that to the homeopathists. :-) Thank you -- Adam |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
"Stephen H" wrote in message ... There is also the LD50 which is the amount (in mass) required to kill 50% of a specific population. The LD refers to lethal dose..... LD50 is an incredibly crude approximation. I once conducted a series of experiments in which we measured the LD50 to be approximately 10 times higher than the previously published data. Admittedly the previous data was 40 years old by that point and a lot of experimental techniques (and for that matter animal strains) had changed in that time. That is not to say that LD50 is useless - it works well as a 'quick & dirty' approach when setting up pilot studies but otherwise it is only really useful as a comparative measure of toxicity. Cheers Mark |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
"RobertL" wrote in message ... On Monday, July 22, 2013 12:33:12 PM UTC+1, Mentalguy2k8 wrote: "Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... Yes I've often wondered this. After all if its half the amount, the there is never going to be nothing there. Its the old joke about every day you get half as close but never actually arrive. I think there's a point where it decays enough to become insignificant to human health, and then reaches the further point where it's so insignificant as to be regarded as "nothing". It reminds me of the old scenario (in reverse) about putting one grain of sand on a chess square, 2 on the next, then 4, 8, 16, 32 etc etc Was it not a grain of rice rather than sand? The inventor of chess was asked by the rajah what reward he would like. He asked for one grain of rice on the first square, 2 on the next, 4 on the next and so on. the rajah foolishly agreed... Wasn't that one of Aesop's fables? |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
(somewhat) O/T: Question about half-lives.
Thanks all for the replies, I had a vague idea what the answer was, but I'd rather ask than potentially get it wrong.
Cheers again. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Should a pool light bulb be touching water only halfway (half in, half out)? | Home Repair | |||
Should a pool light bulb be touching water only halfway (half in, half out)? | Home Repair | |||
Should a pool light bulb be touching water only halfway (half in, half out)? | Home Repair | |||
Should a pool light bulb be touching water only halfway (half in, half out)? | Home Repair | |||
Half-full/half-empty kind of issue | UK diy |