Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've recently done the electrical wiring in my workshop, which is a
separate room tacked on to the end of a detached garage; so what this entailed was simply adding on to an existing circuit in the garage (a single radial socket) and extending it into a ring with 7 sockets. I understand that you can extend an existing ring without having to put your head above the Part P parapet?; I'm not sure whether what I've done would qualify under that (since there wasn't a ring there as such), not that I'm unduly bothered either way but am curious? It also got me thinking... if the new workshop extension wiring did qualify as exempt from Part P, what would happen if I went back a couple of years later to sort out the garage wiring, ie to rewire that part of the ring? That should then also be exempted under the same rule, surely? - despite that fact in fact the entire circuit would have been installed by a non-Part-P-qualified person with no Building Notice... the old "my broom is 50 years old; but it's had 15 new heads and 10 new handles" thing. Is that right? (As it happens the existing garage radial was indeed installed by yours truly; but in good old red and black cable, years before Part P ever raised its ugly head...!) David |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DIY Conundrum - Bathroom | UK diy | |||
Door conundrum | UK diy | |||
OT Electrical Conundrum | Woodworking | |||
Electrical conundrum | UK diy | |||
OT - A Conundrum for BottleBob | Metalworking |