Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Installing log periodic Digital TV aerial.
You may remember I was waffling on about bad reception on the higher channels off Sudbury. Anyway since this is a loft installation, with a modest gain in the distribution amp I went for a 40 element log periodic. Cheapest I could find online was about £25 delivered. Arrived an hour ago. Installation was a puzzle, till I realised that you actually terminate at the 'sharp' end of the aerial, feeding the cable down one of the tubes . Fortunately there was enough slack in the existing cable to reach the far end, and the diagram was just sufficient to connect it all up. It bolted straight onto the existing pole, which had an aerial worse than I remembered on it. Ho hum. Anyway fired it all up and had a look at the diagnostics on the sony STB's - 50% signal level on the worst channel. 100% good signal quality on all channels. Oddly the worst mux is now in a completely different place. Used to be the ITV2 mux, now its film 4. AHA. that's only 1.5KW along with the radio stations. The rest are 7.5-8KW. I know its no substitute for proper testing, but pixellation starts when 'signal quality' drops to '50%' whatever that means. I used to get at best 75% quality on some muxes, so it looks good already. I didn't bother to align it more than 'within 5 degrees' of the transmitter. Ok, so what can I say to summarise? 1/. Its pretty much done what the figures from http://www.aerialsandtv.com/ said it would. Given me even response all across the channels I need. 2/. It has (as expected) lost a little gain from the channels the original (analogue) aerial was tuned to. 3/. However, compared with an X beam or modified Yagi wideband its MUCH neater and smaller. I would definitely say this is a good choice for lofts and outdoors if you are not marginal on signal strength. 4/. Its only slightly trickier than the average aerial to install. Only time will tell if its cured the occasional pixellation stuff. however it looks like it has more than adequate quality margin. In short a good risk/cost choice for me. It already looks better on the crude diagnostics I have, and it didn't cost a packet. I wonder if it can pick up any other stations? I used to get Sandy Heath..weakly.. Nope. Not a hint of it. THAT is a good sign because its about 100 degrees off beam.... So no nasty sidelobes to have to deal with. I think that's it,. Pip pip! |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Installing log periodic Digital TV aerial.
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
I went for a 40 element log periodic. I wonder if it can pick up any other stations? I used to get Sandy Heath..weakly.. Nope. Not a hint of it. My LP is pointed at Waltham. From here, Belton is almost straight on and three times as far away, but every few nights the TV manages to catch enough of the distant signal to find duplicate channels which it stuffs into the 800's, once in a blue moon they're almost watchable. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Digital TV: Split signal from aerial? | UK diy | |||
Semi-Detached housing, can we share digital aerial? | UK diy | |||
Periodic electrical inspection | UK diy | |||
Digital Aerial Question | UK diy | |||
Wood Periodic Table | Woodworking |