http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

Adam

In article , ARWadsworth
writes

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

from Two Jags to Two Arses.

--
(\__/)
(='.'=) Bunny says Windows 7 is Vi$ta reloaded.
(")_(") http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/windows_7.png

On Fri, 8 May 2009 20:33:45 +0100, Mike Tomlinson
wrote:

In article , ARWadsworth
writes

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

from Two Jags to Two Arses.

From Two Jags John to Two Poos Prescott.





--------------
Any posting using my name and/or e-mail address
but other than by newsindividual.net is not being posted by me and should be disregarded .
Remove NOSPAM to reply by e-mail

In message , ARWadsworth
writes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

But he prolly wears them out every 6 months

As for Hazel Blears, why does she need a second home, what's wrong with
a dog kennel ?

Thieving, lying ****s the lot of them


--
geoff

geoff wrote:
In message ,
ARWadsworth writes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

But he prolly wears them out every 6 months

As for Hazel Blears, why does she need a second home, what's wrong
with a dog kennel ?

Thieving, lying ****s the lot of them

A very charitable view Geoff.


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman
www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On Fri, 08 May 2009 23:55:30 GMT, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

geoff wrote:
In message ,
ARWadsworth writes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

But he prolly wears them out every 6 months

As for Hazel Blears, why does she need a second home, what's wrong
with a dog kennel ?

Thieving, lying ****s the lot of them

A very charitable view Geoff.

But technically accurate.

If they were in judgement on another group, an order-in-council would
be slipped under the door quick enough.

On Sat, 09 May 2009 00:33:10 GMT, EricP wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2009 23:55:30 GMT, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

geoff wrote:
In message ,
ARWadsworth writes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

But he prolly wears them out every 6 months

As for Hazel Blears, why does she need a second home, what's wrong
with a dog kennel ?

Thieving, lying ****s the lot of them

A very charitable view Geoff.

But technically accurate.

If they were in judgement on another group, an order-in-council would
be slipped under the door quick enough.

Almost all of the [pseudo-]honest MPs that are interviewed say that MPs'
expenses should be transparent; all politicians say this about all
procedures. There's a very good reason: that which is perfectly transparent
is invisible and that's what politicians want. What we can't see, they can
fiddle even more - sort of air-fiddle!
--
Peter.
You don't understand Newton's Third Law of Motion?
It's not rocket science, you know.

On Sat, 9 May 2009 09:26:28 +0100, PeterC
wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 00:33:10 GMT, EricP wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2009 23:55:30 GMT, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

geoff wrote:
In message ,
ARWadsworth writes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

But he prolly wears them out every 6 months

As for Hazel Blears, why does she need a second home, what's wrong
with a dog kennel ?

Thieving, lying ****s the lot of them

A very charitable view Geoff.

But technically accurate.

If they were in judgement on another group, an order-in-council would
be slipped under the door quick enough.

Almost all of the [pseudo-]honest MPs that are interviewed say that MPs'
expenses should be transparent; all politicians say this about all
procedures. There's a very good reason: that which is perfectly transparent
is invisible and that's what politicians want. What we can't see, they can
fiddle even more - sort of air-fiddle!

There are no 'honest' MPs as they all subscribed to the expenses scam
whether or not they actually claimed. It has always been within their
power to change the system but it only became a hot topic after the
abuse was published in the media. I find it comical that some of the
'honourable' gentlemen/women are saying 'Yes, we knew the expense
system was open to abuse'. If that was the case,, then why didn't
they campaign to change it?

I wonder whether the Inland Revenue will scan the expenses claims
after they are published and make a ruling on what is legitimate and
what is not and tax these crooks accordingly. I suspect not. In
private industry, it is not acceptable for the employer to approve
what is an untaxable expense, the Inland Revenue must also agree. I
assume that is the same for MPs or is it?

The ones which have said (jack Straw for example) sorry I made a
mistake and repaid the so called mistake, whether he also paid an
appropriate amount of interest. Again I suspect not.

I despair. I hope the Conservatives come out better from this
business as at least it does give an alternative. I just cannot think
how I can support the nu labour bunch under the present set of
circumstances.

EricP wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2009 23:55:30 GMT, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

geoff wrote:
In message ,
ARWadsworth writes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

But he prolly wears them out every 6 months

As for Hazel Blears, why does she need a second home, what's wrong
with a dog kennel ?

Thieving, lying ****s the lot of them

A very charitable view Geoff.

But technically accurate.

Agreed, I thought Geoff was being soft on them.

I wonder how many of these 'claims' HMRC would accept on a tax return from a
handyman?


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman
www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

The Medway Handyman wrote:
EricP wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2009 23:55:30 GMT, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

geoff wrote:
In message ,
ARWadsworth writes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

But he prolly wears them out every 6 months

As for Hazel Blears, why does she need a second home, what's wrong
with a dog kennel ?

Thieving, lying ****s the lot of them
A very charitable view Geoff.
But technically accurate.

Agreed, I thought Geoff was being soft on them.

I wonder how many of these 'claims' HMRC would accept on a tax return from a
handyman?

And how many "mistakes" would they allow you before concluding that you
were a lying git?

"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
m...
EricP wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2009 23:55:30 GMT, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

geoff wrote:
In message ,
ARWadsworth writes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

But he prolly wears them out every 6 months

As for Hazel Blears, why does she need a second home, what's wrong
with a dog kennel ?

Thieving, lying ****s the lot of them

A very charitable view Geoff.

But technically accurate.

Agreed, I thought Geoff was being soft on them.

I wonder how many of these 'claims' HMRC would accept on a tax return from
a handyman?


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman
www.medwayhandyman.co.uk


640 or so flyers at a certain address in London and you could be quids in.
At £150 to refit a toilet seat you can have a 2 day week.

And what Geoff said.

Adam

In article , geoff
scribeth thus
In message , ARWadsworth
writes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

But he prolly wears them out every 6 months

As for Hazel Blears, why does she need a second home, what's wrong with
a dog kennel ?

Thieving, lying ****s the lot of them



And if those brave blokes fighting at Naseby in 1645 for the
parliamentarian cause could see what was to become of what they fought
for .. they'd have said "sod that, we're off down the pub";!.....
--
Tony Sayer

"tony sayer" wrote in message
...
In article , geoff
scribeth thus
In message , ARWadsworth
writes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

But he prolly wears them out every 6 months

As for Hazel Blears, why does she need a second home, what's wrong with
a dog kennel ?

Thieving, lying ****s the lot of them



And if those brave blokes fighting at Naseby in 1645 for the
parliamentarian cause could see what was to become of what they fought
for .. they'd have said "sod that, we're off down the pub";!.....
--
Tony Sayer

That would not be "The Kings Head" then.

Adam

In article ,
ARWadsworth scribeth thus

"tony sayer" wrote in message
...
In article , geoff
scribeth thus
In message , ARWadsworth
writes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

But he prolly wears them out every 6 months

As for Hazel Blears, why does she need a second home, what's wrong with
a dog kennel ?

Thieving, lying ****s the lot of them



And if those brave blokes fighting at Naseby in 1645 for the
parliamentarian cause could see what was to become of what they fought
for .. they'd have said "sod that, we're off down the pub";!.....
--
Tony Sayer

That would not be "The Kings Head" then.


LOL!, bet they would have drunk all the others dry 'tho;!...
Adam



--
Tony Sayer

"ARWadsworth" wrote in message
m...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

That Prescott bloke has some cheek.

Adam
his fat arse probably necessitated a stronger seat fixing system... mine
cost me over £90 from Ideal Standard!.... expensive but very strong