Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
internal wall: brick or block?
We are planning to brick up an opening in an internal wall in our Victoran house. It is where the two main rooms have previously been knocked into one in the 1960s. I am assuming that there is a beam across the opening. We will eventually have a professional plasterer to plaster it at the same time as all the other plastering jobs around the house are done. What do people advise to use: bricks or blocks? It will not be load bearing and will be built on the pre-existing victorian brickwork which comes up as far as floor level. opening is 2.2m high and 2.6m wide (~4" thick) many thanks for any aadvice anyone cares to give. Robert |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
internal wall: brick or block?
"RobertL" wrote in message
... We are planning to brick up an opening in an internal wall in our Victoran house. It is where the two main rooms have previously been knocked into one in the 1960s. I am assuming that there is a beam across the opening. We will eventually have a professional plasterer to plaster it at the same time as all the other plastering jobs around the house are done. What do people advise to use: bricks or blocks? It will not be load bearing and will be built on the pre-existing victorian brickwork which comes up as far as floor level. opening is 2.2m high and 2.6m wide (~4" thick) many thanks for any aadvice anyone cares to give. Most people would install a stud partition in these circumstances (timber and plasterboard). -- Bob Mannix (anti-spam is as easy as 1-2-3 - not |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
internal wall: brick or block?
On 6 Nov, 10:27, RobertL wrote:
We are planning to brick up an opening in an internal wall in our Victoran house. *It is where the two main rooms have previously been knocked into one in the 1960s. *I am assuming that there is a beam across the opening. *We will eventually have a professional plasterer to plaster it at the same time as all the other plastering jobs around the house are done. What do people advise to use: bricks or blocks? *It will not be load bearing and will be built on the pre-existing victorian brickwork which comes up as far as floor level. *opening is 2.2m high and 2.6m wide (~4" thick) many thanks for any aadvice anyone cares to give. Robert Think suitable-thickness aerated Thermalite blocks and ordinary mortar would do fine and you can cut them fairly precisely with a bowsaw or similar - much better thermal / sound insulation than stud infill and a competent plasterer will neatly cover up all your unsightly blocklaying ! Ideally you should 'key' at least some block courses into the existing masonry in order to avoid any possibility of slight movement and cracking but can't see that it's totally necessary for opening as described although certainly belt and braces. |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
internal wall: brick or block?
On Nov 6, 11:06*am, David wrote:
On 6 Nov, 10:27, RobertL wrote: We are planning to brick up an opening in an internal wall in our Victoran house. *It is where the two main rooms have previously been knocked into one in the 1960s. *I am assuming that there is a beam across the opening. *We will eventually have a professional plasterer to plaster it at the same time as all the other plastering jobs around the house are done. What do people advise to use: bricks or blocks? *It will not be load bearing and will be built on the pre-existing victorian brickwork which comes up as far as floor level. *opening is 2.2m high and 2.6m wide (~4" thick) many thanks for any aadvice anyone cares to give. Robert Think suitable-thickness aerated Thermalite blocks and ordinary mortar would do fine and you can cut them fairly precisely with a bowsaw or similar - much better thermal / sound insulation than stud infill and a competent plasterer will neatly cover up all your unsightly blocklaying ! Ideally you should 'key' at least some block courses into the existing masonry in order to avoid any possibility of slight movement and cracking but can't see that it's totally necessary for opening as described *although certainly belt and braces. Thank you both for yoru replies. yes sound insulation is important. Robert |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
internal wall: brick or block?
"RobertL" wrote in message ... On Nov 6, 11:06 am, David wrote: On 6 Nov, 10:27, RobertL wrote: We are planning to brick up an opening in an internal wall in our Victoran house. It is where the two main rooms have previously been knocked into one in the 1960s. I am assuming that there is a beam across the opening. We will eventually have a professional plasterer to plaster it at the same time as all the other plastering jobs around the house are done. What do people advise to use: bricks or blocks? It will not be load bearing and will be built on the pre-existing victorian brickwork which comes up as far as floor level. opening is 2.2m high and 2.6m wide (~4" thick) many thanks for any aadvice anyone cares to give. Robert Think suitable-thickness aerated Thermalite blocks and ordinary mortar would do fine and you can cut them fairly precisely with a bowsaw or similar - much better thermal / sound insulation than stud infill and a competent plasterer will neatly cover up all your unsightly blocklaying ! Ideally you should 'key' at least some block courses into the existing masonry in order to avoid any possibility of slight movement and cracking but can't see that it's totally necessary for opening as described although certainly belt and braces. -Thank you both for yoru replies. yes sound insulation is important. A solid wall will be quieter but you can pack the stud wall with rockwool or double layer the plasterboard. For reception rooms this is usually more than adequate. For bedrooms sometimes not so, as the house is very quiet at night and people can be kept awake by small noises (IMHO). -- Bob Mannix (anti-spam is as easy as 1-2-3 - not) Robert |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
internal wall: brick or block?
On Nov 6, 11:24*am, "Bob Mannix" wrote:
"RobertL" wrote in message -Thank you both for your replies. *yes sound insulation is important. A solid wall will be quieter but you can pack the stud wall with rockwool or double layer the plasterboard. For reception rooms this is usually more than adequate. For bedrooms sometimes not so, as the house is very quiet at night and people can be kept awake by small noises (IMHO). That's true, and also a stud wall can be made more sondproof using staggered 'interleaved' studs so that the plasterboard on one side is not attached to the same studs as the one on the other side. In our case its not just the sound insulation though: I prefer to use the same meterials as the rest of the wall - it just seems 'right'. Robert |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
internal wall: brick or block?
On Nov 6, 11:06*am, David wrote:
On 6 Nov, 10:27, RobertL wrote: We are planning to brick up an opening in an internal wall in our Victoran house. *It is where the two main rooms have previously been knocked into one in the 1960s. *I am assuming that there is a beam across the opening. *We will eventually have a professional plasterer to plaster it at the same time as all the other plastering jobs around the house are done. What do people advise to use: bricks or blocks? *It will not be load bearing and will be built on the pre-existing victorian brickwork which comes up as far as floor level. *opening is 2.2m high and 2.6m wide (~4" thick) many thanks for any aadvice anyone cares to give. Robert Think suitable-thickness aerated Thermalite blocks and ordinary mortar would do fine and you can cut them fairly precisely with a bowsaw or similar - much better thermal / sound insulation than stud infill and a competent plasterer will neatly cover up all your unsightly blocklaying ! Ideally you should 'key' at least some block courses into the existing masonry in order to avoid any possibility of slight movement and cracking but can't see that it's totally necessary for opening as described *although certainly belt and braces. Blocks are quicker than mortar. The block wall should be attached to the existing walls along the side. Use of bits of ss stud (ssthreaded rod) is a lot simpler than interleaving brickwork. Medium weight blocks give better sound reistance than aerated, and can be used on concrete ground floors. NT |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
internal wall: brick or block?
RobertL wrote:
We are planning to brick up an opening in an internal wall in our Victoran house. It is where the two main rooms have previously been knocked into one in the 1960s. I am assuming that there is a beam across the opening. We will eventually have a professional plasterer to plaster it at the same time as all the other plastering jobs around the house are done. What do people advise to use: bricks or blocks? It will not be load bearing and will be built on the pre-existing victorian brickwork which comes up as far as floor level. opening is 2.2m high and 2.6m wide (~4" thick) many thanks for any aadvice anyone cares to give. I'd use lightweight blocks for this. Damn site easier to chase for cables etc. Robert |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
internal wall: brick or block?
RobertL wrote:
On Nov 6, 11:24 am, "Bob Mannix" wrote: "RobertL" wrote in message -Thank you both for your replies. yes sound insulation is important. A solid wall will be quieter but you can pack the stud wall with rockwool or double layer the plasterboard. For reception rooms this is usually more than adequate. For bedrooms sometimes not so, as the house is very quiet at night and people can be kept awake by small noises (IMHO). That's true, and also a stud wall can be made more sondproof using staggered 'interleaved' studs so that the plasterboard on one side is not attached to the same studs as the one on the other side. In our case its not just the sound insulation though: I prefer to use the same meterials as the rest of the wall - it just seems 'right'. Robert Even lightewight block is way better than stud sound wise. |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
internal wall: brick or block?
Bob Mannix wrote:
"RobertL" wrote in message ... We are planning to brick up an opening in an internal wall in our Victoran house. It is where the two main rooms have previously been knocked into one in the 1960s. I am assuming that there is a beam across the opening. We will eventually have a professional plasterer to plaster it at the same time as all the other plastering jobs around the house are done. What do people advise to use: bricks or blocks? It will not be load bearing and will be built on the pre-existing victorian brickwork which comes up as far as floor level. opening is 2.2m high and 2.6m wide (~4" thick) many thanks for any aadvice anyone cares to give. Most people would install a stud partition in these circumstances (timber and plasterboard). If it's an opening in an existing solid wall (ie a doorway) that may not work well though - it's very likely that the different underlying wall composition will end up causing cracks in the skim plaster demarking where the old opening was. I'd definitely go for lightweight blocks - much quicker and no real disadvantage here compared with bricks. David |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to fill hole in brick/block wall? Last block at top? | UK diy | |||
Hep2O through an internal brick wall | UK diy | |||
Advice needed - crack in internal brick wall | UK diy | |||
Bare brick internal wall: paper or emulsion? | UK diy | |||
Building an internal wall - brick or stud? | UK diy |