Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
Lidl Crowborough is selling electronic spirit levels @£25 (lartge box
full seen on Saturday). They appear to be robust and have the 2 normal vials at 90deg. Tucked in at one end is an electronic unit with LED screen powered by 9v battery. No instructions, of course. Strongly suspect wise counsel would whisper 'leave on shelf', even so several Qs arise: 1. How do the levels work? 2. The electronics has a 'calibrate' button - how does that work? Guessing - is the electronic section calibrated by setting the level on a flat surface as shown by the vials and then pressing calibrate? Or is it something more sophisticated than that. 3. After calibration does the electronic unit have its own level detector which takes over independant of the vials? 4. Box shows supplier to Lidl is Paget Trading Ltd of Woodrow London. Searched web to try to discover more info about the levels but drew a blank. Internet searches reveal other people trying to contact this firm! Is it bust? Where are these levels manufactured? 5. What are its pukka competitors? It looks stout, so it could be a reasonable purchase provided the vials can be reset and the electronic unit calibrated / validated, but.....any knowledge or opinions out there? TIA |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
In article .com, jim
says... Lidl Crowborough is selling electronic spirit levels @£25 (lartge box full seen on Saturday). They appear to be robust and have the 2 normal vials at 90deg. Tucked in at one end is an electronic unit with LED screen powered by 9v battery. No instructions, of course. Strongly suspect wise counsel would whisper 'leave on shelf', even so several Qs arise: 1. How do the levels work? 2. The electronics has a 'calibrate' button - how does that work? Guessing - is the electronic section calibrated by setting the level on a flat surface as shown by the vials and then pressing calibrate? Or is it something more sophisticated than that. 3. After calibration does the electronic unit have its own level detector which takes over independant of the vials? 4. Box shows supplier to Lidl is Paget Trading Ltd of Woodrow London. Searched web to try to discover more info about the levels but drew a blank. Internet searches reveal other people trying to contact this firm! Is it bust? Where are these levels manufactured? 5. What are its pukka competitors? It looks stout, so it could be a reasonable purchase provided the vials can be reset and the electronic unit calibrated / validated, but.....any knowledge or opinions out there? TIA I don't know about the Lidl one, but I bought a Black and Decker "LaserPlus" and was very disappointed with it. I forget what tolerance it was supposed to have in terms of vertical tilt error per horizontal metre, but mine was several millimetres out and with no means of adjustment. Trouble was I bought it in the UK to use here in France, so taking it back is not an option. The error came to light after fixing a batten supposedly level by the B&D, but when I put the machine on the other side of the timber, the level was showing way out - they could not both be correct. I subsequently tested it by first holding it one way around then the other. The tilt is quite clear. Great if you want wonky shelves. It turns out my old trusty bubble spirit level is more accurate. At least you can turn it around and it still shows the same level. -- David in Normandy. (The free MicroPlanet Gravity newsreader is great for eliminating rubbish and cross-posts) |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
jim wrote:
4. Box shows supplier to Lidl is Paget Trading Ltd of Woodrow London. Searched web to try to discover more info about the levels but drew a blank. Internet searches reveal other people trying to contact this firm! Is it bust? Where are these levels manufactured? Found via TÜV Rheinland certificates... Paget Trading Ltd. 1 Raffles Place No. 21-01 OUB Centre Singapore 048616 Tel +49 (0)2233 379953 Fax +49 (0)2233 373159 Mr. Willy Clev Paget Services http://www.impo-global.de The UK address is at Woodrow Business Centre - a warehouse. Paget Trading Ltd. c/o Paget Services 65-66 Woodrow UK London SE18 5DH Tel.: +44 1525-715-937 Fax: +44 1525-714-083 Above numbers are a mail/contact forwarding service. -- Adrian C |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:44:57 -0700 Jim wrote :
4. Box shows supplier to Lidl is Paget Trading Ltd of Woodrow London. Searched web to try to discover more info about the levels but drew a blank. Internet searches reveal other people trying to contact this firm! Is it bust? Where are these levels manufactured? At a quick look on http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/WebCHeck/fastrack/ I couldn't find a company of this name. It might just mean it's a company registered outside the UK -- Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
David in Normandy expressed precisely :
I subsequently tested it by first holding it one way around then the other. The tilt is quite clear. Great if you want wonky shelves. It turns out my old trusty bubble spirit level is more accurate. At least you can turn it around and it still shows the same level. That is the standard method of checking any level, to turn it round on the same surface to check for errors. It doesn't give any clues to its basic accuracy - to check for that, you can place a bit of thick card under one end and see how far the bubble moves. -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-10 10:44:57 +0100, jim said:
Lidl Crowborough is selling electronic spirit levels @£25 (lartge box full seen on Saturday). Next to the bananas? They appear to be robust and have the 2 normal vials at 90deg. Tucked in at one end is an electronic unit with LED screen powered by 9v battery. No instructions, of course. Of course. Strongly suspect wise counsel would whisper 'leave on shelf', Any reasonable counsel would shout that since everything else in the store is cheap crap why would that be any different? even so several Qs arise: 1. How do the levels work? 2. The electronics has a 'calibrate' button - how does that work? Guessing - is the electronic section calibrated by setting the level on a flat surface as shown by the vials and then pressing calibrate? Or is it something more sophisticated than that. 3. After calibration does the electronic unit have its own level detector which takes over independant of the vials? 4. Box shows supplier to Lidl is Paget Trading Ltd of Woodrow London. OK, so this is a firm that unpacks containers arriving from Shanghai. Searched web to try to discover more info about the levels but drew a blank. Internet searches reveal other people trying to contact this firm! Is it bust? Where are these levels manufactured? 5. What are its pukka competitors? It looks stout, so it could be a reasonable purchase provided the vials can be reset and the electronic unit calibrated / validated, but.....any knowledge or opinions out there? TIA Those are big "ifs" and it depends on whether you want something vaguely decent or to waste £25 on goodness knows what. If you are looking for a worthwhile product then there are a selection from manufacturers such as Leica, Stabila, Bosch etc. Here's a selection. http://www.yorksurvey.co.uk/products/51laser.htm |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:39:12 +0100, Andy Hall
wrote: http://www.yorksurvey.co.uk/products/51laser.htm That site barely works with Firefox... -- Frank Erskine |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-10 22:03:25 +0100, Frank Erskine
said: On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:39:12 +0100, Andy Hall wrote: http://www.yorksurvey.co.uk/products/51laser.htm That site barely works with Firefox... It barely works at all but they will send a catalogue. They are in rural Yorkshire, after all, so one can't have high expectations. |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:12:52 +0100, Andy Hall
wrote: On 2007-10-10 22:03:25 +0100, Frank Erskine said: On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:39:12 +0100, Andy Hall wrote: http://www.yorksurvey.co.uk/products/51laser.htm That site barely works with Firefox... . They are in rural Yorkshire, after all, so one can't have high expectations. Well that's more or less what I was thinking. I'm surprised they have electric light, never mind computers. -- Frank Erskine |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-10 22:25:04 +0100, Frank Erskine
said: On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:12:52 +0100, Andy Hall wrote: On 2007-10-10 22:03:25 +0100, Frank Erskine said: On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:39:12 +0100, Andy Hall wrote: http://www.yorksurvey.co.uk/products/51laser.htm That site barely works with Firefox... . They are in rural Yorkshire, after all, so one can't have high expectations. Well that's more or less what I was thinking. I'm surprised they have electric light, never mind computers. Exactly, and th'only running water is what goes down 't' walls. |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:12:52 +0100, Andy Hall wrote:
They are in rural Yorkshire, after all, So's the British Library ! so one can't have high expectations. |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
Andy Dingley wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:12:52 +0100, Andy Hall wrote: They are in rural Yorkshire, after all, So's the British Library ! so one can't have high expectations. I can race round it at speed! |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:44:57 -0700, jim
wrote: IMHE, these things are OK so long as you don't need something to be accurately level. If you want a consistent incline, such as for setting out drainage, then they're quick and convenient at delivering an acceptable accuracy. If you want "level", then you typically need better accuracy. They're not up to this. 1. How do the levels work? IMHE, there are lots of methods in detail, but they all use a swinging pendulum to establish a local datum. There's then a sensor to read the offset of this from the level's body. Older high-accuracy models used an optical scale, cheaper ones use a non-contact inductive or capacitive sensor. These have linearity problems on larger angles. |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-11 00:21:45 +0100, Andy Dingley said:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:12:52 +0100, Andy Hall wrote: They are in rural Yorkshire, after all, So's the British Library ! Presumably to avoid any risk of theft........ :-) so one can't have high expectations. |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-11 11:14:39 +0100, Owain said:
Andy Hall wrote: ... they will send a catalogue. A paper catalogue, by post? How old fashioned. Owain Well it is Yorkshire. It's commendable that they can manage to produce one. |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:14:39 +0100, Owain
wrote: Andy Hall wrote: ... they will send a catalogue. A paper catalogue, by post? Post? What's that? -- Frank Erskine |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
"Frank Erskine" wrote in message
... On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:14:39 +0100, Owain wrote: Andy Hall wrote: ... they will send a catalogue. A paper catalogue, by post? Post? What's that? It's what holds fences up round here. And no, not robbing pawn-shops either. cheers, clive |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-11 17:19:23 +0100, Owain said:
Frank Erskine wrote: ... they will send a catalogue. A paper catalogue, by post? Post? What's that? Something Mr Hall professes not to use Owain Not quite. It's used (normally) once a month to deliver documents to my accountant. This week it went by courier firm and will do in future, so that's another `£60 per annum of lost business to RM. I don't have time to waste on these people. They either need to wise up to commercial reality or they'll all be on the street. I don't mind which. |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
"Andy Hall" wrote in message
... Not quite. It's used (normally) once a month to deliver documents to my accountant. This week it went by courier firm and will do in future, so that's another `£60 per annum of lost business to RM. I don't have time to waste on these people. They either need to wise up to commercial reality or they'll all be on the street. I don't mind which. Did your wife run off with a postie at some point? It would explain your almost rabid dislike of them... cheers, clive |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-11 19:25:56 +0100, "Clive George" said:
"Andy Hall" wrote in message ... Not quite. It's used (normally) once a month to deliver documents to my accountant. This week it went by courier firm and will do in future, so that's another `£60 per annum of lost business to RM. I don't have time to waste on these people. They either need to wise up to commercial reality or they'll all be on the street. I don't mind which. Did your wife run off with a postie at some point? It would explain your almost rabid dislike of them... cheers, clive No not at all. I don't dislike individuals, per sec, but think about what it has become. - Ex state owned "business" where the middle management believes that it is still in some kind of cotton wool protected environment and hands out policy for execution at the customer facing end that is sheer nonsense. What other business keeps its customers standing in the pouring rain for 30 mins in order to have the privilege of doing business with it? A complete nonsense. - A demotivated workforce that is desperately underpaid and which knows that probably 80% of what it delivers goes straight in the bin. - A few "leaders" of said workforce who still believe that the state should provide. It doesn't, won't and shouldn't. Rather sadly, the workforce follows this, including withdrawal of labour, because there is nothing else to go for. It won't get them anywhere because the cupboard is close to bare. - Some idealists who still believe in the idea of universal services funded from taxation. That was past its sell-by date by 1970, and has no relevance in today's world at all, especially not in the area of delivery services. - A customer base who still expects something for practically nothing. 34p (or whatever it is now) for a standard item of first class mail. Where does that come from? It's ridiculously low. If an item of mail doesn't justify a delivery charge of at least a pound, probably two, then it has too little value to justify sending. This is about the price range for the current Recorded Signed For service. That should be the bare minimum. What is the point in sending something if you don't really know whether it got there or not? Waste of time. If it doesn't justify that, then it's not worth having. Above this product there is Special Delivery in the £4-5 range which at least offers an attempt at a delivery time. The sensible thing to do would be to dump all the low priced services (i.e. anything less than a pound) and to see what proportion of customers will pay the more realistic market rate and which won't do so. That would identify what is the sound and reasonably sustainable business and to dump the bull****. This would reduce the workforce of RM, but that is untenable anyway, and would provide a more sustainable long term business that can support its workforce properly. What clearly is not going to work is a low ASP customer base and a workforce with unrealistic expectations. Hence my point. I would buy the 34p product if I could be assured of timely delivery and knowing that it arrived. That can't be done for 34p and as soon as there is any uncertainty because of industrial action, that's it, game's off. I have bought the £4-5 service because generally it works OK and there is tracking. The value of what I send is not intrinsically great, but would cost a fair amount in terms of time if I have to replicate it. Generally that's a reasonable bet and has worked. Again, with the uncertainty of delivery, I am not going to waste my time on it in future. It's cheaper in terms of actual cost and time to use a taxi or motor bike courier. In the end, and coming back to the point, if a product or service is worth having, it's worth paying for. Otherwise forget it. |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
"Andy Hall" wrote in message
... What other business keeps its customers standing in the pouring rain for 30 mins in order to have the privilege of doing business with it? The entertainment business? Though I've never had the experience of your post office - IME they're rather better. Ie I've never had to queue in the pouring rain like you have, and nor do I expect to have to do so in the future, despite living in an area where there's more rain than you get. - A customer base who still expects something for practically nothing. 34p (or whatever it is now) for a standard item of first class mail. Where does that come from? It's ridiculously low. If an item of mail doesn't justify a delivery charge of at least a pound, probably two, then it has too little value to justify sending. That's assuming all post is for business purposes. Consider what's sent around the busiest time of year for RM. Also postcards still exist, and work well. And that's just my particularly restricted use. I don't want signed-for delivery on that sort of thing, I just want something reasonably priced and reliable - which IME we have. cheers, clive |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-11 21:38:15 +0100, "Clive George" said:
"Andy Hall" wrote in message ... What other business keeps its customers standing in the pouring rain for 30 mins in order to have the privilege of doing business with it? The entertainment business? Though I've never had the experience of your post office - IME they're rather better. Ie I've never had to queue in the pouring rain like you have, and nor do I expect to have to do so in the future, despite living in an area where there's more rain than you get. I took the trouble to email them and received a reply from some junior dweeb who clearly only had a page of standard answers, a blindfold and a pin; because I got a completely stupid answer. I mailed them back and asked for a more considered reply and asked what they were going to do. The answer was well wrapped in bureaucratic red tape as befits a government department. I gave up at that point. - A customer base who still expects something for practically nothing. 34p (or whatever it is now) for a standard item of first class mail. Where does that come from? It's ridiculously low. If an item of mail doesn't justify a delivery charge of at least a pound, probably two, then it has too little value to justify sending. That's assuming all post is for business purposes. Consider what's sent around the busiest time of year for RM. Also postcards still exist, and work well. And that's just my particularly restricted use. I don't want signed-for delivery on that sort of thing, I just want something reasonably priced and reliable - which IME we have. cheers, clive Yes, all of this is lovely but if you take the revenue from that piece of business and look at the cost of implementation, does it pay? I'm sure it doesn't, which is one reason why RM is having trouble making ends meet. Their mix of products isn't priced correctly. When you have that situation, there are only five ways that I can think of to fix it. - tell the employees that they can have less, not more money. I don't think that that will work - withdraw the service. You say that you want it. - increase the price of the basic service. There is little extra cost in securing a signature at the door in comparison with the logistics cost, so the real cost is closer to £1 than 34p. Would you be willing to pay £1 per item? - subsidise the 34p service from higher value services. Won't work because it's easy for others to compete without giving subsidies. - subsidise from taxation. We came from there and it didn't work then. The Christmas argument doesn't fly either. If you increase the volume of something that makes low margin or a loss but has a requirement to increase the cost base, it only makes it worse. All of this stuff is childrens' business studies. The fact that RM hasn't worked it out yet, indicates to me that they never will. That's why I make the point that we might as well move directly to the end game and shut them down. As it is, all that is happening is a rather long, painful and pathetic death. |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-12 00:12:33 +0100, Tony Bryer said:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:01:09 +0100 Andy Hall wrote : - A demotivated workforce that is desperately underpaid and which knows that probably 80% of what it delivers goes straight in the bin. One would like to think that they know that it's this mail that keeps them in work. And one presumes that the businesses who send it do so because it makes them money and is considered a more effective way of marketing than the alternatives. Except that it's a circular argument. Would the businesses think the same if the price was at a more viable level? - A customer base who still expects something for practically nothing. 34p (or whatever it is now) for a standard item of first class mail. Where does that come from? It's ridiculously low. It's ridiculously low in rural areas (considering the likely cost of collecting *and* delivering mail) but urban-urban mail makes money, even more so when it comes from businesses like us who send virtually everything with printed and postcoded addresses and pay for our postage online. But does it for granny's book token to little Willy? But the one party you can rely on not to interfere with the universal service obligation is the Conservatives so nothing will change here. There's nothing in principle wrong with having this as long as it is priced correctly. If the postman are not being paid enough - and I tend to agree, that they are not, then it means that either there's not enough money going in at the front end or it's being wasted in the middle, possibly both. We spend about £3,500 p.a. on postage and, current strike apart, reckon it to be a mighty good service. The strike is costing us serious money though, some of which we may not pick up later. I suppose it depends on what you are doing. For example, if you are sending out a mailshot to 1000 recipients in the expectation of a 5% response anyway, it may not matter if some go adrift. If it's a software update to customers on a contract then those that don't receive it may be dogged off and not renew next year and you might not know. Perhaps there's a way around that. |
#24
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:01:09 +0100 Andy Hall wrote :
- A demotivated workforce that is desperately underpaid and which knows that probably 80% of what it delivers goes straight in the bin. One would like to think that they know that it's this mail that keeps them in work. And one presumes that the businesses who send it do so because it makes them money and is considered a more effective way of marketing than the alternatives. - A customer base who still expects something for practically nothing. 34p (or whatever it is now) for a standard item of first class mail. Where does that come from? It's ridiculously low. It's ridiculously low in rural areas (considering the likely cost of collecting *and* delivering mail) but urban-urban mail makes money, even more so when it comes from businesses like us who send virtually everything with printed and postcoded addresses and pay for our postage online. But the one party you can rely on not to interfere with the universal service obligation is the Conservatives so nothing will change here. We spend about £3,500 p.a. on postage and, current strike apart, reckon it to be a mighty good service. The strike is costing us serious money though, some of which we may not pick up later. -- Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk |
#25
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
"Andy Hall" wrote in message
... - increase the price of the basic service. There is little extra cost in securing a signature at the door in comparison with the logistics cost, so the real cost is closer to £1 than 34p. Would you be willing to pay £1 per item? Um, there's quite a large increase in cost. Consider an urban round - unlike couriers, the postie will have mail for most of the street, so the difference between "in the letterbox" and "ring, wait, get signature, ..." is significant. A courier doing say 20 drops is rather different to a postie doing a few hundred, and the cost reflects that. Yes, the post model relies on lots of people using it. Is it just RM you hate, or are all the equivalents in other countries also on your hit list? cheers, clive |
#26
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-12 00:31:14 +0100, "Clive George" said:
"Andy Hall" wrote in message ... - increase the price of the basic service. There is little extra cost in securing a signature at the door in comparison with the logistics cost, so the real cost is closer to £1 than 34p. Would you be willing to pay £1 per item? Um, there's quite a large increase in cost. Consider an urban round - unlike couriers, the postie will have mail for most of the street, so the difference between "in the letterbox" and "ring, wait, get signature, ..." is significant. A courier doing say 20 drops is rather different to a postie doing a few hundred, and the cost reflects that. Yes, the post model relies on lots of people using it. Is it just RM you hate, or are all the equivalents in other countries also on your hit list? cheers, clive No, it's generic I think. The US Postal Service can't even manage to provide tracking for an item which has been sent using a premium tracking service that they claim to offer. I've had three items over a couple of years that go missing for about three weeks and then there's a mangled postcard from RM wanting me to go to the post office to pay the import VAT, paying 60p parking and waiting in the rain for half an hour. No sign of any tracking to this day. They collude in their incompetence. Contrast this to Fedex and DHL. I can have something sent by Fedex from the U.S. using my account so that I control the method and the shipping costs. I get a tracking number by email the moment it's picked up and I can either look on the web or receive emails as it passes each transit point. If there's a delay for any reason, I get a notification immediately. I will get delivery to me two days after shipping - no messing about with post offices. An invoice for the shipping and import VAT arrives a few days later. If I'm sending something, I have the same facilities and I can also get a proof of delivery in the form of name and scanned signature downloadable from their web site as a PDF. The theoretical cost is greater than USPS+RM but not by a great deal. The practical cost including all the chasing of these people to do what they say they will do is far greater than that difference. |
#27
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
In article , Andy Hall wrote:
- increase the price of the basic service. There is little extra cost in securing a signature at the door in comparison with the logistics cost, so the real cost is closer to £1 than 34p. Would you be willing to pay £1 per item? Are you seriously considering that every item of post should be tracked and signed for?? There is no one at home here just about every weekday yet most days we have post of some sort. Do you suggest I have to go into town, pay parking and collect this? So instead of a daily service I get a less convenient, weekly service (or may I should drive to town everyday?) I guess it's less of an issue if you have servants to send Darren |
#28
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
|
#29
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:01:09 +0100, Andy Hall wrote:
What other business keeps its customers standing in the pouring rain for 30 mins in order to have the privilege of doing business with it? A complete nonsense. But you aren't customers, you're merely addressees (I've had this one out with them myself). The person buying stamps is a customer. The person receiving it didn't pay for the service personally, thus doesn't matter to the Royal Mail. QED. You're lucky they bother to deliver it to you at all. They either need to wise up to commercial reality or they'll all be on the street. I don't mind which. I agree with your first point, but not the second. I've got quite a soft spot for the Royal Mail and I dearly wish for them to succeed and to provide me with a competent service. However Consignia's management are, by definition (implicit in the re-naming), clueless ****wits incapable of carrying on the trade of whelk-based refreshment. |
#30
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:23:18 +0100, Andy Dingley
wrote: However Consignia's management are, by definition (implicit in the re-naming), clueless ****wits incapable of carrying on the trade of whelk-based refreshment. Consignia as a trading name hasn't existed for about five years! -- Frank Erskine |
#31
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-13 16:23:18 +0100, Andy Dingley said:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:01:09 +0100, Andy Hall wrote: What other business keeps its customers standing in the pouring rain for 30 mins in order to have the privilege of doing business with it? A complete nonsense. But you aren't customers, you're merely addressees (I've had this one out with them myself). The person buying stamps is a customer. The person receiving it didn't pay for the service personally, thus doesn't matter to the Royal Mail. QED. You're lucky they bother to deliver it to you at all. Oh, sure. I figured that one out. The trouble is that wihout tracking, there is no way for their version of the customer or anybody else's for that matter, to determine whether or not they did what was paid for. If I still wrote any cheques, the old line that the cheque's in the mail would be a very useful one. They either need to wise up to commercial reality or they'll all be on the street. I don't mind which. I agree with your first point, but not the second. I've got quite a soft spot for the Royal Mail and I dearly wish for them to succeed and to provide me with a competent service. I would too, if I didn't believe that it's already too late for them. The opportunities have been there and not taken on countless occasions. However Consignia's management are, by definition (implicit in the re-naming), clueless ****wits incapable of carrying on the trade of whelk-based refreshment. I don't disagree with you there either. Peston's blog on the BBC News site gives, I feel a reasonably balanced commentary about the situation: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/ The most telling point is that both sides have been titting around for months, apparently wih each side being clueless about what the other wants to achieve. This was patently obvious weeks ago and so it becomes a face saving exercise in the end. The main problem is that there is not enough money in what it does to support its staff and was why I made the point that the entry level should be £1. If something is worth sending at all, it's worth that. Imagine why the postmen want to continue to have an early start. For most it's because they need second jobs on the cash market just like firemen. It's also one of the main reasons that I believe that it's a doomed operation at best likely to end up with more nimble competitors forever nipping at its heels. Euthanasia would be the kindest option, rather like the Final Trip to the Vet for a much loved old pet. Frankly, keeping it alive is rather like keeping said old pet alive beyond what is in its best interests and I feel that this is only happening because of sentimentality for a "service" that doesn't really exist and hasn't long before it had any competition. Of course, nothing will be done. It will be left to fester in its own way becoming more and more untenable until it becomes a museum piece. The NHS, of course, is exactly the same mix of incorrect expectation all round, incompetent management and no clear direction. That should be shut down as well, but when one has an organisation that is third in size to the Chinese army and the Indian railway in terms of people that it pays, then that will take a little longer. Either way, I don't expect to see Royal Mail around in any form recognisable to us today within 10 years and the health service in a generation. Sooner or later people realise that while having soft spots may be a good thing, in the end reality has to set in. |
#32
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:13:07 +0100, Frank Erskine
wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:23:18 +0100, Andy Dingley wrote: However Consignia's management are, by definition (implicit in the re-naming), clueless ****wits incapable of carrying on the trade of whelk-based refreshment. Consignia as a trading name hasn't existed for about five years! Possibly, But the fact is they did make the change, which was presumably meaningful and significant for them. And now they are *still* in the clag. DG |
#33
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:57:31 +0100, Andy Hall
wrote: On 2007-10-12 21:51:21 +0100, (dmc) said: In article , Andy Hall wrote: - increase the price of the basic service. There is little extra cost in securing a signature at the door in comparison with the logistics cost, so the real cost is closer to £1 than 34p. Would you be willing to pay £1 per item? Are you seriously considering that every item of post should be tracked and signed for?? That was just to get your attention. The real point is that the minimum price needs to be nearer to a pound than 34p. Let's be fair to them, it's not the RM, their regulator won't let them price themselves competitively in the market. So prices tend to go up about 1p at a time. We have a Pitney Bowes postage meter. Every price change invoves us buying a new EPROM with the prices in a look-up table for 50 quid or so. We were Right Royally pigged off when the price was put up by 1p or so, then within just a few weeks another pricing scheme ( size / thickness of envelopes) of was announced. There is no one at home here just about every weekday yet most days we have post of some sort. Do you suggest I have to go into town, pay parking and collect this? Royal Mail does if there is VAT to pay. DG |
#34
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-15 21:59:25 +0100, Derek Geldard said:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:13:07 +0100, Frank Erskine wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:23:18 +0100, Andy Dingley wrote: However Consignia's management are, by definition (implicit in the re-naming), clueless ****wits incapable of carrying on the trade of whelk-based refreshment. Consignia as a trading name hasn't existed for about five years! Possibly, But the fact is they did make the change, which was presumably meaningful and significant for them. And now they are *still* in the clag. DG It's a doomed operation, and the only question now left is how long will that take..... I had to smirk when I read the following on the BBC News web site about the union membership ballot. "Postal workers would vote on the deal's conditions by post" |
#35
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
"Derek Geldard" wrote in message ... We have a Pitney Bowes postage meter. Every price change invoves us buying a new EPROM with the prices in a look-up table for 50 quid or so. We were Right Royally pigged off when the price was put up by 1p or so, then within just a few weeks another pricing scheme ( size / thickness of envelopes) of was announced. You could chuck it and use a label printer to print your own postage and addresses. Then you won't need to buy another EPROM. |
#36
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:48:27 +0100, Andy Hall
wrote: I agree with your first point, but not the second. I've got quite a soft spot for the Royal Mail and I dearly wish for them to succeed and to provide me with a competent service. I would too, if I didn't believe that it's already too late for them. The opportunities have been there and not taken on countless occasions. However Consignia's management are, by definition (implicit in the re-naming), clueless ****wits incapable of carrying on the trade of whelk-based refreshment. I don't disagree with you there either. My sister runs a little jewellers shop, it's not Tiffany's or Mappin & Webb, but she does repairs. She also has a degree in law. What gets up her trumpet is the fact that it costs about £0.40 to send a repaired bracelet back to a customer, but if you want the RM to guarantee they/their employees won't pinch it, it costs about a fiver, which is within the same order of magnitude as the cost of a simple repair. Any other organisation in the country (or so she says) would have to accept responsibility for goods entrusted to their care, but not the RM. I'm not so sure she's right haulage contractors in general tend to have terms which limit their liability to according to the weight of your consignement in proportion to the weight and value of a trainload of ****. :-(( The NHS, of course, is exactly the same mix of incorrect expectation all round, incompetent management and no clear direction. That should be shut down as well, but when one has an organisation that is third in size to the Chinese army and the Indian railway in terms of people that it pays, then that will take a little longer. Either way, I don't expect to see Royal Mail around in any form recognisable to us today within 10 years and the health service in a generation. Sooner or later people realise that while having soft spots may be a good thing, in the end reality has to set in. DG |
#37
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-15 22:10:32 +0100, Derek Geldard said:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:57:31 +0100, Andy Hall wrote: On 2007-10-12 21:51:21 +0100, (dmc) said: In article , Andy Hall wrote: - increase the price of the basic service. There is little extra cost in securing a signature at the door in comparison with the logistics cost, so the real cost is closer to £1 than 34p. Would you be willing to pay £1 per item? Are you seriously considering that every item of post should be tracked and signed for?? That was just to get your attention. The real point is that the minimum price needs to be nearer to a pound than 34p. Let's be fair to them, it's not the RM, their regulator won't let them price themselves competitively in the market. So prices tend to go up about 1p at a time. OK, so the regulator needs to be educated about market reality. |
#38
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:16:54 +0100, "dennis@home"
wrote: "Derek Geldard" wrote in message .. . We have a Pitney Bowes postage meter. Every price change invoves us buying a new EPROM with the prices in a look-up table for 50 quid or so. We were Right Royally pigged off when the price was put up by 1p or so, then within just a few weeks another pricing scheme ( size / thickness of envelopes) of was announced. You could chuck it and use a label printer to print your own postage and addresses. Then you won't need to buy another EPROM. It was on a 5 year contract. Which had to include "Maintenance", (RM rules) a hangover from the days of mechanical postage meters, not that the "Maintenance" guy ever did anything even then. Now it's all electronic the user does all the maintenance such as changing the ink cartridge which IIRC were horribly expensive. But we still pay a quarterly bill for "Maintenance". The contract runs out at the end of the month when we will revert to postage stamps which we will buy at COSTCO at a discount. :-)) BTW if you are referring to the RM "print your own stamps" scheme : That is also a Pitney Bowes scheme. *NO THANK YOU* ;-) DG |
#39
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:16:38 +0100, Andy Hall
wrote: On 2007-10-15 21:59:25 +0100, Derek Geldard said: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:13:07 +0100, Frank Erskine wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:23:18 +0100, Andy Dingley wrote: However Consignia's management are, by definition (implicit in the re-naming), clueless ****wits incapable of carrying on the trade of whelk-based refreshment. Consignia as a trading name hasn't existed for about five years! Possibly, But the fact is they did make the change, which was presumably meaningful and significant for them. And now they are *still* in the clag. DG It's a doomed operation, and the only question now left is how long will that take..... What puzzles me is that RM realise that they are facing increasing competition, yet they _reduce_ their service. I walked past a post box the other day; there was a sticker attached saying that after 28 Oct there will be no more collections on Sundays or Bank Holidays. Surely if they want to outdo competition they should be having several collections every day. I have a facsimile of a Year Book for 1902 which indicates at least four house deliveries every day. And I remember that even in the 1960s you could post a letter at up to 9.00pm here in Sunderland and it would be delivered in, say, London, the next morning. -- Frank Erskine |
#40
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Electronnic Spirit Level (Lidl)
On 2007-10-15 22:27:23 +0100, Derek Geldard said:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:48:27 +0100, Andy Hall wrote: I agree with your first point, but not the second. I've got quite a soft spot for the Royal Mail and I dearly wish for them to succeed and to provide me with a competent service. I would too, if I didn't believe that it's already too late for them. The opportunities have been there and not taken on countless occasions. However Consignia's management are, by definition (implicit in the re-naming), clueless ****wits incapable of carrying on the trade of whelk-based refreshment. I don't disagree with you there either. My sister runs a little jewellers shop, it's not Tiffany's or Mappin & Webb, but she does repairs. She also has a degree in law. What gets up her trumpet is the fact that it costs about £0.40 to send a repaired bracelet back to a customer, but if you want the RM to guarantee they/their employees won't pinch it, it costs about a fiver, which is within the same order of magnitude as the cost of a simple repair. Any other organisation in the country (or so she says) would have to accept responsibility for goods entrusted to their care, but not the RM. I'm not so sure she's right haulage contractors in general tend to have terms which limit their liability to according to the weight of your consignement in proportion to the weight and value of a trainload of ****. :-(( So here the situation is really that the repair costs £10 including shipping and insurance. There are plenty of products where the transport forms the lion's share of the price at the end, so 50/50 is fairly good. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
lidl electronic spirit levels | UK diy | |||
Replacement Spirit Level Vial | UK diy | |||
Spirit level question | Woodworking | |||
Self levelling laser spirit level advice sought | UK diy | |||
"Lidl Ruler/Spirit level for marking up" | UK diy |