Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lack of shower power
The shower in my new home is a bit weak. Descaling the shower head helped,
but only a little. I suspect there is just not enough of a head of water - the bathroom is only 7 ft 6 high and the cold water tank is on the loft floor. What would be the best/cheapest remedy? Do I fit a power shower, or do I raise the cold water tank? As far as a power shower is concerned, I would only want it to make the shower flow acceptable - so I would be happy to buy the least powerful unit and set it to its minimum setting just to do the job - from a conservation point of view I wouldn't want to start using a lot more water for showers. Raising the tank sounds more complicated but I guess may not be, and may be a cheaper option - how much of a head would be needed to get a decent shower flow? I'm also concerned about how I would adequately insulate a tank situated a number of feet above the loft floor, and also about how substantial a stand would be needed, recognising that water is b****y heavy. Keith |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lack of shower power
On 18 Jun, 10:26, "Keith Dunbar" wrote:
The shower in my new home is a bit weak. Descaling the shower head helped, but only a little. I suspect there is just not enough of a head of water - the bathroom is only 7 ft 6 high and the cold water tank is on the loft floor. What would be the best/cheapest remedy? Do I fit a power shower, or do I raise the cold water tank? As far as a power shower is concerned, I would only want it to make the shower flow acceptable - so I would be happy to buy the least powerful unit and set it to its minimum setting just to do the job - from a conservation point of view I wouldn't want to start using a lot more water for showers. Raising the tank sounds more complicated but I guess may not be, and may be a cheaper option - how much of a head would be needed to get a decent shower flow? I'm also concerned about how I would adequately insulate a tank situated a number of feet above the loft floor, and also about how substantial a stand would be needed, recognising that water is b****y heavy. Keith Is it for an electric shower? Would it be possible to take a feed from the rising main to supply the shower with mains pressure cold water? Mark. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lack of shower power
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:26:10 GMT someone who may be "Keith Dunbar"
wrote this:- The shower in my new home is a bit weak. Descaling the shower head helped, but only a little. I suspect there is just not enough of a head of water - the bathroom is only 7 ft 6 high and the cold water tank is on the loft floor. I assume you have a gravity shower with the cold taken directly from the storage tank. What size are the pipes feeding the shower and how torturous route do they take? What would be the best/cheapest remedy? Often mutually exclusive. Also you need to define what you will consider best, as this varies from person to person. You might also like to consider a venturi shower. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54 |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lack of shower power
Keith Dunbar wrote:
The shower in my new home is a bit weak. Descaling the shower head helped, but only a little. I suspect there is just not enough of a head of water - the bathroom is only 7 ft 6 high and the cold water tank is on the loft floor. What would be the best/cheapest remedy? Do I fit a power shower, or do I raise the cold water tank? Depends on how much better you want it to be. I would guess the former (or a venturi shower) unless you are looking for only a very small improvement. As far as a power shower is concerned, I would only want it to make the shower flow acceptable - so I would be happy to buy the least powerful unit and set it to its minimum setting just to do the job - from a conservation point of view I wouldn't want to start using a lot more water for showers. Raising the tank sounds more complicated but I guess may not be, and may be a cheaper option - how much of a head would be needed to get a decent shower flow? I'm also concerned about how I would adequately insulate a tank situated a number of feet above the loft floor, and also about how substantial a stand would be needed, recognising that water is b****y heavy. Every 30' of head gives you 1 bar of pressure. Many people find that a shower will feel rather weak with anything less than 1 bar. Have a look here for some options: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=Showers -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lack of shower power
In article ,
Keith Dunbar wrote: The shower in my new home is a bit weak. Descaling the shower head helped, but only a little. I suspect there is just not enough of a head of water - the bathroom is only 7 ft 6 high and the cold water tank is on the loft floor. What would be the best/cheapest remedy? Do I fit a power shower, or do I raise the cold water tank? As far as a power shower is concerned, I would only want it to make the shower flow acceptable - so I would be happy to buy the least powerful unit and set it to its minimum setting just to do the job - from a conservation point of view I wouldn't want to start using a lot more water for showers. Raising the tank sounds more complicated but I guess may not be, and may be a cheaper option - how much of a head would be needed to get a decent shower flow? I'm also concerned about how I would adequately insulate a tank situated a number of feet above the loft floor, and also about how substantial a stand would be needed, recognising that water is b****y heavy. You can get a surprisingly effective high flow shower with a small head if you are careful with pipework sizing, design and the choice of shower. You need to reduce the flow resistance to a minimum. Unfortunately many bath type shower mixers are poor in this way - but things like Aqualisa temperature controlled 22m fed ones can work very well. However, I realise due to the position of the storage tank this may simply be impracticable. So you have the choice of raising the header tank or fitting a pump. If you use the same size timber as the existing joists, you won't go far wrong. Screw the vertical timbers on one side to a wall if possible. Triangulate the sides of the frame too. -- *What happens if you get scared half to death twice? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lack of shower power
On 18 Jun, 15:53, "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:
In article , Keith Dunbar wrote: The shower in my new home is a bit weak. Descaling the shower head helped, but only a little. I suspect there is just not enough of a head of water - the bathroom is only 7 ft 6 high and the cold water tank is on the loft floor. What would be the best/cheapest remedy? Do I fit a power shower, or do I raise the cold water tank? As far as a power shower is concerned, I would only want it to make the shower flow acceptable - so I would be happy to buy the least powerful unit and set it to its minimum setting just to do the job - from a conservation point of view I wouldn't want to start using a lot more water for showers. Raising the tank sounds more complicated but I guess may not be, and may be a cheaper option - how much of a head would be needed to get a decent shower flow? I'm also concerned about how I would adequately insulate a tank situated a number of feet above the loft floor, and also about how substantial a stand would be needed, recognising that water is b****y heavy. You can get a surprisingly effective high flow shower with a small head if you are careful with pipework sizing, design and the choice of shower. You need to reduce the flow resistance to a minimum. Unfortunately many bath type shower mixers are poor in this way - but things like Aqualisa temperature controlled 22m fed ones can work very well. However, I realise due to the position of the storage tank this may simply be impracticable. So you have the choice of raising the header tank or fitting a pump. If you use the same size timber as the existing joists, you won't go far wrong. Screw the vertical timbers on one side to a wall if possible. Triangulate the sides of the frame too. I know this is uk.d-i-y, but what Dave proposes sounds like hard work. Have a look at the Aqualisa Quartz pumped showers. They are not cheap at around £600, but are very easy to fit especially in a situation such as this (retrofit rather than new build). There is a small box to which the 22mm connections are made, and then a single pipe goes down to the control position. Difficult to explain in a few words, but have a look at their web site. In it's standard rather than boost mode, I think it gives a good compromise between effectiveness and eco-friendlyness. I say the single pipe goes down, as the gubbins can be located in the loft (depending of size/head of tank etc, you'd need to check) they can also be located under the bath or in an adjacent airing cupboard, etc, etc. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Power Shower | UK diy | |||
power shower | UK diy | |||
Lack of flow from shower | UK diy | |||
Power Shower | UK diy | |||
Power Shower | UK diy |