Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in
: McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#2
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil Kyle wrote:
Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. -- ah |
#3
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil Kyle wrote:
Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** |
#4
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#5
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
widget verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** **** -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#6
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil Kyle" wrote in message .. . ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. ****ing tit. The light WAS working. Read the post again, prick. -- Beav VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19 |
#7
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Beav wrote:
"Phil Kyle" wrote in message .. . ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. ****ing tit. The light WAS working. Read the post again, prick. You'll not be warned. -- ah |
#8
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
widget wrote:
Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** Abuse reproted. -- ah |
#9
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle
wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! |
#10
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ah" wrote in message ... widget wrote: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** Abuse reproted. Macig. -- Beav VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19 |
#11
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Beav wrote:
"ah" wrote in message ... widget wrote: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** Abuse reproted. Macig. Pardon? -- ah |
#12
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ah" wrote in message ... Beav wrote: "ah" wrote in message ... widget wrote: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** Abuse reproted. Macig. Pardon? Never mind. -- Beav VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19 |
#13
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Beav wrote:
"ah" wrote in message ... Beav wrote: "ah" wrote in message ... widget wrote: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** Abuse reproted. Macig. Pardon? Never mind. o.k. -- ah |
#14
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Beav" verbally sodomised in
: "Phil Kyle" wrote in message .. . ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. ****ing tit. The light WAS working. Read the post again, prick. As long as you're not taking it all too seriously then. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#15
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoff verbally sodomised in
: On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#16
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
widget verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** ****ler I presume. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#17
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil Kyle wrote:
"Beav" verbally sodomised in : "Phil Kyle" wrote in message .. . ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. ****ing tit. The light WAS working. Read the post again, prick. As long as you're not taking it all too seriously then. "Un-Plug" is too mild a prescription. -- ah |
#18
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: "Beav" verbally sodomised in : "Phil Kyle" wrote in message .. . ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. ****ing tit. The light WAS working. Read the post again, prick. As long as you're not taking it all too seriously then. "Un-Plug" is too mild a prescription. Very true. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#19
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil Kyle wrote:
Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. -- ah |
#20
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#21
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phill Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. -- ah |
#22
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#23
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? |
#24
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#25
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. Silicate monolattice? |
#26
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. Silicate monolattice? Erm, too latticey. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#27
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phi1 Ky1e wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. Silicate monolattice? Erm, too latticey. Organo-phosphate? |
#28
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phi1 Ky1e wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. Silicate monolattice? Erm, too latticey. Organo-phosphate? Too melodic. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
#29
![]()
Posted to demon.local,uk.rec.driving,uk.rec.caravanning,uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.motorcycles
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phi1 Ky1e wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in : Phi1 Ky1e wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. Silicate monolattice? Erm, too latticey. Organo-phosphate? Too melodic. Hydroxyl salt? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
weird lights issue | Home Repair | |||
travel warning ( indonesia ) | Home Repair | |||
Is it possible to hardwire under the cabinet lights to a switch | Home Repair | |||
Recessed lights in garage workshop? | Woodworking | |||
Multiple lights trip MCB | UK diy |