ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phill Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phil Kyle wrote:
Geoff verbally sodomised in
:

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle
wrote:

ah verbally sodomised in
:

Phil Kyle wrote:
Harry Bloomfield verbally
sodomised in :

McKev expressed precisely :
My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in
excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the
test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the
dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the
cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed
hands.

The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd
asked about before it took the test and was told the car
wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the
brakes didn't pass.

The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the
legal answer?
Thanks in advance.



Id have removed the light.
..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working
ABS warning light.

The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then
goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS
diagnostics give an all clear.

I'd have removed the light.

Typical.
I'd have then replaced it with a working one.
I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one!




Yes, they're much more entertaining.



To mice.

And trackerballs.

Those sound, er, teflonish.

Nup.

--
Phil Kyle™

T
h i
i s
s l
f i l
S o n o
i u e n
g r s g