|
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in
: McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Phil Kyle wrote:
Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. -- ah |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Phil Kyle wrote:
Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
widget verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** **** -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
"Phil Kyle" wrote in message .. . ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. ****ing tit. The light WAS working. Read the post again, prick. -- Beav VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19 |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Beav wrote:
"Phil Kyle" wrote in message .. . ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. ****ing tit. The light WAS working. Read the post again, prick. You'll not be warned. -- ah |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
widget wrote:
Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** Abuse reproted. -- ah |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle
wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
"ah" wrote in message ... widget wrote: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** Abuse reproted. Macig. -- Beav VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19 |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Beav wrote:
"ah" wrote in message ... widget wrote: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** Abuse reproted. Macig. Pardon? -- ah |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
"ah" wrote in message ... Beav wrote: "ah" wrote in message ... widget wrote: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** Abuse reproted. Macig. Pardon? Never mind. -- Beav VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19 |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Beav wrote:
"ah" wrote in message ... Beav wrote: "ah" wrote in message ... widget wrote: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** Abuse reproted. Macig. Pardon? Never mind. o.k. -- ah |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
"Beav" verbally sodomised in
: "Phil Kyle" wrote in message .. . ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. ****ing tit. The light WAS working. Read the post again, prick. As long as you're not taking it all too seriously then. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Geoff verbally sodomised in
: On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
widget verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. **** ****ler I presume. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Phil Kyle wrote:
"Beav" verbally sodomised in : "Phil Kyle" wrote in message .. . ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. ****ing tit. The light WAS working. Read the post again, prick. As long as you're not taking it all too seriously then. "Un-Plug" is too mild a prescription. -- ah |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: "Beav" verbally sodomised in : "Phil Kyle" wrote in message .. . ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. ****ing tit. The light WAS working. Read the post again, prick. As long as you're not taking it all too seriously then. "Un-Plug" is too mild a prescription. Very true. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Phil Kyle wrote:
Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. -- ah |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Phill Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. -- ah |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Phil Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Phil Kyle wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. Silicate monolattice? |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. Silicate monolattice? Erm, too latticey. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Phi1 Ky1e wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. Silicate monolattice? Erm, too latticey. Organo-phosphate? |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
ah verbally sodomised in
: Phi1 Ky1e wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. Silicate monolattice? Erm, too latticey. Organo-phosphate? Too melodic. -- Phil Kyle™ T h i i s s l f i l S o n o i u e n g r s g |
MOT Dashboard warning lights
Phi1 Ky1e wrote:
ah verbally sodomised in : Phi1 Ky1e wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phill Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Geoff verbally sodomised in : On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:06:23 +0000 (UTC), Phil Kyle wrote: ah verbally sodomised in : Phil Kyle wrote: Harry Bloomfield verbally sodomised in : McKev expressed precisely : My car failed it's MOT. The tester said the car was in excellent condition and that whilst the brakes passed the test, and the ABS was fully working, the ABS light on the dashboard remained lit. I then of course paid him to track the cause of the light, which was fixed after a big wadge changed hands. The car passed last year with the same problem - which I'd asked about before it took the test and was told the car wouldn't fail because of the light, it would only fail if the brakes didn't pass. The views on this seem contradictory - does anyone know the legal answer? Thanks in advance. Id have removed the light. ..and it would have (or should have) failed on a none working ABS warning light. The tester is supposed to confirm that the light comes on, then goes off after a few seconds - thus confirming that the ABS diagnostics give an all clear. I'd have removed the light. Typical. I'd have then replaced it with a working one. I'd have removed the dashboard and replaced it with a Tomy one! Yes, they're much more entertaining. To mice. And trackerballs. Those sound, er, teflonish. Nup. Polystyrene? Too many. Silicate monolattice? Erm, too latticey. Organo-phosphate? Too melodic. Hydroxyl salt? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter