In message , Bob Eager
writes
On Sun, 7 May 2006 14:53:39 UTC, raden wrote:

In message , Chris Bacon
writes
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Quite right. The old A series high comp engines in midgets and the
like worked better on 5 star, especially once you got them to breathe
a bit better and sorted out the timing a bit.
They WERE designed to work on 5 star. Especially once I had
finsished with em.

OK, you say you've done some performance tuning on "A" series engines.
What did this comprise of.

Things can't "comprise of", can they ?

Well, it's Bacon; what did you expect? People are quoting him far too
often, though...!


But note the restraint in my answer ...


--
geoff

On Sun, 7 May 2006 15:58:14 UTC, raden wrote:

In message , Bob Eager
writes
On Sun, 7 May 2006 14:53:39 UTC, raden wrote:

In message , Chris Bacon
writes
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Quite right. The old A series high comp engines in midgets and the
like worked better on 5 star, especially once you got them to breathe
a bit better and sorted out the timing a bit.
They WERE designed to work on 5 star. Especially once I had
finsished with em.

OK, you say you've done some performance tuning on "A" series engines.
What did this comprise of.

Things can't "comprise of", can they ?

Well, it's Bacon; what did you expect? People are quoting him far too
often, though...!


But note the restraint in my answer ...

Very commendable under such provocation!

--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
Avenue Supplies, http://avenuesupplies.co.uk

raden wrote:
Bob Eager writes
raden wrote:
Chris Bacon writes
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
[engine tuning]
OK, you say you've done some performance tuning on "A" series engines.
What did this comprise of.

Things can't "comprise of", can they ?

Well, it's Bacon; what did you expect? People are quoting him far too
often, though...!

But note the restraint in my answer ...

Can't see how I've upset *you*. Stupid boring non-contributing
*******s perhaps....

In message , Chris Bacon
writes
raden wrote:
Bob Eager writes
raden wrote:
Chris Bacon writes
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
[engine tuning]
OK, you say you've done some performance tuning on "A" series engines.
What did this comprise of.

Things can't "comprise of", can they ?

Well, it's Bacon; what did you expect? People are quoting him far too
often, though...!

But note the restraint in my answer ...

Can't see how I've upset *you*. Stupid boring non-contributing
*******s perhaps....


Me - a non-contributor?

To this thread, maybe

and quiet of late because I've been busy saving the world,

but hardly a non contributor

... but then, you're a bit of a newbie and as such, blessed with the
ignorance which goes with it

--
geoff

raden wrote:
Chris Bacon
Can't see how I've upset *you*. Stupid boring non-contributing
*******s perhaps....

Me - a non-contributor?

To this thread, maybe

and quiet of late because I've been busy saving the world,

but hardly a non contributor

Of course not you, you great gonk! Thre's a plural up there ^. I will,
for your delictation, re-phrase: "Can't see how I've upset *you*, but
I may have perhaps upset some stupid boring non-contributing *******s".


... but then, you're a bit of a newbie and as such, blessed with the
ignorance which goes with it

Thank you for your consideration.

In message , Chris Bacon
writes
raden wrote:
Chris Bacon
Can't see how I've upset *you*. Stupid boring non-contributing
*******s perhaps....
Me - a non-contributor?
To this thread, maybe
and quiet of late because I've been busy saving the world,
but hardly a non contributor

Of course not you, you great gonk! Thre's a plural up there ^. I will,
for your delictation, re-phrase: "Can't see how I've upset *you*, but
I may have perhaps upset some stupid boring non-contributing *******s".


... but then, you're a bit of a newbie and as such, blessed with the
ignorance which goes with it

Thank you for your consideration.

Send contributions to ...


--
geoff