Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear all
The new Housing Act (shortly to take effect in a few days) meant that I had to have two of my properties which are let as student houses (HMO's) have their fixed wiring tested (so that I can now pay the council a further £ 600 per property to register as a landlord!!......something I have been doing since 1998 (with very satisfied tenants who never leave).............it's all bureaucratic nonsence really!!!) I had NICEIC electricians inspect the wiring and issue PIR certificates My perfectly safe and very new wiring (which I did myself 3 years ago) failed on one small point (in both houses). It failed as you ......."need a protective device for each ring main circuit". What I did is to put 2 small ring mains (two adjacent ground floor rooms) into one 32amp MCB. This meant there was 4 tails in one 32 Amp MCB. Each ring main is small and has 4 sockets and covers a very small area. (It was done as rooms were renovated one after another and was easier to wire like that. I combined some rooms on the ground floor as the house has about 15 rooms (so I didn't want 15 ring mains with 15MCB's!!!!!!!!). The NICEIC electricians informed me that if (they) put a joint box behind the consumer unit (there is an access hatch) and make one larger ring main (with 8 sockets) it will then comply!! What nonsence I say!! These wiring regulations would mean an increased the length of the total ring main, increase the impedance and would make it (slightly) less safe (not more!!). I really can't see that it makes any difference! If you use the MCB as a "joint" it is not allowed but "out of sight joint box " behind the consumer unit which doubles the length of the ring main makes it comply!! Secondly they noted this as a "dangerous fail". I can't see how it could be any worse than "not up to current wiring regulations". I can possibly see that it is unsafe in any way as the MCB is 32 Amps which is fine for each individual ring Interestingly enough, this seems to be allowed with the lighting circuits!!! It seems that one can shove in as many 1mm tails in those 6 Amp breakers as you like!! Any comments from anybody?? I'm jolly interested to see what the group think!! ......and I especially want to hear from NICEIC electricians!! Best regards - Lightman (now a qualified PAT tester with 96.666% in that stupid City & Guilds test which is also a bureacratic waste of time but saves on PAT testing fees!!!!) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
wiring behind skirting boards | UK diy | |||
IEE 2004 (16th Edition) Wiring Regulations on CD ROM | UK diy | |||
Kitchen Electrical Wiring Regulations Advice Please | UK diy | |||
Proposed Wiring Regulations chages to cable colour codes | UK diy | |||
Proposed Part P Building Regulations (Electrical Wiring) | UK diy |