Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't TRVs close completely watertight???
In my previous house I thought it was because my TRVs were cheap and
nasty that they didn't close completely. This made it impossible to remove a radiator for an extended period of time, as the TRV was dripping at the rate of a maybe drop per second at ~1 psi pressure even when closed as tightly as possible. In my current house I have brand new, well-known UK name, good quality, expensive, reversible flow TRVs. I decided to move the misplaced radiator in the dining area, and thought I could disconnect it and hang it in its new place before starting on rerouting the underfloor pipework. Fat chance. Not even violence will stop the TRV from dripping when the radiator is disconnected. Are there some stupid technical reasons for why TRVs should not be able to close completely??? |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't TRVs close completely watertight???
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 23:00:01 +0000 (UTC), cs
wrote: In my previous house I thought it was because my TRVs were cheap and nasty that they didn't close completely. This made it impossible to remove a radiator for an extended period of time, as the TRV was dripping at the rate of a maybe drop per second at ~1 psi pressure even when closed as tightly as possible. In my current house I have brand new, well-known UK name, good quality, expensive, reversible flow TRVs. I decided to move the misplaced radiator in the dining area, and thought I could disconnect it and hang it in its new place before starting on rerouting the underfloor pipework. Fat chance. Not even violence will stop the TRV from dripping when the radiator is disconnected. Are there some stupid technical reasons for why TRVs should not be able to close completely??? The Honeywell ones I fitted a couple of years back came with "decorators caps" that fit in place of the thermostat head and screw the valve pin right down. I've never tried them out though... Cheers, Colin, |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't TRVs close completely watertight???
In article ,
cs writes: In my previous house I thought it was because my TRVs were cheap and nasty that they didn't close completely. This made it impossible to remove a radiator for an extended period of time, as the TRV was dripping at the rate of a maybe drop per second at ~1 psi pressure even when closed as tightly as possible. In my current house I have brand new, well-known UK name, good quality, expensive, reversible flow TRVs. I decided to move the misplaced radiator in the dining area, and thought I could disconnect it and hang it in its new place before starting on rerouting the underfloor pipework. Fat chance. Not even violence will stop the TRV from dripping when the radiator is disconnected. Are there some stupid technical reasons for why TRVs should not be able to close completely??? Most thermostatic heads don't have an 'off' position. If you want to switch them off, you remove the head and fit the decorator's cap which was supplied with the valve. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't TRVs close completely watertight???
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Most thermostatic heads don't have an 'off' position. If you want to switch them off, you remove the head and fit the decorator's cap which was supplied with the valve. And if you have lost that, remove the head, insert 5p coin, replace the head and screw on tight. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't TRVs close completely watertight???
What a great tip, wish I'd known that before now!
|
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't TRVs close completely watertight???
John Rumm wrote:
Andrew Gabriel wrote: Most thermostatic heads don't have an 'off' position. If you want to switch them off, you remove the head and fit the decorator's cap which was supplied with the valve. And if you have lost that, remove the head, insert 5p coin, replace the head and screw on tight. A bit of an expensive solution ;-) but 5p and a piece of sticky tape seems to have done the trick - thanks!!! |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't TRVs close completely watertight???
cs wrote: John Rumm wrote: Andrew Gabriel wrote: Most thermostatic heads don't have an 'off' position. If you want to switch them off, you remove the head and fit the decorator's cap which was supplied with the valve. And if you have lost that, remove the head, insert 5p coin, replace the head and screw on tight. A bit of an expensive solution ;-) but 5p and a piece of sticky tape seems to have done the trick - thanks!!! Something's been bothering me about cs's reply. Please tell me you've done what was suggested and screwed the head back on with the 5p trapped between it and the pin. That mention of sticky tape gives me an image of a 5p held onto the pin with tape. Not good. But if that's what you've done you'll have found that out by now... |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't TRVs close completely watertight???
On 6 Feb 2006 01:56:24 -0800, "Calvin" wrote:
cs wrote: John Rumm wrote: Andrew Gabriel wrote: Most thermostatic heads don't have an 'off' position. If you want to switch them off, you remove the head and fit the decorator's cap which was supplied with the valve. And if you have lost that, remove the head, insert 5p coin, replace the head and screw on tight. A bit of an expensive solution ;-) but 5p and a piece of sticky tape seems to have done the trick - thanks!!! Something's been bothering me about cs's reply. Please tell me you've done what was suggested and screwed the head back on with the 5p trapped between it and the pin. That mention of sticky tape gives me an image of a 5p held onto the pin with tape. Not good. But if that's what you've done you'll have found that out by now... Probbaly just used the tape to hold the coin in place while the head was screwed back on . Stuart |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't TRVs close completely watertight???
A bit of an expensive solution ;-) but 5p and a piece of sticky tape seems to have done the trick - thanks!!! Something's been bothering me about cs's reply. Please tell me you've done what was suggested and screwed the head back on with the 5p trapped between it and the pin. That mention of sticky tape gives me an image of a 5p held onto the pin with tape. Not good. But if that's what you've done you'll have found that out by now... Nah, just to keep the 5p in place, took me a few attempts to figure out how to defeat gravity, if I'd been chewing a gum at the time I might have tried that instead... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sears Craftman garage door opener won't close anymore | Electronics Repair | |||
Craftsman Garage opener Won't close | Home Repair | |||
Fitting a Close Coupled Toilet - long | UK diy | |||
Aligning table saw -- how close is close enough? | Woodworking | |||
How close can electrical sockets be to sinks ? | UK diy |