Which one is better?

wrote:
Which one is better?

FRICS is the top one. This is someone that has been a "member" and has
then been "elevated" to being a "fellow" - normally this is in
recognition of continued excellent work in the field.

On 5 Dec 2005 03:31:31 -0800, "Matt Beard" wrote:


wrote:
Which one is better?

FRICS is the top one. This is someone that has been a "member" and has
then been "elevated" to being a "fellow" - normally this is in
recognition of continued excellent work in the field.

Like a scarecrow?

That's about all they are fit for :-)



--

In message .com, Matt
Beard writes

wrote:
Which one is better?

FRICS is the top one. This is someone that has been a "member" and has
then been "elevated" to being a "fellow" - normally this is in
recognition of continued excellent work in the field.

Or just having paid your subs for enough years

--
geoff

wrote:
Which one is better?

The fact is that you get some really crap surveyors who are fellows and
members, but it is generally accepted that these should in theory be
more competant than a tech.

Incidentally, techRICS is just a way for trainees to pay for status
letters after their name, and the RICS gets a bit more income. But its
a worthless title.

dg