Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all
Thanks to all respondents to original thread. Have shifted emphasis here so new thread in order. My concern is pump over! As roughly outlined in my previous thread, the solenoid valve for heating is half way between ground and first floor, with upstairs feed to all rads in 15mm pipe from this point. The feed to the cylinder and vent is 22mm with the solenoid close to the cylinder on the first floor. On advice from previous thread, I tried to "force" flow to 2 upstairs rads by turning all downstairs rads off (this is a likely scenario if all trvs close doownstairs). I didn't get as far as checking these 2 rads because water started to pump over into the header tank immediately, even with the upstairs bathroom rad fully open (both lockshield and control valves). My dilemma is that it appears pump over is inevitable with this piping. With downstairs rads off, the pump runs and is faced with 2 routes, either 22mm up passed cylinder and over to header tank, or 15mm with fittings and rad valve resistance. Surely, as installed, this arrangement will always pump over rather than feeding the upstairs rads? I have two theories: 1. The systems were never designed to have trvs, therefore some down stairs flow would always avoid the pump over. 2. There is a problem with the heating solenoid valve (although it seems to work OK) and it is presenting some restriction. So add the further restriction of only 15mm pipe available and pump over occurs. Anyone shed any further light on this please? TIA Phil |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone shed any further light on this please?
Yes, switch to sealed pressurised operation, if your boiler allows it. Much quicker and simpler than diagnosing a pump over problem. Christian. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
TheScullster wrote: My dilemma is that it appears pump over is inevitable with this piping. With downstairs rads off, the pump runs and is faced with 2 routes, either 22mm up passed cylinder and over to header tank, or 15mm with fittings and rad valve resistance. Surely, as installed, this arrangement will always pump over rather than feeding the upstairs rads? Is it possible to extend the expansion pipe so it goes higher? Possible to site the entire header tank higher in the roof void? -- *Procrastinate now Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TheScullster wrote:
My dilemma is that it appears pump over is inevitable with this piping. With downstairs rads off, the pump runs and is faced with 2 routes, either 22mm up passed cylinder and over to header tank, or 15mm with fittings and rad valve resistance. Surely, as installed, this arrangement will always pump over rather than feeding the upstairs rads? What speed was the pump running at? What is the height difference between the rads and the apex of the vent pipe? That (converted into an equivilent pressure) will tell you the maximum flow resistance that can be accomodated in the upstairs rads without pumping over. Are you sure you don't have a restriction or blockage of some sort in the upstairs rad loop? I have two theories: 1. The systems were never designed to have trvs, therefore some down stairs flow would always avoid the pump over. Do you have a bypass radiator or a bypass valve? If it is all TRVs and there is no bypass, then there is always the possibility of pump over unless you also include a flow switch as an interlock. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Rumm" wrote: What speed was the pump running at? Meant to include that - it's at speed 2 of 3. What is the height difference between the rads and the apex of the vent pipe? That (converted into an equivilent pressure) will tell you the maximum flow resistance that can be accomodated in the upstairs rads without pumping over. Approx 3.5m above top of rads (not towel rail) Are you sure you don't have a restriction or blockage of some sort in the upstairs rad loop? Only the pipe size of 15mm mains rather than 22mm I think. Original radiators heat up in just-about-acceptable time. Do you have a bypass radiator or a bypass valve? As stated, the bathroom rad valves were both fully open on the first floor. Thanks for the help John Phil |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TheScullster wrote:
Approx 3.5m above top of rads (not towel rail) So that is about 1/3rd of a bar then... Are you sure you don't have a restriction or blockage of some sort in the upstairs rad loop? Only the pipe size of 15mm mains rather than 22mm I think. Original radiators heat up in just-about-acceptable time. What happens if you close off the downstairs rads and set the pump to speed 1? Do the upstairs rads heat then or do you still get pump over? It seems that with the downstairs rads closed, and a differential pressure such as you have, you ought to be able to get decent circulation through the upstairs rads. If even in that circumstance you don't get decent flow through them that suggests some form of blockage to me, rather than just a flow restriction. Do you have a bypass radiator or a bypass valve? As stated, the bathroom rad valves were both fully open on the first floor. I was asking for a different reason ;-) More a case of without a bypass of some form and TRVs everywhere there would come a point (when the house is up to temperature) that the only place the pump can send water is up the vent! -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was asking for a different reason ;-) More a case of without a bypass
of some form and TRVs everywhere there would come a point (when the house is up to temperature) that the only place the pump can send water is up the vent! Yes, Grundfos Alpha and sealed circuit. You know it makes sense. Christian. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Rumm" wrote: So that is about 1/3rd of a bar then... Yes What happens if you close off the downstairs rads and set the pump to speed 1? Do the upstairs rads heat then or do you still get pump over? Didn't try that. What would this show if it worked? The system is pretty slow to heat up as is without lowering the pump speed. I will try this tonight and report back. It seems that with the downstairs rads closed, and a differential pressure such as you have, you ought to be able to get decent circulation through the upstairs rads. If even in that circumstance you don't get decent flow through them that suggests some form of blockage to me, rather than just a flow restriction. Still not clear why the water would want to take the tortuous route through 15mm pipe/rads rather than the clear 22mm route via the vent pipe. The heating solenoid valve did start making noises some time ago and has since gone quiet. But as this controls water flow to both upstairs and downstairs I'm not clear on whether this is likely to be the cause. Could this be causing a partial restriction which, when added to the 15mm pipe reduction, might cause the pump over? Do you have a bypass radiator or a bypass valve? Other than the bathroom, there is also a rad piped direct to the flow and return of the boiler before either solenoid valve. Opening this last night did not stop the pump over but may have reduced it. valves were both fully open on the first floor. I was asking for a different reason ;-) More a case of without a bypass of some form and TRVs everywhere there would come a point (when the house is up to temperature) that the only place the pump can send water is up the vent! Do you not think that the bathroom rad should perform this function? Thanks again for your time with this Phil |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
TheScullster wrote: Didn't try that. What would this show if it worked? The system is pretty slow to heat up as is without lowering the pump speed. The pump speed makes little difference to this. All it needs to do is to provide sufficient flow to get the correct temperature differential between flow and return. Speeding up the flow beyond this only results in more noise. -- *Upon the advice of my attorney, my shirt bears no message at this time Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TheScullster wrote:
So that is about 1/3rd of a bar then... Yes Ought to be plenty... (the vented system I used to have ran fine on 2m of head) What happens if you close off the downstairs rads and set the pump to speed 1? Do the upstairs rads heat then or do you still get pump over? Didn't try that. What would this show if it worked? The system is pretty It would show that the upstairs rad loop is not blocked. If however it still failed to heat (or did so very slowly, or still pumped over) then that would suggest something wrong in that pipe loop. Still not clear why the water would want to take the tortuous route through 15mm pipe/rads rather than the clear 22mm route via the vent pipe. Because the 22mm path requires 1/3rd of a bar more pressure to get water to pump over. Even if the flow rate is not as fast through the smaller pipe, the pressure required to achieve *some* flow through it ought to be a good deal less. The heating solenoid valve did start making noises some time ago and has since gone quiet. But as this controls water flow to both upstairs and downstairs I'm not clear on whether this is likely to be the cause. Could this be causing a partial restriction which, when added to the 15mm pipe reduction, might cause the pump over? Perhaps... Is the valve one that can be operated manually (perhaps by removing the solenoid)? If so does it move freely? I was asking for a different reason ;-) More a case of without a bypass of some form and TRVs everywhere there would come a point (when the house is up to temperature) that the only place the pump can send water is up the vent! Do you not think that the bathroom rad should perform this function? Yes it should, sorry I must have missed this detail before. A rad can be used as a bypass (should have lockshield valves at *both* ends in which case). -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "TheScullster" wrote in message ... Hi all Thanks to all respondents to original thread. Have shifted emphasis here so new thread in order. My concern is pump over! You can't get pump over in my system. The vent and filler pipe are combined. It takes a little longer to fill but thats about the only problem. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can't get pump over in my system.
The vent and filler pipe are combined. It takes a little longer to fill but thats about the only problem. The main issue with combined feed/expansion is that it requires the same safety features in the boiler as sealed pressurised operation. Personally, if the boiler did have the safety features, then I'd go sealed instead of combined gravity feed, as the benefits are great. Christian. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
TheScullster wrote: Hi all Thanks to all respondents to original thread. Have shifted emphasis here so new thread in order. My concern is pump over! As roughly outlined in my previous thread, the solenoid valve for heating is half way between ground and first floor, with upstairs feed to all rads in 15mm pipe from this point. The feed to the cylinder and vent is 22mm with the solenoid close to the cylinder on the first floor. On advice from previous thread, I tried to "force" flow to 2 upstairs rads by turning all downstairs rads off (this is a likely scenario if all trvs close doownstairs). I didn't get as far as checking these 2 rads because water started to pump over into the header tank immediately, even with the upstairs bathroom rad fully open (both lockshield and control valves). My dilemma is that it appears pump over is inevitable with this piping. With downstairs rads off, the pump runs and is faced with 2 routes, either 22mm up passed cylinder and over to header tank, or 15mm with fittings and rad valve resistance. Surely, as installed, this arrangement will always pump over rather than feeding the upstairs rads? I have two theories: 1. The systems were never designed to have trvs, therefore some down stairs flow would always avoid the pump over. 2. There is a problem with the heating solenoid valve (although it seems to work OK) and it is presenting some restriction. So add the further restriction of only 15mm pipe available and pump over occurs. Anyone shed any further light on this please? TIA Phil In order to get pump-over, you need a difference in dynamic pressure between the vent pipe and fill pipe. This can happen if they are connected on opposite sides of the pump, or even on the same side - but at two distant points on a pipe carrying a lot of flow. If at all possible, they should both be connected on the suction side of the pump, and not more than 100mm apart. Mine actually have a *single* 22mm connection into the flow pipe - which then splits into a 22mm vent pipe and 15mm fill pipe. Have a close look at how your pipes are connected, and see whether you can move one of them to prevent this problem. Take care to ensure that both pipes have a clear path to the boiler which cannot be interrupted by closing any motorised (or solenoid) valves. -- Cheers, Set Square ______ Please reply to newsgroup. Reply address is invalid. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Central Heating - Expert Assistance Required | UK diy | |||
Rayburn integrated into central heating | UK diy | |||
Central Heating control unit replacement - advice please | Home Repair | |||
Central Heating costs + other questions | UK diy | |||
No central heating - HW only threewayvalve and tank therm | UK diy |