UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
TheScullster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Central Heating - Expert Assistance Required - Revisited

Hi all

Thanks to all respondents to original thread.
Have shifted emphasis here so new thread in order.

My concern is pump over!
As roughly outlined in my previous thread, the solenoid valve for heating is
half way between ground and first floor, with upstairs feed to all rads in
15mm pipe from this point.
The feed to the cylinder and vent is 22mm with the solenoid close to the
cylinder on the first floor.
On advice from previous thread, I tried to "force" flow to 2 upstairs rads
by turning all downstairs rads off (this is a likely scenario if all trvs
close doownstairs).
I didn't get as far as checking these 2 rads because water started to pump
over into the header tank immediately, even with the upstairs bathroom rad
fully open (both lockshield and control valves).

My dilemma is that it appears pump over is inevitable with this piping.
With downstairs rads off, the pump runs and is faced with 2 routes, either
22mm up passed cylinder and over to header tank, or 15mm with fittings and
rad valve resistance.
Surely, as installed, this arrangement will always pump over rather than
feeding the upstairs rads?

I have two theories:

1. The systems were never designed to have trvs, therefore some down stairs
flow would always avoid the pump over.
2. There is a problem with the heating solenoid valve (although it seems to
work OK) and it is presenting some restriction. So add the further
restriction of only 15mm pipe available and pump over occurs.


Anyone shed any further light on this please?


TIA

Phil


  #2   Report Post  
Christian McArdle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Anyone shed any further light on this please?

Yes, switch to sealed pressurised operation, if your boiler allows it. Much
quicker and simpler than diagnosing a pump over problem.

Christian.


  #3   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
TheScullster wrote:
My dilemma is that it appears pump over is inevitable with this piping.
With downstairs rads off, the pump runs and is faced with 2 routes,
either 22mm up passed cylinder and over to header tank, or 15mm with
fittings and rad valve resistance. Surely, as installed, this
arrangement will always pump over rather than feeding the upstairs rads?


Is it possible to extend the expansion pipe so it goes higher? Possible to
site the entire header tank higher in the roof void?

--
*Procrastinate now

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #4   Report Post  
John Rumm
 
Posts: n/a
Default

TheScullster wrote:

My dilemma is that it appears pump over is inevitable with this piping.
With downstairs rads off, the pump runs and is faced with 2 routes, either
22mm up passed cylinder and over to header tank, or 15mm with fittings and
rad valve resistance.
Surely, as installed, this arrangement will always pump over rather than
feeding the upstairs rads?


What speed was the pump running at?

What is the height difference between the rads and the apex of the vent
pipe? That (converted into an equivilent pressure) will tell you the
maximum flow resistance that can be accomodated in the upstairs rads
without pumping over.

Are you sure you don't have a restriction or blockage of some sort in
the upstairs rad loop?

I have two theories:

1. The systems were never designed to have trvs, therefore some down stairs
flow would always avoid the pump over.


Do you have a bypass radiator or a bypass valve?

If it is all TRVs and there is no bypass, then there is always the
possibility of pump over unless you also include a flow switch as an
interlock.



--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/
  #5   Report Post  
dennis@home
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"TheScullster" wrote in message
...
Hi all

Thanks to all respondents to original thread.
Have shifted emphasis here so new thread in order.

My concern is pump over!


You can't get pump over in my system.
The vent and filler pipe are combined.
It takes a little longer to fill but thats about the only problem.






  #6   Report Post  
Set Square
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
TheScullster wrote:

Hi all

Thanks to all respondents to original thread.
Have shifted emphasis here so new thread in order.

My concern is pump over!
As roughly outlined in my previous thread, the solenoid valve for
heating is half way between ground and first floor, with upstairs
feed to all rads in 15mm pipe from this point.
The feed to the cylinder and vent is 22mm with the solenoid close to
the cylinder on the first floor.
On advice from previous thread, I tried to "force" flow to 2 upstairs
rads by turning all downstairs rads off (this is a likely scenario if
all trvs close doownstairs).
I didn't get as far as checking these 2 rads because water started to
pump over into the header tank immediately, even with the upstairs
bathroom rad fully open (both lockshield and control valves).

My dilemma is that it appears pump over is inevitable with this
piping. With downstairs rads off, the pump runs and is faced with 2
routes, either 22mm up passed cylinder and over to header tank, or
15mm with fittings and rad valve resistance.
Surely, as installed, this arrangement will always pump over rather
than feeding the upstairs rads?

I have two theories:

1. The systems were never designed to have trvs, therefore some down
stairs flow would always avoid the pump over.
2. There is a problem with the heating solenoid valve (although it
seems to work OK) and it is presenting some restriction. So add the
further restriction of only 15mm pipe available and pump over occurs.


Anyone shed any further light on this please?


TIA

Phil


In order to get pump-over, you need a difference in dynamic pressure between
the vent pipe and fill pipe. This can happen if they are connected on
opposite sides of the pump, or even on the same side - but at two distant
points on a pipe carrying a lot of flow. If at all possible, they should
both be connected on the suction side of the pump, and not more than 100mm
apart. Mine actually have a *single* 22mm connection into the flow pipe -
which then splits into a 22mm vent pipe and 15mm fill pipe.

Have a close look at how your pipes are connected, and see whether you can
move one of them to prevent this problem. Take care to ensure that both
pipes have a clear path to the boiler which cannot be interrupted by closing
any motorised (or solenoid) valves.
--
Cheers,
Set Square
______
Please reply to newsgroup. Reply address is invalid.


  #7   Report Post  
TheScullster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Rumm" wrote:


What speed was the pump running at?


Meant to include that - it's at speed 2 of 3.


What is the height difference between the rads and the apex of the vent
pipe? That (converted into an equivilent pressure) will tell you the
maximum flow resistance that can be accomodated in the upstairs rads
without pumping over.


Approx 3.5m above top of rads (not towel rail)


Are you sure you don't have a restriction or blockage of some sort in the
upstairs rad loop?


Only the pipe size of 15mm mains rather than 22mm I think. Original
radiators heat up in just-about-acceptable time.



Do you have a bypass radiator or a bypass valve?


As stated, the bathroom rad valves were both fully open on the first floor.


Thanks for the help John

Phil


  #8   Report Post  
Christian McArdle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You can't get pump over in my system.
The vent and filler pipe are combined.
It takes a little longer to fill but thats about the only problem.


The main issue with combined feed/expansion is that it requires the same
safety features in the boiler as sealed pressurised operation.

Personally, if the boiler did have the safety features, then I'd go sealed
instead of combined gravity feed, as the benefits are great.

Christian.


  #9   Report Post  
John Rumm
 
Posts: n/a
Default

TheScullster wrote:

Approx 3.5m above top of rads (not towel rail)


So that is about 1/3rd of a bar then...

Are you sure you don't have a restriction or blockage of some sort in the
upstairs rad loop?



Only the pipe size of 15mm mains rather than 22mm I think. Original
radiators heat up in just-about-acceptable time.


What happens if you close off the downstairs rads and set the pump to
speed 1? Do the upstairs rads heat then or do you still get pump over?

It seems that with the downstairs rads closed, and a differential
pressure such as you have, you ought to be able to get decent
circulation through the upstairs rads. If even in that circumstance you
don't get decent flow through them that suggests some form of blockage
to me, rather than just a flow restriction.

Do you have a bypass radiator or a bypass valve?



As stated, the bathroom rad valves were both fully open on the first floor.


I was asking for a different reason ;-) More a case of without a bypass
of some form and TRVs everywhere there would come a point (when the
house is up to temperature) that the only place the pump can send water
is up the vent!


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/
  #10   Report Post  
Christian McArdle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was asking for a different reason ;-) More a case of without a bypass
of some form and TRVs everywhere there would come a point (when the
house is up to temperature) that the only place the pump can send water
is up the vent!


Yes, Grundfos Alpha and sealed circuit. You know it makes sense.

Christian.




  #11   Report Post  
TheScullster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Rumm" wrote:

So that is about 1/3rd of a bar then...


Yes


What happens if you close off the downstairs rads and set the pump to
speed 1? Do the upstairs rads heat then or do you still get pump over?


Didn't try that. What would this show if it worked? The system is pretty
slow to heat up as is without lowering the pump speed.
I will try this tonight and report back.


It seems that with the downstairs rads closed, and a differential pressure
such as you have, you ought to be able to get decent circulation through
the upstairs rads. If even in that circumstance you don't get decent flow
through them that suggests some form of blockage to me, rather than just a
flow restriction.


Still not clear why the water would want to take the tortuous route through
15mm pipe/rads rather than the clear 22mm route via the vent pipe.

The heating solenoid valve did start making noises some time ago and has
since gone quiet.
But as this controls water flow to both upstairs and downstairs I'm not
clear on whether this is likely to be the cause.
Could this be causing a partial restriction which, when added to the 15mm
pipe reduction, might cause the pump over?


Do you have a bypass radiator or a bypass valve?


Other than the bathroom, there is also a rad piped direct to the flow and
return of the boiler before either solenoid valve.
Opening this last night did not stop the pump over but may have reduced it.
valves were both fully open on the first floor.



I was asking for a different reason ;-) More a case of without a bypass of
some form and TRVs everywhere there would come a point (when the house is
up to temperature) that the only place the pump can send water is up the
vent!

Do you not think that the bathroom rad should perform this function?

Thanks again for your time with this


Phil


  #12   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
TheScullster wrote:
Didn't try that. What would this show if it worked? The system is
pretty slow to heat up as is without lowering the pump speed.


The pump speed makes little difference to this. All it needs to do is to
provide sufficient flow to get the correct temperature differential
between flow and return. Speeding up the flow beyond this only results in
more noise.

--
*Upon the advice of my attorney, my shirt bears no message at this time

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #13   Report Post  
John Rumm
 
Posts: n/a
Default

TheScullster wrote:

So that is about 1/3rd of a bar then...



Yes


Ought to be plenty... (the vented system I used to have ran fine on 2m
of head)

What happens if you close off the downstairs rads and set the pump to
speed 1? Do the upstairs rads heat then or do you still get pump over?



Didn't try that. What would this show if it worked? The system is pretty


It would show that the upstairs rad loop is not blocked. If however it
still failed to heat (or did so very slowly, or still pumped over) then
that would suggest something wrong in that pipe loop.

Still not clear why the water would want to take the tortuous route through
15mm pipe/rads rather than the clear 22mm route via the vent pipe.


Because the 22mm path requires 1/3rd of a bar more pressure to get water
to pump over. Even if the flow rate is not as fast through the smaller
pipe, the pressure required to achieve *some* flow through it ought to
be a good deal less.

The heating solenoid valve did start making noises some time ago and has
since gone quiet.
But as this controls water flow to both upstairs and downstairs I'm not
clear on whether this is likely to be the cause.
Could this be causing a partial restriction which, when added to the 15mm
pipe reduction, might cause the pump over?


Perhaps... Is the valve one that can be operated manually (perhaps by
removing the solenoid)? If so does it move freely?

I was asking for a different reason ;-) More a case of without a bypass of
some form and TRVs everywhere there would come a point (when the house is
up to temperature) that the only place the pump can send water is up the
vent!


Do you not think that the bathroom rad should perform this function?


Yes it should, sorry I must have missed this detail before. A rad can be
used as a bypass (should have lockshield valves at *both* ends in which
case).


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/
  #14   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
John Rumm wrote:
Ought to be plenty... (the vented system I used to have ran fine on 2m
of head)


Yup. That's about what I have from the top of the highest rad to the top
of the water level in the header tank in a three story house.

--
*I brake for no apparent reason.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #15   Report Post  
TheScullster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Rumm" wrote:

What happens if you close off the downstairs rads and set the pump to
speed 1? Do the upstairs rads heat then or do you still get pump over?



John

Thanks for all the input!

Turned pump down to speed 1 last night and managed to close all rads except
bathroom without pump over.
As I started to close bathroom rad, pump over started - what you'd expect I
suppose.

BUT

The two radiators piped in plastic numbers 6 and 7 on the sketch below are
still not performing.

http://www.thesculls.freeuk.com/Radpipes.jpg

I cannot turn off the bathroom rad and leave these open cos pump over
occurs.
The towel rail has hot feed pipe right to valve, but no flow through it.
The valves on this I am not familiar with. They have an almost ball shaped
chrome body with white plastic control knobs and are "in-line" style.
The lockshield has been fitted on the flow side, this has a free spinning
knob! There is a chrome insert on the knob which prises out to reveal a
slotted screw recessed. This appears to operate the valve as it comes to a
stop when unscrewed, but I'm not convinced! The chrome insert on the
control valve has a threaded screw behind it, which screws into the valve
stem. Removing the chrome insert allows the valve knob to be removed
revealing the valve stem. Don't know how to remove the free spinning knob
on the lockshield end!

SO

There is less flow to the plastic piped rad and towel rail (with pump over
if only these are open), and I cannot get flow through the towel rail.
Are you familiar with these towel rails and associated valves?
Both rad and towel rail bleed OK.
Any suggestions on the way forward please?

Thanks again

Phil




  #16   Report Post  
John Rumm
 
Posts: n/a
Default

TheScullster wrote:

Turned pump down to speed 1 last night and managed to close all rads except
bathroom without pump over.
As I started to close bathroom rad, pump over started - what you'd expect I
suppose.


Yup you would...

BUT

The two radiators piped in plastic numbers 6 and 7 on the sketch below are
still not performing.

http://www.thesculls.freeuk.com/Radpipes.jpg

I cannot turn off the bathroom rad and leave these open cos pump over
occurs.


Which suggests serious flow resistance through that loop.

The towel rail has hot feed pipe right to valve, but no flow through it.


If the pipe is hot you would expect some heat to get into the rad if
only via convection... It sounds like it could be the valve not letting
through here.

The valves on this I am not familiar with. They have an almost ball shaped
chrome body with white plastic control knobs and are "in-line" style.
The lockshield has been fitted on the flow side, this has a free spinning
knob! There is a chrome insert on the knob which prises out to reveal a
slotted screw recessed. This appears to operate the valve as it comes to a
stop when unscrewed, but I'm not convinced! The chrome insert on the
control valve has a threaded screw behind it, which screws into the valve
stem. Removing the chrome insert allows the valve knob to be removed
revealing the valve stem. Don't know how to remove the free spinning knob
on the lockshield end!


Have you tried giving it a good pull?

SO

There is less flow to the plastic piped rad and towel rail (with pump over
if only these are open), and I cannot get flow through the towel rail.
Are you familiar with these towel rails and associated valves?


Not the one you descibe alas. Could they possibly be thermostatic? (and
how cold is it in your neck of the woods?)

Both rad and towel rail bleed OK.


They would do that even with a blocked feed or return though - since
water makeup could come from either side.

Perhaps if you drained the rad and turned off the feed side valve (if
you can) and then see if it bleeds. Then open the feed and turn off the
return side valve and see if it still bleeds, you may be able to confim
that water can come through both valves.

Any suggestions on the way forward please?


none that don't involve making some changes to see what happens...

How difficult would it be for example to try an alternative pipe run
with a reel of speedfit draped up the stairs or similar - perhaps tee
into the flow before your zone valve, diconnect the feed on a rad and
cap the original feed pipe/valve[1], and connect your new temporary feed
direct to the rad.


[1] I use a stop end on a short section of pipe in a compression to 1/2"
bsp femail connector - this can be screwed onto the rad valve when a rad
is removed to make sure nothing is going to come out!


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/
  #17   Report Post  
Set Square
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
TheScullster wrote:


BUT

The two radiators piped in plastic numbers 6 and 7 on the sketch
below are still not performing.

http://www.thesculls.freeuk.com/Radpipes.jpg

A thought. Are there any horizontal runs in the plastic pipes? Do the pipes
undulate up and down at all? If so, there's a good chance there's an air
lock in one of the pipes. To make sure that *both* pipes to each rad are
clear of air, close one valve and open the other, and bleed several pints of
water out through the vent (into a suitable receptacle, of course!). Then
open the other valve and close the first one, and repeat.
--
Cheers,
Set Square
______
Please reply to newsgroup. Reply address is invalid.


  #18   Report Post  
TheScullster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Rumm" wrote:


Have you tried giving it a good pull?


This handwheel "appears" to be retained by a circlip near the adjusting
screw.
Did try pulling it but not too hard!


They would do that even with a blocked feed or return though - since water
makeup could come from either side.


Excellent and seemingly obvious point that had escaped me!


How difficult would it be for example to try an alternative pipe run with
a reel of speedfit draped up the stairs or similar - perhaps tee into the
flow before your zone valve, diconnect the feed on a rad and cap the
original feed pipe/valve[1], and connect your new temporary feed direct to
the rad.


This is possible as a test but permanent re-routing would be bad news as en
suite floor is tiled!


Thanks John

I'll start by trying Set Square's suggestion of closing each valve in turn
and bleeding.

Phil


  #19   Report Post  
TheScullster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Set Square" wrote:


A thought. Are there any horizontal runs in the plastic pipes? Do the
pipes
undulate up and down at all?


Yes I believe they do!

If so, there's a good chance there's an air
lock in one of the pipes. To make sure that *both* pipes to each rad are
clear of air, close one valve and open the other, and bleed several pints
of
water out through the vent (into a suitable receptacle, of course!). Then
open the other valve and close the first one, and repeat.
--


Thanks Set Square I'll give this a go!


Phil


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Central Heating - Expert Assistance Required TheScullster UK diy 87 October 3rd 05 05:59 PM
Rayburn integrated into central heating David Cawkwell UK diy 2 February 8th 05 06:23 PM
Central Heating control unit replacement - advice please Damian Home Repair 1 December 29th 03 01:35 AM
Central Heating costs + other questions The Question Asker UK diy 7 December 1st 03 06:28 PM
No central heating - HW only threewayvalve and tank therm John UK diy 7 September 29th 03 09:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"