Looking for an angle finder because I've lost me other. :-(

how does this work? I cant see the logic.
http://tinyurl.com/8dzle

ben wrote:

Looking for an angle finder because I've lost me other. :-(

how does this work? I cant see the logic.
http://tinyurl.com/8dzle

Stick the wide edge on one side of the angle to measure, then alight the
laser with the other side of the angle. Now read off the angle on the
scale. Looks like it can only do angles from 0 to 90 though.

--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:19:51 GMT, ben wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/8dzle

They would probably sell a lot more if they spelled LASER properly.

--
Nigel M

Nigel Molesworth wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:19:51 GMT, ben wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/8dzle

They would probably sell a lot more if they spelled LASER properly.


As it happend I never made a searched for "laser", twas "angle finder".

But please enlighten us as to why they would have sold more with the
correct spelling of "laser"?

John Rumm wrote:
ben wrote:

Looking for an angle finder because I've lost me other. :-(

how does this work? I cant see the logic.
http://tinyurl.com/8dzle

Stick the wide edge on one side of the angle to measure, then alight
the laser with the other side of the angle. Now read off the angle on
the scale. Looks like it can only do angles from 0 to 90 though.



Thats what I thought but if you have a wall thats more than 90 deg then it
fails as a angle finder. lol

On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:30:57 GMT, ben wrote:

But please enlighten us as to why they would have sold more with the
correct spelling of "laser"?

Err... because people who are searching for LASER devices won't find
them if the listing doesn't spell it correctly.

--
Nigel M

Nigel Molesworth wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:30:57 GMT, ben wrote:

But please enlighten us as to why they would have sold more with the
correct spelling of "laser"?

Err... because people who are searching for LASER devices won't find
them if the listing doesn't spell it correctly.

http://tinyurl.com/8aj5x

On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:20:27 GMT, ben wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/8aj5x

YPB?

--
Nigel M

ben wrote:
Nigel Molesworth wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:19:51 GMT, ben wrote:

They would probably sell a lot more if they spelled LASER properly.

But please enlighten us as to why they would have sold more with the
correct spelling of "laser"?

Try http://www.fatfingers.com/ :-)

David

Lobster wrote:
ben wrote:
Nigel Molesworth wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:19:51 GMT, ben wrote:

They would probably sell a lot more if they spelled LASER properly.

But please enlighten us as to why they would have sold more with the
correct spelling of "laser"?

Try http://www.fatfingers.com/ :-)

David

I've no need to use that, thanks I'm more intrigued as to what "YPB" is.

In article , "ben"
says...
Lobster wrote:
ben wrote:
Nigel Molesworth wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:19:51 GMT, ben wrote:

They would probably sell a lot more if they spelled LASER properly.

But please enlighten us as to why they would have sold more with the
correct spelling of "laser"?

Try http://www.fatfingers.com/ :-)

David

I've no need to use that, thanks I'm more intrigued as to what "YPB" is.


Your point being ...

Rob Morley wrote:
In article , "ben"
says...

Lobster wrote:

ben wrote:

Nigel Molesworth wrote:


On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:19:51 GMT, ben wrote:

They would probably sell a lot more if they spelled LASER properly.

But please enlighten us as to why they would have sold more with the
correct spelling of "laser"?

I've no need to use that, thanks I'm more intrigued as to what "YPB" is.

Your point being ...

He just wants to know what YPB means
;-)

Rob Morley wrote:
In article , "ben"
says...
Lobster wrote:
ben wrote:
Nigel Molesworth wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:19:51 GMT, ben wrote:

They would probably sell a lot more if they spelled LASER
properly.

But please enlighten us as to why they would have sold more with
the correct spelling of "laser"?

Try http://www.fatfingers.com/ :-)

David

I've no need to use that, thanks I'm more intrigued as to what "YPB"
is.


Your point being ...

Cheers, RB.