Yes its slightly smutty but it makes one wonder if we could replace
DIMM with a bot (and get him to make more sense)

http://project******.netsexchat.com/...gid=1&limit=10


--

Anon wrote:

Yes its slightly smutty but it makes one wonder if we could replace
DIMM with a bot (and get him to make more sense)

http://project******.netsexchat.com/...gid=1&limit=10

LOL... must have been posted by Drivel's more litterate brother though. ;-)


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

In message , Anon
writes
Yes its slightly smutty but it makes one wonder if we could replace
DIMM with a bot (and get him to make more sense)

http://project******.netsexchat.com/...gid=1&limit=10

VBG

--
geoff

Anon wrote:
Yes its slightly smutty but it makes one wonder if we could replace
DIMM with a bot (and get him to make more sense)

http://project******.netsexchat.com/...gid=1&limit=10

Now why did I just *know* who the "character" was going to be before
even opening the message...?

In article , John Rumm
wrote:

more litterate

And there is one of the infallible rules of Usenet. :-)

--
AJL Electronics (G6FGO) Ltd : Satellite and TV aerial systems
http://www.classicmicrocars.co.uk : http://www.ajlelectronics.co.uk