Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
I recently engaged a window company to quote for replacement windows. At the quoting stage i had some minor reservations but just put that down to my general distrust of the window industry. I went to the survey stage and had another guy round to measure up. I got the impression that he wasnt a direct employee and contracted as a surveyor. He took about 45 mins to survey. After the survey stage i decided that i didnt want to engage this company and wrote and told them so. They were ok with this but said they;d bill for the survey. I accpet that they may have incurred some costs but then we come to what is a reasonable cost?. In their T&C's they say that if they survey and chose not to continue with the job then they reserve the right to cancel. There is no mention of post survey cancellation by the customer. Any experinces/feedback gratefully received A Remove antispam and add 670 after bra to email Be a good Global citizen-CONSUMECONFORMOBEY Circumcision- A crime and an abuse. http://www.sexuallymutilatedchild.org/ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Tarquinlinbin
wrote: Hello, I recently engaged a window company to quote for replacement windows. At the quoting stage i had some minor reservations but just put that down to my general distrust of the window industry. I went to the survey stage and had another guy round to measure up. I got the impression that he wasnt a direct employee and contracted as a surveyor. He took about 45 mins to survey. After the survey stage i decided that i didnt want to engage this company and wrote and told them so. They were ok with this but said they;d bill for the survey. I accpet that they may have incurred some costs but then we come to what is a reasonable cost?. At one point I did these surveys (and plans) for a conservatory company: I was on a set rate that was effectively 1-1.5% of the job cost (the salesman got 10%!). I'd reckon that probably £100 +/- is fair especially if they're accepting your cancellation and the contract doesn't explicitly allow you to do so. -- Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk Free SEDBUK boiler database browser http://www.sda.co.uk/qsedbuk.htm [Latest version QSEDBUK 1.10 released 4 April 2005] |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 May 2005 12:19:35 +0100, Tony Bryer
wrote: In article , Tarquinlinbin wrote: Hello, I recently engaged a window company to quote for replacement windows. At the quoting stage i had some minor reservations but just put that down to my general distrust of the window industry. I went to the survey stage and had another guy round to measure up. I got the impression that he wasnt a direct employee and contracted as a surveyor. He took about 45 mins to survey. After the survey stage i decided that i didnt want to engage this company and wrote and told them so. They were ok with this but said they;d bill for the survey. I accpet that they may have incurred some costs but then we come to what is a reasonable cost?. At one point I did these surveys (and plans) for a conservatory company: I was on a set rate that was effectively 1-1.5% of the job cost (the salesman got 10%!). I'd reckon that probably £100 +/- is fair especially if they're accepting your cancellation and the contract doesn't explicitly allow you to do so. How long have you been going straight, Tony? :-) -- ..andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl The information contained in this post is copyright the poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by http://www.diybanter.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Andy Hall
wrote: How long have you been going straight, Tony? :-) I haven't drawn plans for money for about 12 years now. But the conservatory plans were a nice earner while it lasted. Most went straight onto a flat wall and the plan was really for the erectors. They may have been 'made to measure' as far as the customer was concerned but they were all standard modules and after a few weeks you could draw the plans (pre-CAD days) on autopilot. I generally got £100-150 for 3 hours work in total, not bad in the late 1980's - though their best salesman reputedly earned £86K! The boss of the firm wanted me to do more of their design work but I declined, telling him that they could have 1/3 of my time, no mo eggs in one basket and all that. He asked whether they were paying me enough - I agreed that the rate was very fair, and that it was nice 'clean' work - I agreed, in response to which he said I must be stupid to decline more of the same. When they went broke owing me £1,500 (and everyone else £300K) I was very glad I'd not been tempted to do more. -- Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk Free SEDBUK boiler database browser http://www.sda.co.uk/qsedbuk.htm [Latest version QSEDBUK 1.10 released 4 April 2005] |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 May 2005 15:42:19 +0100, Tony Bryer
wrote: In article , Andy Hall wrote: How long have you been going straight, Tony? :-) I haven't drawn plans for money for about 12 years now. But the conservatory plans were a nice earner while it lasted. Most went straight onto a flat wall and the plan was really for the erectors. They may have been 'made to measure' as far as the customer was concerned but they were all standard modules and after a few weeks you could draw the plans (pre-CAD days) on autopilot. I generally got £100-150 for 3 hours work in total, not bad in the late 1980's - though their best salesman reputedly earned £86K! It certainly wasn't a bad rate for that era, especially if there was little or no come-back. I suppose that said salesman would have been earning around £150k at today's prices, but was probably on commission only or 20/80 split. If he was generating £3m for the company (not impossible) he will have earned every penny. The boss of the firm wanted me to do more of their design work but I declined, telling him that they could have 1/3 of my time, no mo eggs in one basket and all that. He asked whether they were paying me enough - I agreed that the rate was very fair, and that it was nice 'clean' work - I agreed, in response to which he said I must be stupid to decline more of the same. When they went broke owing me £1,500 (and everyone else £300K) I was very glad I'd not been tempted to do more. I suspect that that business (apart from the big guys who manufacture) is all about cash flow). Couple that with having to trim margins to win business and you have all the ingredients for going broke, In that respect, the software business is attractive, isn't it :-) -- ..andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl The information contained in this post is copyright the poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by http://www.diybanter.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy Hall" wrote in message ... I suspect that that business (apart from the big guys who manufacture) is all about cash flow). Couple that with having to trim margins to win business and you have all the ingredients for going broke, In that respect, the software business is attractive, isn't it :-) Uh ... no ! :-( |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Andy Hall
wrote: I suppose that said salesman would have been earning around £150k at today's prices, but was probably on commission only or 20/80 split. If he was generating £3m for the company (not impossible) he will have earned every penny. Commission only, basically 10%. I never found out the exact details but AIUI there was a list price (not to be confused with 'List Price' off which you give 50% discount ... but only if you sign tonight) and a floor price below which you could not go. If you sold at list you got 10%. If you could sell above list you got 10% of list and a much greater proportion of the excess. If you sold between the floor and list price you got an appropriately reduced commission. -- Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk Free SEDBUK boiler database browser http://www.sda.co.uk/qsedbuk.htm [Latest version QSEDBUK 1.10 released 4 April 2005] |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 May 2005 10:10:12 +0100, tarquinlinbin
wrote: Hello, I recently engaged a window company to quote for replacement windows. At the quoting stage i had some minor reservations but just put that down to my general distrust of the window industry. I went to the survey stage and had another guy round to measure up. I got the impression that he wasnt a direct employee and contracted as a surveyor. He took about 45 mins to survey. After the survey stage i decided that i didnt want to engage this company and wrote and told them so. They were ok with this but said they;d bill for the survey. I accpet that they may have incurred some costs but then we come to what is a reasonable cost?. In their T&C's they say that if they survey and chose not to continue with the job then they reserve the right to cancel. There is no mention of post survey cancellation by the customer. Any experinces/feedback gratefully received I'd say that most established businesses are out to screw you, though some try to make it more of a mutual pleasure than others. It used to get blamed a lot on the pressures of competition, it often still does. It's much more to do with pressures of taxation though. The relentless demand from above kills off any hope of benevolence or genuine customer care in very short order. The guvnors gets the gravy and we get to eat each other. Thank goodness for Loyd Grossman's fabulous sauces which help to take the bitter taste away. -- Regards, Mike Halmarack Drop the EGG to email me. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 May 2005 12:55:10 +0100, Mike Halmarack
wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2005 10:10:12 +0100, tarquinlinbin wrote: Hello, I recently engaged a window company to quote for replacement windows. At the quoting stage i had some minor reservations but just put that down to my general distrust of the window industry. I went to the survey stage and had another guy round to measure up. I got the impression that he wasnt a direct employee and contracted as a surveyor. He took about 45 mins to survey. After the survey stage i decided that i didnt want to engage this company and wrote and told them so. They were ok with this but said they;d bill for the survey. I accpet that they may have incurred some costs but then we come to what is a reasonable cost?. In their T&C's they say that if they survey and chose not to continue with the job then they reserve the right to cancel. There is no mention of post survey cancellation by the customer. Any experinces/feedback gratefully received I'd say that most established businesses are out to screw you, though some try to make it more of a mutual pleasure than others. It used to get blamed a lot on the pressures of competition, it often still does. It's much more to do with pressures of taxation though. The relentless demand from above kills off any hope of benevolence or genuine customer care in very short order. The guvnors gets the gravy and we get to eat each other. Thank goodness for Loyd Grossman's fabulous sauces which help to take the bitter taste away. I think I prefer the free market to the strange, affected accent of Loyd Grossman. -- ..andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl The information contained in this post is copyright the poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by http://www.diybanter.com |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:07:26 +0100, Andy Hall
wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2005 12:55:10 +0100, Mike Halmarack wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2005 10:10:12 +0100, tarquinlinbin wrote: Hello, I recently engaged a window company to quote for replacement windows. At the quoting stage i had some minor reservations but just put that down to my general distrust of the window industry. I went to the survey stage and had another guy round to measure up. I got the impression that he wasnt a direct employee and contracted as a surveyor. He took about 45 mins to survey. After the survey stage i decided that i didnt want to engage this company and wrote and told them so. They were ok with this but said they;d bill for the survey. I accpet that they may have incurred some costs but then we come to what is a reasonable cost?. In their T&C's they say that if they survey and chose not to continue with the job then they reserve the right to cancel. There is no mention of post survey cancellation by the customer. Any experinces/feedback gratefully received I'd say that most established businesses are out to screw you, though some try to make it more of a mutual pleasure than others. It used to get blamed a lot on the pressures of competition, it often still does. It's much more to do with pressures of taxation though. The relentless demand from above kills off any hope of benevolence or genuine customer care in very short order. The guvnors gets the gravy and we get to eat each other. Thank goodness for Loyd Grossman's fabulous sauces which help to take the bitter taste away. I think I prefer the free market to the strange, affected accent of Loyd Grossman. I knew you were smart Andy! The best I can find is car boot sales, which are pretty cheap but Free Market WOW! Gimme the addrass ASAP. P.S Don't mock the afflicted. -- Regards, Mike Halmarack Drop the EGG to email me. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:10:36 +0100, Mike Halmarack
wrote: Gimme the addrass I had Loyd's Curry sauce on my mind at the time. -- Regards, Mike Halmarack Drop the EGG to email me. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:14:52 +0100, Mike Halmarack
wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:10:36 +0100, Mike Halmarack wrote: Gimme the addrass I had Loyd's Curry sauce on my mind at the time. Curry sauce? in a jar? yuk. :-) Curry is something that needs to be made from fresh and individual spices. -- ..andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl The information contained in this post is copyright the poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by http://www.diybanter.com |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:10:36 +0100, Mike Halmarack
wrote: I'd say that most established businesses are out to screw you, though some try to make it more of a mutual pleasure than others. It used to get blamed a lot on the pressures of competition, it often still does. It's much more to do with pressures of taxation though. The relentless demand from above kills off any hope of benevolence or genuine customer care in very short order. The guvnors gets the gravy and we get to eat each other. Thank goodness for Loyd Grossman's fabulous sauces which help to take the bitter taste away. I think I prefer the free market to the strange, affected accent of Loyd Grossman. I knew you were smart Andy! The best I can find is car boot sales, which are pretty cheap but Free Market WOW! Gimme the addrass ASAP. P.S Don't mock the afflicted. Ah.. I just don't have a negative perspective about established businesses. I don't think that people come into their offices every day with the express intent in mind of how to screw the customer. Certainly businesses do have the objective of maximising the amount of money that they can obtain from a customer and in the shortest time possible and for the least cost. However, that is simplistic. If the customer feels that they have been screwed, they won't buy from that business again. If it's a business that relies on repeat orders, then having customers feeling screwed for whatever reason is counterproductive. Businesses that achieve mainly one-time sales are generally in a competitive market and benefit from customer recommendation. That is not to say that large national businesses making one time sales don't screw customers - they spend marketing money on image and the numbers game. The windows industry certainly has this issue. It's certainly true that there is far too much government interference in business, although corporate taxation in the UK is not the highest in the world by a long way. If the owners of local and regional businesses make good money out of them, then good for them as far as I am concerned because they took the initial risk. For the large national and multinational companies, the "guvnors" are ultimately us through our investments directly or indirectly in the stock market. We would like to maximise the return on our investments, so there is no point in complaining if we feel that said companies are making a good profit. -- ..andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl The information contained in this post is copyright the poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by http://www.diybanter.com |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:34:15 +0100, Andy Hall
wrote: Ah.. I just don't have a negative perspective about established businesses. Of course, or how could you still participate so heartily? I don't think that people come into their offices every day with the express intent in mind of how to screw the customer. They have little time to give it a thought. It's a condition induced by circumstances beyond their direct control. Certainly businesses do have the objective of maximising the amount of money that they can obtain from a customer and in the shortest time possible and for the least cost. Yes. However, that is simplistic. If the customer feels that they have been screwed, they won't buy from that business again. If it's a business that relies on repeat orders, then having customers feeling screwed for whatever reason is counterproductive. Businesses that achieve mainly one-time sales are generally in a competitive market and benefit from customer recommendation. If it's not possible to survive without screwing the customer then the competition will be doing the same. So what's to choose between them? That is not to say that large national businesses making one time sales don't screw customers - they spend marketing money on image and the numbers game. The windows industry certainly has this issue. It's certainly true that there is far too much government interference in business, although corporate taxation in the UK is not the highest in the world by a long way. If the owners of local and regional businesses make good money out of them, then good for them as far as I am concerned because they took the initial risk. For the large national and multinational companies, the "guvnors" are ultimately us through our investments directly or indirectly in the stock market. We would like to maximise the return on our investments, so there is no point in complaining if we feel that said companies are making a good profit. Glad to hear that you own the world you live in and that all is generally well with it. IMO though, this is a level of self deception that's necessary to allow you to continue to participate. That's also why the situation will continue to deteriorate. -- Regards, Mike Halmarack Drop the EGG to email me. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mike Halmarack writes: Thank goodness for Loyd Grossman's fabulous sauces which help to take the bitter taste away. Ah, the ones with the red boot polish in them -- never tried them myself as I don't have any red boots. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Company politics | Woodworking | |||
How to secure a window after installing a/c | Home Repair | |||
Installing a new window without casing | Home Repair | |||
window plugs for soundproofing | Home Repair | |||
Flat Roof Side Window | UK diy |