I was watching the news tonight and saw the clip with John Prescotts house
being invaded by the Greenpeace activists. I noticed the mock tudor features
of the house and the turret type structures and just thought WOW......where
can I get those.
And I always thought that fat piece of **** had no style.......
Off to builders merchants at the weekend to get meself some fake turrets to
put on our roof.......they always say if you can't beat em' join the
*******s.

In article , dIMM
writes
I was watching the news tonight and saw the clip with John Prescotts house
being invaded by the Greenpeace activists. I noticed the mock tudor features
of the house and the turret type structures and just thought WOW......where
can I get those.
And I always thought that fat piece of **** had no style.......
Off to builders merchants at the weekend to get meself some fake turrets to
put on our roof.......they always say if you can't beat em' join the
*******s.

I live not too far away from the man in question, and there are quite a
few houses with odd features like that in the area. There's one with
cinderella-style pointy turrets. Sutton is an old village which has been
slowly surrounded by council estates, it's a strange contrast.
--
Tim Mitchell

"dIMM" wrote in message
...
I was watching the news tonight and saw the clip with John Prescotts house
being invaded by the Greenpeace activists. I noticed the mock tudor
features
of the house and the turret type structures and just thought
WOW......where
can I get those.

Vote for Blair and it will be made compulsory - with grants.

And I always thought that fat piece of **** had no style.......

Oh come on! Dear John is one of Our People, a rough diamond maybe but you
know he makes sense.

Off to builders merchants at the weekend to get meself some fake turrets
to
put on our roof.......they always say if you can't beat em' join the
*******s.

I wonder if he has a licence to crenellate ... and which Part will cover the
work ...

He's also reported as saying, "Wives shouldn't be there for terrorising."

That raises two questions:

a) what does he think wives ARe for?

b) who IS there for terrorising?

Mary

In article ,
"dIMM" writes:
I was watching the news tonight and saw the clip with John Prescotts house
being invaded by the Greenpeace activists. I noticed the mock tudor features
of the house and the turret type structures and just thought WOW......where
can I get those.
And I always thought that fat piece of **** had no style.......
Off to builders merchants at the weekend to get meself some fake turrets to
put on our roof.......they always say if you can't beat em' join the
*******s.

On the news I heard, they said Two-Jags wasn't home, but his wife and staff
were. Staff????
--
SAm. all sweeping generalisations are false

In article , Mary
Fisher writes

"dIMM" wrote in message
...
I was watching the news tonight and saw the clip with John Prescotts house
being invaded by the Greenpeace activists. I noticed the mock tudor
features
of the house and the turret type structures and just thought
WOW......where
can I get those.

I wonder if he has a licence to crenellate ... and which Part will cover the
work ...

He's also reported as saying, "Wives shouldn't be there for terrorising."

That raises two questions:

a) what does he think wives ARe for?

b) who IS there for terrorising?

The whole story, as reported in the local paper, was quite humorous. The
Greenpeace people went to the (armed) police guarding the place and told
them what they were going to do, and the police allowed them in!! A
greenpeace spokesman was quoted as saying "The police were very
professional about it, and so were we."
--
Tim Mitchell

"Sam Nelson" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"dIMM" writes:
I was watching the news tonight and saw the clip with John
Prescotts house
being invaded by the Greenpeace activists. I noticed the mock
tudor features
of the house and the turret type structures and just thought
WOW......where
can I get those.
And I always thought that fat piece of **** had no style.......
Off to builders merchants at the weekend to get meself some fake
turrets to
put on our roof.......they always say if you can't beat em' join
the
*******s.

On the news I heard, they said Two-Jags wasn't home, but his wife
and staff
were. Staff????

Err, he is trying to get re elected locally so I suspect his 'staff'
could well be his local election organisers etc. along with his PA. As
for two Jags, get your fact correct, he owns one and the other is his
Ministerial car.

I'm not stating one way or the other my personal opinions about the
man or the protest above, just the (probable) facts.

In article ,
(Sam Nelson) writes:

On the news I heard, they said Two-Jags wasn't home, but his wife and staff
were. Staff????

He seems to have a good boxing coach. Probably already
well into the training for this General Election now.

--
Andrew Gabriel

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:50:57 +0100, "dIMM"
wrote:

I was watching the news tonight and saw the clip with John Prescotts house
being invaded by the Greenpeace activists. I noticed the mock tudor features
of the house and the turret type structures and just thought WOW......where
can I get those.
And I always thought that fat piece of **** had no style.......
Off to builders merchants at the weekend to get meself some fake turrets to
put on our roof.......they always say if you can't beat em' join the
*******s.

Until I read this post, and it's pathetic follow-ups, I had not
recognised Mr. Prescott as being a model of sophistication and master
of the english language.

Thank you diMM (In name as in brain ) , Now I know that British
politicians are superior to some British electors.

:::Jerry:::: wrote:
"Sam Nelson" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"dIMM" writes:
I was watching the news tonight and saw the clip with John Prescotts house
being invaded by the Greenpeace activists. I noticed the mock tudor features
of the house and the turret type structures and just thought WOW......where
can I get those.
And I always thought that fat piece of **** had no style.......
Off to builders merchants at the weekend to get meself some fake turrets to
put on our roof.......they always say if you can't beat em' join the
*******s.

On the news I heard, they said Two-Jags wasn't home, but his wife and staff
were. Staff????

Err, he is trying to get re elected locally so I suspect his 'staff'
could well be his local election organisers etc. along with his PA. As
for two Jags, get your fact correct, he owns one and the other is his
Ministerial car.

and he's the only working class man in the cabinet. something about him
and his attitude suggest that maybe he'd be better off in the top job, sort
of like that nosher powell character in eat the rich.



RT

Sam Nelson wrote :-

On the news I heard, they said Two-Jags wasn't home, but his wife and
staff
were. Staff????

= smallish muscle bound dog much favored by men of his his ilk ;-)

Regards Jeff

"[news]" wrote in message
...


and he's the only working class

What's your definition of working class?

May

Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...


and he's the only working class

What's your definition of working class?

May

you dropped this ' r '



RT

"[news]" wrote in message
...
Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...


and he's the only working class

What's your definition of working class?

May

you dropped this ' r '

I'd say thanks but I can't see a hole ...



RT

Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...
Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...


and he's the only working class

What's your definition of working class?

May

you dropped this ' r '

I'd say thanks but I can't see a hole ...

ah, you need both hands /and/ a torch to do that


RT

"[news]" wrote in message
...
Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...
Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...


and he's the only working class

What's your definition of working class?

May

you dropped this ' r '

I'd say thanks but I can't see a hole ...

ah, you need both hands /and/ a torch to do that

Lucky we use head torches then.

But you haven't answered my question.

Mary


RT

Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...
Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...
Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...


and he's the only working class

What's your definition of working class?

May

you dropped this ' r '

I'd say thanks but I can't see a hole ...

ah, you need both hands /and/ a torch to do that

Lucky we use head torches then.

But you haven't answered my question.

correct. it's OT. s/n ratio and all that.


RT

"[news]" wrote in message
...
Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...
Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...
Mary Fisher wrote:
"[news]" wrote in message
...


and he's the only working class

What's your definition of working class?

May

you dropped this ' r '

I'd say thanks but I can't see a hole ...

ah, you need both hands /and/ a torch to do that

Lucky we use head torches then.

But you haven't answered my question.

correct. it's OT.

So why was it mentioned in the firstplace?

s/n ratio

?

RT

Mary

in reply to dan22's most eloquent comment.........**** off you bleedin heart
left wing tax grabbing do gooder....
sorry but it just had to be said....
apologies to all the good ladies and limp wristed faggots out there..

Mary Fisher wrote:

...but you know he makes sense.

Not many would agree ;-) :

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1972379.stm


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

"John Rumm" wrote in message
...
Mary Fisher wrote:

...but you know he makes sense.

Not many would agree ;-) :

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1972379.stm

er - I did have my tongue in my cheek ...

We love listening to him being interviewed on Today. We lie in bed,
absolutely rapt, and when he's finished we turn to each other and ask what
it was all about. Neither of us ever knows.

It's not just the odd gaff ... it would be pitiful if he weren't No 2.

Mary


--
Cheers,

John.

"dIMM" wrote in message
...
I was watching the news tonight and saw the clip with John Prescotts house
being invaded by the Greenpeace activists. I noticed the mock tudor
features
of the house and the turret type structures and just thought
WOW......where
can I get those.
And I always thought that fat piece of **** had no style.......
Off to builders merchants at the weekend to get meself some fake turrets
to
put on our roof.......they always say if you can't beat em' join the
*******s.

So you are voting New Labour then.


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

"John Rumm" wrote in message
...
Mary Fisher wrote:

...but you know he makes sense.

Not many would agree ;-) :

If you can't understand Prescott then you can't understand most people in
the UK. He has a problem about his syntax when speaking; probably dyslexic
to some degree. I recall the Tory benches mocking him, which was a real low
thing to do to someone who has any sort of affliction, no matter how minor,
who were laughing about his syntax. He responded brilliantly about their
tax.

I'm voting for Tony. The only choice that matters.


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

"Doctor Evil" wrote in message
...

If you can't understand Prescott then you can't understand most people in
the UK. He has a problem about his syntax when speaking; probably
dyslexic
to some degree. I recall the Tory benches mocking him, which was a real
low
thing to do to someone who has any sort of affliction, no matter how
minor,
who were laughing about his syntax.

They were mocking him because he's a member of the labour party, not because
he can't speak proper English.

Doctor Evil wrote:

If you can't understand Prescott then you can't understand most people in
the UK. He has a problem about his syntax when speaking; probably dyslexic
to some degree. I recall the Tory benches mocking him, which was a real low

Being dyslexic myself (and knowing many others who are) I can reassure
you that speaking incomprehensible ******** is not a well known trait of
dyslexia. Dyslexics lack lexical ability, not oral.

The word you are searching for is "inarticulate".


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

"John Rumm" wrote in message
...
Doctor Evil wrote:

If you can't understand Prescott then you can't understand most
people in
the UK. He has a problem about his syntax when speaking; probably
dyslexic
to some degree. I recall the Tory benches mocking him, which was
a real low

Being dyslexic myself (and knowing many others who are) I can
reassure
you that speaking incomprehensible ******** is not a well known
trait of
dyslexia. Dyslexics lack lexical ability, not oral.

The word you are searching for is "inarticulate".


In fact many people who are dyslexic are very articulate, due often,
to being the only sure fire way to communicate with others !

s/n ratio


?

Signal to noise ratio. Or in English the amount of complete and utter
rubbish to gem quality posts ratio.



RT


Mary







--

.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`· Shallow Sea Aquatics .¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·
.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯ http://www.shallowsea.com ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`

"Mike" wrote in message
...

"Doctor Evil" wrote in message
...

If you can't understand Prescott then you can't understand most people
in
the UK. He has a problem about his syntax when speaking; probably
dyslexic
to some degree. I recall the Tory benches mocking him, which was a real
low
thing to do to someone who has any sort of affliction, no matter how
minor,
who were laughing about his syntax.

They were mocking him because he's a member of the labour party, not
because
he can't speak proper English.

You obviously did not see the TV slot. They were mocking his speech
affliction. They are lower than whale ****. His affliction is only slight
anyhow. They were also probably mocking his working class accent too, as he
doesn't sound like a queer.


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

John Rumm wrote:
Being dyslexic myself (and knowing many others who are) I can reassure
you that speaking incomprehensible ******** is not a well known trait of
dyslexia. Dyslexics lack lexical ability, not oral.
The word you are searching for is "inarticulate".

I think the word is "dense".

Inarticulate people lack oral ability, not logical.

Owain

"John Rumm" wrote in message
...
Doctor Evil wrote:

If you can't understand Prescott then you can't understand most people in
the UK. He has a problem about his syntax when speaking; probably
dyslexic
to some degree. I recall the Tory benches mocking him, which was a real
low

Being dyslexic myself (and knowing many others who are) I can reassure you
that speaking incomprehensible ******** is not a well known trait of
dyslexia. Dyslexics lack lexical ability, not oral.

The word you are searching for is "inarticulate".

Nice one :-)

Mary


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

"doozer" wrote in message
...

s/n ratio


?

Signal to noise ratio. Or in English the amount of complete and utter
rubbish to gem quality posts ratio.

Why, thank you!

Although because of snipping I don't understand the context ...and no, I'm
not going back and I don't want anyone to explain. I'll just try to remember
for the next time it's used.

Probably now :-)

Mary



RT


Mary







--

.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`· Shallow Sea Aquatics .¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·
.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯ http://www.shallowsea.com ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`

"Doctor Evil" wrote in message
...

I'm voting for Tony. The only choice that matters.

Why does that not surprise me!

Mary

nope!

"Mary Fisher" wrote in message
. net...

"Doctor Evil" wrote in message
...

I'm voting for Tony. The only choice that matters.

Why does that not surprise me!

Mary,

I assume you have intelligence and vote for Tony too. Remember all that
poverty and destitution with the others? Appalling.....


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

"Doctor Evil" wrote in message
...

If you can't understand Prescott then you can't understand most people
in
the UK. He has a problem about his syntax when speaking; probably
dyslexic
to some degree. I recall the Tory benches mocking him, which was a
real
low
thing to do to someone who has any sort of affliction, no matter how
minor,
who were laughing about his syntax.

They were mocking him because he's a member of the labour party, not
because
he can't speak proper English.

You obviously did not see the TV slot. They were mocking his speech
affliction. They are lower than whale ****. His affliction is only slight
anyhow. They were also probably mocking his working class accent too, as
he
doesn't sound like a queer.

Nope. He sounds like a thug.

I presume by 'queer' you mean homosexual or gay. I thought New Labour were
full of them.

You may find that your communications convey On Wed, 27 Apr 2005
17:27:32 +0100, "dIMM" wrote:

in reply to dan22's most eloquent comment.........**** off you bleedin heart
left wing tax grabbing do gooder....
sorry but it just had to be said....
apologies to all the good ladies and limp wristed faggots out there..

You may find that you can construct messages with meaning if
you pay attention to the meanings of the words which you use.

If you do this you may be pleasantly surprised by finding that people
pay attention to what you write.

In a spirit of helpfulness, I suggest that you
consult a dictionary , if you have one.
if you don't have one then
consult a friend, if you have one.

Best wishes

all your comments gratefully accepted and taken on board......hopefully no
offence taken ......my most sincerest apologies to yourself and your good
family.
nuff said.

"Mike" wrote in message
...

"Doctor Evil" wrote in message
...

If you can't understand Prescott then you can't understand most
people
in
the UK. He has a problem about his syntax when speaking; probably
dyslexic
to some degree. I recall the Tory benches mocking him, which was a
real
low
thing to do to someone who has any sort of affliction, no matter how
minor,
who were laughing about his syntax.

They were mocking him because he's a member of the labour party, not
because
he can't speak proper English.

You obviously did not see the TV slot. They were mocking his speech
affliction. They are lower than whale ****. His affliction is only
slight
anyhow. They were also probably mocking his working class accent too,
as
he
doesn't sound like a queer.

Nope. He sounds like a thug.

I presume by 'queer' you mean homosexual or gay. I thought New Labour
were
full of them.

Nope. Firmly the Tories favourite pastime - famous for it!

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

dan22 wrote:

In a spirit of helpfulness, I suggest that you
consult a dictionary , if you have one.
if you don't have one then
consult a friend, if you have one.

It worked better when Churchill said it ;-)

--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

"Doctor Evil" wrote in message
...

"Mike" wrote in message
...

snip

I presume by 'queer' you mean homosexual or gay. I thought New
Labour
were
full of them.

Nope. Firmly the Tories favourite pastime - famous for it!


Hmm, they may be (in)famous for it but they don't seem to be full of
them though (not publicly anyway)....