Hey Ed, why don't you cook up some great pseudonym and get some
white house press credentials?

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022405E.shtml

What the heck's going on here, First Mary Roush and then this
Guckert Guy! Is it really that easy to pull the wool over
american eyes?

Jim


--
==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================

"jim rozen" wrote in message
...
Hey Ed, why don't you cook up some great pseudonym and get some
white house press credentials?

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022405E.shtml

What the heck's going on here, First Mary Roush and then this
Guckert Guy! Is it really that easy to pull the wool over
american eyes?

Jim

The funniest thing is to hear the wingnuts defend this homosexual prostitute
turned "journalist".

"jim rozen" wrote in message
...
Hey Ed, why don't you cook up some great pseudonym and get some
white house press credentials?

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022405E.shtml

What the heck's going on here, First Mary Roush and then this
Guckert Guy! Is it really that easy to pull the wool over
american eyes?

I don't know. It appears that having Karl Rove working behind the scenes for
you is a help.

In the most stage-managed presidency in history, Guckert is just one of the
props.

--
Ed Huntress

In article , ATP* says...

The funniest thing is to hear the wingnuts defend this homosexual prostitute
turned "journalist".

I understand there were photos. Apparently the sites
were yanked down straight away though...

Jim


--
==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================

"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...
"jim rozen" wrote in message
...
Hey Ed, why don't you cook up some great pseudonym and get some
white house press credentials?

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022405E.shtml

What the heck's going on here, First Mary Roush and then this
Guckert Guy! Is it really that easy to pull the wool over
american eyes?

I don't know. It appears that having Karl Rove working behind the scenes
for
you is a help.

In the most stage-managed presidency in history, Guckert is just one of
the
props.

--
Ed Huntress

Guckert's press pass on ebay:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...ayphotohosting

"jim rozen" wrote in message
...
In article , ATP* says...

The funniest thing is to hear the wingnuts defend this homosexual
prostitute
turned "journalist".

I understand there were photos. Apparently the sites
were yanked down straight away though...

Jim

From the descriptions, that was a good thing...........

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:07:39 -0500, "ATP*" wrote:


"jim rozen" wrote in message
...
Hey Ed, why don't you cook up some great pseudonym and get some
white house press credentials?

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022405E.shtml

What the heck's going on here, First Mary Roush and then this
Guckert Guy! Is it really that easy to pull the wool over
american eyes?

Jim

The funniest thing is to hear the wingnuts defend this homosexual prostitute
turned "journalist".

You talking about Barney Franks?

Gunner

It's better to be a red person in a blue state
than a blue person in a red state. As a red
person, if your blue neighbors turn into a mob
at least you have a gun to protect yourself.
As a blue person, your only hope is to appease
the red mob with herbal tea and marinated tofu.

(Phil Garding)

"Gunner" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:07:39 -0500, "ATP*" wrote:


"jim rozen" wrote in message
...
Hey Ed, why don't you cook up some great pseudonym and get some
white house press credentials?

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022405E.shtml

What the heck's going on here, First Mary Roush and then this
Guckert Guy! Is it really that easy to pull the wool over
american eyes?

Jim

The funniest thing is to hear the wingnuts defend this homosexual
prostitute
turned "journalist".

You talking about Barney Franks?

Gunner

That was his boytoy running the prostitution ring out of his apartment.
Anyway, he was reprimanded. I think he should have given up his seat.

In article , Gunner says...

You talking about Barney Franks?

Nah, barney franks wouldn't have needed a day pass
to wander around in the white house for a year.

What the heck was this guy guckert doing in there
all that time??

Jim


--
==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================

"jim rozen" wrote in message
...
In article , Gunner says...

You talking about Barney Franks?

Nah, barney franks wouldn't have needed a day pass
to wander around in the white house for a year.

What the heck was this guy guckert doing in there
all that time??

Jim

making an impression, but not leaving a mark?

On 26 Feb 2005 07:10:35 -0800, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , Gunner says...

You talking about Barney Franks?

Nah, barney franks wouldn't have needed a day pass
to wander around in the white house for a year.

What the heck was this guy guckert doing in there
all that time??

Jim
He said he was a "top". Wonder who was the "bottom". Or whose bottom
was on the bottom.
ERS

In article , Eric R Snow says...

What the heck was this guy guckert doing in there
all that time??

He said he was a "top". Wonder who was the "bottom". Or whose bottom
was on the bottom.

I just don't get this. That administration was always touting
its 'family values.' And here they have a man-whore running around
inside the white house, nobody seems to know what he was doing
or why he was there.

It's a big mystery.

Jim


--
==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:34:50 -0500, "ATP*" wrote:


"Gunner" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:07:39 -0500, "ATP*" wrote:


"jim rozen" wrote in message
...
Hey Ed, why don't you cook up some great pseudonym and get some
white house press credentials?

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/022405E.shtml

What the heck's going on here, First Mary Roush and then this
Guckert Guy! Is it really that easy to pull the wool over
american eyes?

Jim

The funniest thing is to hear the wingnuts defend this homosexual
prostitute
turned "journalist".

You talking about Barney Franks?

Gunner

That was his boytoy running the prostitution ring out of his apartment.
Anyway, he was reprimanded. I think he should have given up his seat.


The funny thing was listening to the deafening silence from the Left
over the issue, and their continued support of Franks even when he was
caught with his..ah..er..stuck in the cookie jar.

Gunner

It's better to be a red person in a blue state
than a blue person in a red state. As a red
person, if your blue neighbors turn into a mob
at least you have a gun to protect yourself.
As a blue person, your only hope is to appease
the red mob with herbal tea and marinated tofu.

(Phil Garding)

On 26 Feb 2005 09:50:14 -0800, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , Eric R Snow says...

What the heck was this guy guckert doing in there
all that time??

He said he was a "top". Wonder who was the "bottom". Or whose bottom
was on the bottom.

I just don't get this. That administration was always touting
its 'family values.' And here they have a man-whore running around
inside the white house, nobody seems to know what he was doing
or why he was there.

It's a big mystery.

Jim

We are talking about Barney Franks then. Thanks for the
clarification.

Gunner

It's better to be a red person in a blue state
than a blue person in a red state. As a red
person, if your blue neighbors turn into a mob
at least you have a gun to protect yourself.
As a blue person, your only hope is to appease
the red mob with herbal tea and marinated tofu.

(Phil Garding)

"Gunner" wrote in message
...
On 26 Feb 2005 09:50:14 -0800, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , Eric R Snow
says...

What the heck was this guy guckert doing in there
all that time??

He said he was a "top". Wonder who was the "bottom". Or whose bottom
was on the bottom.

I just don't get this. That administration was always touting
its 'family values.' And here they have a man-whore running around
inside the white house, nobody seems to know what he was doing
or why he was there.

It's a big mystery.

Jim

We are talking about Barney Franks then. Thanks for the
clarification.

Gunner

Uh, then you're saying that Barney Franks would not be a favorite of
conservatives? I think you've got that right. g

The issue is that the party of homophobic fundamentalists just got caught
with a rather large embarrassment. When Barney Franks came out, his
relatively more tolerant constituents had little problem with it.

--
Ed Huntress

"Ed Huntress" wrote

The issue is that the party of homophobic fundamentalists just got caught
with a rather large embarrassment. When Barney Franks came out, his
relatively more tolerant constituents had little problem with it.


Just for the record, Ed, it's Barney Frank (no "s"). He's the guy who once
observed that for a certain brand of Republicans, "Life begins at conception
and ends at birth". When his homosexuality became public, Tip O'Neil is
alleged to have told him "Gee, Barney, I always thought you'd be our first
_Jewish_ president" :-)

-- TP

In article , tonyp says...

Just for the record, Ed, it's Barney Frank (no "s"). He's the guy who once
observed that for a certain brand of Republicans, "Life begins at conception
and ends at birth". When his homosexuality became public, Tip O'Neil is
alleged to have told him "Gee, Barney, I always thought you'd be our first
_Jewish_ president" :-)

LOL. I had never heard of this quote from O'Neil.
And it is Frank, of course.

My question is how come the republicans, who ran on a platform of
homophobia, and family values, reconcile this with having a
man-whore parading around in the white house.

Apparently Talon News Service didn't even *exist* until after
guckert had already been frequenting the white house with day
passes for quite some time.

Was he there to service some of the male members of the administration?

I'm not quite sure how he wound up in a press conference, or what
the administration thought when he started spouting off about
'reality.'

Did the Secret Service understand about all the public web sites
with his photos, "8 inches cut?" Did they stop to consider the
threat he represented to the white house? Apparently they weren't
consulted.

Next time I hear mr. bush yammering on about 'family values'
I will know what he's talking about - male prostitutes prancing
about in his office.

Jim


--
==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================

"jim rozen" wrote

My question is how come the republicans, who ran on a platform of
homophobia, and family values, reconcile this with having a
man-whore parading around in the white house.


About the same way they reconcile their professed disgust for Michael Moore
with big tax cuts for people like ... Michael Moore :-)


Was he there to service some of the male members of the administration?


Yes: Scott McLellan and, once, George W. Bush. His "questions" generally
had the quality of an especially slurpy rim job.

-- TP

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:52:18 -0500, "tonyp"
wrote:


"jim rozen" wrote

My question is how come the republicans, who ran on a platform of
homophobia, and family values, reconcile this with having a
man-whore parading around in the white house.


About the same way they reconcile their professed disgust for Michael Moore
with big tax cuts for people like ... Michael Moore :-)

and little people like...Me.

Was he there to service some of the male members of the administration?


Yes: Scott McLellan and, once, George W. Bush. His "questions" generally
had the quality of an especially slurpy rim job.

-- TP

Oh...softball questions like most of the lefties ask any Demonrat.
Correct?

Gunner


It's better to be a red person in a blue state
than a blue person in a red state. As a red
person, if your blue neighbors turn into a mob
at least you have a gun to protect yourself.
As a blue person, your only hope is to appease
the red mob with herbal tea and marinated tofu.

(Phil Garding)

In article , Gunner says...

Oh...softball questions like most of the lefties ask any Demonrat.
Correct?

Gunner, all kidding aside, you probably have the "other" spin
on this guckert fellow. I suspect you could explain his
existence in the white house in a number of other ways:

He was planted by the righties to embarass the news media.

He was a mole designed to test the Secret Service's abilities.

He had some other secret mission that has yet to be revealed
by our administration.

Please tell me somthing like that, instead of, "it's
what it really looks like" because I don't want to think
my goverment is really run that way.

Jim


--
==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================

On 27 Feb 2005 12:29:15 -0800, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , tonyp says...

Just for the record, Ed, it's Barney Frank (no "s"). He's the guy who once
observed that for a certain brand of Republicans, "Life begins at conception
and ends at birth". When his homosexuality became public, Tip O'Neil is
alleged to have told him "Gee, Barney, I always thought you'd be our first
_Jewish_ president" :-)

LOL. I had never heard of this quote from O'Neil.
And it is Frank, of course.

My question is how come the republicans, who ran on a platform of
homophobia, and family values, reconcile this with having a
man-whore parading around in the white house.

Apparently Talon News Service didn't even *exist* until after
guckert had already been frequenting the white house with day
passes for quite some time.

Was he there to service some of the male members of the administration?

I'm not quite sure how he wound up in a press conference, or what
the administration thought when he started spouting off about
'reality.'

Did the Secret Service understand about all the public web sites
with his photos, "8 inches cut?" Did they stop to consider the
threat he represented to the white house? Apparently they weren't
consulted.

Next time I hear mr. bush yammering on about 'family values'
I will know what he's talking about - male prostitutes prancing
about in his office.

Jim
Some of the things Mr Guckert learned were classified. Like the name
of a CIA operative. I was listening to someone who compared his
knowledge to "pillow talk". The kind of thing someone might say to
impress a lover. Wonder if any pictures will show up?
ERS

On 28 Feb 2005 04:52:25 -0800, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , Gunner says...

Oh...softball questions like most of the lefties ask any Demonrat.
Correct?

Gunner, all kidding aside, you probably have the "other" spin
on this guckert fellow. I suspect you could explain his
existence in the white house in a number of other ways:

He was planted by the righties to embarass the news media.

He was a mole designed to test the Secret Service's abilities.

He had some other secret mission that has yet to be revealed
by our administration.

Please tell me somthing like that, instead of, "it's
what it really looks like" because I don't want to think
my goverment is really run that way.

Jim

No idea Jim. But Im sure the truth will come out before long. I tend
to take a wait and see attitude until all the data is in. Or at least
enough of it to make a case one way or another.

The Lefties are already trying to make political hay over this on
various newsgroups..."gay prositution and pedophile rings"..yada yada
yada. They tend to go silent when I mention Barney Frank and a host
of other Lefties who have gotten their dicks caught in their zippers.

Shrug. Lets wait and see what comes to the surface. It could well be a
scandal. Wont be the first time. Bob Packwood comes to mind. Though
Republicans are surprisingly good about cleaning out their problem
children. The Left on the other hand..tends to Diefy them.

"I did not have sex...with that woman..." (or commit at least 3
rapes)

Gunner



It's better to be a red person in a blue state
than a blue person in a red state. As a red
person, if your blue neighbors turn into a mob
at least you have a gun to protect yourself.
As a blue person, your only hope is to appease
the red mob with herbal tea and marinated tofu.

(Phil Garding)

In article , Eric R Snow says...

Some of the things Mr Guckert learned were classified. Like the name
of a CIA operative. I was listening to someone who compared his
knowledge to "pillow talk". The kind of thing someone might say to
impress a lover. Wonder if any pictures will show up?

My understanding is that he's mixed up in the Valeri Plame
matter.

Jim


--
==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================

"Eric R Snow" wrote in message
...
On 27 Feb 2005 12:29:15 -0800, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , tonyp says...

Just for the record, Ed, it's Barney Frank (no "s"). He's the guy who
once
observed that for a certain brand of Republicans, "Life begins at
conception
and ends at birth". When his homosexuality became public, Tip O'Neil
is
alleged to have told him "Gee, Barney, I always thought you'd be our
first
_Jewish_ president" :-)

LOL. I had never heard of this quote from O'Neil.
And it is Frank, of course.

My question is how come the republicans, who ran on a platform of
homophobia, and family values, reconcile this with having a
man-whore parading around in the white house.

Apparently Talon News Service didn't even *exist* until after
guckert had already been frequenting the white house with day
passes for quite some time.

Was he there to service some of the male members of the administration?

I'm not quite sure how he wound up in a press conference, or what
the administration thought when he started spouting off about
'reality.'

Did the Secret Service understand about all the public web sites
with his photos, "8 inches cut?" Did they stop to consider the
threat he represented to the white house? Apparently they weren't
consulted.

Next time I hear mr. bush yammering on about 'family values'
I will know what he's talking about - male prostitutes prancing
about in his office.

Jim
Some of the things Mr Guckert learned were classified. Like the name
of a CIA operative. I was listening to someone who compared his
knowledge to "pillow talk". The kind of thing someone might say to
impress a lover. Wonder if any pictures will show up?
ERS

Here's one man's opinion:

wrote in message
oups.com...
Stop trying to play the "gay bashing card". The fact that he got in
for two years shows that he is part of a conspiracy. False name,
Phony news outlet, No journalistic credentials. His gayness is just a
link to how he got in, not the real story. When the full story comes
out Karl Rove's DNA will be found on Gannon's blue dress. The real story
is who put him in the press corps. .......

In article , ATP* says...

Stop trying to play the "gay bashing card". The fact that he got in
for two years shows that he is part of a conspiracy. False name,
Phony news outlet, No journalistic credentials. His gayness is just a
link to how he got in, not the real story. When the full story comes
out Karl Rove's DNA will be found on Gannon's blue dress. The real story
is who put him in the press corps. .......

Apparently there are a couple of "freedom of information"
requests in the works. And I've been told that congressmen
do get preferential treatment when they submit those.

Who issued the press passes and the day passes? He was
in there before Talon even existed.

Jim


--
==================================================
please reply to:
JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com
==================================================

On 28 Feb 2005 11:25:49 -0800, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , Eric R Snow says...

Some of the things Mr Guckert learned were classified. Like the name
of a CIA operative. I was listening to someone who compared his
knowledge to "pillow talk". The kind of thing someone might say to
impress a lover. Wonder if any pictures will show up?

My understanding is that he's mixed up in the Valeri Plame
matter.

Jim
That's correct. Now, who told him, and why? Was it in the afterglow
after some particular satisfying sex? It sure cracks me up to see how
the White House keeps trying to explain this one away. I'm sure that
there's someone in the White House who REALLY doesn't want the truth
to come out.
ERS

On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:51:13 -0800, Eric R Snow
wrote:

On 28 Feb 2005 11:25:49 -0800, jim rozen
wrote:

In article , Eric R Snow says...

Some of the things Mr Guckert learned were classified. Like the name
of a CIA operative. I was listening to someone who compared his
knowledge to "pillow talk". The kind of thing someone might say to
impress a lover. Wonder if any pictures will show up?

My understanding is that he's mixed up in the Valeri Plame
matter.

Jim
That's correct. Now, who told him, and why? Was it in the afterglow
after some particular satisfying sex? It sure cracks me up to see how
the White House keeps trying to explain this one away. I'm sure that
there's someone in the White House who REALLY doesn't want the truth
to come out.
ERS

Much like MonicaGate? Or perhaps FlowerGate, or even JonesGate? Might
even be similar to RapeGate, no?

Gunner
It's better to be a red person in a blue state
than a blue person in a red state. As a red
person, if your blue neighbors turn into a mob
at least you have a gun to protect yourself.
As a blue person, your only hope is to appease
the red mob with herbal tea and marinated tofu.

(Phil Garding)