On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:15:00 GMT, Gunner
wrote:

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:09:27 GMT, Dale Dunn
wrote:

Those are all pretty speculative, and require colossal energies. I'm ok
with people thinking about it, but it's far short of convincing me that
it's possible.

Besides, you wouldn't want to pull that hard on space anywhere near an
inhabited planet.

At one time it was common knowlege that if you managed to travel
faster than 60 miles per hour, you would die from the extreme speed.

Well, once again the conservatives, fundies & wingers were wrong,
were they not?
You REALLY need to stop letting them do your "thinking" for you,
Gunner.
--
Cliff

Cliff piddled around and finally wrote:

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:15:00 GMT, Gunner
wrote:

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:09:27 GMT, Dale Dunn
wrote:

Those are all pretty speculative, and require colossal energies. I'm ok
with people thinking about it, but it's far short of convincing me that
it's possible.

Besides, you wouldn't want to pull that hard on space anywhere near an
inhabited planet.

At one time it was common knowlege that if you managed to travel
faster than 60 miles per hour, you would die from the extreme speed.

Well

Pretty deep subject for such a shallow mind.

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:26:19 GMT, Gunner
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:17:03 GMT, Dale Dunn
wrote:

At one time it was common knowlege that if you managed to travel
faster than 60 miles per hour, you would die from the extreme speed.

Common knowledge is a long way from well established physics.

You mean long held beliefs in physics, or theory or hypothesis. What
was fact before, is often disproven later.

It was all well known to be total rubbish at the time, except
by conservatives, wingers & fundies.
They are very slow learners indeed.

HTH
--
Cliff