Democratic presidential candidate Martin OMalley suggested Sunday that
Congress had fallen under the sway of "white racism" and the political
force of the National Rifle Assn. in refusing to respond with new laws
to a cascade of shooting incidents in recent years.

Speaking before the nations mayors, gathered in San Francisco, OMalley
pointed to gun restrictions passed when he was governor of Maryland to
ban assault weapons, enforce background checks and tighten permitting
procedures -- efforts that have been blocked at the national level by
Republicans, and some Democrats, in Congress.

"One of the sad triumphs of white racism is the degree to which it has
succeeded in subconsciously convincing so many of us, black and white,
that somehow black lives dont matter," he said. "If the thousands of
young men killed by gun violence every year across America were young,
poor and white -- rather than young, poor and black -- it is hard to
imagine that our Congress would continue to block common-sense measures
to keep guns out of the hands of criminals."

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politi...621-story.html

On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:06:36 AM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley suggested Sunday that
Congress had fallen under the sway of "white racism" and the political
force of the National Rifle Assn. in refusing to respond with new laws
to a cascade of shooting incidents in recent years.

Speaking before the nation's mayors, gathered in San Francisco, O'Malley
pointed to gun restrictions passed when he was governor of Maryland to
ban assault weapons, enforce background checks and tighten permitting
procedures -- efforts that have been blocked at the national level by
Republicans, and some Democrats, in Congress.

"One of the sad triumphs of white racism is the degree to which it has
succeeded in subconsciously convincing so many of us, black and white,
that somehow black lives don't matter," he said. "If the thousands of
young men killed by gun violence every year across America were young,
poor and white -- rather than young, poor and black -- it is hard to
imagine that our Congress would continue to block common-sense measures
to keep guns out of the hands of criminals."

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politi...621-story.html

With which part of this do you disagree?

On 6/22/2015 10:19 AM, rangerssuck wrote:
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:06:36 AM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley suggested Sunday that
Congress had fallen under the sway of "white racism" and the political
force of the National Rifle Assn. in refusing to respond with new laws
to a cascade of shooting incidents in recent years.

Speaking before the nation's mayors, gathered in San Francisco, O'Malley
pointed to gun restrictions passed when he was governor of Maryland to
ban assault weapons, enforce background checks and tighten permitting
procedures -- efforts that have been blocked at the national level by
Republicans, and some Democrats, in Congress.

"One of the sad triumphs of white racism is the degree to which it has
succeeded in subconsciously convincing so many of us, black and white,
that somehow black lives don't matter," he said. "If the thousands of
young men killed by gun violence every year across America were young,
poor and white -- rather than young, poor and black -- it is hard to
imagine that our Congress would continue to block common-sense measures
to keep guns out of the hands of criminals."

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politi...621-story.html

With which part of this do you disagree?

All of it is obviously bull****, but mostly this: "One of the sad
triumphs of white racism..." That's just bull**** Democratic
boilerplate. They always say that ****. That's the race obsession.

No leftist, and certainly not this ****wipe O'Malley, wants to have a
"conversation on race." What they want is to deliver a monologue or
sermon, and ****bags like you sit in the front pew and nod vigorously
every time some leftist spews this "America is a racist country" bull****.

On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:19:24 -0700, rangerssuck wrote:

On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:06:36 AM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley suggested Sunday that
Congress had fallen under the sway of "white racism" and the political
force of the National Rifle Assn. in refusing to respond with new laws
to a cascade of shooting incidents in recent years.

Speaking before the nation's mayors, gathered in San Francisco,
O'Malley pointed to gun restrictions passed when he was governor of
Maryland to ban assault weapons, enforce background checks and tighten
permitting procedures -- efforts that have been blocked at the national
level by Republicans, and some Democrats, in Congress.

"One of the sad triumphs of white racism is the degree to which it has
succeeded in subconsciously convincing so many of us, black and white,
that somehow black lives don't matter," he said. "If the thousands of
young men killed by gun violence every year across America were young,
poor and white -- rather than young, poor and black -- it is hard to
imagine that our Congress would continue to block common-sense measures
to keep guns out of the hands of criminals."

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politi.../la-pn-martin-
omalley-guns-mayors-20150621-story.html

With which part of this do you disagree?

The part where it was posted to a METALWORKING newsgroup, dickwad.



--
www.wescottdesign.com

On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:32:19 -0500, Tim Wescott
wrote:

On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:19:24 -0700, rangerssuck wrote:

On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:06:36 AM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley suggested Sunday that
Congress had fallen under the sway of "white racism" and the political
force of the National Rifle Assn. in refusing to respond with new laws
to a cascade of shooting incidents in recent years.

Speaking before the nation's mayors, gathered in San Francisco,
O'Malley pointed to gun restrictions passed when he was governor of
Maryland to ban assault weapons, enforce background checks and tighten
permitting procedures -- efforts that have been blocked at the national
level by Republicans, and some Democrats, in Congress.

"One of the sad triumphs of white racism is the degree to which it has
succeeded in subconsciously convincing so many of us, black and white,
that somehow black lives don't matter," he said. "If the thousands of
young men killed by gun violence every year across America were young,
poor and white -- rather than young, poor and black -- it is hard to
imagine that our Congress would continue to block common-sense measures
to keep guns out of the hands of criminals."

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politi.../la-pn-martin-
omalley-guns-mayors-20150621-story.html

With which part of this do you disagree?

The part where it was posted to a METALWORKING newsgroup, dickwad.

That and the fact that the entire article was Liberal horse****
propaganda. Democrats have always been the party of racism, but for
some reason, it drives blacks into their party. Crom knows why.

Want to stop the majority of killings in the U.S.? Disband all the
gangs with innoculations of lead. Instant 90% decrease in killings,
instant 50% decrease in future jail sentences. And probably a 30%
decrease in the welfare roles when same gang bangers stop raping
women.

That won't stop the individuals who are shooting people, but we're
talking 13k vs. a dozen or two deaths. Which is more important?

Without the gangs, many of the potential members suddenly decide that
school and a good paying job are good things, and we have a better
society. Win, win, wot?

("innoculations of lead" made this rant on-topic.

--
Find out what people will submit to, and you have found out the
exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them.
--Frederick Douglass

On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:31:11 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:

On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:32:19 -0500, Tim Wescott
wrote:

On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:19:24 -0700, rangerssuck wrote:

On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:06:36 AM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley suggested Sunday that
Congress had fallen under the sway of "white racism" and the political
force of the National Rifle Assn. in refusing to respond with new laws
to a cascade of shooting incidents in recent years.

Speaking before the nation's mayors, gathered in San Francisco,
O'Malley pointed to gun restrictions passed when he was governor of
Maryland to ban assault weapons, enforce background checks and tighten
permitting procedures -- efforts that have been blocked at the national
level by Republicans, and some Democrats, in Congress.

"One of the sad triumphs of white racism is the degree to which it has
succeeded in subconsciously convincing so many of us, black and white,
that somehow black lives don't matter," he said. "If the thousands of
young men killed by gun violence every year across America were young,
poor and white -- rather than young, poor and black -- it is hard to
imagine that our Congress would continue to block common-sense measures
to keep guns out of the hands of criminals."

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politi.../la-pn-martin-
omalley-guns-mayors-20150621-story.html

With which part of this do you disagree?

The part where it was posted to a METALWORKING newsgroup, dickwad.

That and the fact that the entire article was Liberal horse****
propaganda. Democrats have always been the party of racism, but for
some reason, it drives blacks into their party. Crom knows why.

The answer to this is that you have swallowed Gunner's malignant
bull****, which leaves you confused about events in the real world. On
top of that, you've just been baited by the troll Jon Ball. This is
ironic because you, more than anyone, are always telling people to
plonk the trolls.


Want to stop the majority of killings in the U.S.? Disband all the
gangs with innoculations of lead. Instant 90% decrease in killings,
instant 50% decrease in future jail sentences. And probably a 30%
decrease in the welfare roles when same gang bangers stop raping
women.

That won't stop the individuals who are shooting people, but we're
talking 13k vs. a dozen or two deaths. Which is more important?

Without the gangs, many of the potential members suddenly decide that
school and a good paying job are good things, and we have a better
society. Win, win, wot?

("innoculations of lead" made this rant on-topic.

Killing your fellow Americans seems to be your solution to everything,
Larry. Most of us grew out of that by the time we were 12 or 13. You,
Gunner, Pyotr, and a few others seem to be victims of arrested
emotional development.

Maybe it's from breathing too many lead fumes.

--
Ed Huntress

Larry Jaques wrote:

Want to stop the majority of killings in the U.S.? Disband all the
gangs with innoculations of lead. Instant 90% decrease in killings,
instant 50% decrease in future jail sentences. And probably a 30%
decrease in the welfare roles when same gang bangers stop raping
women.

It does seem odd that people can be arrested for loitering, which is
standing and doing nothing, but we can't find a reason to arrest all gang
members.

On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:10:48 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:


Larry Jaques wrote:

Want to stop the majority of killings in the U.S.? Disband all the
gangs with innoculations of lead. Instant 90% decrease in killings,
instant 50% decrease in future jail sentences. And probably a 30%
decrease in the welfare roles when same gang bangers stop raping
women.

It does seem odd that people can be arrested for loitering, which is
standing and doing nothing, but we can't find a reason to arrest all gang
members.

There goes the Boy Scouts...

In Russia, it's not a problem.

--
Ed Huntress