On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:38:28 -0700, George Plimpton
wrote:

On 4/24/2012 8:23 AM, whothe****doIthinkImfooling bull****ted:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:30:33 -0700, George
wrote:

On 4/23/2012 5:55 PM, whothe****doIthinkImfooling bull****ted:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:29:10 -0700, George
wrote:

On 4/23/2012 5:18 PM, whothe****doIthinkImfooling bull****ted:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:29:41 -0700, George
wrote:


I contend that being obsessed with race is a more useful definition of
racism than to say that one believes in racial superiority.

Try it out on Wikipedia and see how far you get goofball.

Wikipedia is sometimes a useful starting point, but it tends toward the
lowest common denominator and is frequently corrupted.
Wikipedia is no more authoritative on the definition and meaning of
racism than you are, which is to say, not at all authoritative.

It's because it isn't always authoritative and occasionally edited by
the deluded

...like you.

Well if I was editing at Wikipedia that would certainly be a step up
from here. You know the place that if you can't make it here then you
can't make it anywhere. It has a very high concentration of kooks like

...you, who can't even make it here. You ****wit.


Hey Orly I was just reading about Sheriff Joe's latest windbaggery. He
uses World Nut Daily to spread his deep thinking. That might be a good
place to market yours as well.