On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 7:13:52 AM UTC-4, One Party System wrote:
news13 wrote in news:merhn2$106$6@dont-
email.me:

On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 04:05:58 +0000, One Party System wrote:

news13 wrote in
news:meon4t$hid$12@dont-
email.me:

On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:05:58 -0400, Scout wrote:

"news13" wrote in message
...

Hint, how many years was it ice ball earth?

Well clearly man is responsible for turning the ice ball earth into
the nice warm place it is today.......or you're going to have to
explain why we shouldn't consider the possibility that what's going on
now is just more of the same natural process.

If you are that dumb, why would I bother.Obviously you're part of the
infestation to be wiped out. Gunner is gunna get his great cull. Stock
up on flavouring for all the snowcones.


Ok, so I point out that the earth is 4.5 billion years old and now i'll
point out that oxygen breathing life has been around for at least 2
billion years.

If you are just rooting for "oxygen breathing life", then you've nothing
to worry about, but if your hoping your descendants will still be
enjoyuing a life style similar to your current lifestyle, then that is a
whole different ball game.

If I want my descendants to live a better life than me I need to stop you
Druids from destroying the economy.



You want us to panic at a few decades of questionable data.

Is leaving things until it is too late and then panicing you're usual
approach or are you a head in the sand man?

Oh please. the data and the projections are fanciful as well as your
conclusions.

The "data" goes back centuries, if not millenia from some sources.

Really? Produce it.

The bitching is that a certain committee treated the public the same way
pollies do and are paying the price for it.

A certain comittee? IPCC DEPENDS on climate panic for it's existence and
thier cushy well paid jobs. Mikey LIED. Period.


That would be a more a religion than science cupcake.

Following a religion is what you seem to be doing.
BTW, Science is a process and not the results.

No. I'm saying look at the science, unaltered by poltically motivated
hacks.

I've been looking at various sources of information to reach my approach.
My 2c is that people will approach this the same way they did the health
and smoking warnings, the sub-prime fiasco warning and similar events in
the past. The sheeple are consistent.


So give us your sources.

"14 of the last 15 years since 2000, have been the warmest in history"

-- https://digesthis.wordpress.com/category/creativity/