On Friday, August 29, 2014 5:57:21 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:50:13 -0400, Ed Huntress

wrote:

On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:57:15 -0600, wrote:


On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:06:03 +0200 (CEST), "LPM"

wrote:

On January 27, 1998, then First Lady Hillary Clinton � without a

shred of credible evidence � infamously claimed during an NBC

"Today Show" interview with Matt Lauer that a �vast right-wing

conspiracy� had been working to destroy her husband �since the

day he announced for president.�

By the end of the year----everything she claimed was proven true

The writer of the article publicly confessed that nothing he wrote the

"speckled tater" (run by ****-ant Emmet Tyrell jr), was true---and

exposed over $4 million in funds funneled in from Richard Mellon

Scaife to discredit Clinton(s)



Eventually----after spending over $300,000,000 in bogus investigations

by 3 separate committees (D'Amato, Burton, Thompsen)---not one shred

of credible evidence supported any of the dozens and dozens of charges

and claims made by the rightwing



By ALL definitions---it was conspiratorial, done by a "concerted

effort" on the part of wealthy GOP backers, politicians, and

legislative chairmen.



WHACK @



_ Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative _, by

David Brock, who was funded by Scaife, explains what he did in detail.

Exactly---couldn't remember Brock, but at first, he was viciously


attacking. Then he began to see the bogus effort funded by Scaife and

Tyrell stealing from the fund for personal gain.

Regarding Scaife, founder in 1967 of the rightist rag the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, a question appeared in The Washington Post:

"... But have you heard if he, like that other lush Emmett Tyrell, is on Richard Scaife's payroll?"

-- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...urce050401.htm

If you are on the billionaire who funded the 1960's republican congressional mayhem all through out the '60s and '70s payroll, then why steal from elsewhere?

In the end---What clinton said was essentially true.....a concerted

effort to achieve a goal of destroying a political enemy.

On Saturday, August 30, 2014 2:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Friday, August 29, 2014 5:57:21 PM UTC-4, wrote:

On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:50:13 -0400, Ed Huntress



wrote:



On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:57:15 -0600, wrote:





On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:06:03 +0200 (CEST), "LPM"



wrote:



On January 27, 1998, then First Lady Hillary Clinton � without a



shred of credible evidence � infamously claimed during an NBC



"Today Show" interview with Matt Lauer that a �vast right-wing



conspiracy� had been working to destroy her husband �since the



day he announced for president.�



By the end of the year----everything she claimed was proven true



The writer of the article publicly confessed that nothing he wrote the



"speckled tater" (run by ****-ant Emmet Tyrell jr), was true---and



exposed over $4 million in funds funneled in from Richard Mellon



Scaife to discredit Clinton(s)







Eventually----after spending over $300,000,000 in bogus investigations



by 3 separate committees (D'Amato, Burton, Thompsen)---not one shred



of credible evidence supported any of the dozens and dozens of charges



and claims made by the rightwing







By ALL definitions---it was conspiratorial, done by a "concerted



effort" on the part of wealthy GOP backers, politicians, and



legislative chairmen.







WHACK @







_ Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative _, by



David Brock, who was funded by Scaife, explains what he did in detail.



Exactly---couldn't remember Brock, but at first, he was viciously





attacking. Then he began to see the bogus effort funded by Scaife and



Tyrell stealing from the fund for personal gain.



Regarding Scaife, founder in 1967 of the rightist rag the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review,
a question appeared in

Np, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review was already around. Scaife later bought it and became publisher.

Tyrrell founded the American Spectator magazine in 1967, I believe, though.