Ignoramus13907 wrote:

The answer is, it is the "Santa conspiracy".

Very wide ranging.



You mean expecting to be given something for nothing? You voted for
him.

On 2012-12-05, Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Ignoramus13907 wrote:

The answer is, it is the "Santa conspiracy".

Very wide ranging.

You mean expecting to be given something for nothing? You voted for
him.

Actually, the concept of "low taxes", while continue spending with
abandon, is more like "something for nothing".

i

Ignoramus13907 wrote:



Actually, the concept of "low taxes", while continue spending with
abandon, is more like "something for nothing".
No, it's just like a loan from the seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts. They give you cash for a while, then eventually they
come to "breaka you legs".

Jon

Jon Elson wrote:

Ignoramus13907 wrote:


Actually, the concept of "low taxes", while continue spending with
abandon, is more like "something for nothing".
No, it's just like a loan from the seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts. They give you cash for a while, then eventually they
come to "breaka you legs".


Iggy just doesn't get it. The rest of the US isn't like Chicago's
gansters.

On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:52:09 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Jon Elson wrote:

Ignoramus13907 wrote:


Actually, the concept of "low taxes", while continue spending with
abandon, is more like "something for nothing".
No, it's just like a loan from the seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts. They give you cash for a while, then eventually they
come to "breaka you legs".


Iggy just doesn't get it. The rest of the US isn't like Chicago's
gansters.

NO, it's only D.C., Chickaga, GnuYawk, Bawstun, and Miami which are.

--
....in order that a man may be happy, it is
necessary that he should not only be capable
of his work, but a good judge of his work.
-- John Ruskin

Jon Elson wrote:

Ignoramus13907 wrote:


Actually, the concept of "low taxes", while continue spending with
abandon, is more like "something for nothing".
No, it's just like a loan from the seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts. They give you cash for a while, then eventually they
come to "breaka you legs".

That is pretty much backwards.

Most of the money is being borrowed is
at less than 1% interest. That means it
is borrowed below the rate of inflation.

And a lot of the borrowed money goes for
buying the biggest leg breaking
weapons in the world.

So no its nothing like your analogy.

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Jon Elson wrote:

Ignoramus13907 wrote:


Actually, the concept of "low taxes", while continue spending with
abandon, is more like "something for nothing".
No, it's just like a loan from the seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts. They give you cash for a while, then eventually they
come to "breaka you legs".

Iggy just doesn't get it. The rest of the US isn't like Chicago's
gansters.

Aren't you a tad confused?

Iggy isn't the one who mentioned loan
sharks and "seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts"

jim wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Jon Elson wrote:

Ignoramus13907 wrote:


Actually, the concept of "low taxes", while continue spending with
abandon, is more like "something for nothing".
No, it's just like a loan from the seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts. They give you cash for a while, then eventually they
come to "breaka you legs".

Iggy just doesn't get it. The rest of the US isn't like Chicago's
gansters.

Aren't you a tad confused?


Not at all, but once again you jump in with both feet and fall on
your ass.

On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:01:39 -0600, jim
wrote:



"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Jon Elson wrote:

Ignoramus13907 wrote:


Actually, the concept of "low taxes", while continue spending with
abandon, is more like "something for nothing".
No, it's just like a loan from the seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts. They give you cash for a while, then eventually they
come to "breaka you legs".

Iggy just doesn't get it. The rest of the US isn't like Chicago's
gansters.

Aren't you a tad confused?

Iggy isn't the one who mentioned loan
sharks and "seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts"

Are you complaining about confused posts.... on THIS site :-?

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

jim wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Jon Elson wrote:

Ignoramus13907 wrote:


Actually, the concept of "low taxes", while continue spending with
abandon, is more like "something for nothing".
No, it's just like a loan from the seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts. They give you cash for a while, then eventually they
come to "breaka you legs".

Iggy just doesn't get it. The rest of the US isn't like Chicago's
gansters.

Aren't you a tad confused?

Not at all, but once again you jump in with both feet and fall on
your ass.

Should I be following your example of
jumping in with your ass?

"F.K." wrote:

On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:01:39 -0600, jim
wrote:



"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Jon Elson wrote:

Ignoramus13907 wrote:


Actually, the concept of "low taxes", while continue spending with
abandon, is more like "something for nothing".
No, it's just like a loan from the seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts. They give you cash for a while, then eventually they
come to "breaka you legs".

Iggy just doesn't get it. The rest of the US isn't like Chicago's
gansters.

Aren't you a tad confused?

Iggy isn't the one who mentioned loan
sharks and "seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts"

Are you complaining about confused posts.... on THIS site :-?

Ah right. Complaining is so out of place.
I'll try to make it a little more whiny next time :^}.

jim wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

jim wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Jon Elson wrote:

Ignoramus13907 wrote:


Actually, the concept of "low taxes", while continue spending with
abandon, is more like "something for nothing".
No, it's just like a loan from the seedy guys with the white jackets
and dark shirts. They give you cash for a while, then eventually they
come to "breaka you legs".

Iggy just doesn't get it. The rest of the US isn't like Chicago's
gansters.

Aren't you a tad confused?

Not at all, but once again you jump in with both feet and fall on
your ass.

Should I be following your example of
jumping in with your ass?


I don't own an ass, I'm registered as independent.

jim wrote:

Ah right. Complaining is so out of place.
I'll try to make it a little more whiny next time :^}.


Not if you're treated for that PMS.