Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Electrical code question
My ex is in the process of buying a house. When I looked at the place
I noticed that the Romex cables coming from the main box are draped over the tops of the ceiling joists in the garage (perpendicular to them) with no support, nor any staples or attachment of any kind. It was my understanding that when romex was run over the top of the joists that they must put a 1X under the cables so they don't sag and have staples to restrain them. Anyone know if this is correct? This hose is a foreclosure and the selling bank has alloted $1000 for required repairs. The initial inspection by the lenders inspector didn't note this in the report, but if the code does require the cable to be supported I am thinking that this would be a good idea to get this fixed before she inherits a problem. Roger Shoaf |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Electrical code question
On Tue, 3 May 2011 08:13:51 -0700 (PDT), RS at work
wrote: My ex is in the process of buying a house. When I looked at the place I noticed that the Romex cables coming from the main box are draped over the tops of the ceiling joists in the garage (perpendicular to them) with no support, nor any staples or attachment of any kind. It was my understanding that when romex was run over the top of the joists that they must put a 1X under the cables so they don't sag and have staples to restrain them. Anyone know if this is correct? This hose is a foreclosure and the selling bank has alloted $1000 for required repairs. The initial inspection by the lenders inspector didn't note this in the report, but if the code does require the cable to be supported I am thinking that this would be a good idea to get this fixed before she inherits a problem. Roger Shoaf As an old alarm installer..this is generally what I recall seeing. Seldom would the romex be supported by anything other than the rafters in any house I ever crawled the attics in. I do a lot of commerical electrical these days..and see that occasionally in older office sections of shops as well. Gunner -- "If I say two plus two is four and a Democrat says two plus two is eight, it's not a partial victory for me when we agree that two plus two is six. " Jonah Goldberg (modified) |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Electrical code question
On Tue, 03 May 2011 09:42:18 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote: On Tue, 3 May 2011 08:13:51 -0700 (PDT), RS at work wrote: My ex is in the process of buying a house. When I looked at the place I noticed that the Romex cables coming from the main box are draped over the tops of the ceiling joists in the garage (perpendicular to them) with no support, nor any staples or attachment of any kind. It was my understanding that when romex was run over the top of the joists that they must put a 1X under the cables so they don't sag and have staples to restrain them. Anyone know if this is correct? This hose is a foreclosure and the selling bank has alloted $1000 for required repairs. The initial inspection by the lenders inspector didn't note this in the report, but if the code does require the cable to be supported I am thinking that this would be a good idea to get this fixed before she inherits a problem. Roger Shoaf As an old alarm installer..this is generally what I recall seeing. Seldom would the romex be supported by anything other than the rafters in any house I ever crawled the attics in. I do a lot of commerical electrical these days..and see that occasionally in older office sections of shops as well. Gunner It IS required by code up here - not sure it that is NEC or Canada (or Ontario) specific. In an attic with a ceiling below, the board may not be required, but in basements and open rafter structures it is (apparently to keep people from hanging things on the wire) |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Electrical code question
RS at work wrote:
My ex is in the process of buying a house. When I looked at the place I noticed that the Romex cables coming from the main box are draped over the tops of the ceiling joists in the garage (perpendicular to them) with no support, nor any staples or attachment of any kind. It was my understanding that when romex was run over the top of the joists that they must put a 1X under the cables so they don't sag and have staples to restrain them. Anyone know if this is correct? Absolutely, for new work. But there's a whole class of exceptions for remodeling/repair/addons. Call the city building inspector. This hose is a foreclosure and the selling bank has alloted $1000 for required repairs. The initial inspection by the lenders inspector didn't note this in the report, but if the code does require the cable to be supported I am thinking that this would be a good idea to get this fixed before she inherits a problem. Roger Shoaf |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Electrical code question
On 5/3/2011 11:13 AM, RS at work wrote:
My ex is in the process of buying a house. When I looked at the place I noticed that the Romex cables coming from the main box are draped No one downloaded that 2011 NEC from the binaries newsgroup? I'll be quiet now. MikeB |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Electrical code question
On Tue, 3 May 2011 08:13:51 -0700 (PDT), RS at work
wrote: My ex is in the process of buying a house. When I looked at the place I noticed that the Romex cables coming from the main box are draped over the tops of the ceiling joists in the garage (perpendicular to them) with no support, nor any staples or attachment of any kind. It was my understanding that when romex was run over the top of the joists that they must put a 1X under the cables so they don't sag and have staples to restrain them. Anyone know if this is correct? This hose is a foreclosure and the selling bank has alloted $1000 for required repairs. The initial inspection by the lenders inspector didn't note this in the report, but if the code does require the cable to be supported I am thinking that this would be a good idea to get this fixed before she inherits a problem. Roger Shoaf WOW, if a few missing staples is all that you can find wrong don't worry about it! |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Electrical code question
RS at work wrote:
... The initial inspection by the lenders inspector didn't note this in the report... That's all you need. If the inspector didn't say it's not OK, it should be OK. After all, the lender is the one who eats it if the house burns down. (a highly remote possibility.) I'd put the 1x's under them and staple the romex to the 1x's just because then you won't have drooping romex, which would look kinda like sloppy workmanship. I'm kinda persnickety that way. :-) Cheers! Rich |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question about electrical code | Home Repair | |||
Electrical Code question | Home Repair | |||
Electrical Code question | Home Repair | |||
Electrical Code question | Home Repair | |||
Electrical code question | Home Repair |