"Jeff M" wrote in message
...
On 2/14/2011 6:59 PM, Not Sure wrote:
On Feb 12, 1:42 pm, Jeff wrote:
On 2/12/2011 3:07 PM, Shall not be infringed wrote:

On Feb 3, 7:46 am,
wrote:
http://www.politicsdaily.com/2011/02...palin-brand-sa...
[
In the last several months, Politics Daily has learned that the Palin
family
lawyer, Alaska attorney Thomas Van Flein, has filed applications to
the United
States Patent and Trademark Office to trademark "Sarah Palin " and
"Bristol
Palin ."
]

That would preclude maggots like you from posting garbage about them.

It would do nothing of the kind. Trademarking does not repeal the 1st
Amendment. Your heroine would still be subject to the public scorn and
ridicule her bellicose idiocy and incendiary ignorance engenders in
informed and thinking people everywhere.

Yes, she's already used the hatred of the hysterical dip****s on the
left to make herself a multi-millionaire. I wonder how much she'll
make off this (enough to send you a thank you card, no doubt)?

Palin's fleecing of you rubes doesn't require any assistance from us. You
are easy marks, ripe for the plucking, Palin knows it, and she's laughing
at you much harder than we possibly could, while raking in your cash.

One better than that. Her daughter gets up to $30k for speaking on
.............. abstinence.

Gotta be true, I saw it on the Internet.

I think I know why so many people fear capitalism. They're just jealous.

ROTFLMAO

Steve