"Joe AutoDrill" wrote in message
...
Oh, grow up you pathetic twisted little sociopath.

You must be a liberal. Instead of offering a credible rebuttal, you
name-call.

Thanks,
Rich

You sound like the guy who came over from your NG a few years ago and
couldn't understand why we wouldn't debate the racist bigots who claimed
that "Negroes" were an inferior race that should all be deported. He said
we were being unfair by not listening to his "reasoning," which was of
the same caliber as that of the birthers.

There is no rebuttal worth making, Rich, just like there wasn't to
them -- and for the same reason.

In all fairness, he does have a point.

I don't think so. I think he has a subject for trolling.

No response would have been better than Rich calling him a "pathetic
twisted little sociopath", eh?

I'll have to leave that for you do decide, Joe. These characters tend to run
wild unless someone hammers them a little bit. Then it's a question of
whether you're dealing with a real troll, or a hobbyist. If it's the former,
you just get them going. If it's the latter, they'll give up after a short
while.

You'll have to decide for yourself how you want to handle them. From
experience, though, I'm with calling them what they are.


After all is said and done, there are a LOT of people on bopth sides of
the political fence with lots of opinions these days. To squelch any of
them is stupidity at best - even if their opinions are stupidity at best.
Let the mud identify itself.

Soon, we're hip-deep in it. The hobbyists seem to take a lack of hard
response as acquiescence.

It's not like they're having a real debate. The issues have been fully
aired. They're just going for throw-weight, like Gunner used to do when he
was here full time.


Me personally, I'd actually like to see the whole birth certificate issue
investigated a bit further. There is simply too much smoke for fire to be
considered impossible in this case.
--

The smoke is self-generated by the birther nutbags, like Richard the Loony
Libretardian. They're a self-propelled echo chamber, and your reaction is
exactly what they've been shooting for. To some degree, in other words,
they've been quite successful.

--
Ed Huntress

"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...

"Joe AutoDrill" wrote in message
...
Oh, grow up you pathetic twisted little sociopath.

You must be a liberal. Instead of offering a credible rebuttal, you
name-call.

Thanks,
Rich

You sound like the guy who came over from your NG a few years ago and
couldn't understand why we wouldn't debate the racist bigots who claimed
that "Negroes" were an inferior race that should all be deported. He
said we were being unfair by not listening to his "reasoning," which was
of the same caliber as that of the birthers.

There is no rebuttal worth making, Rich, just like there wasn't to
them -- and for the same reason.

In all fairness, he does have a point.

I don't think so. I think he has a subject for trolling.

No response would have been better than Rich calling him a "pathetic
twisted little sociopath", eh?

I'll have to leave that for you do decide, Joe. These characters tend to
run wild unless someone hammers them a little bit. Then it's a question of
whether you're dealing with a real troll, or a hobbyist. If it's the
former, you just get them going. If it's the latter, they'll give up after
a short while.

You'll have to decide for yourself how you want to handle them. From
experience, though, I'm with calling them what they are.


After all is said and done, there are a LOT of people on bopth sides of
the political fence with lots of opinions these days. To squelch any of
them is stupidity at best - even if their opinions are stupidity at best.
Let the mud identify itself.

Soon, we're hip-deep in it. The hobbyists seem to take a lack of hard
response as acquiescence.

It's not like they're having a real debate. The issues have been fully
aired. They're just going for throw-weight, like Gunner used to do when he
was here full time.

He's not here full time now?


Me personally, I'd actually like to see the whole birth certificate issue
investigated a bit further. There is simply too much smoke for fire to
be considered impossible in this case.
--

The smoke is self-generated by the birther nutbags, like Richard the Loony
Libretardian. They're a self-propelled echo chamber, and your reaction is
exactly what they've been shooting for. To some degree, in other words,
they've been quite successful.

--
Ed Huntress
Soon the only smoke Gunner's going to be dealing with is from the 55 gallon
drum he's warming his hands over.

"ATP*" wrote in message
...

"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...

"Joe AutoDrill" wrote in message
...
Oh, grow up you pathetic twisted little sociopath.

You must be a liberal. Instead of offering a credible rebuttal, you
name-call.

Thanks,
Rich

You sound like the guy who came over from your NG a few years ago and
couldn't understand why we wouldn't debate the racist bigots who
claimed that "Negroes" were an inferior race that should all be
deported. He said we were being unfair by not listening to his
"reasoning," which was of the same caliber as that of the birthers.

There is no rebuttal worth making, Rich, just like there wasn't to
them -- and for the same reason.

In all fairness, he does have a point.

I don't think so. I think he has a subject for trolling.

No response would have been better than Rich calling him a "pathetic
twisted little sociopath", eh?

I'll have to leave that for you do decide, Joe. These characters tend to
run wild unless someone hammers them a little bit. Then it's a question
of whether you're dealing with a real troll, or a hobbyist. If it's the
former, you just get them going. If it's the latter, they'll give up
after a short while.

You'll have to decide for yourself how you want to handle them. From
experience, though, I'm with calling them what they are.


After all is said and done, there are a LOT of people on bopth sides of
the political fence with lots of opinions these days. To squelch any of
them is stupidity at best - even if their opinions are stupidity at
best. Let the mud identify itself.

Soon, we're hip-deep in it. The hobbyists seem to take a lack of hard
response as acquiescence.

It's not like they're having a real debate. The issues have been fully
aired. They're just going for throw-weight, like Gunner used to do when
he was here full time.

He's not here full time now?

Oh, hell no. This is a pale version of Gunner at full chat.



Me personally, I'd actually like to see the whole birth certificate
issue investigated a bit further. There is simply too much smoke for
fire to be considered impossible in this case.
--

The smoke is self-generated by the birther nutbags, like Richard the
Loony Libretardian. They're a self-propelled echo chamber, and your
reaction is exactly what they've been shooting for. To some degree, in
other words, they've been quite successful.

--
Ed Huntress

Soon the only smoke Gunner's going to be dealing with is from the 55
gallon drum he's warming his hands over.

Don't count on it. He has a good offer from Tom, and he may take it yet.

--
Ed Huntress

"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...

"ATP*" wrote in message
...

"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...

"Joe AutoDrill" wrote in message
...
Oh, grow up you pathetic twisted little sociopath.

You must be a liberal. Instead of offering a credible rebuttal, you
name-call.

Thanks,
Rich

You sound like the guy who came over from your NG a few years ago and
couldn't understand why we wouldn't debate the racist bigots who
claimed that "Negroes" were an inferior race that should all be
deported. He said we were being unfair by not listening to his
"reasoning," which was of the same caliber as that of the birthers.

There is no rebuttal worth making, Rich, just like there wasn't to
them -- and for the same reason.

In all fairness, he does have a point.

I don't think so. I think he has a subject for trolling.

No response would have been better than Rich calling him a "pathetic
twisted little sociopath", eh?

I'll have to leave that for you do decide, Joe. These characters tend to
run wild unless someone hammers them a little bit. Then it's a question
of whether you're dealing with a real troll, or a hobbyist. If it's the
former, you just get them going. If it's the latter, they'll give up
after a short while.

You'll have to decide for yourself how you want to handle them. From
experience, though, I'm with calling them what they are.


After all is said and done, there are a LOT of people on bopth sides of
the political fence with lots of opinions these days. To squelch any
of them is stupidity at best - even if their opinions are stupidity at
best. Let the mud identify itself.

Soon, we're hip-deep in it. The hobbyists seem to take a lack of hard
response as acquiescence.

It's not like they're having a real debate. The issues have been fully
aired. They're just going for throw-weight, like Gunner used to do when
he was here full time.

He's not here full time now?

Oh, hell no. This is a pale version of Gunner at full chat.



Me personally, I'd actually like to see the whole birth certificate
issue investigated a bit further. There is simply too much smoke for
fire to be considered impossible in this case.
--

The smoke is self-generated by the birther nutbags, like Richard the
Loony Libretardian. They're a self-propelled echo chamber, and your
reaction is exactly what they've been shooting for. To some degree, in
other words, they've been quite successful.

--
Ed Huntress

Soon the only smoke Gunner's going to be dealing with is from the 55
gallon drum he's warming his hands over.

Don't count on it. He has a good offer from Tom, and he may take it yet.

--
Ed Huntress
That might last a week or two- until Tom wakes up and Gunner turns on his
benefactor- but it will make another interesting chapter in the saga of the
welfare/drama queen.

"ATP*" wrote in message
...

"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...

"ATP*" wrote in message
...

"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...

"Joe AutoDrill" wrote in message
...
Oh, grow up you pathetic twisted little sociopath.

You must be a liberal. Instead of offering a credible rebuttal, you
name-call.

Thanks,
Rich

You sound like the guy who came over from your NG a few years ago and
couldn't understand why we wouldn't debate the racist bigots who
claimed that "Negroes" were an inferior race that should all be
deported. He said we were being unfair by not listening to his
"reasoning," which was of the same caliber as that of the birthers.

There is no rebuttal worth making, Rich, just like there wasn't to
them -- and for the same reason.

In all fairness, he does have a point.

I don't think so. I think he has a subject for trolling.

No response would have been better than Rich calling him a "pathetic
twisted little sociopath", eh?

I'll have to leave that for you do decide, Joe. These characters tend
to run wild unless someone hammers them a little bit. Then it's a
question of whether you're dealing with a real troll, or a hobbyist. If
it's the former, you just get them going. If it's the latter, they'll
give up after a short while.

You'll have to decide for yourself how you want to handle them. From
experience, though, I'm with calling them what they are.


After all is said and done, there are a LOT of people on bopth sides
of the political fence with lots of opinions these days. To squelch
any of them is stupidity at best - even if their opinions are
stupidity at best. Let the mud identify itself.

Soon, we're hip-deep in it. The hobbyists seem to take a lack of hard
response as acquiescence.

It's not like they're having a real debate. The issues have been fully
aired. They're just going for throw-weight, like Gunner used to do when
he was here full time.

He's not here full time now?

Oh, hell no. This is a pale version of Gunner at full chat.



Me personally, I'd actually like to see the whole birth certificate
issue investigated a bit further. There is simply too much smoke for
fire to be considered impossible in this case.
--

The smoke is self-generated by the birther nutbags, like Richard the
Loony Libretardian. They're a self-propelled echo chamber, and your
reaction is exactly what they've been shooting for. To some degree, in
other words, they've been quite successful.

--
Ed Huntress

Soon the only smoke Gunner's going to be dealing with is from the 55
gallon drum he's warming his hands over.

Don't count on it. He has a good offer from Tom, and he may take it yet.

--
Ed Huntress
That might last a week or two- until Tom wakes up and Gunner turns on his
benefactor- but it will make another interesting chapter in the saga of
the welfare/drama queen.

Having seen Tom here when he's wound up, I don't think I'd want the job
myself. d8-) However, you never know. It might work out for both of them.

--
Ed Huntress

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:25:25 -0500, "ATP*"
wrote:


"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...

"Joe AutoDrill" wrote in message
...
Oh, grow up you pathetic twisted little sociopath.

You must be a liberal. Instead of offering a credible rebuttal, you
name-call.

Thanks,
Rich

You sound like the guy who came over from your NG a few years ago and
couldn't understand why we wouldn't debate the racist bigots who claimed
that "Negroes" were an inferior race that should all be deported. He
said we were being unfair by not listening to his "reasoning," which was
of the same caliber as that of the birthers.

There is no rebuttal worth making, Rich, just like there wasn't to
them -- and for the same reason.

In all fairness, he does have a point.

I don't think so. I think he has a subject for trolling.

No response would have been better than Rich calling him a "pathetic
twisted little sociopath", eh?

I'll have to leave that for you do decide, Joe. These characters tend to
run wild unless someone hammers them a little bit. Then it's a question of
whether you're dealing with a real troll, or a hobbyist. If it's the
former, you just get them going. If it's the latter, they'll give up after
a short while.

You'll have to decide for yourself how you want to handle them. From
experience, though, I'm with calling them what they are.


After all is said and done, there are a LOT of people on bopth sides of
the political fence with lots of opinions these days. To squelch any of
them is stupidity at best - even if their opinions are stupidity at best.
Let the mud identify itself.

Soon, we're hip-deep in it. The hobbyists seem to take a lack of hard
response as acquiescence.

It's not like they're having a real debate. The issues have been fully
aired. They're just going for throw-weight, like Gunner used to do when he
was here full time.

He's not here full time now?


Me personally, I'd actually like to see the whole birth certificate issue
investigated a bit further. There is simply too much smoke for fire to
be considered impossible in this case.
--

The smoke is self-generated by the birther nutbags, like Richard the Loony
Libretardian. They're a self-propelled echo chamber, and your reaction is
exactly what they've been shooting for. To some degree, in other words,
they've been quite successful.

--
Ed Huntress
Soon the only smoke Gunner's going to be dealing with is from the 55 gallon
drum he's warming his hands over.


Or the one they filled with concrete along with your corpse and used as
fill in a breakwater.

G

Hypothetically speaking of course.

Gunner

"Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
Unknown Usnet Poster

Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
Keyton

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:44:26 -0500, "ATP*"
wrote:

but it will make another interesting chapter in the saga of the
welfare/drama queen.


So you are admitting to being Gay also?

Fascinating. No big thing of course..but fascinating nonetheless.

Gunner

"Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
Unknown Usnet Poster

Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
Keyton