On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:03:13 -0700, the infamous Gunner Asch
scrawled the following:

On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:28:11 +0100, Mark Rand
wrote:

On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:24:55 +0100, Mark Rand wrote:



You do realize that the number of British military deaths in the war were 90%
as high as US deaths and total British deaths were almost 10% higher than
total US deaths. Those numbers are dwarfed by the numbers of Russian deaths.


Correct myself. British Military deaths in WWII were 10% higher than US
military deaths.

Mark Rand
RTFM

And the british were in it for nearly 2 years longer than the US.

If we hadn't joined in WWII, would there still -be- a Great Britain? I
doubt I'm alone in "rather doubting it."

Too many people have died in war over land and religion.

--
You can't do anything about the length of your life,
but you _can_ do something about its width and depth.
-- Evan Esar

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
snip
If we hadn't joined in WWII, would there still -be- a Great Britain? I
doubt I'm alone in "rather doubting it."


I wonder if we would be better off if Germany had won. Hitler and that
philosophy would have passed quickly and good sense would have prevailed and
led the world into peace and prosperity.
....sure beats the socialism we're heading into.

On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 22:11:53 -0400, "Buerste" wrote:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
.. .
snip
If we hadn't joined in WWII, would there still -be- a Great Britain? I
doubt I'm alone in "rather doubting it."


I wonder if we would be better off if Germany had won. Hitler and that
philosophy would have passed quickly and good sense would have prevailed and
led the world into peace and prosperity.

Hardly...The Nazis would have continued plaguing the world ..taking
more and more of it and killing off all those who were Jews, Gypsies
etc etc etc until they had prvailed over most of the planet, or had
been put down like the viciious dogs they were. Be thankful they are
gone.

...sure beats the socialism we're heading into.

Socialism, Nazism, Marxism...all are part of a great game played by
people who want to be rulers of it all.

We defeated the Nazis, we defeated the Marxists..now its time to kill
the Socialists.

Stockup, prepare, strike when the time is right.

Gunner



"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner

On Apr 3, 9:28*pm, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 22:11:53 -0400, "Buerste" wrote:

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
.. .
snip
If we hadn't joined in WWII, would there still -be- a Great Britain? I
doubt I'm alone in "rather doubting it."

I wonder if we would be better off if Germany had won. *Hitler and that
philosophy would have passed quickly and good sense would have prevailed and
led the world into peace and prosperity.

Hardly...The Nazis would have continued plaguing the world ..taking
more and more of it and killing off all those who were Jews, Gypsies
etc etc etc until they had prvailed over most of the planet, or had
been put down like the viciious dogs they were. *Be thankful they are
gone.

...sure beats the socialism we're heading into.

Socialism, Nazism, Marxism...all are part of a great game played by
people who want to be rulers of it all.

We defeated the Nazis, we defeated the Marxists..now its time to kill
the Socialists.

Stockup, prepare, strike when the time is right.

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont *kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you
for torturing the cat." *Gunner

The Socialists were defeated last November.

TMT

"Buerste" wrote in message
...

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
snip
If we hadn't joined in WWII, would there still -be- a Great Britain? I
doubt I'm alone in "rather doubting it."


I wonder if we would be better off if Germany had won. Hitler and that
philosophy would have passed quickly and good sense would have prevailed
and led the world into peace and prosperity.
...sure beats the socialism we're heading into.
Now you're revealing your true colors.

On Apr 3, 10:11*pm, "Buerste" wrote:
"Larry Jaques" wrote in message

...
snip

If we hadn't joined in WWII, would there still -be- a Great Britain? I
doubt I'm alone in "rather doubting it."

I wonder if we would be better off if Germany had won. *Hitler and that
philosophy would have passed quickly and good sense would have prevailed and
led the world into peace and prosperity.
...sure beats the socialism we're heading into.

You're kidding, right?

Let the Record show that "Buerste" on or about Fri,
3 Apr 2009 22:11:53 -0400 did write/type or cause to appear in
rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
snip
If we hadn't joined in WWII, would there still -be- a Great Britain? I
doubt I'm alone in "rather doubting it."

I wonder if we would be better off if Germany had won. Hitler and that
philosophy would have passed quickly

Define "quickly".

The same could be said in an alternate universe where the
Bolshevik Soviet Union didn't last "Lenin and that philosophy would
have passed quickly..." where as in this timeline, it passed "quickly"
if you consider 70 years to be a short time.

and good sense would have prevailed and
led the world into peace and prosperity.
...sure beats the socialism we're heading into.

Unfortunately, Hitler lead a party called "The German Worker's
National Socialist Party". A left deviation from the Marxist -
Hegelian idea, much as the Bolshevikiis were a Right deviation. (And
the Trotskyites were even more out of line.)

-
pyotr filipivich
We will drink no whiskey before its nine.
It's eight fifty eight. Close enough!

"pyotr filipivich" wrote in message
...
Let the Record show that "Buerste" on or about Fri,
3 Apr 2009 22:11:53 -0400 did write/type or cause to appear in
rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
snip
If we hadn't joined in WWII, would there still -be- a Great Britain? I
doubt I'm alone in "rather doubting it."

I wonder if we would be better off if Germany had won. Hitler and that
philosophy would have passed quickly

Define "quickly".

The same could be said in an alternate universe where the
Bolshevik Soviet Union didn't last "Lenin and that philosophy would
have passed quickly..." where as in this timeline, it passed "quickly"
if you consider 70 years to be a short time.

and good sense would have prevailed and
led the world into peace and prosperity.
...sure beats the socialism we're heading into.

Unfortunately, Hitler lead a party called "The German Worker's
National Socialist Party". A left deviation from the Marxist -
Hegelian idea, much as the Bolshevikiis were a Right deviation. (And
the Trotskyites were even more out of line.)

-
pyotr filipivich
We will drink no whiskey before its nine.
It's eight fifty eight. Close enough!

Tom obviously doesn't have a clue, so you might as well be talking to a
brush. Unfortunately, his last statement goes beyond cluelessness and is
really distasteful, to say the least.

Let the Record show that "ATP*" on or
about Sun, 5 Apr 2009 08:23:58 -0400 did write/type or cause to appear
in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

"pyotr filipivich" wrote in message
.. .
Let the Record show that "Buerste" on or about Fri,
3 Apr 2009 22:11:53 -0400 did write/type or cause to appear in
rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
snip
If we hadn't joined in WWII, would there still -be- a Great Britain? I
doubt I'm alone in "rather doubting it."

I wonder if we would be better off if Germany had won. Hitler and that
philosophy would have passed quickly

Define "quickly".

The same could be said in an alternate universe where the
Bolshevik Soviet Union didn't last "Lenin and that philosophy would
have passed quickly..." where as in this timeline, it passed "quickly"
if you consider 70 years to be a short time.

and good sense would have prevailed and
led the world into peace and prosperity.
...sure beats the socialism we're heading into.

Unfortunately, Hitler lead a party called "The German Worker's
National Socialist Party". A left deviation from the Marxist -
Hegelian idea, much as the Bolshevikiis were a Right deviation. (And
the Trotskyites were even more out of line.)

-
pyotr filipivich
We will drink no whiskey before its nine.
It's eight fifty eight. Close enough!

Tom obviously doesn't have a clue, so you might as well be talking to a
brush. Unfortunately, his last statement goes beyond cluelessness and is
really distasteful, to say the least.

Tom might not recognize a clue if it stripped naked, painted its
butt blue and danced upon the piano singing "I'm a lonely little Clue
in an Onion Patch"; but that doesn't mean I can't point it out for
those who might benefit from his cluelessness.
I noticed that a long time ago, how the students of The Great
Teacher are such clueless dweebs - because if they "got it" - then
there would be no further exposition to explain it to those who came
after - the readers.


cheerioes
pyotr


-
pyotr filipivich
We will drink no whiskey before its nine.
It's eight fifty eight. Close enough!

"pyotr filipivich" wrote in message
...
Let the Record show that "ATP*" on or
about Sun, 5 Apr 2009 08:23:58 -0400 did write/type or cause to appear
in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

"pyotr filipivich" wrote in message
. ..
Let the Record show that "Buerste" on or about Fri,
3 Apr 2009 22:11:53 -0400 did write/type or cause to appear in
rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
snip
If we hadn't joined in WWII, would there still -be- a Great Britain? I
doubt I'm alone in "rather doubting it."

I wonder if we would be better off if Germany had won. Hitler and that
philosophy would have passed quickly

Define "quickly".

The same could be said in an alternate universe where the
Bolshevik Soviet Union didn't last "Lenin and that philosophy would
have passed quickly..." where as in this timeline, it passed "quickly"
if you consider 70 years to be a short time.

and good sense would have prevailed and
led the world into peace and prosperity.
...sure beats the socialism we're heading into.

Unfortunately, Hitler lead a party called "The German Worker's
National Socialist Party". A left deviation from the Marxist -
Hegelian idea, much as the Bolshevikiis were a Right deviation. (And
the Trotskyites were even more out of line.)

-
pyotr filipivich
We will drink no whiskey before its nine.
It's eight fifty eight. Close enough!

Tom obviously doesn't have a clue, so you might as well be talking to a
brush. Unfortunately, his last statement goes beyond cluelessness and is
really distasteful, to say the least.

Tom might not recognize a clue if it stripped naked, painted its
butt blue and danced upon the piano singing "I'm a lonely little Clue
in an Onion Patch"; but that doesn't mean I can't point it out for
those who might benefit from his cluelessness.
I noticed that a long time ago, how the students of The Great
Teacher are such clueless dweebs - because if they "got it" - then
there would be no further exposition to explain it to those who came
after - the readers.


cheerioes
pyotr

true. if anything the current threat is growing corporatism, it seems
Goldman Sachs alumni are calling the shots for Obama's administration, just
like they did for Bush's administration.

Larry Jaques wrote:

If we hadn't joined in WWII, would there still -be- a Great Britain? I
doubt I'm alone in "rather doubting it."

Not a chance. Russia wouldn't exist either nor Israel.

Wes