Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out
of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? Eric |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
wrote in message ... Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? Eric Looks like an angle grinder, doesn't it. You need a reliable ignition source before you turn the hydrogen on! I guess the oxygen goes on first, but someone will be along in a minute with all the details. |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
newshound wrote:
wrote in message ... Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? Eric Looks like an angle grinder, doesn't it. You need a reliable ignition source before you turn the hydrogen on! I guess the oxygen goes on first, but someone will be along in a minute with all the details. Yes, I always understood that those sparks were used to ignite the liquid fuel engines. I'm sure there are folks here that can answer in far more detail. AL A. |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:08:04 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm,
quickly quoth: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? That's the NASA version of a Bic lighter. It causes the volatile fuel to ignite. Remember hearing the countdown? Three, two, one, ignition, liftoff. -- Such is the irresistible nature of truth that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing. -- Thomas Paine |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
Larry Jaques wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:08:04 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm, quickly quoth: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? That's the NASA version of a Bic lighter. It causes the volatile fuel to ignite. Remember hearing the countdown? Three, two, one, ignition, liftoff. -- Such is the irresistible nature of truth that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing. -- Thomas Paine Made that up all by yourself, eh? t-15 suppression water start t-10 secs, free hydrogen burn off initiators fire, run 9 secs (+5/-0) t-6.6 sec Main engine 3 start t-6.48 sec Main engine 2 start t-6.36 sec Main engine 1 start t-0 SRB ignition, release hold downs Liftoff |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
And there is always in the shot a device that shoots
out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? These are hot beads, ceramic I believe. They make for smooth ignition instead of a fuel-air or fuel-oxidizer explosion. The principle is not unlike lighting a welding torch, where you get a bang if you relight without turning off the O2. |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:47:58 -0400, Stuart Wheaton
wrote: wrote: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? Eric Those are Hydrogen Burn Off Initiators. They are meant to keep leaking or unburned hydrogen fuel from a failed engine start from accumulating to explosive levels. Good Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFXVxc6ms1U Stuart Thanks Stuart. I always figured that they couldn't possibly be for lighting the engines. If they were, then they would need to be blasting off with the shuttle. Either that, or some astronaut would need to go on an EVA with a striker. I can just see this poor spacesuited figure holding a striker around the edge of a rocket nozzle. Eric |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
|
#10
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
SteveB wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:47:58 -0400, Stuart Wheaton wrote: wrote: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? Eric Those are Hydrogen Burn Off Initiators. They are meant to keep leaking or unburned hydrogen fuel from a failed engine start from accumulating to explosive levels. Good Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFXVxc6ms1U Stuart Thanks Stuart. I always figured that they couldn't possibly be for lighting the engines. If they were, then they would need to be blasting off with the shuttle. Either that, or some astronaut would need to go on an EVA with a striker. I can just see this poor spacesuited figure holding a striker around the edge of a rocket nozzle. Eric I'm late on this, but I saw a program a long long time ago that said they were to ignite gases around the base. I thought that plausible, but then looking at that huge friggin solid propellant blowtorch going off, I wondered what extra gas could be hanging around and not ignited. I guess that's why they're sitting there in Mission Control and I'm sitting here in Buck Snort. As an aside, I nominate Cliff Culprick (sp?) for the job. Steve The solid boosters don't ignite until AFTER the main engines are running. |
#11
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
Jim Chandler wrote:
wrote: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? Eric If you find out, let the rest of us know. I wrote to NASA a few years ago with the same question and never received an answer. I have to assume that the shower of sparks is to ignite any gathering fuel before is can collect into a dangerous amount, but that's just my opinion. I build these for engines for a living. I can't imagine why NASA didn't reply. They are pretty good at PR. The main engines in any launch platform that is liquid fueled mix fuel and oxidizer in the motor section. A coaxial motor has one section for each with a difuser in between. They sections are joined with metering ports. Typically, these systems run at three hundred pounds and, as an example, the third stage set I'm building now feeds the oxidized through a two inch OD ..065 wall Stainless inlet port and the fuel is similar but an inch and a half in diameter. That is a LOT of stuff. The problem, as you might have realised, is getting from zero to 300 lbs with that much flow and without tearing the internals apart. Balancing the pressure on both sides of the system is important. It doesn't take long but you still "spill" a lot of volume and that has to be ignited in a controlled manner. The engines are actually fired electrically by an igniter that runs directly through the center of the engine and isn't unlike the spark plug in you car. Well, except for the price. LOL Rocketdyne has an engine the size of the shuttle Main on a concrete pad in front of their Chatsworth, California plant. Stop and look it over if you ever have the chance. -- John R. Carroll www.machiningsolution.com |
#12
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
wrote in message ... On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:47:58 -0400, Stuart Wheaton wrote: wrote: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? Eric Those are Hydrogen Burn Off Initiators. They are meant to keep leaking or unburned hydrogen fuel from a failed engine start from accumulating to explosive levels. Good Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFXVxc6ms1U Stuart Thanks Stuart. I always figured that they couldn't possibly be for lighting the engines. If they were, then they would need to be blasting off with the shuttle. Either that, or some astronaut would need to go on an EVA with a striker. I can just see this poor spacesuited figure holding a striker around the edge of a rocket nozzle. Eric I'm late on this, but I saw a program a long long time ago that said they were to ignite gases around the base. I thought that plausible, but then looking at that huge friggin solid propellant blowtorch going off, I wondered what extra gas could be hanging around and not ignited. I guess that's why they're sitting there in Mission Control and I'm sitting here in Buck Snort. As an aside, I nominate Cliff Culprick (sp?) for the job. Steve |
#13
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:01:48 -0800, "SteveB" toquerville@zionvistas
wrote: wrote in message ... On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:47:58 -0400, Stuart Wheaton wrote: wrote: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? Eric Those are Hydrogen Burn Off Initiators. They are meant to keep leaking or unburned hydrogen fuel from a failed engine start from accumulating to explosive levels. Good Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFXVxc6ms1U Stuart Thanks Stuart. I always figured that they couldn't possibly be for lighting the engines. If they were, then they would need to be blasting off with the shuttle. Either that, or some astronaut would need to go on an EVA with a striker. I can just see this poor spacesuited figure holding a striker around the edge of a rocket nozzle. Eric I'm late on this, but I saw a program a long long time ago that said they were to ignite gases around the base. I thought that plausible, but then looking at that huge friggin solid propellant blowtorch going off, I wondered what extra gas could be hanging around and not ignited. I guess that's why they're sitting there in Mission Control and I'm sitting here in Buck Snort. As an aside, I nominate Cliff Culprick (sp?) for the job. Steve Id be happy to donate a box of Blue Diamond "strike anywhere" kitchen matches and an umbrella to him for the job. Gunner "The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened." -- Norman Thomas, American socialist |
#14
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
Gunner Asch wrote: Id be happy to donate a box of Blue Diamond "strike anywhere" kitchen matches and an umbrella to him for the job. What, no Acme® anvil? ;-) -- http://improve-usenet.org/index.html If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm Sporadic E is the Earth's aluminum foil beanie for the 'global warming' sheep. |
#15
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
wrote: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? Eric Others have said "why", but from my standpoint, the "what" is just as fascinating. Those are zirconium gerbs (fountains by any other name). Zirconium is so damned expensive because of its military/aerospace igniter uses, that we cannot use it in civilian fireworks. But it makes some beautiful, white, and very hot sparks. LLoyd |
#16
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
SteveB wrote:
"cavelamb himself" wrote in message m... SteveB wrote: wrote in message ... On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:47:58 -0400, Stuart Wheaton wrote: wrote: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? Eric Those are Hydrogen Burn Off Initiators. They are meant to keep leaking or unburned hydrogen fuel from a failed engine start from accumulating to explosive levels. Good Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFXVxc6ms1U Stuart Thanks Stuart. I always figured that they couldn't possibly be for lighting the engines. If they were, then they would need to be blasting off with the shuttle. Either that, or some astronaut would need to go on an EVA with a striker. I can just see this poor spacesuited figure holding a striker around the edge of a rocket nozzle. Eric I'm late on this, but I saw a program a long long time ago that said they were to ignite gases around the base. I thought that plausible, but then looking at that huge friggin solid propellant blowtorch going off, I wondered what extra gas could be hanging around and not ignited. I guess that's why they're sitting there in Mission Control and I'm sitting here in Buck Snort. As an aside, I nominate Cliff Culprick (sp?) for the job. Steve The solid boosters don't ignite until AFTER the main engines are running. Don't know what starts when, or the exact sequence, but in every launch I have seen, I cannot imagine anything burnable under that rocket not finding an ignition source. Steve That's actually the reason they are there. If the SSME's don't fire properly, there's a bunch of hydrogen pouring out of them, the initiators will ignite it before it has a chance to accumulate to dangerous levels and blow the ass end off the spacecraft. They only burn a few seconds until the engines are running full on. Those SSME's get to 90% or better thrust in about 4 seconds, which is the trigger that fires the solids. Remember this is NASA, suspenders and belt. Especially when you think about the fact that they don't add weight to the ship. Stuart |
#17
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
"cavelamb himself" wrote in message m... SteveB wrote: wrote in message ... On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:47:58 -0400, Stuart Wheaton wrote: wrote: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? Eric Those are Hydrogen Burn Off Initiators. They are meant to keep leaking or unburned hydrogen fuel from a failed engine start from accumulating to explosive levels. Good Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFXVxc6ms1U Stuart Thanks Stuart. I always figured that they couldn't possibly be for lighting the engines. If they were, then they would need to be blasting off with the shuttle. Either that, or some astronaut would need to go on an EVA with a striker. I can just see this poor spacesuited figure holding a striker around the edge of a rocket nozzle. Eric I'm late on this, but I saw a program a long long time ago that said they were to ignite gases around the base. I thought that plausible, but then looking at that huge friggin solid propellant blowtorch going off, I wondered what extra gas could be hanging around and not ignited. I guess that's why they're sitting there in Mission Control and I'm sitting here in Buck Snort. As an aside, I nominate Cliff Culprick (sp?) for the job. Steve The solid boosters don't ignite until AFTER the main engines are running. Don't know what starts when, or the exact sequence, but in every launch I have seen, I cannot imagine anything burnable under that rocket not finding an ignition source. Steve |
#18
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:10:23 -0400, Stuart Wheaton wrote:
Larry Jaques wrote: On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:08:04 GMT, quickly quoth: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? That's the NASA version of a Bic lighter. It causes the volatile fuel to ignite. Remember hearing the countdown? Three, two, one, ignition, liftoff. Made that up all by yourself, eh? t-15 suppression water start t-10 secs, free hydrogen burn off initiators fire, run 9 secs (+5/-0) t-6.6 sec Main engine 3 start t-6.48 sec Main engine 2 start t-6.36 sec Main engine 1 start t-0 SRB ignition, release hold downs Liftoff And more important, if by around t-1 if the computers don't see three engines running properly at programmed outputs and steering gimbals responding and aimed straight, with correct pressures and temperatures everywhere, NO solids and NO liftoff. The Main Engines can be shut down and the launch aborted easily enough if something isn't right. But when they light off the Solids they'd better blow the hold-down bolts within a few milliseconds, because that ship is leaving, period. You don't want to make a Lawn Dart or a Daisy Cutter out of a spacecraft if there are people aboard. That kind of wild ride tends to be immediately deleterious to life and health. (Ain't that an understatement...) -- Bruce -- |
#19
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:27:27 -0700, Bruce L. Bergman
wrote: On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:10:23 -0400, Stuart Wheaton wrote: Larry Jaques wrote: On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:08:04 GMT, quickly quoth: Whenever the launch is shown there is a shot of the exhaust coming out of the rockets. And there is always in the shot a device that shoots out sparks horizontally. What is the spark shower for? That's the NASA version of a Bic lighter. It causes the volatile fuel to ignite. Remember hearing the countdown? Three, two, one, ignition, liftoff. Made that up all by yourself, eh? t-15 suppression water start t-10 secs, free hydrogen burn off initiators fire, run 9 secs (+5/-0) t-6.6 sec Main engine 3 start t-6.48 sec Main engine 2 start t-6.36 sec Main engine 1 start t-0 SRB ignition, release hold downs Liftoff And more important, if by around t-1 if the computers don't see three engines running properly at programmed outputs and steering gimbals responding and aimed straight, with correct pressures and temperatures everywhere, NO solids and NO liftoff. The Main Engines can be shut down and the launch aborted easily enough if something isn't right. But when they light off the Solids they'd better blow the hold-down bolts within a few milliseconds, because that ship is leaving, period. You don't want to make a Lawn Dart or a Daisy Cutter out of a spacecraft if there are people aboard. That kind of wild ride tends to be immediately deleterious to life and health. (Ain't that an understatement...) -- Bruce -- and makes nasa look bad when approriations time comes around..... "The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened." -- Norman Thomas, American socialist |
#20
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
In article ,
Bruce L. Bergman wrote: You don't want to make a Lawn Dart or a Daisy Cutter out of a spacecraft if there are people aboard. That kind of wild ride tends to be immediately deleterious to life and health. (Ain't that an understatement...) NASA has never made a Lawn Dart or a Daisy Cutter out of a spacecraft. NASA has, however, shown very bad stringing when shotgunning a couple of shuttles and egregious CYA the like of which has never been heard on any trap range when explaining them both. |
#21
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
John Husvar wrote:
In article , Bruce L. Bergman wrote: You don't want to make a Lawn Dart or a Daisy Cutter out of a spacecraft if there are people aboard. That kind of wild ride tends to be immediately deleterious to life and health. (Ain't that an understatement...) NASA has never made a Lawn Dart or a Daisy Cutter out of a spacecraft. NASA has, however, shown very bad stringing when shotgunning a couple of shuttles and egregious CYA the like of which has never been heard on any trap range when explaining them both. Go back and look at the tests done using the Atlas rockets... More than a few went TU just off the pad, when they made it off the pad at all.... I'll say one thing for ANY of the crews, it takes MAJOR LEAGUE guts to willingly strap your ass to the top of a multi billion dollar machine that was built out of parts procured through the lowest bidder program... -- Steve W. |
#22
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
In article , "Steve W."
wrote: John Husvar wrote: In article , Bruce L. Bergman wrote: You don't want to make a Lawn Dart or a Daisy Cutter out of a spacecraft if there are people aboard. That kind of wild ride tends to be immediately deleterious to life and health. (Ain't that an understatement...) NASA has never made a Lawn Dart or a Daisy Cutter out of a spacecraft. NASA has, however, shown very bad stringing when shotgunning a couple of shuttles and egregious CYA the like of which has never been heard on any trap range when explaining them both. Go back and look at the tests done using the Atlas rockets... More than a few went TU just off the pad, when they made it off the pad at all.... I'll say one thing for ANY of the crews, it takes MAJOR LEAGUE guts to willingly strap your ass to the top of a multi billion dollar machine that was built out of parts procured through the lowest bidder program... Those weren't spacecraft. Those were attempts to catch up with Russian rockets which had made it into orbit and, thus, were spacecraft. Fireworks displays, mere fireworks displays. I wonder what the reactions would have been if the USSR's space teams had conducted their tries, tests, and failures as openly as the USA did. The USSR could sit back in Baikal and smash ever so much hardware into lawn darts and nobody the wiser. Not us, oh, no! As usual, we had to hang all our dirty laundry out for the whole neighborhood to see! Still doing it, too. |
#23
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
Hello all
I work on these engines. They are started with spark plugs that can take a little heat, just way over priced. The sparks are sprayed to ignite any leaking hydrogen. If to much hydrogen leaks into any space it will detonate. The greater amount of gas the greater the detonation. At Mississippi test site they use glow plugs all over the engine for the same reason. Hope this helped. |
#24
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT Space Shuttle question
wrote in message ... Hello all I work on these engines. They are started with spark plugs that can take a little heat, just way over priced. The sparks are sprayed to ignite any leaking hydrogen. If to much hydrogen leaks into any space it will detonate. The greater amount of gas the greater the detonation. At Mississippi test site they use glow plugs all over the engine for the same reason. Hope this helped. Damn. I recall getting flamed in a conversation here when I said hydrogen was flammable. Steve |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Excellent Space Shuttle Assembly Photos | Metalworking | |||
Shop space Question | Metalworking | |||
Space Shuttle Grouting | UK diy | |||
How to craft a space shuttle ??? | Metalworking | |||
Making a space shuttle | Woodworking |