I took the two back hold-down plates off the carriage, cleaned
everything up, and re-assembled. There was visible wear on the plates,
but not excessively so.

The left (headstock side) plate had two 0.002" brass shims under it,
while the right plate had only one 0.002" shim. I removed one shim from
each plate, and the carriage dragged somewhat near the tailstock (where
the bed is unworn), so I made up two 0.001 shims to replace the removed
0.002" shims.

In any event, the hold down plates were not very loose to start with.
The manual shows the late coming with more shims that I have, so prior
owners may have been removing shims as needed.

With a 3/8" shank carbide bit, I was able to make a cut ~0.100" deep
without chatter, although a heavy hand was needed. It was on the edge
of chatter, and a long smoking hot chip came out. I was cutting a
shoulder, moving the carriage to the left.

But I do seem to be achieving something like the expected stock removal
rate.

Joe Gwinn

Joseph Gwinn wrote:

With a 3/8" shank carbide bit, I was able to make a cut ~0.100" deep
without chatter, although a heavy hand was needed.

So the 0.1" were radius? Then you really can be happy with that value on a
lathe of that size. Even for diameter, it is quite OK.


... and a long smoking hot chip came out.

Coolant. :-)


Nick
--
The lowcost-DRO:
http://www.yadro.de

In article ,
Nick Mueller wrote:

Joseph Gwinn wrote:

With a 3/8" shank carbide bit, I was able to make a cut ~0.100" deep
without chatter, although a heavy hand was needed.

So the 0.1" were radius? Then you really can be happy with that value on a
lathe of that size. Even for diameter, it is quite OK.

Yes, 0.100" radius (0.200" diameter reduction).

I may have found and fixed all the loose joints. Except for those in
the toolpost itself.


... and a long smoking hot chip came out.

Coolant. :-)

Brushed-on black sulfur oil. Very dramatic. Soluble oil isn't nearly
as dramatic.

Joe Gwinn