Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
Hello all,
Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Thanks, Bill |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"Bill Schwab" wrote in message ... Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Thanks, Bill I installed a Vacuflow 960 in the shop, and have it extended to the house we're building. This particular model has twin motors, and is recommended for use in large systems, in buildings up to 18,000 square feet. Need I tell you I'm impressed with the performance? Model numbers may be different now, but I suggest you investigate this particular name brand. It uses a cyclonic separator instead of filter bags, and discharges outside. Filters restrict performance, so are not in anyone's best interest. Discharging out of doors removes fine particulate matter instead of redistributing it in your home. I recommend this system highly. Dog hair will be a non-issue. No, I am not affiliated with Vacuflow in any way. I'm simply a satisfied customer. Harold |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:37:19 -0500, Bill Schwab
wrote: Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Thanks, Bill Beam Central Vac has been running over 20 years. No dog, but 2 daughters and 2 cats shed their fair share of hair!!! Carpet, vinyl and hardwood mix in a 2 story with finished basement - total just under 2000 sq ft. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:37:19 -0500, Bill Schwab
wrote: Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Thanks, Bill Size is only related to power because that seems to be how they come. Take the head off a large powerful shopvac and fit it to the cannister of a small one. Many or most shopvac heads take the same size filters or bags. My daughter in London has a Dyson and loves it, but I don't know how "powerful" it is. She says it does an excellent job, and her space is small. These use cyclonic separation rather than filters so they don't have the backpressure of a filter, or at least less so. They are pricey, though. |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"Bill Schwab" wrote in message ... Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Thanks, Bill Hi Bill I have easy access to the attic in my house. The garage is attached, so it was easy to mount a good shop vac in the garage and lay PVC tubes in the attic to access several "outlets in the house. I dropped the PVC down thru closets where they are easily not seen. I chose closets that had a wall common to a convenient place to insert a socket for the vacuum. It can be a big benefit to have the dust/smell/noise in the garage rather the house. Jerry |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"Bill Schwab" wrote in message ... Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Thanks, Bill We have a 3 year old Dyson DC14. Best vacuum ever made, period. The ease-of-use is way beyond any other vacuum cleaner design and just like the ad says: never loses suction, never needs bags. Not cheap but I see the price has gone down since they were introduced. Still worth every penny. I don't care how powerful a vacuum is, if it needs bags or filters, it is obsolete 19th century technology on par with 78 rpm records or pedal-powered sewing machines. -Carl |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:20:32 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm, "Carl
Byrns" quickly quoth: "Bill Schwab" wrote in message ... Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Thanks, Bill We have a 3 year old Dyson DC14. Best vacuum ever made, period. The Dyson? Hmm, don't they make spheres? -- Once we believe in ourselves, we can risk curiosity, wonder, spontaneous delight, or any experience that reveals the human spirit. --e e cummings |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
- vacuum that really sucks??
On Dec 22, 5:34*pm, Larry Jaques
wrote: Dyson? *Hmm, don't they make spheres? I can almost guarantee you that Freeman never built a working model. http://www.sns.ias.edu/~dyson/ |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"Carl Byrns" wrote in message news:Q4gbj.750$OH6.579@trndny03... We have a 3 year old Dyson DC14. Best vacuum ever made, period. The ease-of-use is way beyond any other vacuum cleaner design and just like the ad says: never loses suction, never needs bags. Not cheap but I see the price has gone down since they were introduced. Still worth every penny. I don't care how powerful a vacuum is, if it needs bags or filters, it is obsolete 19th century technology on par with 78 rpm records or pedal-powered sewing machines. -Carl Sure agree with you on the Dyson. What they say is true. Tom |
#10
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"Tom M" wrote in message . .. "Carl Byrns" wrote in message news:Q4gbj.750$OH6.579@trndny03... We have a 3 year old Dyson DC14. Best vacuum ever made, period. The ease-of-use is way beyond any other vacuum cleaner design and just like the ad says: never loses suction, never needs bags. Not cheap but I see the price has gone down since they were introduced. Still worth every penny. I don't care how powerful a vacuum is, if it needs bags or filters, it is obsolete 19th century technology on par with 78 rpm records or pedal-powered sewing machines. -Carl Sure agree with you on the Dyson. What they say is true. Tom i thought that was pure marketing hype (i have a dyson). there were cyclonic vacuum cleaners before dyson. i think the dyson is heavy clunky and big. difficult to vacuum under stuff, VERY difficult to vacuum stairs, sometimes (like when vacuuming heavy shag carpet) the vibrator bar rattles/clatters LOUDLY against the mouth/housing. if it were me i'd buy a (two or three) MUCH less expensive vacuum cleaner than the dyson. i'd like to try the oreck. |
#11
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
Bill Schwab wrote:
Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Thanks, Bill get a Metrovac. they're small, have a shockingly small canvas filter/dirt holder, which is a mess to work with, but are more powerful than anything else I've ever tried. They should be under $150. You can strap it on and carry it around. The exhaust will blow everything in the place around so watch out. |
#12
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
Bill Schwab writes:
Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 I've got a Golden Retriever. Unlike breeds that shed in the summer, Goldens just shed *more* in the summer. If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Got a Dyson a little while ago. And it's the first vacuum cleaner I can remember us having in almost thirty years of marriage that I wasn't swearing at within a month of bringing it home. It cost a mint, but It Works. I haven't had to try to get clogs of dog hair out of the extension hose, I haven't had to disassemble it to replace a belt, and it doesn't use filters. And it cleans. |
#13
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"William Wixon" writes:
i thought that was pure marketing hype (i have a dyson). there were cyclonic vacuum cleaners before dyson. i think the dyson is heavy clunky and big. difficult to vacuum under stuff, VERY difficult to vacuum stairs, sometimes (like when vacuuming heavy shag carpet) the vibrator bar rattles/clatters LOUDLY against the mouth/housing. if it were me i'd buy a (two or three) MUCH less expensive vacuum cleaner than the dyson. i'd like to try the oreck. Try one of those less-expensive vacuum cleaners and, after you have to replace the belt, report on your findings. Bonus points if the belt failure breaks the belt guide (which happened on our Eureka). I haven't tried an Oreck -- but they sure look big and heavy to me... granted, they seem to be the dominant commercial choice which has got to be a good thing. |
#14
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
Bill Schwab wrote:
Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Thanks, Bill My girlfriend and I bought a Dyson about four years ago and that thing really cleans. With a dog and cat in the house we needed something that would work and this did. Jim Chandler |
#15
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
William Wixon wrote:
"Tom M" wrote in message . .. "Carl Byrns" wrote in message news:Q4gbj.750$OH6.579@trndny03... We have a 3 year old Dyson DC14. Best vacuum ever made, period. The ease-of-use is way beyond any other vacuum cleaner design and just like the ad says: never loses suction, never needs bags. Not cheap but I see the price has gone down since they were introduced. Still worth every penny. I don't care how powerful a vacuum is, if it needs bags or filters, it is obsolete 19th century technology on par with 78 rpm records or pedal-powered sewing machines. -Carl Sure agree with you on the Dyson. What they say is true. Tom i thought that was pure marketing hype (i have a dyson). there were cyclonic vacuum cleaners before dyson. i think the dyson is heavy clunky and big. difficult to vacuum under stuff, VERY difficult to vacuum stairs, sometimes (like when vacuuming heavy shag carpet) the vibrator bar rattles/clatters LOUDLY against the mouth/housing. if it were me i'd buy a (two or three) MUCH less expensive vacuum cleaner than the dyson. i'd like to try the oreck. You must have an older one. I've experienced no such problems. The only thing I don't really care for is the wand in the handle. It's a bit difficult to manage and the hose tends to crimp but other than that, no problems. Jim |
#16
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:56:03 -0700, with neither quill nor qualm, Joe
Pfeiffer quickly quoth: Got a Dyson a little while ago. And it's the first vacuum cleaner I can remember us having in almost thirty years of marriage that I wasn't swearing at within a month of bringing it home. It cost a mint, but It Works. Sounds good. I haven't had to try to get clogs of dog hair out of the extension hose, I haven't had to disassemble it to replace a belt, and it doesn't use filters. And it cleans. Don't they have a HEPA filter at the top? How else could they work that well and not transmit fine dust into the air around them? The only test I know to ensure that your vacuum is working that well is to pull up the section of carpet at the front door. If there's no dust and dirt in the padding or on the floor beneath it, your vacuum is excellent. -- Once we believe in ourselves, we can risk curiosity, wonder, spontaneous delight, or any experience that reveals the human spirit. --e e cummings |
#17
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"Larry Jaques" wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:56:03 -0700, with neither quill nor qualm, Joe Pfeiffer quickly quoth: Got a Dyson a little while ago. And it's the first vacuum cleaner I can remember us having in almost thirty years of marriage that I wasn't swearing at within a month of bringing it home. It cost a mint, but It Works. Sounds good. I haven't had to try to get clogs of dog hair out of the extension hose, I haven't had to disassemble it to replace a belt, and it doesn't use filters. And it cleans. Don't they have a HEPA filter at the top? How else could they work that well and not transmit fine dust into the air around them? There is a washable filter near the motor that has to be cleaned every six months. It is never very dirty. The 8 little cyclones spin the air so fast that even smoke particles are removed. -Carl |
#18
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
Joe,
Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 I've got a Golden Retriever. Unlike breeds that shed in the summer, Goldens just shed *more* in the summer. I have a black mutt - same deal If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Got a Dyson a little while ago. And it's the first vacuum cleaner I can remember us having in almost thirty years of marriage that I wasn't swearing at within a month of bringing it home. It cost a mint, but It Works. I haven't had to try to get clogs of dog hair out of the extension hose, I haven't had to disassemble it to replace a belt, and it doesn't use filters. And it cleans. Interesting. I thought I saw one caution about some banging inside of a Dyson, but they seem to be getting good press. Bill |
#19
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
Harold,
I installed a Vacuflow 960 in the shop, and have it extended to the house we're building. This particular model has twin motors, and is recommended for use in large systems, in buildings up to 18,000 square feet. Need I tell you I'm impressed with the performance? Feel free not to answer, but are you building on the same property, or planning to yank the unit and take it with you? That would probably be trivial compared to moving your shop My concern is over resale: can you easily get away with taking the unit with you? I suppose you could just remove the tubing and patch the holes?? If my mental picture of routing tubes to the unit is correct, it could make for some UGLY blockages?? Does one put capped tees in the lines every so often, or would that only lead to problems? I dread the thought of moving, but in truth have no idea how long I will stay. The installation would do me some good, but so would building the furniture I have been promising myself. You are not the only person advocating a central system - somebody did it with a big shop vac. Bill |
#20
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"Bill Schwab" wrote in message ... Interesting. I thought I saw one caution about some banging inside of a Dyson, but they seem to be getting good press. Bill The beater bar drive has an overload clutch that rattles like crazy if the bar gets pet hair or string wrapped around it. I just cut the string off and it's Bobs yer uncle. Our Dyson DC14 shuts the beater bar off anytime the handle is in the up position- a great feature because the bar doesn't gouge up the carpet while using the wand to get the cobwebs. -Carl |
#21
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"Bill Schwab" wrote in message ... Harold, I installed a Vacuflow 960 in the shop, and have it extended to the house we're building. This particular model has twin motors, and is recommended for use in large systems, in buildings up to 18,000 square feet. Need I tell you I'm impressed with the performance? Feel free not to answer, but are you building on the same property, or planning to yank the unit and take it with you? The shop lies about 30' east of the house, and runs parallel to the side of the house, with an attached double garage between the house and shop. It is for that reason I chose the largest unit they made. I pull air a long distance, so the twin motor unit works out nicely. I installed 2" PVC pipe from the shop to the house early in the project. One unit serves the shop, house and garage. When I made the decision to go with a built in, my first concern was not having a filter. Few of them work that way, and those that don't promote how well their filtering system works, but they do that with the idea that you'll be discharging your vacuum indoors. That's a mistake, as you've likely noticed if you run any kind of vacuum cleaner now. The smell that comes from them is the smell of decaying flesh, the dander we all shed in the course of living our lives. By discharging outside, that is eliminated, although it comes at the expense of discharging heated air. To me, it's worth the loss, especially when you consider that fine dust is eliminated from your environment instead of redistributed by the exhaust. YMMV. That would probably be trivial compared to moving your shop My concern is over resale: can you easily get away with taking the unit with you? I suppose you could just remove the tubing and patch the holes?? The tubing isn't expensive. It's very thin walled PVC, made expressly for the built in vacuum industry. Pretty much all of the manufacturers use the same tubing, near as I can tell. I have no doubt they have their name printed on their particular product, in spite of the fact that it all likely comes from a single source, maybe two. As far as the vacuum unit proper, it simply hangs on brackets and can be readily removed if need be. That's important for what little maintenance you may face in the future (brush replacement, for example). Don't be overly concerned about removing the installation should you choose to go this route. You could probably replace the entire setup (tubing and outlets) for a couple hundred dollars should you choose to leave behind the system. Also, consider that if you own the property, if you simply leave it behind, it will enhance the resale value, perhaps actually make you a profit. If my mental picture of routing tubes to the unit is correct, it could make for some UGLY blockages?? Does one put capped tees in the lines every so often, or would that only lead to problems? My system has no cleanouts, and I'm not aware that anyone puts them in. If you use the proper fittings, the elbow at each inlet is restrictive (they accomplish that by making it a very tight bend) and allows nothing to pass that won't go through the system, all the way to the motor unit, where the dirt is normally stored. If you desire a large storage capacity, a large container can be plumbed between the motor unit and the incoming line. They are readily available from the suppliers. Having discussed the proper elbows, I didn't do that in my shop, and I had the misfortune to vacuum up a small parallel one day. It got about half way through the system and lodged. It took some screwing around, costing me about three hours, but it eventually moved very near one of the inlets, where I retrieved it. In order to avoid that in the future, I'll use a short length of tubing that connects to a collection tank, which, in turn, connects to the intake of the system. Anything sucked up will be deposited in the tank, never entering the tubing of the built in system. Depending on how you install the system, you tend to have downstream hookup points, so they function, to some degree, as access to the tubing. A fish tape can be threaded in, although the fittings are directional, so it's usually best to feed from the motor unit towards the inlet. It's a long shot getting anything stuck if you use good sense, and don't do what I did. If you do, it may be a good idea to provide a couple of access points. My entire system is either underground or poured in concrete. I can't access anything aside from the connection points, and the motor unit. I dread the thought of moving, but in truth have no idea how long I will stay. The installation would do me some good, but so would building the furniture I have been promising myself. You won't regret the installation---it makes life a lot easier, and as I said, it will enhance the value of the real estate, so you won't really lose anything should you decide to move. One thing you should be aware of. When you use any vacuum system, if you vacuum up combustible material (wood shavings, for example), it's very important that you DO NO use the system for picking up anything in the way of sparks. If you do any grinding, don't vacuum the sparks as they leave the wheel. A fire in a vacuum cleaner is not a good thing, and it's readily ignited. The velocity of air movement carries the hot sparks right to the vacuum, and drops them on the shavings. If you choose to install the system yourself, don't use any tees, where you get incoming air from two directions that turns at the junction towards the motor unit. Heavy materials don't follow the air stream and lodge in the opposite side, eventually packing it off. There's ways to tee, usually accomplished by offsetting the two lines with elbows, so one flows past the other. If in doubt on any of this, contact me on the side and I'll go deeper in the concept. The reason I bring this up is I made that very mistake, and must be very careful to keep the line open. Funny how making a bad decision is such a good learning experience. You are not the only person advocating a central system - somebody did it with a big shop vac. Bill My original plan was to use the large B&D shop vac I own, one that came from a car wash, a gift from a friend. What changed my mind was checking larger and better units. You can't begin to understand the difference between a shop vac with one motor and one of the commercial units with two of them. The volume of air that they shovel is truly horrifying. You can vacuum up things that the typical vacuum ignores. A shop vac will work, it's just not as easy to adapt. Built in vacs have the relay system that turns them on and off built in. These units come with muffler (twin motors----twin discharges). Yeah, I know-----doesn't sound like you'd need them. I hadn't intended to install the mufflers, but quickly changed my mind. The unit sounds like a rock crusher when running, but is rendered almost silent with the mufflers. Harold |
#22
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
Bill Schwab wrote:
Harold, I installed a Vacuflow 960 in the shop, and have it extended to the house we're building. This particular model has twin motors, and is recommended for use in large systems, in buildings up to 18,000 square feet. Need I tell you I'm impressed with the performance? Feel free not to answer, but are you building on the same property, or planning to yank the unit and take it with you? That would probably be trivial compared to moving your shop My concern is over resale: can you easily get away with taking the unit with you? I suppose you could just remove the tubing and patch the holes?? If my mental picture of routing tubes to the unit is correct, it could make for some UGLY blockages?? Does one put capped tees in the lines every so often, or would that only lead to problems? I dread the thought of moving, but in truth have no idea how long I will stay. The installation would do me some good, but so would building the furniture I have been promising myself. You are not the only person advocating a central system - somebody did it with a big shop vac. Bill Bill I'll also endorse the Vacuflow product. Back about ten years ago we added a rather large addition onto the house, we also needed a new vacuum at about the same time so we looked at the central systems on the market. The only one that impressed me, and the only one I considered was the Vacuflow, it is true cyclonic with no filters (as Harold has pointed out) as it discharges outside, and the power head for carpets is turbine powered by the airflow, not electric as all the others. That last feature precludes having an AC outlet near each vacuum outlet and plugging two things in all the time. Pretty much all you have to do to empty the thing is unlatch two clips and the dust collector bucket is easily removed for dumping. About once a year I find I have to reach up in above the collector to wipe off a course screen up there but it's no big deal. We bought the next bigger size up, because its me, and I figure we can always take it with us when the time comes, leaving the tubing in place. The local dealer was more than helpfull, loaning us a hose kit so I could figure optimum placing of the outlets, We were able to get by with just two on the main floor, I also put three in the basement and one out the side of the house next to the driveway. I did the installation myself, the dealer loaned me some nice tools to cut and burr the special pipe. He also sold me extra pipe and fittings, taking back any unused. As the pipe and fittings aren't readily available at the usual big box stores this really came in handy, keeping the project going on Sunday and allowing the use of the best combination of fittings, not just what even I had on hand. I was worried about the pluggage issue but it has not ever been an issue, I did install tee's were runs elbowed back towards the unit capping the unused port of the tee with an unglued cap. This has turned out to not be needed but doesn't cause any issues either, so far. Use care to minimize total degrees of bends as much as possible. My daughter's long haired cat tends to be hard on the carpet head but the unit can be disassembled fairly easily for cleanings/dehairings when required. I'd buy another if and when we move, I don't even need to look at other brands. Believe me, I'm not easily impressed by consumer goods but Vacuflow is well made and engineered, central vacuum systems done right. Regards Paul -- ----------------------------------------- It's a Linux world....well, it oughta be. ----------------------------------------- |
#23
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
Bill Schwab wrote:
Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. Thanks, Bill I know what you mean about the dog hair. We had a Brittany Spaniel (possibly related to Brittany Spears :-) ) that was a walking hair machine. That dog weighed about 35 pounds and I swear it lost 50 lbs of hair a day. We went though a Hoover and a Eureka and then said to hell with it and bought a Kirby (This was about 1990 or so). That thing was able to pick up all the hair that dog lost and is still going strong today. Never had a problem with it. It is a little on the heavy side but it isn't too bad, and it will not get into small or low spaces. But it really sucks. Wayne |
#24
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:54:56 -0600, Paul wrote:
My Beam also vents outside and has a turbine brush, but is not a true cyclonic as it still has a filter, which DOES restrict the power a bit. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#25
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"Bill Schwab" wrote in message ... Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. http://www.jondon.com/catalog/produc...ducts_id=17182 Backpack vacs have been recognized in the commercial cleaning industry as one of the most efficient ways to vacuum. This is one of the better models. They are not the most powerful, but the mobility and the fact that you can clean more frequently due to the efficiency is a big plus. |
#26
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
Keywords:
In article , "ATP*" wrote: "Bill Schwab" wrote in message ... Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. http://www.jondon.com/catalog/produc...ducts_id=17182 Backpack vacs have been recognized in the commercial cleaning industry as one of the most efficient ways to vacuum. This is one of the better models. They are not the most powerful, but the mobility and the fact that you can clean more frequently due to the efficiency is a big plus. The Cadillac of back pack vacuums is the Nilfisk Backvacuum. They are very expensive, but they work great. They are light, comfortable to wear, and powerful. I borrowed one briefly at work, and have been lusting after one ever since. Too bad they are so pricey. http://www.bestvacuum.com/nilfisk-backvacuum.html Doug White |
#27
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"Doug White" wrote in message ... Keywords: In article , "ATP*" wrote: "Bill Schwab" wrote in message ... Hello all, Any recommendations for a vacuum cleaner for home cleaning? Trying to fit a big shop vacuum through tight spaces is getting a little old. Noise isn't too big a deal: a mix of ear buds and hearing protection works wonders, but size and suction are important. I have a mix of carpet, wood and some tiled areas. My dog has long hair and sheds in ways that defy description, even in winter =:0 If you bought something a little pricey and got a machine truly worth having, I would like to hear about it. Of course, if something cheap is worth having, I'd _really_ like to know about it. http://www.jondon.com/catalog/produc...ducts_id=17182 Backpack vacs have been recognized in the commercial cleaning industry as one of the most efficient ways to vacuum. This is one of the better models. They are not the most powerful, but the mobility and the fact that you can clean more frequently due to the efficiency is a big plus. The Cadillac of back pack vacuums is the Nilfisk Backvacuum. They are very expensive, but they work great. They are light, comfortable to wear, and powerful. I borrowed one briefly at work, and have been lusting after one ever since. Too bad they are so pricey. http://www.bestvacuum.com/nilfisk-backvacuum.html Doug White IMHO if it has a bag, it is obsolete. It is a flawed design: the performance of any bag vacuum starts to diminish the moment it starts to pick up dust, no matter how expensive it is. -Carl |
#28
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
Gang,
Thanks to all who replied: built-ins and backpacks are interesting. You are certainly not the only group with members who swear by Dyson. After some searching, budgeting, and deliberation, I went to Home Depot with the expectation of leaving with a Dyson pet vac. Looking at the thing, I suddenly wasn't so certain. Ok, the real reason was that they were doing a little bait and switch: sales mentioned on line, not in the store, or so it seemed. Looking at the web page again, I still see no indication of a different in-store price. Whether or not they would honor it wasn't the point: it's slimy. There is an old joke: to the optimist, the glass is half full, to the pessimist, the glass is half empty; to the engineer, the damn thing is twice as big as it needs to be. The more I learn, the more it sounds like sound judgment vs. a joke So the careful shopper gives way to the engineer: call me nuts, but the Dyson $550 beast is not built all that well. There are lots of snap-in plastic parts, avoidably weird mechanisms, seals that look pretty good today, but probably will not next year, etc. I could see the duct tape and rubber bands accumulating with time - not good on something so expensive. There were some cheap pet vacs, but $110 isn't going to go very far given all they claim to do. In the middle, there was a Bissell that looks like a Dyson clone, with (I think???) some improvements, and for $250. Compared to the Dyson, there are fewer cheap looking plastic parts, the seals are generally larger (more material, bigger support and mating surfaces), which will hopefully translate into longer life. It uses a similar (if not identical) centrifugal action with washable filter and a replaceable post-motor filter. The release and hands-off empty business is slightly simpler than Dyson's, but it does the same basic job. Dyson claims that their HEPA filter never needs to be replaced (for the "life of the vacuum"); Bissell says to replace theirs at six months or so. I should be able to buy quite a few replacement filters for the difference in price. The machine I bought is not labeled as a pet vac, but it has a small brush attachment for the hose, which appears to be one of the big features of them. The attachments are not as elaborate as Dysons, but again, they look to me as reflecting better design for plastics. Especially Dyson fans, please feel encouraged to set me straight on the filters. If the thing turns out to suck (the bad way), I will let you know. For now, it looks like a pretty good buy. I hate to tell you what it picked up in just a few minutes in the entry way (tile), carpet near the dog's main hang-out, and "the other bath" (more tile and some dusty base boards) =:0 In a tight space, I notice some heat from it; I don't find it ominous (no hot motor smells), I think it's just the cost of moving the air. It isn't terribly quiet, but the aforementioned ear buds and hearing protection will do nicely in that area. It has not had time to accumulate any old crud, but there is NO smell while running it. This is my first exposure to HEPA, so I was not sure what to expect; I'm impressed. The next test will be to see how long the filters survive. Wish me luck! Thanks again, and Happy New Year! Bill |
#29
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
"Bill Schwab" wrote in message ... Gang, Thanks to all who replied: built-ins and backpacks are interesting. You are certainly not the only group with members who swear by Dyson. After some searching, budgeting, and deliberation, I went to Home Depot with the expectation of leaving with a Dyson pet vac. Looking at the thing, I suddenly wasn't so certain. Ok, the real reason was that they were doing a little bait and switch: sales mentioned on line, not in the store, or so it seemed. Looking at the web page again, I still see no indication of a different in-store price. Whether or not they would honor it wasn't the point: it's slimy. Is it possible that the point is you wern't ready to spend a lot of money on something as pedestrian as a vacuum cleaner? g There is an old joke: to the optimist, the glass is half full, to the pessimist, the glass is half empty; to the engineer, the damn thing is twice as big as it needs to be. The more I learn, the more it sounds like sound judgment vs. a joke So the careful shopper gives way to the engineer: call me nuts, but the Dyson $550 beast is not built all that well. There are lots of snap-in plastic parts, avoidably weird mechanisms, seals that look pretty good today, but probably will not next year, etc. I could see the duct tape and rubber bands accumulating with time - not good on something so expensive. My Dyson DC14 (not the 'animal') is three years old. Nothing's broken, glued or duct taped. I bought it for $400 on sale at Sears. Don't tell my wife, but I have used it to clean up the shop and drywall repair dust. The vacuum looks like new. Dyson claims that their HEPA filter never needs to be replaced (for the "life of the vacuum"); Bissell says to replace theirs at six months or so. I should be able to buy quite a few replacement filters for the difference in price. Mine has the original filter. It's washable. It's three years old. Every six months I clean it (and the entire dust seperator section) in about ten minutes. Vacuum cleaner companies count on the insane markup of replacement filters or bags for the bulk of their profits. When you buy that first-of-many HEPA filters, think about how little it cost to make versus how much it cost to buy. If the thing turns out to suck (the bad way), I will let you know. For now, it looks like a pretty good buy. I hate to tell you what it picked up in just a few minutes in the entry way (tile), carpet near the dog's main hang-out, and "the other bath" (more tile and some dusty base boards) =:0 In a tight space, I notice some heat from it; I don't find it ominous (no hot motor smells), I think it's just the cost of moving the air. It isn't terribly quiet, but the aforementioned ear buds and hearing protection will do nicely in that area. It has not had time to accumulate any old crud, but there is NO smell while running it. Same thing with the Dyson- it doesn't smell like a vacuum because it is not blowing dust and dead mites back into the room air. Sounds like Bissell has ripped off er, cloned some elements of the Dyson design. I don't understand your comments regarding the design- the snap-in parts allow for quick disassembly in case of a clog (happened to me just once when it sucked up a cat toy that made through the hose and to the second turn) and the majority of the plastic parts have some flexibility ( and impact-resistance) that shows a bit of subtly in engineering. -Carl |
#30
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] - vacuum that really sucks??
Carl Byrns wrote:
Is it possible that the point is you wern't ready to spend a lot of money on something as pedestrian as a vacuum cleaner? g My Dyson DC14 (not the 'animal') is three years old. Nothing's broken, glued or duct taped. I bought it for $400 on sale at Sears. Don't tell my wife, but I have used it to clean up the shop and drywall repair dust. The vacuum looks like new. Mine has the original filter. It's washable. It's three years old. Every six months I clean it (and the entire dust seperator section) in about ten minutes. Vacuum cleaner companies count on the insane markup of replacement filters or bags for the bulk of their profits. When you buy that first-of-many HEPA filters, think about how little it cost to make versus how much it cost to buy. Same thing with the Dyson- it doesn't smell like a vacuum because it is not blowing dust and dead mites back into the room air. Sounds like Bissell has ripped off er, cloned some elements of the Dyson design. I don't understand your comments regarding the design- the snap-in parts allow for quick disassembly in case of a clog (happened to me just once when it sucked up a cat toy that made through the hose and to the second turn) and the majority of the plastic parts have some flexibility ( and impact-resistance) that shows a bit of subtly in engineering. -Carl I like the Kirby G4 we have. 15 years old and other than a new bag every 3 weeks or so and one impeller it has not had anything done to it. (I replaced the impeller because the wife managed to suck up about half a carpet which got tangled in the impeller and snapped off one vane) HEPA bags run about 5 bucks each online. -- Steve W. Near Cooperstown, New York Life is not like a box of chocolates it's more like a jar of jalapenos- what you do today could burn your ass tomorrow! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GE Silicone II Sucks!! | Home Repair | |||
3 in 1 oil sucks | Metalworking | |||
Why Your Life Sucks! | Home Repair | |||
Sucks no more ... | Woodworking |