Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
jim rozen wrote in message ...
In article , Harold & Susan Vordos says... DoN has mentioned the necessary amount of clearance on the threading tool, but there's one thing that you may be missing, and it's easy to do. The way you describe your thread leads me to believe that you have your compound set improperly. The markings on compounds are not all the same. What is 30 degrees on one is 60 degrees on another. To set your compound properly, assuming you are threading a right hand internal thread, cutting from the outside towards the headstock, you should start with your compound parallel to the cross slide, with the handle towards you. At that point, you should turn the handle TOWARDS the headstock until you've gone almost 30 degrees. I like to use 29, which makes sure you keep cleaning up the back side of the thread. It may not read 29 degrees, but 61 instead. Don't let that worry you, it's the way the machine is marked. Setting the compound as I've suggested is important to a good end result. Don't set the compound the same way you do for an external right hand thread. If you're not comfortable with your compound set as I've suggested, the next best way is to set it exactly 180 degrees opposite, with the handle on the far side of the bed, and pointed towards the tailstock. That way you always feed such that you keep the leadscrew loaded by the cut. I tend to harp on this subject endlessly, but it's a good lesson to learn and remember, and it ALWAYS applies when threading, regardless of the type of thread. I much prefer the second setup, becuause otherwise the compound dial and handle tend to interfere with the work on smaller machines. Has anyone suggested that he double check his thread form with a simple thread gage to be sure it is correct? I suspect at 40 tpi his problem is not thread relief on the tool. Jim ================================================== please reply to: JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com ================================================== Actually I think I had the compound set wrong. To start with, my threading tool is made from drill rod. I got the idea from the 7x10 minilathe post on yahoo some time ago. Anyway the suggestion was to get the same size rod as my boring tool holder, in my case 3/8" and then turn a disk on one end. Make it a 60 degree angle on each shoulder. Then grind off the top and bottom of the disk to form two cutting tools. This is what I have been using. Now as far as the compound angle goes I don't have a handle like you say. Picture it this way....I shrink myself and stand on the tailstock. I then peer straight into the headstock. Let's call this 0 degrees. I point the boring bar in this direction. Now I turn it 30 degrees counterclockwise. I then feed toward the headstock. I just tried this and the thread looks much better. Must have done something right. How does this sound? Of course now I have to bore it to the correct i.d., thread it, and finally screw the filter into it. The proof is in the pudding. Vince |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reversing leadscrew on small lathe | Metalworking | |||
How do you adjust the cutter bit on Aloris Tool Holders | Metalworking | |||
Project time management Philosophy | Metalworking | |||
Basics on Depth of Cuts | Metalworking |