Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
I've been playing with some Tungsten rod - available worldwide as welding
electrodes - recently. Thing is, I looked at a 6" x 3/16" rod, and wondered whether it would make a good penetrator. I thought, fired as a subcalibre sabot round in a BMG, that it would penetrate all but the glacis plate of an M1A2 Abrams MBT. At nearly half a mile range. Or maybe not, as people will tell me. -- Peter Fairbrother |
#2
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
Don't do it!!! It will rip a hole in the space-time continuum and this
universe will get sucked into the next through a 3/16" hole. |
#3
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
It will shatter.
Tungsten penetraters are very hard to make. |
#4
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
Since when is RCM the terrorist idea clearinghouse?
-D |
#5
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
|
#6
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
Hey, I like blowing holes in stuff as much as the next guy, but this
sounds almost like a US-educated Iranian fishing for IED techniques. Iran is where the sophisticated Iraqi IEDs are coming from, y'know. -Dave |
#7
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
OK, so an ITCAPB...
-D |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:48:39 GMT, Gunner
wrote: On 30 Jan 2006 15:36:28 -0800, wrote: Since when is RCM the terrorist idea clearinghouse? -D Something that makes holes in metal is terrorist related? Holy ****...we are ALL in deep ****. Gunner Yeahbut lubrication with LARDOIL removes it from use by 99% of all terrorists. Gerry :-)} London, Canada |
#9
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
Ignoramus19961 wrote:
I would be very interested in your results. Like you, I have a good quantity of 3/16" lanthanated tungsten rod (for welding), and would love to try something with my 7.52x54R rifle. i If you try something, you are either going to die or be severely mutilated. By the way, don't you mean 7.62x54R? Dean |
#10
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:33:04 -0500, "Dean A. Markley"
wrote: Ignoramus19961 wrote: I would be very interested in your results. Like you, I have a good quantity of 3/16" lanthanated tungsten rod (for welding), and would love to try something with my 7.52x54R rifle. i If you try something, you are either going to die or be severely mutilated. Why? It would be a simple task to chuck a bullet in a collet, drill and install a chunk of tungsten, then load it into a cartridge and fire it at a target. If its an open base bullet, drill from the ass end. If its closed base..drill from the point. Weigh completed bullet and apply appropriate loading data for the bullet weight. By the way, don't you mean 7.62x54R? Dean Its actually 7.62x53R.... Gunner "Deep in her heart, every moslem woman yearns to show us her tits" John Griffin |
#11
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
Gunner wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:33:04 -0500, "Dean A. Markley" wrote: Ignoramus19961 wrote: I would be very interested in your results. Like you, I have a good quantity of 3/16" lanthanated tungsten rod (for welding), and would love to try something with my 7.52x54R rifle. i If you try something, you are either going to die or be severely mutilated. Why? It would be a simple task to chuck a bullet in a collet, drill and install a chunk of tungsten, then load it into a cartridge and fire it at a target. If its an open base bullet, drill from the ass end. If its closed base..drill from the point. Weigh completed bullet and apply appropriate loading data for the bullet weight. By the way, don't you mean 7.62x54R? Dean Its actually 7.62x53R.... Gunner Perhaps he has a Mosin-Nagant? Tom |
#12
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:52:44 +1300, Tom wrote:
Gunner wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:33:04 -0500, "Dean A. Markley" wrote: Ignoramus19961 wrote: I would be very interested in your results. Like you, I have a good quantity of 3/16" lanthanated tungsten rod (for welding), and would love to try something with my 7.52x54R rifle. i If you try something, you are either going to die or be severely mutilated. Why? It would be a simple task to chuck a bullet in a collet, drill and install a chunk of tungsten, then load it into a cartridge and fire it at a target. If its an open base bullet, drill from the ass end. If its closed base..drill from the point. Weigh completed bullet and apply appropriate loading data for the bullet weight. By the way, don't you mean 7.62x54R? Dean Its actually 7.62x53R.... Gunner Perhaps he has a Mosin-Nagant? Tom Im sure he does. The statement stands Gunner "Deep in her heart, every moslem woman yearns to show us her tits" John Griffin |
#13
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
Its actually 7.62x53R.... Gunner Perhaps he has a Mosin-Nagant? Tom Im sure he does. The statement stands It depends on who's source you are using. The Finns and Swedes say 7.62x53R, the Russians and Americans say 7.62x54R, but it is all the same round and usually for the same rifle. A better arrangement for a sub-calibre penitrator would be to turn a nylon or teflon rod to bore diameter and drill a center hole for a bit of the hard stuff. Ideally, the whole assembly should be made to end up lighter than a normal bullet (about 150gr, the new projectile under 100gr) in order to get extra velocity out of it. The penitrating power is only fully appreciated at higher velocities, ideally over 3000 fps. |
#14
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 06:51:00 -0800, steve gallacci
wrote: Its actually 7.62x53R.... Gunner Perhaps he has a Mosin-Nagant? Tom Im sure he does. The statement stands It depends on who's source you are using. The Finns and Swedes say 7.62x53R, the Russians and Americans say 7.62x54R, but it is all the same round and usually for the same rifle. A better arrangement for a sub-calibre penitrator would be to turn a nylon or teflon rod to bore diameter and drill a center hole for a bit of the hard stuff. Ideally, the whole assembly should be made to end up lighter than a normal bullet (about 150gr, the new projectile under 100gr) in order to get extra velocity out of it. The penitrating power is only fully appreciated at higher velocities, ideally over 3000 fps. Good catch. I was only tormenting him G I dont have any data for sabot rounds in the M-N, so would require a fair amount of tungsten for working up a safe and speedy round. Gunner "Deep in her heart, every moslem woman yearns to show us her tits" John Griffin |
#15
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 14:55:44 GMT, Ignoramus1729
wrote: On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 06:51:00 -0800, steve gallacci wrote: Its actually 7.62x53R.... Gunner Perhaps he has a Mosin-Nagant? Tom Im sure he does. The statement stands It depends on who's source you are using. The Finns and Swedes say 7.62x53R, the Russians and Americans say 7.62x54R, but it is all the same round and usually for the same rifle. A better arrangement for a sub-calibre penitrator would be to turn a nylon or teflon rod to bore diameter and drill a center hole for a bit of the hard stuff. Ideally, the whole assembly should be made to end up lighter than a normal bullet (about 150gr, the new projectile under 100gr) in order to get extra velocity out of it. The penitrating power is only fully appreciated at higher velocities, ideally over 3000 fps. The idea of using light jacket (and higher speeds) for the penetrator makes perfect sense. No need to re-invent the wheel. This would be much the same as the old 30.06 accelerator round. It used a sabot to hold a .22 caliber bullet. See: http://www.ammo-one.com/3006ACC.html Just buy your own sabots for playing around. For instance: http://www.eabco.com/reload02.html "Accelerator® Type Sabots for Reloading Handload and Shoot ..224 Caliber Bullets in .30 Caliber Firearms! Now you can handload your 30 caliber handgun or rifle to shoot hyper-velocity .224 caliber bullets! Fit the .224 bullets into our Sabots with the Sabot Bullet Seater die. Then load the sabots as you would any .308 caliber bullet. The Bullet seater die is required for consistent seating of bullets into the sabots… accuracy requires consistency! Shoot to 3,500 fps in a 30-30... 4,200 fps in a 30-06. Free Load Data is Included with Every Sabot Order! Sabots flower away from the bullet after exiting the muzzle. Made from injection molded plastic, these sabots won't harm your barrel and bores are easy to clean with regular Hoppes #9 solvent." I'm sure there are more. I only did a quick search for reference. -- Leon Fisk Grand Rapids MI/Zone 5b Remove no.spam for email |
#16
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 14:42:38 -0500, Leon Fisk
wrote: On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 14:55:44 GMT, Ignoramus1729 wrote: On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 06:51:00 -0800, steve gallacci wrote: Its actually 7.62x53R.... Gunner Perhaps he has a Mosin-Nagant? Tom Im sure he does. The statement stands It depends on who's source you are using. The Finns and Swedes say 7.62x53R, the Russians and Americans say 7.62x54R, but it is all the same round and usually for the same rifle. A better arrangement for a sub-calibre penitrator would be to turn a nylon or teflon rod to bore diameter and drill a center hole for a bit of the hard stuff. Ideally, the whole assembly should be made to end up lighter than a normal bullet (about 150gr, the new projectile under 100gr) in order to get extra velocity out of it. The penitrating power is only fully appreciated at higher velocities, ideally over 3000 fps. The idea of using light jacket (and higher speeds) for the penetrator makes perfect sense. No need to re-invent the wheel. This would be much the same as the old 30.06 accelerator round. It used a sabot to hold a .22 caliber bullet. See: http://www.ammo-one.com/3006ACC.html Just buy your own sabots for playing around. For instance: http://www.eabco.com/reload02.html "Accelerator® Type Sabots for Reloading Handload and Shoot .224 Caliber Bullets in .30 Caliber Firearms! Now you can handload your 30 caliber handgun or rifle to shoot hyper-velocity .224 caliber bullets! Fit the .224 bullets into our Sabots with the Sabot Bullet Seater die. Then load the sabots as you would any .308 caliber bullet. The Bullet seater die is required for consistent seating of bullets into the sabots… accuracy requires consistency! Shoot to 3,500 fps in a 30-30... 4,200 fps in a 30-06. Free Load Data is Included with Every Sabot Order! Sabots flower away from the bullet after exiting the muzzle. Made from injection molded plastic, these sabots won't harm your barrel and bores are easy to clean with regular Hoppes #9 solvent." I'm sure there are more. I only did a quick search for reference. ,224 diameter tungstens are gonna cost a pretty penny.... Gunner "Deep in her heart, every moslem woman yearns to show us her tits" John Griffin |
#17
Posted to alt.war.nuclear,rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Safety first
Gunner wrote: On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 06:51:00 -0800, steve gallacci wrote: Its actually 7.62x53R.... Gunner Perhaps he has a Mosin-Nagant? Tom Im sure he does. The statement stands It depends on who's source you are using. The Finns and Swedes say 7.62x53R, the Russians and Americans say 7.62x54R, but it is all the same round and usually for the same rifle. A better arrangement for a sub-calibre penitrator would be to turn a nylon or teflon rod to bore diameter and drill a center hole for a bit of the hard stuff. Ideally, the whole assembly should be made to end up lighter than a normal bullet (about 150gr, the new projectile under 100gr) in order to get extra velocity out of it. The penitrating power is only fully appreciated at higher velocities, ideally over 3000 fps. Good catch. I was only tormenting him G I dont have any data for sabot rounds in the M-N, so would require a fair amount of tungsten for working up a safe and speedy round. There are commercially available sabots in .308 that hold .224 projectiles that could simplify the project, providing you can find .224 tungsten, or get the new tungsten core 5.56x45 ammo and pull the bullets. As for reload data, look at 308 or 60-06 varmint loads using 100gr or so small bullets to get a sense of loading range. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Musing about Safety Information, (it's for everyone) | Woodturning | |||
Lets talk code and Safety Ideas | Home Repair | |||
2- vs. 3-prong outlets | Home Repair | |||
Am I grounded? Electrically speaking. | Home Repair | |||
Safety spectacles, why so difficult? | UK diy |