I am not much of a do-it-yourselfer, but I do have some basic homowner
tools. One tool that I have thought of purchasing as I think it would
be handy in many instances , is a recriprocating saw.

I have heard of a Sawz-All (not sure of spelling). Is this the same as,
or just similar to a reciprocating saw ? Is it a brand name ? Is there a
need to have both ?

I would like a saw where I could make short cuts in tight places, and in
which I could put a tempered blade in and cut a small bolt loose, cut up
rebar, and things like that.

Any comments ???

Thanks for any advice on these "green" questions !!

--James--

A sawz-all is a reciprocating saw. I think the name sawz-all (spelling?) is
the name owned or coined by Milwaukee tool company. Other companies make a
competing version.


Remove the 'remove' in my address to e:mail me.

In article , "James Nipper" wrote:


I am not much of a do-it-yourselfer, but I do have some basic homowner
tools. One tool that I have thought of purchasing as I think it would
be handy in many instances , is a recriprocating saw.

Oh, yeah. Big-time handy. I wouldn't be without one. I've had a Craftsman
reciprocating saw for fifteen years or more, and I can't begin to count the
number of times I've used it, or the different jobs I've used it for.

I have heard of a Sawz-All (not sure of spelling). Is this the same as,
or just similar to a reciprocating saw ? Is it a brand name ? Is there a
need to have both ?

Same thing. SawzAll is the brand name for the reciprocating saw made by
Milwaukee.

I would like a saw where I could make short cuts in tight places,

Just the ticket.

and in
which I could put a tempered blade in and cut a small bolt loose, cut up
rebar, and things like that.

Reciprocating saws work for those tasks -- but an angle grinder might work
better.

SawzAlls should be made illegal for plumbers and electricians =)
EDS
"Doug Miller" wrote in message
. ..
In article , "James Nipper"
wrote:


I am not much of a do-it-yourselfer, but I do have some basic homowner
tools. One tool that I have thought of purchasing as I think it
would
be handy in many instances , is a recriprocating saw.

Oh, yeah. Big-time handy. I wouldn't be without one. I've had a Craftsman
reciprocating saw for fifteen years or more, and I can't begin to count
the
number of times I've used it, or the different jobs I've used it for.

I have heard of a Sawz-All (not sure of spelling). Is this the same
as,
or just similar to a reciprocating saw ? Is it a brand name ? Is there
a
need to have both ?

Same thing. SawzAll is the brand name for the reciprocating saw made by
Milwaukee.

I would like a saw where I could make short cuts in tight places,

Just the ticket.

and in
which I could put a tempered blade in and cut a small bolt loose, cut up
rebar, and things like that.

Reciprocating saws work for those tasks -- but an angle grinder might work
better.

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 20:31:15 -0400, "James Nipper"
wrote:



I am not much of a do-it-yourselfer, but I do have some basic homowner
tools. One tool that I have thought of purchasing as I think it would
be handy in many instances , is a recriprocating saw.

I have heard of a Sawz-All (not sure of spelling). Is this the same as,
or just similar to a reciprocating saw ? Is it a brand name ? Is there a
need to have both ?

I would like a saw where I could make short cuts in tight places, and in
which I could put a tempered blade in and cut a small bolt loose, cut up
rebar, and things like that.

Any comments ???

Thanks for any advice on these "green" questions !!

--James--


I have the Milwaukee Sawzall. It can take various types and sizes of
blades. I used it last week to cut off the bolts to my car's muffler.
There's a more powerful "Super Sawzall." It really is a "wonder saw"
but its use is mostly for demolition rather than precision jobs.

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 20:31:15 -0400, "James Nipper"
wrote:



I am not much of a do-it-yourselfer, but I do have some basic homowner
tools. One tool that I have thought of purchasing as I think it would
be handy in many instances , is a recriprocating saw.

I have heard of a Sawz-All (not sure of spelling). Is this the same as,
or just similar to a reciprocating saw ? Is it a brand name ? Is there a
need to have both ?

Yes, it's a reciprocating saw. It's Milwaukee's trade name for their
saw. The other power hand tool makers also make them: Porter-Cable has
some even more powerful models, but Milwaukee's are lighter and better
balanced.

I would like a saw where I could make short cuts in tight places, and in
which I could put a tempered blade in and cut a small bolt loose, cut up
rebar, and things like that.

Those are some tasks these are good for. What they're not good for is
tasks like cabinetry: they cut too fast and too rough.

--
Chris Green

"eds" wrote in message
...
SawzAlls should be made illegal for plumbers and electricians =)
EDS
Chuckle. Been on both ends of those hissy fits. More like plumbers and
electricians, to get their tickets, should have to work on a framing crew
for at least a week, and learn where it is and is not safe to cut, and how
to add wood back in if they absolutely have to remove something.

aem sends...

Thank all of you for the quick answers !!!

--James---

"ameijers" wrote in message
...

"eds" wrote in message
...
SawzAlls should be made illegal for plumbers and electricians =)
EDS
Chuckle. Been on both ends of those hissy fits. More like plumbers and
electricians, to get their tickets, should have to work on a framing crew
for at least a week, and learn where it is and is not safe to cut, and how
to add wood back in if they absolutely have to remove something.

aem sends...

And framers should work with plumbers and electricians so they can see how
their work can cause considerable extra work for the plumber or the
electrician....

Actually...they should consult with the designer prior to removing any
wood...regardless of how well they know how to "put it back."

Sawzall is Milwaukee's bailiwick. Check their site online. They make
different sorts of tools now too but the Sawzall became so identified
with the category, it's become almost a common noun, like kleenex or
coke.

Sawzall still routinely wins almost any contest or review so consider
buying it used. Many many many used ones around, they go forever.
Built better than the cheap Chinese ones at Harbor Freight, though
even a used one is likely to cost more.


"James Nipper" wrote in message ...
I am not much of a do-it-yourselfer, but I do have some basic homowner
tools. One tool that I have thought of purchasing as I think it would
be handy in many instances , is a recriprocating saw.

I have heard of a Sawz-All (not sure of spelling). Is this the same as,
or just similar to a reciprocating saw ? Is it a brand name ? Is there a
need to have both ?

I would like a saw where I could make short cuts in tight places, and in
which I could put a tempered blade in and cut a small bolt loose, cut up
rebar, and things like that.

Any comments ???

Thanks for any advice on these "green" questions !!

--James--

"James Nipper" wrote in message
...


I am not much of a do-it-yourselfer, but I do have some basic homowner
tools. One tool that I have thought of purchasing as I think it would
be handy in many instances , is a recriprocating saw.

I have heard of a Sawz-All (not sure of spelling). Is this the same as,
or just similar to a reciprocating saw ? Is it a brand name ? Is there
a
need to have both ?

I would like a saw where I could make short cuts in tight places, and in
which I could put a tempered blade in and cut a small bolt loose, cut up
rebar, and things like that.

Any comments ???

Thanks for any advice on these "green" questions !!

--James--


http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...ate=n3ae60.2.4

Sawzall is Milwaukee Brand reciprocating saw. Pay a little more and get the
quick release chuck. Even if you only use it occasionally, you'll be glad
you did. Somehow, you always lose the hex wrench that fits the blade clamp!!


"Ric" wrote in message
...
"James Nipper" wrote in message
...


I am not much of a do-it-yourselfer, but I do have some basic homowner
tools. One tool that I have thought of purchasing as I think it would
be handy in many instances , is a recriprocating saw.

I have heard of a Sawz-All (not sure of spelling). Is this the same as,
or just similar to a reciprocating saw ? Is it a brand name ? Is there
a
need to have both ?

I would like a saw where I could make short cuts in tight places, and in
which I could put a tempered blade in and cut a small bolt loose, cut up
rebar, and things like that.

Any comments ???

Thanks for any advice on these "green" questions !!

--James--


http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield...ate=n3ae60.2.4

replying to James Nipper, joe wrote:
ciprocating saw. I think the name sawz-all (spelling?) is the
A sawzall is a saw that goes zall.

--
for full context, visit http://www.homeownershub.com/mainten...aw-545465-.htm

joe wrote:
replying to James Nipper, joe wrote:
ciprocating saw. I think the name sawz-all (spelling?) is the
A sawzall is a saw that goes zall.


What a dick . Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .
--
Snag

On 09/07/2016 12:35 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
....

... Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .

Just to be pedantic, it's a trademark for the saw; the brand is actually
Milwaukee.

On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:58:26 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 09/07/2016 12:35 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
...

... Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .

Just to be pedantic, it's a trademark for the saw; the brand is actually
Milwaukee.

Just to be pedantic, Milwaukee is the source.

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrymcl.../#7f2086602aa4

[The first definition of €œbrand€� is the name given to a product or service
from a specific source. Used in this sense, €œbrand€� is similar to the
current meaning of the word €œtrademark.€�]

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/brand-name

"brand name. noun. 1. a word, name, symbol, etc., especially one legally registered as a trademark, used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify its products distinctively from others of the same type and usually prominently displayed on its goods, in advertising, etc.'

On 9/7/2016 10:14 AM, joe wrote:
replying to James Nipper, joe wrote:
ciprocating saw. I think the name sawz-all (spelling?) is the
A sawzall is a saw that goes zall.

Wow! Those Homemoaners get lamer every day.

On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:06:56 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:58:26 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 09/07/2016 12:35 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
...

... Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .

Just to be pedantic, it's a trademark for the saw; the brand is actually
Milwaukee.

Just to be pedantic, Milwaukee is the source.

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrymcl.../#7f2086602aa4

[The first definition of €œbrand€� is the name given to a product or service
from a specific source. Used in this sense, €œbrand€� is similar to the
current meaning of the word €œtrademark.€�]

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/brand-name

"brand name. noun. 1. a word, name, symbol, etc., especially one legally registered as a trademark, used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify its products distinctively from others of the same type and usually prominently displayed on its goods, in advertising, etc.'

Where does it specifically say "Sawzall" was stolen by Milwaukee Tools? Musta missed something?

On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:22:11 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:06:56 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:58:26 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 09/07/2016 12:35 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
...

... Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .

Just to be pedantic, it's a trademark for the saw; the brand is actually
Milwaukee.

Just to be pedantic, Milwaukee is the source.

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrymcl.../#7f2086602aa4

[The first definition of €œbrand€� is the name given to a product or service
from a specific source. Used in this sense, €œbrand€� is similar to the
current meaning of the word €œtrademark.€�]

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/brand-name

"brand name. noun. 1. a word, name, symbol, etc., especially one legally registered as a trademark, used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify its products distinctively from others of the same type and usually prominently displayed on its goods, in advertising, etc.'

Where does it specifically say "Sawzall" was stolen by Milwaukee Tools? Musta missed something?

"Stolen without permission" is my standard way of letting everyone know
that the quoted text that follows was copied and pasted (i.e. stolen) from
the link I provide without the permission of the author or owner of the
website.

If they want to come get me, my defense will be that at least I gave them
full credit for the text I stole.

On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:46:58 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:22:11 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:06:56 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:58:26 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 09/07/2016 12:35 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
...

... Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .

Just to be pedantic, it's a trademark for the saw; the brand is actually
Milwaukee.

Just to be pedantic, Milwaukee is the source.

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrymcl.../#7f2086602aa4

[The first definition of €œbrand€� is the name given to a product or service
from a specific source. Used in this sense, €œbrand€� is similar to the
current meaning of the word €œtrademark.€�]

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/brand-name

"brand name. noun. 1. a word, name, symbol, etc., especially one legally registered as a trademark, used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify its products distinctively from others of the same type and usually prominently displayed on its goods, in advertising, etc.'

Where does it specifically say "Sawzall" was stolen by Milwaukee Tools? Musta missed something?

"Stolen without permission" is my standard way of letting everyone know
that the quoted text that follows was copied and pasted (i.e. stolen) from
the link I provide without the permission of the author or owner of the
website.

If they want to come get me, my defense will be that at least I gave them
full credit for the text I stole.

Wow, paranoid are we?

On 9/7/2016 4:50 PM, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:46:58 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:22:11 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:06:56 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:58:26 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 09/07/2016 12:35 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
...

... Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .

Just to be pedantic, it's a trademark for the saw; the brand is actually
Milwaukee.

Just to be pedantic, Milwaukee is the source.

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrymcl.../#7f2086602aa4

[The first definition of €œbrand€� is the name given to a product or service
from a specific source. Used in this sense, €œbrand€� is similar to the
current meaning of the word €œtrademark.€�]

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/brand-name

"brand name. noun. 1. a word, name, symbol, etc., especially one legally registered as a trademark, used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify its products distinctively from others of the same type and usually prominently displayed on its goods, in advertising, etc.'

Where does it specifically say "Sawzall" was stolen by Milwaukee Tools? Musta missed something?

"Stolen without permission" is my standard way of letting everyone know
that the quoted text that follows was copied and pasted (i.e. stolen) from
the link I provide without the permission of the author or owner of the
website.

If they want to come get me, my defense will be that at least I gave them
full credit for the text I stole.

Wow, paranoid are we?


stupid - he always admits his guilt, so he is unable to plead ignorance.

On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:51:46 -0700, Taxed and Spent
wrote:

On 9/7/2016 4:50 PM, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:46:58 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:22:11 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:06:56 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:58:26 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 09/07/2016 12:35 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
...

... Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .

Just to be pedantic, it's a trademark for the saw; the brand is actually
Milwaukee.

Just to be pedantic, Milwaukee is the source.

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrymcl.../#7f2086602aa4

[The first definition of “brand” is the name given to a product or service
from a specific source. Used in this sense, “brand” is similar to the
current meaning of the word “trademark.”]

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/brand-name

"brand name. noun. 1. a word, name, symbol, etc., especially one legally registered as a trademark, used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify its products distinctively from others of the same type and usually prominently displayed on its goods, in advertising, etc.'

Where does it specifically say "Sawzall" was stolen by Milwaukee Tools? Musta missed something?

"Stolen without permission" is my standard way of letting everyone know
that the quoted text that follows was copied and pasted (i.e. stolen) from
the link I provide without the permission of the author or owner of the
website.

If they want to come get me, my defense will be that at least I gave them
full credit for the text I stole.

Wow, paranoid are we?


stupid - he always admits his guilt, so he is unable to plead ignorance.

"Doctrine of Fair Usage" applies

from wiki:
Fair use is a US legal doctrine that permits limited use of
copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights
holders. It is similar to the fair dealing doctrines used in some
countries outside the United States.

AND FROM THE SAME SOURCE:
While the permissible purposes for fair dealing identified in sections
29, 29.1 or 29.2 of the Canadian Copyright Act are exhaustive, fair
use may be for any purpose including but not limited to “criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching..., scholarship, or research”.
Parody was added in November 2012.

On 9/7/2016 5:11 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:51:46 -0700, Taxed and Spent
wrote:

On 9/7/2016 4:50 PM, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:46:58 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:22:11 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:06:56 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:58:26 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 09/07/2016 12:35 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
...

... Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .

Just to be pedantic, it's a trademark for the saw; the brand is actually
Milwaukee.

Just to be pedantic, Milwaukee is the source.

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrymcl.../#7f2086602aa4

[The first definition of “brand” is the name given to a product or service
from a specific source. Used in this sense, “brand” is similar to the
current meaning of the word “trademark.”]

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/brand-name

"brand name. noun. 1. a word, name, symbol, etc., especially one legally registered as a trademark, used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify its products distinctively from others of the same type and usually prominently displayed on its goods, in advertising, etc.'

Where does it specifically say "Sawzall" was stolen by Milwaukee Tools? Musta missed something?

"Stolen without permission" is my standard way of letting everyone know
that the quoted text that follows was copied and pasted (i.e. stolen) from
the link I provide without the permission of the author or owner of the
website.

If they want to come get me, my defense will be that at least I gave them
full credit for the text I stole.

Wow, paranoid are we?


stupid - he always admits his guilt, so he is unable to plead ignorance.

"Doctrine of Fair Usage" applies

from wiki:
Fair use is a US legal doctrine that permits limited use of
copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights
holders. It is similar to the fair dealing doctrines used in some
countries outside the United States.

AND FROM THE SAME SOURCE:
While the permissible purposes for fair dealing identified in sections
29, 29.1 or 29.2 of the Canadian Copyright Act are exhaustive, fair
use may be for any purpose including but not limited to “criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching..., scholarship, or research”.
Parody was added in November 2012.



I know that, but if he thinks his slogan will help him, he may likely
teeter over the brink, past the fair use exception.

On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 17:14:23 -0700, Taxed and Spent
wrote:

On 9/7/2016 5:11 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:51:46 -0700, Taxed and Spent
wrote:

On 9/7/2016 4:50 PM, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:46:58 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:22:11 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:06:56 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:58:26 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 09/07/2016 12:35 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
...

... Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .

Just to be pedantic, it's a trademark for the saw; the brand is actually
Milwaukee.

Just to be pedantic, Milwaukee is the source.

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrymcl.../#7f2086602aa4

[The first definition of “brand” is the name given to a product or service
from a specific source. Used in this sense, “brand” is similar to the
current meaning of the word “trademark.”]

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/brand-name

"brand name. noun. 1. a word, name, symbol, etc., especially one legally registered as a trademark, used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify its products distinctively from others of the same type and usually prominently displayed on its goods, in advertising, etc.'

Where does it specifically say "Sawzall" was stolen by Milwaukee Tools? Musta missed something?

"Stolen without permission" is my standard way of letting everyone know
that the quoted text that follows was copied and pasted (i.e. stolen) from
the link I provide without the permission of the author or owner of the
website.

If they want to come get me, my defense will be that at least I gave them
full credit for the text I stole.

Wow, paranoid are we?


stupid - he always admits his guilt, so he is unable to plead ignorance.

"Doctrine of Fair Usage" applies

from wiki:
Fair use is a US legal doctrine that permits limited use of
copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights
holders. It is similar to the fair dealing doctrines used in some
countries outside the United States.

AND FROM THE SAME SOURCE:
While the permissible purposes for fair dealing identified in sections
29, 29.1 or 29.2 of the Canadian Copyright Act are exhaustive, fair
use may be for any purpose including but not limited to “criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching..., scholarship, or research”.
Parody was added in November 2012.



I know that, but if he thinks his slogan will help him, he may likely
teeter over the brink, past the fair use exception.
Which is why he should know about "fair use" and never
(presumtively) admit guilt - or ever while not in the presense of his
lawyer (and then only when his lawyer tells him to)

On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 7:50:21 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:46:58 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:22:11 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:06:56 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:58:26 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 09/07/2016 12:35 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
...

... Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .

Just to be pedantic, it's a trademark for the saw; the brand is actually
Milwaukee.

Just to be pedantic, Milwaukee is the source.

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrymcl.../#7f2086602aa4

[The first definition of €œbrand€� is the name given to a product or service
from a specific source. Used in this sense, €œbrand€� is similar to the
current meaning of the word €œtrademark.€�]

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/brand-name

"brand name. noun. 1. a word, name, symbol, etc., especially one legally registered as a trademark, used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify its products distinctively from others of the same type and usually prominently displayed on its goods, in advertising, etc.'

Where does it specifically say "Sawzall" was stolen by Milwaukee Tools? Musta missed something?

"Stolen without permission" is my standard way of letting everyone know
that the quoted text that follows was copied and pasted (i.e. stolen) from
the link I provide without the permission of the author or owner of the
website.

If they want to come get me, my defense will be that at least I gave them
full credit for the text I stole.

Wow, paranoid are we?

Be serious. Do you really think I care? It's nothing more than a fun way
to say "I found this at this site."

I haven't even brought up the fact that you somehow thought those quotes
were about Milwaukee stealing the name Sawzall. I posted 2 definitions
of the word "brand" in response to dpb and you - somehow - read something
into that that didn't even fit.

On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 7:46:43 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 7:50:21 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:46:58 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:22:11 PM UTC-4, bob_villa wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:06:56 PM UTC-5, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:58:26 PM UTC-4, dpb wrote:
On 09/07/2016 12:35 PM, Terry Coombs wrote:
...

... Sawzall is a brand of reciproccating saw .

Just to be pedantic, it's a trademark for the saw; the brand is actually
Milwaukee.

Just to be pedantic, Milwaukee is the source.

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrymcl.../#7f2086602aa4

[The first definition of €œbrand€� is the name given to a product or service
from a specific source. Used in this sense, €œbrand€� is similar to the
current meaning of the word €œtrademark.€�]

Stolen without permission from:

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/brand-name

"brand name. noun. 1. a word, name, symbol, etc., especially one legally registered as a trademark, used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify its products distinctively from others of the same type and usually prominently displayed on its goods, in advertising, etc.'

Where does it specifically say "Sawzall" was stolen by Milwaukee Tools? Musta missed something?

"Stolen without permission" is my standard way of letting everyone know
that the quoted text that follows was copied and pasted (i.e. stolen) from
the link I provide without the permission of the author or owner of the
website.

If they want to come get me, my defense will be that at least I gave them
full credit for the text I stole.

Wow, paranoid are we?

Be serious. Do you really think I care? It's nothing more than a fun way
to say "I found this at this site."

I haven't even brought up the fact that you somehow thought those quotes
were about Milwaukee stealing the name Sawzall. I posted 2 definitions
of the word "brand" in response to dpb and you - somehow - read something
into that that didn't even fit.

You are so anal about things, how am I suppose to read what's in that buzzing mind of yours? You could also just say know, you were kidding...when you weren't!