On 3/14/2018 8:00 AM, GB wrote:
On 14/03/2018 11:50, BurfordTJustice wrote:
British/American left way to deal with armed home invaders.


http://imgbox.com/7St8lJM1



The American Right way is to shoot your loved ones.

http://a.msn.com/01/en-gb/BBKcaaU?ocid=se

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the gun, right?

On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:
On 3/14/2018 8:00 AM, GB wrote:
On 14/03/2018 11:50, BurfordTJustice wrote:
British/American left way to deal with armed home invaders.


http://imgbox.com/7St8lJM1



The American Right way is to shoot your loved ones.

http://a.msn.com/01/en-gb/BBKcaaU?ocid=se

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?

Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot anyone :-)

--
Bod

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.

--
Maggie

On 3/14/2018 at 9:47:45 AM, Muggles wrote:


On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT
the gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot
anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.


Funny how the lack of gun availability in the UK, Canada and Australia
has meant a great deal to people who mean to do harm in those nations.
Crimes committed with guns in those countries are negligible.







--
"In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place."

"Truth Sounds Like Hate To Those Who Hate The Truth"

On 3/14/2018 12:36 PM, Dove Tail wrote:
On 3/14/2018 at 9:47:45 AM, Muggles wrote:


On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:


You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT
the gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot


Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.


Funny how the lack of gun availability in the UK, Canada and Australia
has meant a great deal to people who mean to do harm in those nations.
Crimes committed with guns in those countries are negligible.


The UK, Canada, and Australia are still not the U.S. Different nations,
different groups of people, different problems.

--
Maggie

On 3/14/2018 at 4:47:10 PM, Muggles wrote:


Funny how the lack of gun availability in the UK, Canada and
Australia has meant a great deal to people who mean to do harm in
those nations. Crimes committed with guns in those countries are
negligible.


The UK, Canada, and Australia are still not the U.S. Different
nations, different groups of people, different problems.

The major difference is, the USA has millions of weapons of mass murder
in circulation and easily available to purchase by virtually anyone who
wants to be on the evening news or settle a score.

Get rid of those weapons / ammunition and, over time, mass shootings
will decrease as will the body count from mass shootings.




--
"In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place."

"Truth Sounds Like Hate To Those Who Hate The Truth"

On 03/14/2018 08:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:
On 3/14/2018 8:00 AM, GB wrote:
On 14/03/2018 11:50, BurfordTJustice wrote:
British/American left way to deal with armed home invaders.


http://imgbox.com/7St8lJM1



The American Right way is to shoot your loved ones.

http://a.msn.com/01/en-gb/BBKcaaU?ocid=se

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?

Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot anyone :-)


Right. Hang on a second while I fetch one of my bows.

On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.

You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.
--
Gentlemen, you know the rules - there *are* no rules. This is a fight to the finish. The first man who's dead loses. Wimpy

On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 6:47:08 PM UTC-5, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 12:36 PM, Dove Tail wrote:
On 3/14/2018 at 9:47:45 AM, Muggles wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT
the gun, right?

Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.

Funny how the lack of gun availability in the UK, Canada and Australia
has meant a great deal to people who mean to do harm in those nations.
Crimes committed with guns in those countries are negligible.

The UK, Canada, and Australia are still not the U.S. Different nations,
different groups of people, different problems.
--
Maggie


You're wasting your time on Dove Anus. It's a dyed in the wool Leftist and is a rabid anti-American. Anti-American Leftists like Dove Anus pick and choose what parts of The Constitution and Bill Of Rights they support and hate those who don't believe the dogma espoused by the members of the Leftist cult Dove Anus belongs to. Besides, Dove Anus is kind of a weird pervert because for some strange reason it's infatuated with my penis. O_o

[8~{} Uncle Observant Monster

On 3/14/2018 7:19 PM, Dove Tail wrote:
On 3/14/2018 at 4:47:10 PM, Muggles wrote:


Funny how the lack of gun availability in the UK, Canada and
Australia has meant a great deal to people who mean to do harm in
those nations. Crimes committed with guns in those countries are
negligible.

The UK, Canada, and Australia are still not the U.S. Different
nations, different groups of people, different problems.

The major difference is, the USA has millions of weapons of mass murder
in circulation and easily available to purchase by virtually anyone who
wants to be on the evening news or settle a score.

So? If millions of those weapons are owned and so easily accessible by
virtually anyone, why is there not literally people fighting in the
streets in every town, city, and state? You're premise is ridiculous.

Get rid of those weapons / ammunition and, over time, mass shootings
will decrease as will the body count from mass shootings.



--
Maggie

On 3/14/2018 8:46 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.


You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.


yeah

--
Maggie

On 3/14/2018 9:40 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 6:47:08 PM UTC-5, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 12:36 PM, Dove Tail wrote:
On 3/14/2018 at 9:47:45 AM, Muggles wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT
the gun, right?

Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.

Funny how the lack of gun availability in the UK, Canada and Australia
has meant a great deal to people who mean to do harm in those nations.
Crimes committed with guns in those countries are negligible.


The UK, Canada, and Australia are still not the U.S. Different nations,
different groups of people, different problems.


You're wasting your time on Dove Anus. It's a dyed in the wool Leftist and is a rabid anti-American. Anti-American Leftists like Dove Anus pick and choose what parts of The Constitution and Bill Of Rights they support and hate those who don't believe the dogma espoused by the members of the Leftist cult Dove Anus belongs to. Besides, Dove Anus is kind of a weird pervert because for some strange reason it's infatuated with my penis. O_o


awe geee ... can't a girl have a little fun now and then?
{{{kicks dirt}}



--
Maggie

On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 11:03:30 PM UTC-5, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 9:40 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 6:47:08 PM UTC-5, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 12:36 PM, Dove Tail wrote:
On 3/14/2018 at 9:47:45 AM, Muggles wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT
the gun, right?

Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.

Funny how the lack of gun availability in the UK, Canada and Australia
has meant a great deal to people who mean to do harm in those nations..
Crimes committed with guns in those countries are negligible.


The UK, Canada, and Australia are still not the U.S. Different nations,
different groups of people, different problems.


You're wasting your time on Dove Anus. It's a dyed in the wool Leftist and is a rabid anti-American. Anti-American Leftists like Dove Anus pick and choose what parts of The Constitution and Bill Of Rights they support and hate those who don't believe the dogma espoused by the members of the Leftist cult Dove Anus belongs to. Besides, Dove Anus is kind of a weird pervert because for some strange reason it's infatuated with my penis. O_o

awe geee ... can't a girl have a little fun now and then?
{{{kicks dirt}}
--
Maggie


As long as you're poking Dove Anus with a sharp stick on a regular basis. snicker ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Sharp Monster

On 15/03/2018 01:46, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.

You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.

Execution is legalised, gratuous cold blooded murder.
Most civilised countries don't have capital punishment.
It's mainly the medieval religious countries that still do it.
Mostly the middle east countries. Dictators love it.

--
Bod

On 15/03/2018 04:00, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 8:46 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.


You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.


yeah

In primitive deeply religious countries, yes.

--
Bod

On 03/15/2018 03:01 AM, Bod wrote:
On 15/03/2018 01:46, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot
anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.

You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.

Execution is legalised, gratuous cold blooded murder.
Most civilised countries don't have capital punishment.
It's mainly the medieval religious countries that still do it.
Mostly the middle east countries. Dictators love it.


You would prefer warehousing murderers and rapists for decades at public
expense? Or give them lenient sentences and release them upon the public
with the hope they have had an epiphany after a few years of watching
television and learning from their peers?

What is your solution for the criminally depraved? You are quick to
criticize but offer no solutions but mealy mouthed platitudes.

On 03/15/2018 03:21 AM, Bod wrote:
On 15/03/2018 04:00, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 8:46 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot
anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.


You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.


yeah

In primitive deeply religious countries, yes.


So Britain isn't deeply religious? No wonder the Moslems despise the
country. or is it one of those advanced, hyper-intelligent communities
so beloved by the ailing she-wolf Clinton?

On 15/03/2018 13:41, rbowman wrote:
On 03/15/2018 03:01 AM, Bod wrote:
On 15/03/2018 01:46, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot
anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.

You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.

Execution is legalised, gratuous cold blooded murder.
Most civilised countries don't have capital punishment.
It's mainly the medieval religious countries that still do it.
Mostly the middle east countries. Dictators love it.


You would prefer warehousing murderers and rapists for decades at public
expense? Or give them lenient sentences and release them upon the public
with the hope they have had an epiphany after a few years of watching
television and learning from their peers?

What is your solution for the criminally depraved? You are quick to
criticize but offer no solutions but mealy mouthed platitudes.

Perhaps you should check your facts first about the expense.

Why is it more expensive to execute a prisoner than it is to keep ...
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-it-more...than-it-is-to-...
17 Mar 2015 - The death penalty is very expensive, usually costing
taxpayers millions of dollars more than life in prison. ... Some states
have wised up and stopped capital punishment because they realized they
were wasting millions of taxpayer dollars on something that doesn't
deter people from ...

--
Bod

On 3/15/2018 1:53 AM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 11:03:30 PM UTC-5, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 9:40 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 6:47:08 PM UTC-5, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 12:36 PM, Dove Tail wrote:
On 3/14/2018 at 9:47:45 AM, Muggles wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT
the gun, right?

Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.

Funny how the lack of gun availability in the UK, Canada and Australia
has meant a great deal to people who mean to do harm in those nations.
Crimes committed with guns in those countries are negligible.


The UK, Canada, and Australia are still not the U.S. Different nations,
different groups of people, different problems.


You're wasting your time on Dove Anus. It's a dyed in the wool Leftist and is a rabid anti-American. Anti-American Leftists like Dove Anus pick and choose what parts of The Constitution and Bill Of Rights they support and hate those who don't believe the dogma espoused by the members of the Leftist cult Dove Anus belongs to. Besides, Dove Anus is kind of a weird pervert because for some strange reason it's infatuated with my penis. O_o


awe geee ... can't a girl have a little fun now and then?
{{{kicks dirt}}



As long as you're poking Dove Anus with a sharp stick on a regular basis. snicker ^_^

.... only when I'm bored.

--
Maggie

On 3/15/2018 4:21 AM, Bod wrote:
On 15/03/2018 04:00, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 8:46 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot
anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.


You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.

yeah

In primitive deeply religious countries, yes.

Do you believe in justice?


--
Maggie

On 15/03/2018 14:41, Muggles wrote:
On 3/15/2018 4:21 AM, Bod wrote:
On 15/03/2018 04:00, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 8:46 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot
anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.


You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.

yeah

In primitive deeply religious countries, yes.

Do you believe in justice?


Of course. Silly question. Life imprisonment for a convicted murderer
seems a fair punishment for the crime.

--
Bod

On 3/14/2018 at 8:58:49 PM, Muggles wrote:


The major difference is, the USA has millions of weapons of mass
murder in circulation and easily available to purchase by virtually
anyone who wants to be on the evening news or settle a score.
Get rid of those weapons / ammunition and, over time, mass shootings
will decrease as will the body count from mass shootings.


So? If millions of those weapons are owned and so easily accessible
by virtually anyone, why is there not literally people fighting in the
streets in every town, city, and state? You're premise is ridiculous.


Once again, your argument (in the form of a rhetorical question) is
specious.

It is entirely possible you are not bright enough to construct cogent
arguments and responses without diverting the discussion onto a siding.

Pathetic and sad, but consistent and typical for you.







--
"In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place."

"Truth Sounds Like Hate To Those Who Hate The Truth"

On 3/15/2018 11:10 AM, Bod wrote:
On 15/03/2018 14:41, Muggles wrote:
On 3/15/2018 4:21 AM, Bod wrote:
On 15/03/2018 04:00, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 8:46 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT
the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot
anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.


You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.

yeah

In primitive deeply religious countries, yes.

Do you believe in justice?


Of course. Silly question. Life imprisonment for a convicted murderer
seems a fair punishment for the crime.


Why should a murderer get to live their life out when their victim does not?

--
Maggie

On 3/15/2018 2:27 PM, Dove Tail wrote:
On 3/14/2018 at 8:58:49 PM, Muggles wrote:


The major difference is, the USA has millions of weapons of mass
murder in circulation and easily available to purchase by virtually
anyone who wants to be on the evening news or settle a score.
Get rid of those weapons / ammunition and, over time, mass shootings
will decrease as will the body count from mass shootings.


So? If millions of those weapons are owned and so easily accessible
by virtually anyone, why is there not literally people fighting in the
streets in every town, city, and state? You're premise is ridiculous.


Once again, your argument (in the form of a rhetorical question) is
specious.

Explain if someone claims there are millions of weapons of mass murder
in circulation then why aren't we seeing people using those millions of
weapons of mass murder to do harm? Could it be that millions of people
who own those weapons are NOT using them for mass murders??


It is entirely possible you are not bright enough to construct cogent
arguments and responses without diverting the discussion onto a siding.

Pathetic and sad, but consistent and typical for you.

What is really pathetic if you not being able to put two and two together.







--
Maggie

On 3/15/2018 at 2:50:47 PM, Muggles wrote:


then why aren't we seeing people using those millions of
weapons of mass murder to do harm?

USA from 2014 - 2017 gun violence stats

226,009 incidents of gun violence
56,754 deaths from gun violence
2,710 deaths of children 0 - 11 YOA from gun violence
11,397 deaths of children 12 - 17 YOA from gun violence
1,332 Mass shootings

http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/past-tolls






--
"In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place."

"Truth Sounds Like Hate To Those Who Hate The Truth"

On 3/15/2018 6:38 PM, Dove Tail wrote:
On 3/15/2018 at 2:50:47 PM, Muggles wrote:


then why aren't we seeing people using those millions of
weapons of mass murder to do harm?

USA from 2014 - 2017 gun violence stats

226,009 incidents of gun violence
56,754 deaths from gun violence
2,710 deaths of children 0 - 11 YOA from gun violence
11,397 deaths of children 12 - 17 YOA from gun violence
1,332 Mass shootings

http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/past-tolls


Wait a minute ... you said millions of weapons of mass murder. Which
ones of those were caused by "weapons of mass murder" and which ones
were caused by hand guns, or rifles, or other types of guns?


--
Maggie

On 03/15/2018 08:40 AM, Bod wrote:
On 15/03/2018 13:41, rbowman wrote:
On 03/15/2018 03:01 AM, Bod wrote:
On 15/03/2018 01:46, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot
anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.

You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.

Execution is legalised, gratuous cold blooded murder.
Most civilised countries don't have capital punishment.
It's mainly the medieval religious countries that still do it.
Mostly the middle east countries. Dictators love it.


You would prefer warehousing murderers and rapists for decades at
public expense? Or give them lenient sentences and release them upon
the public with the hope they have had an epiphany after a few years
of watching television and learning from their peers?

What is your solution for the criminally depraved? You are quick to
criticize but offer no solutions but mealy mouthed platitudes.

Perhaps you should check your facts first about the expense.

Why is it more expensive to execute a prisoner than it is to keep ...
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-it-more...than-it-is-to-...

17 Mar 2015 - The death penalty is very expensive, usually costing
taxpayers millions of dollars more than life in prison. ... Some states
have wised up and stopped capital punishment because they realized they
were wasting millions of taxpayer dollars on something that doesn't
deter people from ...


"3. Death row costs a lot more because they are in special units with
more security. The national average per year for a prisoner is around
$30,000. For a death row prisoner it can be around $1,000,000 per year. $$"

No need to warehouse a maggot for 20 years. Justice should be swift.

On 03/15/2018 10:10 AM, Bod wrote:
On 15/03/2018 14:41, Muggles wrote:
On 3/15/2018 4:21 AM, Bod wrote:
On 15/03/2018 04:00, Muggles wrote:
On 3/14/2018 8:46 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:47:45 -0500, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/14/2018 9:05 AM, Bod wrote:
On 14/03/2018 12:40, Dev Null wrote:

You do realize that the real problem here is the shooter and NOT
the
gun, right?


Using the same logic, if there is no gun, then you can't shoot
anyone :-)

Sure ... but that means nothing to a person who intends to do harm.


You can't reason with brit trolls.

Crooks don't commit crimes expecting the death penalty. The law is of
no concern to them.

The death penalty is the final deterrent.

yeah

In primitive deeply religious countries, yes.

Do you believe in justice?


Of course. Silly question. Life imprisonment for a convicted murderer
seems a fair punishment for the crime.


If someone murdered a person I cared about I would want the mother****er
dead. NOW.

On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 6:58:28 PM UTC-5, Muggles wrote:
On 3/15/2018 6:38 PM, Dove Tail wrote:
On 3/15/2018 at 2:50:47 PM, Muggles wrote:

then why aren't we seeing people using those millions of
weapons of mass murder to do harm?

USA from 2014 - 2017 gun violence stats

226,009 incidents of gun violence
56,754 deaths from gun violence
2,710 deaths of children 0 - 11 YOA from gun violence
11,397 deaths of children 12 - 17 YOA from gun violence
1,332 Mass shootings

http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/past-tolls

Wait a minute ... you said millions of weapons of mass murder. Which
ones of those were caused by "weapons of mass murder" and which ones
were caused by hand guns, or rifles, or other types of guns?
--
Maggie


Dove Anus is afflicted with "Firearms Derangement Syndrome". It believes that guns have cooties that will jump on you from a firearm, burrow into your brain and turn you into a mass murderer. My gun cooties are very sweet and wouldn't hurt anyone. I have to keep a can of gun oil around to feed them. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Armed Monster