On 3/15/2018 2:27 PM, Dove Tail wrote:
On 3/14/2018 at 8:58:49 PM, Muggles wrote:


The major difference is, the USA has millions of weapons of mass
murder in circulation and easily available to purchase by virtually
anyone who wants to be on the evening news or settle a score.
Get rid of those weapons / ammunition and, over time, mass shootings
will decrease as will the body count from mass shootings.


So? If millions of those weapons are owned and so easily accessible
by virtually anyone, why is there not literally people fighting in the
streets in every town, city, and state? You're premise is ridiculous.


Once again, your argument (in the form of a rhetorical question) is
specious.

Explain if someone claims there are millions of weapons of mass murder
in circulation then why aren't we seeing people using those millions of
weapons of mass murder to do harm? Could it be that millions of people
who own those weapons are NOT using them for mass murders??


It is entirely possible you are not bright enough to construct cogent
arguments and responses without diverting the discussion onto a siding.

Pathetic and sad, but consistent and typical for you.

What is really pathetic if you not being able to put two and two together.







--
Maggie