OT "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
infringed."

Okay, you think it's a personal right, not a community right, or
whatever, and that every adult male or every adult is part of the
militia. Okay.

So why can't it be well regulated, , no weapons for the mentally ill, or
felons or those convicted of a misdemeanour involving violence, no
automatic weapons, no assault weapons, no weapons at all for junior
members, etc. Why isn't that part of regulating the militia well?

How does it violate the 2nd amendment to regulate the militia?

micky wrote in
news
OT "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free
State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
infringed."



How does it violate the 2nd amendment to regulate the militia?


MickyBoi, you are such an asshole bringing this political **** to a.h.r.
Why don't you go **** yourself.

On 02/21/2018 10:25 PM, micky wrote:
So why can't it be well regulated, , no weapons for the mentally ill, or
felons or those convicted of a misdemeanour involving violence, no
automatic weapons, no assault weapons, no weapons at all for junior
members, etc. Why isn't that part of regulating the militia well?

Absolutely right. No weapons for you Micky.

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:19:01 -0700, rbowman
wrote:

On 02/21/2018 10:25 PM, micky wrote:
So why can't it be well regulated, , no weapons for the mentally ill, or
felons or those convicted of a misdemeanour involving violence, no
automatic weapons, no assault weapons, no weapons at all for junior
members, etc. Why isn't that part of regulating the militia well?

Absolutely right. No weapons for you Micky.

I second that motion!

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:19:01 -0700, rbowman
wrote:

On 02/21/2018 10:25 PM, micky wrote:
So why can't it be well regulated, , no weapons for the mentally
ill, or felons or those convicted of a misdemeanour involving
violence, no automatic weapons, no assault weapons, no weapons at
all for junior members, etc. Why isn't that part of regulating
the militia well?

Absolutely right. No weapons for you Micky.

I second that motion!

And the motion passes

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:48:28 -0600, "ChairMan" no
wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:19:01 -0700, rbowman
wrote:

On 02/21/2018 10:25 PM, micky wrote:
So why can't it be well regulated, , no weapons for the mentally
ill, or felons or those convicted of a misdemeanour involving
violence, no automatic weapons, no assault weapons, no weapons at
all for junior members, etc. Why isn't that part of regulating
the militia well?

Absolutely right. No weapons for you Micky.

I second that motion!

And the motion passes


Dueling with unarmed idiots is no fun, eh?

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:48:28 -0600, "ChairMan" no

wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:19:01 -0700, rbowman

wrote:

On 02/21/2018 10:25 PM, micky wrote:
So why can't it be well regulated, , no weapons for
the mentally
ill, or felons or those convicted of a misdemeanour
involving
violence, no automatic weapons, no assault weapons, no
weapons at
all for junior members, etc. Why isn't that part of
regulating
the militia well?

Absolutely right. No weapons for you Micky.

I second that motion!

And the motion passes


Dueling with unarmed idiots is no fun, eh?

Like shootin fish in a barrel

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:09:53 -0600, "ChairMan"
wrote in

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:48:28 -0600, "ChairMan" no

wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:19:01 -0700, rbowman

wrote:

On 02/21/2018 10:25 PM, micky wrote:
So why can't it be well regulated, , no weapons for
the mentally
ill, or felons or those convicted of a misdemeanour
involving
violence, no automatic weapons, no assault weapons, no
weapons at
all for junior members, etc. Why isn't that part of
regulating
the militia well?

Absolutely right. No weapons for you Micky.

I second that motion!

And the motion passes


Dueling with unarmed idiots is no fun, eh?

Like shootin fish in a barrel

Just curious: Why is there such low regard for this "Micky" fellow in
this N.G.?
--
Web based forums are like subscribing to 10 different newspapers
and having to visit 10 different news stands to pickup each one.
Email list-server groups and USENET are like having all of those
newspapers delivered to your door every morning.

On 2/23/2018 6:16 AM, CRNG wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:09:53 -0600, "ChairMan"
wrote in

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:48:28 -0600, "ChairMan" no

wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:19:01 -0700, rbowman

wrote:

On 02/21/2018 10:25 PM, micky wrote:
So why can't it be well regulated, , no weapons for
the mentally
ill, or felons or those convicted of a misdemeanour
involving
violence, no automatic weapons, no assault weapons, no
weapons at
all for junior members, etc. Why isn't that part of
regulating
the militia well?

Absolutely right. No weapons for you Micky.

I second that motion!

And the motion passes


Dueling with unarmed idiots is no fun, eh?

Like shootin fish in a barrel

Just curious: Why is there such low regard for this "Micky" fellow in
this N.G.?

You do know what a troll is, right?

On 02/23/2018 04:16 AM, CRNG wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:09:53 -0600, "ChairMan"
wrote in

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:48:28 -0600, "ChairMan" no

wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:19:01 -0700, rbowman

wrote:

On 02/21/2018 10:25 PM, micky wrote:
So why can't it be well regulated, , no weapons for
the mentally
ill, or felons or those convicted of a misdemeanour
involving
violence, no automatic weapons, no assault weapons, no
weapons at
all for junior members, etc. Why isn't that part of
regulating
the militia well?

Absolutely right. No weapons for you Micky.

I second that motion!

And the motion passes


Dueling with unarmed idiots is no fun, eh?

Like shootin fish in a barrel

Just curious: Why is there such low regard for this "Micky" fellow in
this N.G.?


Haven't read many Micky generated threads, have you? Unless he's just
trolling he is to incompetent to be allowed out of the yard without
adult supervision. His inability to deal with his personal life makes
his suggestions for national policy especially valuable -- like most
liberals.

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:13:04 -0700, rbowman wrote
in

On 02/23/2018 04:16 AM, CRNG wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:09:53 -0600, "ChairMan"
wrote in

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:48:28 -0600, "ChairMan" no

wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:19:01 -0700, rbowman

wrote:

On 02/21/2018 10:25 PM, micky wrote:
So why can't it be well regulated, , no weapons for
the mentally
ill, or felons or those convicted of a misdemeanour
involving
violence, no automatic weapons, no assault weapons, no
weapons at
all for junior members, etc. Why isn't that part of
regulating
the militia well?

Absolutely right. No weapons for you Micky.

I second that motion!

And the motion passes


Dueling with unarmed idiots is no fun, eh?

Like shootin fish in a barrel

Just curious: Why is there such low regard for this "Micky" fellow in
this N.G.?


Haven't read many Micky generated threads, have you? Unless he's just
trolling he is to incompetent to be allowed out of the yard without
adult supervision. His inability to deal with his personal life makes
his suggestions for national policy especially valuable -- like most
liberals.

Since this thread started, I've noticed a few other of his posts and I
see what you mean. He does seem to have some sort of mental problem.
--
Web based forums are like subscribing to 10 different newspapers
and having to visit 10 different news stands to pickup each one.
Email list-server groups and USENET are like having all of those
newspapers delivered to your door every morning.