Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
If you have the service agreement, never admit you tried to fix
anything. I had two flaky remotes and I tried to fix one of them by cleaning the board and pads. Bear in mind these are not returnable items. They send you a new one and you throw the old one away. When I called for a replacement they said the coverage was void because I took it apart. I said "so if I just threw it in the trash it would be OK" "No then it is lost and we do not cover loss" "But when I get the new one, I just throw the old one away" "yes" "How do you know I messed with it at all" "you told us" It just got silly from there. I said "OK I also have 2 OTHER bad remotes and I am afraid to touch them" "OK great, you will have 2 new ones an a couple days" Moral, no good deed goes unpunished. Never admit you tried to help. |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
|
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 at 2:05:16 PM UTC-4, wrote:
If you have the service agreement, never admit you tried to fix anything. I had two flaky remotes and I tried to fix one of them by cleaning the board and pads. Bear in mind these are not returnable items. They send you a new one and you throw the old one away. When I called for a replacement they said the coverage was void because I took it apart. I said "so if I just threw it in the trash it would be OK" "No then it is lost and we do not cover loss" "But when I get the new one, I just throw the old one away" "yes" "How do you know I messed with it at all" "you told us" It just got silly from there. I said "OK I also have 2 OTHER bad remotes and I am afraid to touch them" "OK great, you will have 2 new ones an a couple days" Moral, no good deed goes unpunished. Never admit you tried to help. I assume the other two are actually good, so the problem is solved? If not, I guess you can wait awhile, then claim you have another bad one. Amazing that they have that absurd position, good way to lose customers over a cheap remote. |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:38:36 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote: On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 at 2:05:16 PM UTC-4, wrote: If you have the service agreement, never admit you tried to fix anything. I had two flaky remotes and I tried to fix one of them by cleaning the board and pads. Bear in mind these are not returnable items. They send you a new one and you throw the old one away. When I called for a replacement they said the coverage was void because I took it apart. I said "so if I just threw it in the trash it would be OK" "No then it is lost and we do not cover loss" "But when I get the new one, I just throw the old one away" "yes" "How do you know I messed with it at all" "you told us" It just got silly from there. I said "OK I also have 2 OTHER bad remotes and I am afraid to touch them" "OK great, you will have 2 new ones an a couple days" Moral, no good deed goes unpunished. Never admit you tried to help. I assume the other two are actually good, so the problem is solved? If not, I guess you can wait awhile, then claim you have another bad one. Amazing that they have that absurd position, good way to lose customers over a cheap remote. I really could not believe it, after this stupid thread continued with the supervisor on line. I assume they are all script monkeys there and nobody has the power to think. This guy kept playing the game after I said we were talking about two OTHER remotes. He was about to run the whole trouble shooting script when I just gave him all the answers before he could get past "replace the batteries". It ended with a simple "what address do we send the remotes to." If I had not said I actually tried to fix them before I wanted new ones they would have simply sent me new ones. Remember these are not supposed to be returned. They would not know if it had a bullet hole in it. (I wasn't that mad at them anyway) ;-) |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
|
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 at 3:34:43 PM UTC-5, Don Y wrote:
On 9/22/2015 1:09 PM, wrote: From their point of view, how do they know you were qualified to diagnose the piece of equipment (it could just as easily have been the DISH tuner box with which you were tinkering!) was, in fact, 'defective'? And, that you are even remotely qualified to disassemble (without breaking), repair *and* reassemble it? Given that they have to come up with a policy that addresses customers who may well be ROCKET SCIENTISTS as well as COMPLETE IDIOTS, it seems like the only logical choice is the one they made. So what, they simply send you another one anyway. It was already broke! They don't *know* that it was broke. The *receiver* could have been broke. The batteries could have been dead; you may have installed replacement batteries *backwards*, etc. All they know is the remote function *appeared* not to work -- ACCORDING TO YOU! Do you know how many items are returned as "broken" that, in fact, are NOT broken? I.e., consumers are not good diagnosticians. How do they know *your* capabilities? They mail you another remote and your problem may or may NOT go away. OTOH, you tinkering with their equipment leaves them at *your* mercy. I design electronic products. I repair most electronic products that I purchase. That doesn't mean I don't make mistakes when performing those diagnostics/repairs. The difference is, I do those repairs when I no longer have the recourse of a warranty to exploit. I.e., it's broken; I MAY be able to fix it -- or, I may break it *more*! But, *I* am assuming the risk for my actions -- not expecting the manufacturer to pick up the pieces if/when I screw up! A warranty repair/replace costs *more* than the original product cost (the manufacturer). They don't want to be fixing things that *you* may have broken -- or, that you may have *changed* the failure mode through your unfamiliarity with the device. ["Yeah, that's failure type XYZ001 -- replace module 23, verify operation and ship it back to the customer" suddenly becomes "Cripes! Who was poking around in here? Nothing is where it should be! Just scrap the entire item..."] Me fooling with it was not going to make it worse. In fact, cleaning it bought them a few months and a few extra payments into the maintenance kitty. I really won't be making money on that maintenance plan until lightning blows up both of my sat boxes. When you design a product, does a production engineer get hold of it and spec the least expensive parts that will make the product work or do you have control of how the item is produced? I've seen bean counters ruin some perfectly good equipment. o_O [8~{} Uncle Bean Monster |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
On 9/22/2015 1:44 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
When you design a product, does a production engineer get hold of it and spec the least expensive parts that will make the product work or do you have control of how the item is produced? I've seen bean counters ruin some perfectly good equipment. o_O I design to a formal specification. That includes cost (to manufacture)/pricing (to sell) targets -- which also have to reflect the cost of in-warranty repairs (I can't factor in the "cost of good-will -- when a defect or poor performance costs you a customer). So, no one tends to touch a design other to choose between "equivalent" components that I specify/qualify in the Bill of Materials, etc. One place I worked at, some "buyer" took it upon himself to buy a metric buttload of a particular component "at a great price". The cost to *rework* all of the machines built with those components was astronomical! It became a sort of inside joke to spring on the purchasing folks any time they started "getting creative": "When *you're* the engineer, then *you* can decide what parts get purchased. Just like *I* can't decide which distributor *you* will choose to place the order with! Even if one disti was particularly helpful to me in selecting the components at design time." |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
Uncle Monster wrote:
On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 at 3:34:43 PM UTC-5, Don Y wrote: On 9/22/2015 1:09 PM, wrote: From their point of view, how do they know you were qualified to diagnose the piece of equipment (it could just as easily have been the DISH tuner box with which you were tinkering!) was, in fact, 'defective'? And, that you are even remotely qualified to disassemble (without breaking), repair *and* reassemble it? Given that they have to come up with a policy that addresses customers who may well be ROCKET SCIENTISTS as well as COMPLETE IDIOTS, it seems like the only logical choice is the one they made. So what, they simply send you another one anyway. It was already broke! They don't *know* that it was broke. The *receiver* could have been broke. The batteries could have been dead; you may have installed replacement batteries *backwards*, etc. All they know is the remote function *appeared* not to work -- ACCORDING TO YOU! Do you know how many items are returned as "broken" that, in fact, are NOT broken? I.e., consumers are not good diagnosticians. How do they know *your* capabilities? They mail you another remote and your problem may or may NOT go away. OTOH, you tinkering with their equipment leaves them at *your* mercy. I design electronic products. I repair most electronic products that I purchase. That doesn't mean I don't make mistakes when performing those diagnostics/repairs. The difference is, I do those repairs when I no longer have the recourse of a warranty to exploit. I.e., it's broken; I MAY be able to fix it -- or, I may break it *more*! But, *I* am assuming the risk for my actions -- not expecting the manufacturer to pick up the pieces if/when I screw up! A warranty repair/replace costs *more* than the original product cost (the manufacturer). They don't want to be fixing things that *you* may have broken -- or, that you may have *changed* the failure mode through your unfamiliarity with the device. ["Yeah, that's failure type XYZ001 -- replace module 23, verify operation and ship it back to the customer" suddenly becomes "Cripes! Who was poking around in here? Nothing is where it should be! Just scrap the entire item..."] Me fooling with it was not going to make it worse. In fact, cleaning it bought them a few months and a few extra payments into the maintenance kitty. I really won't be making money on that maintenance plan until lightning blows up both of my sat boxes. When you design a product, does a production engineer get hold of it and spec the least expensive parts that will make the product work or do you have control of how the item is produced? I've seen bean counters ruin some perfectly good equipment. o_O [8~{} Uncle Bean Monster Bean counters are making decisions, not engineers. Some times bean counters demise good product and it's manufacturer into ground. Way back Chrysler was an example. When accountant became a CEO, company started going down hill. He was deaf to engineers no matter what. |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
On 9/22/2015 3:35 PM, Don Y wrote:
On 9/22/2015 1:09 PM, wrote: From their point of view, how do they know you were qualified to diagnose the piece of equipment (it could just as easily have been the DISH tuner box with which you were tinkering!) was, in fact, 'defective'? And, that you are even remotely qualified to disassemble (without breaking), repair *and* reassemble it? Given that they have to come up with a policy that addresses customers who may well be ROCKET SCIENTISTS as well as COMPLETE IDIOTS, it seems like the only logical choice is the one they made. So what, they simply send you another one anyway. It was already broke! They don't *know* that it was broke. The *receiver* could have been broke. The batteries could have been dead; you may have installed replacement batteries *backwards*, etc. All they know is the remote function *appeared* not to work -- ACCORDING TO YOU! Do you know how many items are returned as "broken" that, in fact, are NOT broken? I.e., consumers are not good diagnosticians. How do they know *your* capabilities? They mail you another remote and your problem may or may NOT go away. OTOH, you tinkering with their equipment leaves them at *your* mercy. I design electronic products. I repair most electronic products that I purchase. That doesn't mean I don't make mistakes when performing those diagnostics/repairs. The difference is, I do those repairs when I no longer have the recourse of a warranty to exploit. I.e., it's broken; I MAY be able to fix it -- or, I may break it *more*! But, *I* am assuming the risk for my actions -- not expecting the manufacturer to pick up the pieces if/when I screw up! A warranty repair/replace costs *more* than the original product cost (the manufacturer). They don't want to be fixing things that *you* may have broken -- or, that you may have *changed* the failure mode through your unfamiliarity with the device. ["Yeah, that's failure type XYZ001 -- replace module 23, verify operation and ship it back to the customer" suddenly becomes "Cripes! Who was poking around in here? Nothing is where it should be! Just scrap the entire item..."] Me fooling with it was not going to make it worse. In fact, cleaning it bought them a few months and a few extra payments into the maintenance kitty. I really won't be making money on that maintenance plan until lightning blows up both of my sat boxes. My daughter used to work for Dish Network as a tech. Some of the calls she describes to me are hysterical. "Ma'am, is the receiver plugged in?" "uh, what's a plug?" "You know that chord on the back of the receiver that goes into the wall to get power?" "yeah. Is that the plug?" "Yes, Ma'am." .... "My satellite isn't working!! I can't get anything on the TV!" "Is your TV turned on?" "No. The power's been out for a couple of hours now." .... Those were REAL discussions she had with a couple of customers. -- Maggie |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
On 9/22/2015 3:04 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 9/22/2015 3:35 PM, Don Y wrote: On 9/22/2015 1:09 PM, wrote: From their point of view, how do they know you were qualified to diagnose the piece of equipment (it could just as easily have been the DISH tuner box with which you were tinkering!) was, in fact, 'defective'? And, that you are even remotely qualified to disassemble (without breaking), repair *and* reassemble it? Given that they have to come up with a policy that addresses customers who may well be ROCKET SCIENTISTS as well as COMPLETE IDIOTS, it seems like the only logical choice is the one they made. So what, they simply send you another one anyway. It was already broke! They don't *know* that it was broke. The *receiver* could have been broke. The batteries could have been dead; you may have installed replacement batteries *backwards*, etc. All they know is the remote function *appeared* not to work -- ACCORDING TO YOU! Do you know how many items are returned as "broken" that, in fact, are NOT broken? I.e., consumers are not good diagnosticians. How do they know *your* capabilities? They mail you another remote and your problem may or may NOT go away. OTOH, you tinkering with their equipment leaves them at *your* mercy. I design electronic products. I repair most electronic products that I purchase. That doesn't mean I don't make mistakes when performing those diagnostics/repairs. The difference is, I do those repairs when I no longer have the recourse of a warranty to exploit. I.e., it's broken; I MAY be able to fix it -- or, I may break it *more*! But, *I* am assuming the risk for my actions -- not expecting the manufacturer to pick up the pieces if/when I screw up! A warranty repair/replace costs *more* than the original product cost (the manufacturer). They don't want to be fixing things that *you* may have broken -- or, that you may have *changed* the failure mode through your unfamiliarity with the device. ["Yeah, that's failure type XYZ001 -- replace module 23, verify operation and ship it back to the customer" suddenly becomes "Cripes! Who was poking around in here? Nothing is where it should be! Just scrap the entire item..."] Me fooling with it was not going to make it worse. In fact, cleaning it bought them a few months and a few extra payments into the maintenance kitty. I really won't be making money on that maintenance plan until lightning blows up both of my sat boxes. My daughter used to work for Dish Network as a tech. Some of the calls she describes to me are hysterical. "Ma'am, is the receiver plugged in?" "uh, what's a plug?" "You know that chord on the back of the receiver that goes into the wall to get power?" "yeah. Is that the plug?" "Yes, Ma'am." .... "My satellite isn't working!! I can't get anything on the TV!" "Is your TV turned on?" "No. The power's been out for a couple of hours now." .... Those were REAL discussions she had with a couple of customers. It's not that people are "stupid". But, most aren't analytical thinkers. They don't have the mindset, skillset or inclination to sit down and sort out the exact nature of a problem. Now, they're in a frustrating situation (whatever isn't working for some reason) *and* you want them to be calm and logical in thinking about the source of their frustration?? : This is one of the main reasons why brand new (obviously working!) items are returned for refunds: the user is unnecessarily intimidated by a device that doesn't work the way he *hopes* it will work! I get frustrated when vendors/manufacturers assume *all* users are inept and reduce a "problem" to a bogus error code (analogous to an idiot light!). Why not indicate what you were *trying* to do and what UNEXPECTED condition was detected? That way, instead of conveying an error code to a support person -- and waiting for them to look it up in The Big Book of Error Codes -- I can possibly check some of the things that YOUR message *suggests* -- either explicitly in the text of the message or *implicitly* as I ponder what the message might mean?! I had a recent piece of software crash miserably during installation simply because a network cable was not plugged into the network jack on the computer! The software didn't care if the network was accessible -- just that the network *interface* was "up"! Had the error message included the characters "n e t w o r k" in it ANYWHERE, I would have explored this option immediately! :-/ Instead, I look at the software as "of poor quality". |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
"Don Y" wrote in message ... They don't *know* that it was broke. The *receiver* could have been broke. The batteries could have been dead; you may have installed replacement batteries *backwards*, etc. All they know is the remote function *appeared* not to work -- ACCORDING TO YOU! Do you know how many items are returned as "broken" that, in fact, are NOT broken? I.e., consumers are not good diagnosticians. How do they know *your* capabilities? They mail you another remote and your problem may or may NOT go away. I can agree with that . I worked in a very large plant making polyester. Worked as a trouble shooter for part of the time. Got a call one night the machine would not start. Went out and the fellow said it would not start and he was pressing the RED button (which is the stop button) and said 'see, it won't start'. Said to him' look you big dumb ass try the GREEN button'. I could tell lots of stories like that if I had the time. About once a year the cable TV went out. First time I found out it blew a fuse somewhere down the line from my house. Called them about 6 or 8 times for the same problem over the years and still let them go through their scrip but as I had already tried things, just answered them. Then they send out the 'inside man' to check the house. He calls the 'out side man' to go and check where the fuse is. After the second time I tried to tell the phone person to send the 'outside' man but they never do, so quit trying to tell them anything. |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
On 9/22/2015 3:09 PM, Ralph Mowery wrote:
"Don Y" wrote in message ... They don't *know* that it was broke. The *receiver* could have been broke. The batteries could have been dead; you may have installed replacement batteries *backwards*, etc. All they know is the remote function *appeared* not to work -- ACCORDING TO YOU! Do you know how many items are returned as "broken" that, in fact, are NOT broken? I.e., consumers are not good diagnosticians. How do they know *your* capabilities? They mail you another remote and your problem may or may NOT go away. I can agree with that . I worked in a very large plant making polyester. Worked as a trouble shooter for part of the time. Got a call one night the machine would not start. Went out and the fellow said it would not start and he was pressing the RED button (which is the stop button) and said 'see, it won't start'. Said to him' look you big dumb ass try the GREEN button'. I could tell lots of stories like that if I had the time. About once a year the cable TV went out. First time I found out it blew a fuse somewhere down the line from my house. Called them about 6 or 8 times for the same problem over the years and still let them go through their scrip but as I had already tried things, just answered them. Then they send out the 'inside man' to check the house. He calls the 'out side man' to go and check where the fuse is. After the second time I tried to tell the phone person to send the 'outside' man but they never do, so quit trying to tell them anything. The same problem also exists in reverse -- "technicians" thinking the customer/user is an idiot and NOT taking him/her for granted. When we had DSL, I was encountering lots of "line noise" problems (cables are all below grade, here, so water infiltration often compromises a cable). Technician came out to test the line. Chatted with him for a bit while he was setting up, etc. So, he had some idea as to my technical abilities. After running a battery of tests, he shook his head and said, "Looks good", and was getting ready to pack up and leave ("No fault found"). I asked him to humor me. As we were having a good discussion, he opted to do so. Some 4 or 5 minutes later, the noise floor shot up tremendously! He clipped his handset to the pair and could barely make out the *dial* tone! "Yikes! Looks like you've got a problem, here!" I've learned with any "professional" who shows up to do some repair that it is in my best interest to engage them in conversation so they understand the quality of my comments and don't rush to dismiss them (on the work order they've been given) as they might for one of my neighbors. Having to call them *back* isn't a win for *anyone*! I detected a slight natural gas odor (rotten eggs) after a plumber had done some work on the gas line, here. He double checked it (soapy water test) and dismissed it as a figment of my imagination. I borrowed a portable mass spectrometer from a friend who was the Safety Officer at a local hospital. With this as a "sniffer", went in search of the leak. Called the plumber *back* (after having returned the instrument) and pointed him at the *exact* location that I had isolated. Again, the soapy water comes out. But, this time, he's far more patient and sits for a good 5 minutes watching for bubbles. "Wow! That's such a *tiny* leak! How the hell could you smell that with your nose??" |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:35:03 -0700, Don Y
wrote: So what, they simply send you another one anyway. It was already broke! They don't *know* that it was broke. The *receiver* could have been broke. The batteries could have been dead; you may have installed replacement batteries *backwards*, etc. All they know is the remote function *appeared* not to work -- ACCORDING TO YOU! Do you know how many items are returned as "broken" that, in fact, are NOT broken? I.e., consumers are not good diagnosticians. How do they know *your* capabilities? They mail you another remote and your problem may or may NOT go away. OTOH, you tinkering with their equipment leaves them at *your* mercy. I design electronic products. I repair most electronic products that I purchase. That doesn't mean I don't make mistakes when performing those diagnostics/repairs. The difference is, I do those repairs when I no longer have the recourse of a warranty to exploit. I.e., it's broken; I MAY be able to fix it -- or, I may break it *more*! But, *I* am assuming the risk for my actions -- not expecting the manufacturer to pick up the pieces if/when I screw up! A warranty repair/replace costs *more* than the original product cost (the manufacturer). They don't want to be fixing things that *you* may have broken -- or, that you may have *changed* the failure mode through your unfamiliarity with the device. ["Yeah, that's failure type XYZ001 -- replace module 23, verify operation and ship it back to the customer" suddenly becomes "Cripes! Who was poking around in here? Nothing is where it should be! Just scrap the entire item..."] What part of "this is not a returnable item" are you having trouble with? The "know" it is bad because I tell them so. That is all they have. Since the problem was that a couple of buttons did not work without really pressing them hard, your battery comment is simply chaff in the conversation. I am sending these people $8 a month for a maintenance agreement and if they have to send me a new $5 remote (a generous price for a chinese product) every now and then, so be it. BTW I was field support for IBM for 30 years, about half of it as region support on a number of products, working on things a lot more complex than a remote control. I don't need you or anyone else questioning my opinion of what was wrong with this. Opening it up and cleaning the pads had already spared them sending me one 6 months ago. I am just pointing out, a painless replacement is if you just say "the mother ****er broke". Then it will be, "OK then we will send you a new one". Anything else is not a wise choice. |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
|
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 at 5:23:09 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:35:03 -0700, Don Y wrote: So what, they simply send you another one anyway. It was already broke! They don't *know* that it was broke. The *receiver* could have been broke. The batteries could have been dead; you may have installed replacement batteries *backwards*, etc. All they know is the remote function *appeared* not to work -- ACCORDING TO YOU! Do you know how many items are returned as "broken" that, in fact, are NOT broken? I.e., consumers are not good diagnosticians. How do they know *your* capabilities? They mail you another remote and your problem may or may NOT go away. OTOH, you tinkering with their equipment leaves them at *your* mercy. I design electronic products. I repair most electronic products that I purchase. That doesn't mean I don't make mistakes when performing those diagnostics/repairs. The difference is, I do those repairs when I no longer have the recourse of a warranty to exploit. I.e., it's broken; I MAY be able to fix it -- or, I may break it *more*! But, *I* am assuming the risk for my actions -- not expecting the manufacturer to pick up the pieces if/when I screw up! A warranty repair/replace costs *more* than the original product cost (the manufacturer). They don't want to be fixing things that *you* may have broken -- or, that you may have *changed* the failure mode through your unfamiliarity with the device. ["Yeah, that's failure type XYZ001 -- replace module 23, verify operation and ship it back to the customer" suddenly becomes "Cripes! Who was poking around in here? Nothing is where it should be! Just scrap the entire item..."] What part of "this is not a returnable item" are you having trouble with? The "know" it is bad because I tell them so. That is all they have. Since the problem was that a couple of buttons did not work without really pressing them hard, your battery comment is simply chaff in the conversation. I am sending these people $8 a month for a maintenance agreement and if they have to send me a new $5 remote (a generous price for a chinese product) every now and then, so be it. BTW I was field support for IBM for 30 years, about half of it as region support on a number of products, working on things a lot more complex than a remote control. I don't need you or anyone else questioning my opinion of what was wrong with this. Opening it up and cleaning the pads had already spared them sending me one 6 months ago. I am just pointing out, a painless replacement is if you just say "the mother ****er broke". Then it will be, "OK then we will send you a new one". Anything else is not a wise choice. I remember getting some cards from a remote terminal based on the IBM Selectric that was connected to an IBM 360/50 RAX network on a college campus. The cards had what looked like square LSI modules the size of a large mans thumbnail with aluminum covers on them. It looked to be all custom made parts with IBM printed on them. It was back in the mid 1960's and I thought it was the stuff of SciFi. It was so cool. ^_^ [8~{} Uncle Chip Monster |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 at 4:34:43 PM UTC-4, Don Y wrote:
On 9/22/2015 1:09 PM, wrote: From their point of view, how do they know you were qualified to diagnose the piece of equipment (it could just as easily have been the DISH tuner box with which you were tinkering!) was, in fact, 'defective'? And, that you are even remotely qualified to disassemble (without breaking), repair *and* reassemble it? Given that they have to come up with a policy that addresses customers who may well be ROCKET SCIENTISTS as well as COMPLETE IDIOTS, it seems like the only logical choice is the one they made. So what, they simply send you another one anyway. It was already broke! They don't *know* that it was broke. The *receiver* could have been broke. The batteries could have been dead; you may have installed replacement batteries *backwards*, etc. All they know is the remote function *appeared* not to work -- ACCORDING TO YOU! Do you know how many items are returned as "broken" that, in fact, are NOT broken? I.e., consumers are not good diagnosticians. How do they know *your* capabilities? They mail you another remote and your problem may or may NOT go away. OTOH, you tinkering with their equipment leaves them at *your* mercy. I design electronic products. I repair most electronic products that I purchase. That doesn't mean I don't make mistakes when performing those diagnostics/repairs. The difference is, I do those repairs when I no longer have the recourse of a warranty to exploit. I.e., it's broken; I MAY be able to fix it -- or, I may break it *more*! But, *I* am assuming the risk for my actions -- not expecting the manufacturer to pick up the pieces if/when I screw up! A warranty repair/replace costs *more* than the original product cost (the manufacturer). They don't want to be fixing things that *you* may have broken -- or, that you may have *changed* the failure mode through your unfamiliarity with the device. ["Yeah, that's failure type XYZ001 -- replace module 23, verify operation and ship it back to the customer" suddenly becomes "Cripes! Who was poking around in here? Nothing is where it should be! Just scrap the entire item..."] Me fooling with it was not going to make it worse. In fact, cleaning it bought them a few months and a few extra payments into the maintenance kitty. I really won't be making money on that maintenance plan until lightning blows up both of my sat boxes. It's a cheap made in China remote that costs them a few bucks and isn't worth the time they are taking arguing about it and losing a customer in the process, it's not a DISH receiver or some other piece of more expensive eqpt. |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:42:39 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote: It's a cheap made in China remote that costs them a few bucks and isn't worth the time they are taking arguing about it and losing a customer in the process, it's not a DISH receiver or some other piece of more expensive eqpt. It was simply a room of of script monkeys, following the rules. I almost understand it until I step back and apply a little logic. I did think it was funny that when I said, "OK I have two OTHER bad remotes and I never touched them" that it just sailed through. If people are not allowed to think, you just have to lower yourself to their level. I am sure they are laughing about this in a bar in Bangladesh too, I don't think the people are stupid, only the rules they operate under. |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
DISH network tip.
Don Y posted for all of us...
consumers are not good diagnosticians. And neither is their tech support. -- Tekkie |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Dish Network | Metalworking | |||
Dish Network Deals & Special Offers! | Electronics Repair | |||
Does Old Dish Network Hardware Have Value? | Home Repair | |||
HDTV and Dish Network | Home Repair | |||
Dish Network reception issue with VCR | Electronics Repair |