Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of
problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
|
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
wrote in message ... Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? First a heads up. surge suppressor outlet strips are typically one shot one time protection (and poor at that). We had industrial grade (typically multiple surge) suppressor installed in the breaker box. Again this is not 100% but much better than plug strips. I would check with your insurance (if you saw fire and or smoke) you may have coverage. For surge that's iffy. Second I would try to file a claim with the power company. Last a Ferro resonance voltage controller may help. Increases the power consumption by~ 15% but does give a added protection for voltage surges. We have all our computers running on heavy duty inverters using large (think golf cart) batteries on three state float charges. Short of one *hell* of a hard lighting strike real close we're safe. |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? *Were there any lightning storms in the area at the time? You could try calling the power company to see if they had any incidents during that time period. Basic protection against future events would be to install a whole house surge protector and also to make sure that your grounding electrode system (water pipe, ground rods, bonding jumper) has good clean, and tight connections. |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:45:08 AM UTC-4, wrote:
I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? Those power strips did exactly what they claim to do. They protect only from transients that typically do no damage. And are so grossly undersized as to fail even on transients that are too small to damage other appliances. Utility equipment can detect faults (ie a lightning strike). Temporarily disconnects power (ie because voltages are out of spec). And then automatically restore power a few seconds later after the fault has cleared. That would be what you observed. Protection from such transients only works where AC wires enter the building. Nothing inside the building will or claims to protect from such anomalies. Protection from such anomalies has been routine for over 100 years. But most are, instead, educated by advertising. For example, purchase power strips that do not do that protection. But sure are profitable. Destructive transients occur maybe once every seven years. Typically may be hundreds of thousands of joules. And are not averted by any 'box'. Understand what does the protection - what absorbs hundreds of thousands of joules - earth ground. Either you connected every wire inside every cable to the single point earth ground. Or that transient was inside hunting for earth destructively via appliances. The adjacent protector sometimes gives that transient even more potentially destructive paths. Even the power strip needs protection provided by earthing one 'whole house' protector. That protector (the box) is not protection. It simply connects a surge (maybe 20,000 amps) to earth. But only if the connection is low impedance (ie 'less than 10 feet', no sharp wire bends, well separated from other non-grounding wires, etc). Every facility that cannot have damage uses the 'whole house' solution. You have learned the hard way why those facilities do not waste money on adjacent magic boxes. And finally, protectors are simple science. The 'art' of protection is earth ground. Most of your questions should be about what does the actual protection - the art of earthing. Routine is to have direct lightning strikes. And nobody even knew a surge existed. Because even a protector does not fail. Because a protector is only as effective as its earth ground. |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
Tony Hwang wrote:
wrote: Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? Hi, Sorry to hear that. Don't you have insurance coverage for that kinda damage? The insurance of a few hundred dollars is moot. What about all the data that could be lost? I have an external HD connected to my computer. I only turn it on when I back up the internal HD and then I turn it off. Regarding good suppressor individually or at main power entrance point you have many choices but like anything else, case of you get what you pay for. I moved out here from Ontario in '70. Since total power outage altogether does not even equal 3 hour caused by grass fire in the spring of some years ago. All our power, phone, cable are under ground nothing over head in my neighborhood. Only steel street lamp poles fed by under ground cable stand along the streets. -- Bill In Hamptonburgh, NY In the original Orange County. Est. 1683 To email, remove the double zeros after @ |
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 8:44:08 AM UTC-4, westom wrote:
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:45:08 AM UTC-4, wrote: I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? Those power strips did exactly what they claim to do. They protect only from transients that typically do no damage. Good grief, Tom's back folks! Mention surge protector and wham!, there he is. Show us where plug-in surge protectors claim to "only protect from transients that typically do no damage". It seems to me it would be very hard to sell them if they made that claim...... That alone should put everyone on guard that you don't know what you're talking about And are so grossly undersized as to fail even on transients that are too small to damage other appliances. That would be something, because those other appliances all use MOVs, just like the plug-in surge protectors. The difference is that the MOVs inside the appliance are much smaller and can only handle smaller surges than the plug-in protector. The other obvious difference is that each surge degrades the MOV a bit. Which MOV would you rather have fail? The one in the $2000 TV or the one in the $25 surge protector? And the rating of that $25 one is typically higher than that of the ones in the TV. Utility equipment can detect faults (ie a lightning strike). Temporarily disconnects power (ie because voltages are out of spec). And then automatically restore power a few seconds later after the fault has cleared. That would be what you observed. While lightning is the most frequent cause, you have no way of knowing what caused this specific event. Protection from such transients only works where AC wires enter the building. Nothing inside the building will or claims to protect from such anomalies. The IEEE tutorial on surge protection strategies disagrees. They clearly show plug-in type surge protectors being used as part of a tiered protection strategy. So would all the appliance manufacturers who almost all include some surge protection inside the appliances they manufacture. And they use the same components and method that the manufacturers of plug-ins use. It's just that the MOVs they use are even smaller than those in the plug-in. You start with a perfectly valid premise. That a whole house surge protector is the best first line defense. The IEEE agrees with that and so do I. But then you go astray by this crusade against plug-ins offering any protection at all. There we disagree. And you fail to recognize that not everyone can install a whole house surge protector. Those living in a rental house, rental apartment, etc. Protection from such anomalies has been routine for over 100 years. But most are, instead, educated by advertising. For example, purchase power strips that do not do that protection. But sure are profitable. Again the IEEE, among other authorities, disagrees. Destructive transients occur maybe once every seven years. Typically may be hundreds of thousands of joules. And are not averted by any 'box'. My whole house surge protector is in a "box". Have you actually seen one? Understand what does the protection - what absorbs hundreds of thousands of joules - earth ground. Either you connected every wire inside every cable to the single point earth ground. Or that transient was inside hunting for earth destructively via appliances. The adjacent protector sometimes gives that transient even more potentially destructive paths. The myth repeated that surge protectors are what cause destruction. Even the power strip needs protection provided by earthing one 'whole house' protector. That protector (the box) is not protection. It simply connects a surge (maybe 20,000 amps) to earth. But only if the connection is low impedance (ie 'less than 10 feet', no sharp wire bends, well separated from other non-grounding wires, etc). A powerstrip uses MOVs. If you look inside a TV, PC, electronic oven, etc you will almost always find an MOV. An MOV that is smaller than those used in a plug-in surge protector. If they are useless, incapable of any protection because they are not directly connected to an earth ground, are all the appliance manufacturers just dumb and wasting their money? Every facility that cannot have damage uses the 'whole house' solution. You have learned the hard way why those facilities do not waste money on adjacent magic boxes. The plug-in work by clamping all the voltages at an appliance together. If there is a 1000V surge, all the voltages going into the PC then rise together so there is no potential difference to cause damage. That is why for a surge protector for a PC to be effective, anything connected must pass through it, ie power, phone, cable. At the same time, they provide a path for the surge to ground. It would be interesting to know if in the case of the PC damaged, what all it was connected to and what passed through the surge protector. And finally, protectors are simple science. The 'art' of protection is earth ground. Most of your questions should be about what does the actual protection - the art of earthing. Routine is to have direct lightning strikes. Nonsense. Damage that occurs as a result of surges is rarely a direct lightning strike. It's usually lightning hitting the electric utility somewhere nearby, eg out at the steet poles with overhead wires. And nobody even knew a surge existed. If you're house took a direct lightning strike, it would most likely be obvious. Because even a protector does not fail. Because a protector is only as effective as its earth ground. Which is not true either. The whole house surge protectors also use MOVs. They are typically larger. But with each surge their capability also degrades. It's part of the basic physics of the devices. And over time, with enough surges, they will fail. |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
willshak wrote:
The insurance of a few hundred dollars is moot. What about all the data that could be lost? I have an external HD connected to my computer. I only turn it on when I back up the internal HD and then I turn it off. Unless you unplug it, both from the computer and the power, it could still get fried. |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
"Bob F" wrote in message ... willshak wrote: The insurance of a few hundred dollars is moot. What about all the data that could be lost? I have an external HD connected to my computer. I only turn it on when I back up the internal HD and then I turn it off. Unless you unplug it, both from the computer and the power, it could still get fried. That is why I have one of the external drives that plug into the USB port. I plug it every day or so depending on what I am doing with the computer. It will automatically back up the internal hard drive. I then unplug it. It colst less than $ 100 for about a 500 GB drive. You can get larger ones now, but my hard drive is only around 200 GB. I also keep a copy of most of my data and pic on a netbook computer. Usually have a 32 GB thumb drive with me that also has most of the important data on it. That way if the house goes up in smoke I will have a copy of the pic. I used to leave it at work but have retired now. Always good to have an off site copy of any computer data. |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
|
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On 6/19/2013 6:44 AM, westom wrote:
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:45:08 AM UTC-4, wrote: I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? Excellent information on surges and surge protection is at: http://www.lightningsafety.com/nlsi_lhm/IEEE_Guide.pdf - "How to protect your house and its contents from lightning: IEEE guide for surge protection of equipment connected to AC power and communication circuits" published by the IEEE (the IEEE is a major organization of electrical and electronic engineers). And also: http://www.eeel.nist.gov/817/pubs/sp...%20happen!.pdf - "NIST recommended practice guide: Surges Happen!: how to protect the appliances in your home" published by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology The IEEE surge guide is aimed at people with some technical background. ======================== From the description this was something more like crossed power wires. That is not a "surge", which is, by definition, a very short event. As JohnG wrote, ask the utility if they had an 'incident'. Those power strips did exactly what they claim to do. They protect only from transients that typically do no damage. Complete nonsense. And are so grossly undersized as to fail even on transients that are too small to damage other appliances. More complete nonsense. Contrary to westom's beliefs, which he compulsively spreads all over the internet, both the IEEE and NIST surge guides say plug-in protectors are effective. When using a plug-in protector all interconnected equipment needs to be connected to the same protector. External connections, like coax, also must go through the protector Utility equipment can detect faults (ie a lightning strike). Temporarily disconnects power (ie because voltages are out of spec). And then automatically restore power a few seconds later after the fault has cleared. That would be what you observed. A lighting strike is not a fault. Sounds like a "recloser", that does open on faults and may reclose several times. Service panel protectors are very effective against very high current but very short duration surges. They will be rapidly burned out by the much longer duration of a crossed power wire. See the IEEE surge guide pages 11, 15 and 25. The same is true of plug-in protectors. There are supposed to be plug-in protectors that disconnect on overvoltage - I haven't seen them. A UPS may disconnect and provide protection (and apparently they did). (Disconnecting to protect from a surge doesn't work because a surge is too short an event.) The author of the NIST surge guide has written "the major cause of [surge protector] failures is a temporary overvoltage, rather than an unusually large surge." Destructive transients occur maybe once every seven years. Typically may be hundreds of thousands of joules. And are not averted by any 'box'. It has been explained to westom many times that not much surge energy can make it to a plug-in protector, and also explained why. But westom ignores anything that does not fit his very limited beliefs on protection. Even the power strip needs protection provided by earthing one 'whole house' protector. More complete nonsense. SquareD does not make plug-in protectors, but says for their "best" service panel protector "electronic equipment may need additional protection by installing plug-in [protectors] at the point of use." Because a protector is only as effective as its earth ground. It is westom's mantra that protects him from confusing thoughts (aka reality). Unfortunately for westom, the IEEE surge guide explains (starting page 30) that plug in protectors do not work primarily by earthing surges. Earthing occurs elsewhere. Plug-in protectors work by limiting the voltage from each wire (power and signal) to the ground at the protector. The voltage between the wires going to the protected equipment is safe for the protected equipment. For real science, and excellent information on surge protection, read the IEEE and NIST surge guides. |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Jun 19, 9:25*am, bud-- wrote:
On 6/19/2013 6:44 AM, westom wrote: * On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:45:08 AM wrote: * * I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage * control item on our comps and a few other things around here. * Any suggestions? Excellent information on surges and surge protection is at:http://www.lightningsafety.com/nlsi_lhm/IEEE_Guide.pdf - "How to protect your house and its contents from lightning: IEEE guide for surge protection of equipment connected to AC power and communication circuits" published by the IEEE (the IEEE is a major organization of electrical and electronic engineers). And also:http://www.eeel.nist.gov/817/pubs/sp...urges%20happen... - "NIST recommended practice guide: Surges Happen!: how to protect the appliances in your home" published by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology The IEEE surge guide is aimed at people with some technical background. ======================== *From the description this was something more like crossed power wires. That is not a "surge", which is, by definition, a very short event. As JohnG wrote, ask the utility if they had an 'incident'. * Those power strips did exactly what they claim to do. *They protect * only from transients that * typically do no damage. Complete nonsense. * And are so grossly undersized as to fail even on transients that are * too * small to damage other appliances. More complete nonsense. Contrary to westom's beliefs, which he compulsively spreads all over the internet, both the IEEE and NIST surge guides say plug-in protectors are effective. When using a plug-in protector all interconnected equipment needs to be connected to the same protector. External connections, like coax, also must go through the protector * * Utility equipment can detect faults (ie a lightning strike). * Temporarily disconnects power * (ie because voltages are out of spec). *And then automatically * restore power a few seconds later * after the fault has cleared. *That would be what you observed. A lighting strike is not a fault. Sounds like a "recloser", that does open on faults and may reclose several times. Service panel protectors are very effective against very high current but very short duration surges. They will be rapidly burned out by the much longer duration of a crossed power wire. See the IEEE surge guide pages 11, 15 and 25. The same is true of plug-in protectors. *There are supposed to be plug-in protectors that disconnect on overvoltage - I haven't seen them. A UPS may disconnect and provide protection (and apparently they did). (Disconnecting to protect from a surge doesn't work because a surge is too short an event.) The author of the NIST surge guide has written "the major cause of [surge protector] failures is a temporary overvoltage, rather than an unusually large surge." * * Destructive transients occur maybe once every seven years. *Typically * may be hundreds of * thousands of joules. *And are not averted by any 'box'. It has been explained to westom many times that not much surge energy can make it to a plug-in protector, and also explained why. But westom ignores anything that does not fit his very limited beliefs on protection.. * * Even the power strip needs protection provided by earthing one 'whole * house' protector. More complete nonsense. SquareD does not make plug-in protectors, but says for their "best" service panel protector "electronic equipment may need additional protection by installing plug-in [protectors] at the point of use." * * Because a protector is only as effective as its earth ground. It is westom's mantra that protects him from confusing thoughts (aka reality). Unfortunately for westom, the IEEE surge guide explains (starting page 30) that plug in protectors do not work primarily by earthing surges. Earthing occurs elsewhere. Plug-in protectors work by limiting the voltage from each wire (power and signal) to the ground at the protector. The voltage between the wires going to the protected equipment is safe for the protected equipment. For real science, and excellent information on surge protection, read the IEEE and NIST surge guides. Hear, hear. Good example of NO ground, Norway. I was once told by utilities people that when a distribution fault/'short' occurs; we'll see a brown-out, or complete drop out, then the utilities come back on trying to 'clear' the short [burning it out?] and if that doesn't work, power goes off again. Was believable, because that has pretty much been the sequence here. Only thing here that REALLY caused the PC's to get upset, was when strong winds kept slapping the high tension cabling together coming in from ?? Hoover Dam? [according to utilities spokesperson giving that reason] You can't believe the on off sequences we went through. |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:45:08 AM UTC-4, wrote:
Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? Here in this country we have frequent outages. Many ppl here use inverters, or in Spanish 'inversors'. Good for the times there is no electricity and for surge protection. They are great in theory... but they suck up a lot of power, especially if one or more batteries are not up to par... If a battery has a problem holding a charge, then it will just keep sucking up electricity trying to charge.... mucho dollars my friend... which is why even though I have one, I don't use it (our electricity has been pretty good around here lately). |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:45:08 AM UTC-4, wrote:
Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? Here in this country we have frequent outages. Many ppl here use inverters, or in Spanish 'inversors', usually using four 12v batteries. Good for the times there is no electricity and for surge protection. They are great in theory... but they suck up a lot of power, especially if one or more batteries are not up to par... If a battery has a problem holding a charge, then it will just keep sucking up electricity trying to charge.... mucho dollars my friend... which is why even though I have one, I don't use it (our electricity has been pretty good around here lately). Another problem is that the batteries go out rather frequently. A car battery typically lasts 3 years... but invertor batteries are always in use, so they only last a year at best. |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
|
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:45:08 PM UTC-7, wrote:
Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? Maybe you just need a line filter that contains coils and capacitors because they block surges according to how fast the voltage and current change, rather than according to the voltage level, as MOVs do. Typically the more expensive surge protector power strips have both types of protection, but watch out for those that advertise having an RF filter but it's only a capacitor. |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:45:08 PM UTC-7, wrote: Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? Maybe you just need a line filter that contains coils and capacitors because they block surges according to how fast the voltage and current change, rather than according to the voltage level, as MOVs do. Typically the more expensive surge protector power strips have both types of protection, but watch out for those that advertise having an RF filter but it's only a capacitor. I like the triplite suppressors with metal boxes, LC filtering and MOV protection. I don't like plastic contraptions. I think the L does slow down the spike enabling the MOV to do a better job. Many MOV devices have MOV's with too high a trip point. At a segment powered by the line, such as a computer desk, anything connected to the computer must be grounded to the same ground. The ground is not protected against another ground point by MOV. Signal grounds can fail at very low voltage levels. Makes sense to use a protect strip with plugs for telephones, and other data connection. Greg |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
gregz wrote:
wrote: On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:45:08 PM UTC-7, wrote: Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? Maybe you just need a line filter that contains coils and capacitors because they block surges according to how fast the voltage and current change, rather than according to the voltage level, as MOVs do. Typically the more expensive surge protector power strips have both types of protection, but watch out for those that advertise having an RF filter but it's only a capacitor. I like the triplite suppressors with metal boxes, LC filtering and MOV protection. I don't like plastic contraptions. I think the L does slow down the spike enabling the MOV to do a better job. Many MOV devices have MOV's with too high a trip point. At a segment powered by the line, such as a computer desk, anything connected to the computer must be grounded to the same ground. The ground is not protected against another ground point by MOV. Signal grounds can fail at very low voltage levels. Makes sense to use a protect strip with plugs for telephones, and other data connection. Greg Have to mention isolation transformers, such as sold by triplite. The ground is equalized at the transformer, since a new neutral is formed by tying to ground. The will be no great potential between line and ground, except if differential surge is created on line. Spikes would automatically be attenuated. I still have an old Heathkit spike and voltage monitor which no longer works. I had given Heathkit recommendation of adding a ground monitor to the circuit, but they sort of went away. Greg |
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
wrote:
Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? One time I had power going off and on. It was then a main suppressor blew. I'm always concerned with things in the house to cause backward ac flow against the main flow causing excessive voltage. Motors are still turning. It's my theory. Thats why I like local suppressors on equipment. if lightning hit a nearby line or your house, things will fail regardless. I had a lightning strike my tree. Didn't notice any failure, but years ago I had a modem go out in the computer, after a loud crack. After that in installed MOV's on phone line. Greg |
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
|
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:10:40 -0600, Tony Hwang
wrote: wrote: Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? Hi, Sorry to hear that. Don't you have insurance coverage for that kinda damage? Regarding good suppressor individually or at main power entrance point you have many choices but like anything else, case of you get what you pay for. I moved out here from Ontario in '70. Since total power outage altogether does not even equal 3 hour caused by grass fire in the spring of some years ago. All our power, phone, cable are under ground nothing over head in my neighborhood. Only steel street lamp poles fed by under ground cable stand along the streets. Same here in Waterloo Ontario - at least the part I live in. |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 1:10:04 PM UTC-4, The Daring Dufas wrote:
The power company here offers a whole house surge protector that plugs in behind the meter. Then the customer is definitely covered for voltage surge damage to their equipment. ^_^ A 'whole house' protector is the only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage. IEEE even puts a number to the protection. It does about 99.5% of the protection. Then get maybe an additional 0.2% protection using 'point of connection' protectors. IEEE papers even report damage created when 'point of connection' protectors are used without a 'whole house' protector. Some facilities that may even suffer about 100 surges per storm always use the 'whole house' solution. In some cases, an employee could even be fired for using the adjacent 'point of connection' protector. Due to their higher requirements for reliablity. Even professional organization including the IEEE, NIST, and ARRL recommend the 'whole house' solution. Because no protector does protection. Either the protector connects to what does protection - earth ground. Or the protector is for other transients that typically are not destructive; made irrelevant by protection that routinely exists inside all appliances (with or without internal MOVs). The utility 'whole house' protector is so simple that the girl who reads the meter may often install it. But the same solution from many other (and more responsible companies including GE, Siemens, Intermatic, Cutler-Hammer, Ditek, ABB, Syscom, Square D, etc) can be installed for less money. Even the 'point of connection' protection needs protection only possible by earthing a 'whole house' protector. |
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
Ralph Mowery wrote:
"Bob F" wrote in message ... willshak wrote: The insurance of a few hundred dollars is moot. What about all the data that could be lost? I have an external HD connected to my computer. I only turn it on when I back up the internal HD and then I turn it off. Unless you unplug it, both from the computer and the power, it could still get fried. That is why I have one of the external drives that plug into the USB port. I plug it every day or so depending on what I am doing with the computer. It will automatically back up the internal hard drive. I then unplug it. It colst less than $ 100 for about a 500 GB drive. You can get larger ones now, but my hard drive is only around 200 GB. I also keep a copy of most of my data and pic on a netbook computer. Usually have a 32 GB thumb drive with me that also has most of the important data on it. That way if the house goes up in smoke I will have a copy of the pic. I used to leave it at work but have retired now. Always good to have an off site copy of any computer data. My ISP is Comcast, and I get a huge amount of storage space free with our account. I'm quite religious about backing up the computerized payroll data files from our family business by FTPing them to Comcast immediately after anything is done which changes them. I also back up stuff like my family tree efforts and family photo albums there too. Jeff -- Jeffry Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE) The speed of light is 1.8*10^12 furlongs per fortnight. |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On 6/20/2013 11:31 AM, westom wrote:
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 1:10:04 PM UTC-4, The Daring Dufas wrote: The power company here offers a whole house surge protector that plugs in behind the meter. Then the customer is definitely covered for voltage surge damage to their equipment. ^_^ A 'whole house' protector is the only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage. IEEE even puts a number to the protection. It does about 99.5% of the protection. Then get maybe an additional 0.2% protection using 'point of connection' protectors. IEEE papers even report damage created when 'point of connection' protectors are used without a 'whole house' protector. Some facilities that may even suffer about 100 surges per storm always use the 'whole house' solution. In some cases, an employee could even be fired for using the adjacent 'point of connection' protector. Due to their higher requirements for reliablity. Even professional organization including the IEEE, NIST, and ARRL recommend the 'whole house' solution. Because no protector does protection. Either the protector connects to what does protection - earth ground. Or the protector is for other transients that typically are not destructive; made irrelevant by protection that routinely exists inside all appliances (with or without internal MOVs). The utility 'whole house' protector is so simple that the girl who reads the meter may often install it. But the same solution from many other (and more responsible companies including GE, Siemens, Intermatic, Cutler-Hammer, Ditek, ABB, Syscom, Square D, etc) can be installed for less money. Even the 'point of connection' protection needs protection only possible by earthing a 'whole house' protector. I remember reading about some research done by labs working for The DOD where they had to come up with a way to protect the power systems and connected electronic equipment from the EMP created by a nuclear weapon when it explodes. They were testing surge protection installed in layers. It would start where power entered the facility and was added to inside electrical panels all the outlets and in/on the individual pieces of electronic equipment. They found what they did was the best way to protect electronic equipment from any extreme events affecting the electrical power service. ^_^ TDD |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
The Daring Dufas wrote:
On 6/19/2013 11:08 AM, wrote: On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:10:52 -0500, The Daring Dufas wrote: On 6/18/2013 11:45 PM, wrote: Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? I live in Alabamastan and we have a pretty good power company, Alabama Power and I've had damage due to aberrations in the power at times and on one occasion, I had a really bad power spike blow out some equipment at my business. I had to get past the nice lady customer service rep in order to speak with one of the engineers to explain what happened. He agreed with me and the power company paid for my damaged gear. ^_^ TDD The best chance to get a PoCo to help you out with a surge is to buy their surge protection package. (protectors in the meter base and an evaluation of your grounding) Usually that will stop most of them tho. You want all of your surge protection connected to the same ground electrode system, preferably at the same place. That needs to be a robust grounding system too., Then when you add point of use protection at the devices that need it. protecting all inputs, you have a comprehensive surge protection scheme. The power company here offers a whole house surge protector that plugs in behind the meter. Then the customer is definitely covered for voltage surge damage to their equipment. ^_^ http://www.metertreater.com/Utility_Products.html TDD When I moved in, the power company informed me I had a protector, and wanted to know if I wanted to keep it. Something like $6-7 month. I don't think anyone came to remove it, and I don't think I had one to begin with. scam ? Greg |
#28
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On 6/20/2013 7:13 PM, gregz wrote:
The Daring Dufas wrote: On 6/19/2013 11:08 AM, wrote: On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:10:52 -0500, The Daring Dufas wrote: On 6/18/2013 11:45 PM, wrote: Where we live we have regular electrical outages due to a number of problems. Last night, however, we had a new experience. It must have been something like a voltage surge. it blew out a drive of mine, my PC speaker system and screwed up our wireless home network pretty good. All electricity to the house went off for a few seconds and then turned back on. I guess the electric company had a backup system of sorts that took over. I did have so-called surge suppressor outlet strips to which our comps were plugged in. They were useless against whatever it was that happened. I'm amazed my battery backups for the computers are still working. I'm thinking we need some kind of really strong voltage control item on our comps and a few other things around here. Any suggestions? I live in Alabamastan and we have a pretty good power company, Alabama Power and I've had damage due to aberrations in the power at times and on one occasion, I had a really bad power spike blow out some equipment at my business. I had to get past the nice lady customer service rep in order to speak with one of the engineers to explain what happened. He agreed with me and the power company paid for my damaged gear. ^_^ TDD The best chance to get a PoCo to help you out with a surge is to buy their surge protection package. (protectors in the meter base and an evaluation of your grounding) Usually that will stop most of them tho. You want all of your surge protection connected to the same ground electrode system, preferably at the same place. That needs to be a robust grounding system too., Then when you add point of use protection at the devices that need it. protecting all inputs, you have a comprehensive surge protection scheme. The power company here offers a whole house surge protector that plugs in behind the meter. Then the customer is definitely covered for voltage surge damage to their equipment. ^_^ http://www.metertreater.com/Utility_Products.html TDD When I moved in, the power company informed me I had a protector, and wanted to know if I wanted to keep it. Something like $6-7 month. I don't think anyone came to remove it, and I don't think I had one to begin with. scam ? Greg You should call your power company and ask them what they'll cover in the way of damage if you lease a meter mounted surge arrester from them. $7.00 per month sounds like cheep insurance to me. ^_^ TDD |
#29
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
|
#30
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Thursday, June 20, 2013 12:31:30 PM UTC-4, westom wrote:
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 1:10:04 PM UTC-4, The Daring Dufas wrote: The power company here offers a whole house surge protector that plugs in behind the meter. Then the customer is definitely covered for voltage surge damage to their equipment. ^_^ A 'whole house' protector is the only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage. Nonsense. Look at a phone facility for example. Not only is there protection on the incoming lines, there is also protection on the linecard boards in the system that the lines go to too. Just like IEEE recommends, they use a tiered protection strategy. In the past, I even provided you with references to major component manufacturers that provide such surge protection, but of course you ignore it. Here are some again: http://www.littelfuse.com/~/media/Fi...ns/3Analog.pdf http://www.st.com/st-web-ui/static/a...CD00004119.pdf "A “primary protection” located on the Main Distribution Frame (MDF) eliminates coarsely the high energy environmental disturbances (lightning transients and AC power mains disturbances) n A “secondary protection” located on the line card includes a primary protection level (first stage) and a residual protection (second stage) which eliminates finely the remaining transients that have not been totally suppressed by the first stage." Note that the above clearly is a TIERED strategy, consistent with the IEEE recommendations. IEEE even puts a number to the protection. It does about 99.5% of the protection. Then get maybe an additional 0.2% protection using 'point of connection' protectors. Please provide us with a link that shows those numbers. IEEE papers even report damage created when 'point of connection' protectors are used without a 'whole house' protector. Some facilities that may even suffer about 100 surges per storm always use the 'whole house' solution. In some cases, an employee could even be fired for using the adjacent 'point of connection' protector. Due to their higher requirements for reliablity. Even professional organization including the IEEE, NIST, and ARRL recommend the 'whole house' solution. Yes and right in the IEEE white paper, part of that whole house strategy is to use a whole house protector at the panel AND point-of-use, ie plug-in protectors at appliances, like TV, PC, etc. Because no protector does protection. Either the protector connects to what does protection - earth ground. Or the protector is for other transients that typically are not destructive; made irrelevant by protection that routinely exists inside all appliances (with or without internal MOVs). Still waiting all these years for an answer. If MOVs inside an appliance are effective with out a direct connection to ground, then how is it that MOVs located in an adjacent surge protector are useless, because they have no earth ground? And factor in that the MOVs in a $25 surge protector are an order of magnitude larger than those in an appliance. And which device would you rather have much of the surge going through? The ones in the $25 surge protector or the ones in the $2000 TV? The utility 'whole house' protector is so simple that the girl who reads the meter may often install it. Demeaning comment noted. How would a simple girl know if the earth ground is proper and adequate? |
#31
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Friday, June 21, 2013 11:09:59 AM UTC-4, wrote:
Nonsense. Look at a phone facility for example. Not only is there protection on the incoming lines, there is also protection on the linecard boards in the system that the lines go to too. Protection on incoming lines is the 'whole house' solution. Protection in a line card is equivalent to protection found inside all household appliances. All appliances (and line cards) already contain protection that would otherwise be on its adjacent power wire. All appliances (and line cards) have best protection on lines entering the facility - properly earthed 'whole house' protection. Tiered protection strategy exists when a consumer earths a 'whole house' protector and nothing more. An earthed 'whole house' protector is his "secondary" protection. Each layer of protection is defined by earth ground - not by the protector. A homeowner's "primary" protection layer is elsewhere. Consumers should also inspect their 'primary' protection layer. A picture demonstrates that most important component: http://www.tvtower.com/fpl.html Protection is always defined by where energy dissipates. Always. An effective protector makes a connection to what does protection. The only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage. Including telco switching centers, radio and TV broadcast stations, and even munitions dumps. The solution that rarely exists in homes because so many foolishly think that power strip protects from the other and typically destructive surge. It doesn’t. I never said MOVs adjacent to appliances are useless. They do a maybe 0.2% additional protection. Many manufactures stopped putting MOVs inside appliances. Since other internal protection is often hardier. And since internal MOVs do little to protect from the other and typically destructive surge. All appliances (and line cards) by design already have superior protection. The informed homeowner is concerned with another and typically destructive transient. A transient that can overwhelm existing protection. That transient can only be diverted by properly earthed protectors. A 'whole house' solution is even necessary to protect 'point of connection' protectors .... that otherwise only protect from something that is typically not destructive. So yes, the adjacent protector does maybe an additional 0.2% protection. And the 'whole house' protector must still exist. Spend about $1 per protected appliance for about 99.5% protection - one properly earthed 'whole house' protector to protect from all type of surges. Then spend $25 or $80 per appliance to protect mostly from a type of surge that typically causes no damage. Yes, install a tiered solution. But that is done with protection already inside each appliance, by what is required (and typically missing) in most homes (a properly earthed 'whole house' protector), and the already existing 'primary' protection layer. Protectors without the short connection to earth do not and do not claim to protect from the typically destructive surge. That other surge is typically made irrelevant by what already exists even in dimmer switches, CFL light bulbs, computers, clocks, the furnace and air conditioner, and even smoke detectors. Informed consumers are better advised to direct money into what is more important - better earthing. And either a wire connection or a 'whole house' protector connection to what actually does the protection - earth ground. Page 42 figure 8: The adjacent protector is too far from earth ground and too close to appliances. So it earths a surge 8000 volts destructively through any nearby appliance. We have seen this often (in part because we did this stuff). Distance between a protector and electronics INCREASES protection. Distance from protector to earth ground is a most critical parameter for effective protection ... from the other and typically destructive surge. Even power strip protectors need protection only possible by earthing one 'whole house' protector. |
#32
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On 6/22/2013 7:10 AM, westom wrote:
On Friday, June 21, 2013 11:09:59 AM UTC-4, wrote: Nonsense. Look at a phone facility for example. Not only is there protection on the incoming lines, there is also protection on the linecard boards in the system that the lines go to too. Protection on incoming lines is the 'whole house' solution. Protection in a line card is equivalent to protection found inside all household appliances. All appliances (and line cards) already contain protection that would otherwise be on its adjacent power wire. All appliances (and line cards) have best protection on lines entering the facility - properly earthed 'whole house' protection. Tiered protection strategy exists when a consumer earths a 'whole house' protector and nothing more. An earthed 'whole house' protector is his "secondary" protection. Each layer of protection is defined by earth ground - not by the protector. A homeowner's "primary" protection layer is elsewhere. Consumers should also inspect their 'primary' protection layer. A picture demonstrates that most important component: http://www.tvtower.com/fpl.html Protection is always defined by where energy dissipates. Always. An effective protector makes a connection to what does protection. The only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage. Including telco switching centers, radio and TV broadcast stations, and even munitions dumps. The solution that rarely exists in homes because so many foolishly think that power strip protects from the other and typically destructive surge. It doesn’t. I never said MOVs adjacent to appliances are useless. They do a maybe 0.2% additional protection. Many manufactures stopped putting MOVs inside appliances. Since other internal protection is often hardier. And since internal MOVs do little to protect from the other and typically destructive surge. All appliances (and line cards) by design already have superior protection. The informed homeowner is concerned with another and typically destructive transient. A transient that can overwhelm existing protection. That transient can only be diverted by properly earthed protectors. A 'whole house' solution is even necessary to protect 'point of connection' protectors ... that otherwise only protect from something that is typically not destructive. So yes, the adjacent protector does maybe an additional 0.2% protection. And the 'whole house' protector must still exist. Spend about $1 per protected appliance for about 99.5% protection - one properly earthed 'whole house' protector to protect from all type of surges. Then spend $25 or $80 per appliance to protect mostly from a type of surge that typically causes no damage. Yes, install a tiered solution. But that is done with protection already inside each appliance, by what is required (and typically missing) in most homes (a properly earthed 'whole house' protector), and the already existing 'primary' protection layer. Protectors without the short connection to earth do not and do not claim to protect from the typically destructive surge. That other surge is typically made irrelevant by what already exists even in dimmer switches, CFL light bulbs, computers, clocks, the furnace and air conditioner, and even smoke detectors. Informed consumers are better advised to direct money into what is more important - better earthing. And either a wire connection or a 'whole house' protector connection to what actually does the protection - earth ground. Page 42 figure 8: The adjacent protector is too far from earth ground and too close to appliances. So it earths a surge 8000 volts destructively through any nearby appliance. We have seen this often (in part because we did this stuff). Distance between a protector and electronics INCREASES protection. Distance from protector to earth ground is a most critical parameter for effective protection ... from the other and typically destructive surge. Even power strip protectors need protection only possible by earthing one 'whole house' protector. When I was doing a lot of residential HVAC work with my late friend GB, our rural customers were having problems with power surges blowing out capacitors and other parts of of their HVAC systems. We started installing hard wired surge protection on their systems and it eliminated those type failures. ^_^ TDD |
#33
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
"westom" wrote in message ... On Friday, June 21, 2013 11:09:59 AM UTC-4, wrote: Nonsense. Look at a phone facility for example. Not only is there protection on the incoming lines, there is also protection on the linecard boards in the system that the lines go to too. Protection on incoming lines is the 'whole house' solution. Protection in a line card is equivalent to protection found inside all household appliances. All appliances (and line cards) already contain protection that would otherwise be on its adjacent power wire. All appliances (and line cards) have best protection on lines entering the facility - properly earthed 'whole house' protection. Tiered protection strategy exists when a consumer earths a 'whole house' protector and nothing more. An earthed 'whole house' protector is his "secondary" protection. Each layer of protection is defined by earth ground - not by the protector. A homeowner's "primary" protection layer is elsewhere. Consumers should also inspect their 'primary' protection layer. A picture demonstrates that most important component: http://www.tvtower.com/fpl.html Protection is always defined by where energy dissipates. Always. An effective protector makes a connection to what does protection. The only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage. Including telco switching centers, radio and TV broadcast stations, and even munitions dumps. The solution that rarely exists in homes because so many foolishly think that power strip protects from the other and typically destructive surge. It doesn't. I never said MOVs adjacent to appliances are useless. They do a maybe 0.2% additional protection. Many manufactures stopped putting MOVs inside appliances. Since other internal protection is often hardier. And since internal MOVs do little to protect from the other and typically destructive surge. All appliances (and line cards) by design already have superior protection. The informed homeowner is concerned with another and typically destructive transient. A transient that can overwhelm existing protection. That transient can only be diverted by properly earthed protectors. A 'whole house' solution is even necessary to protect 'point of connection' protectors ... that otherwise only protect from something that is typically not destructive. So yes, the adjacent protector does maybe an additional 0.2% protection. And the 'whole house' protector must still exist. Spend about $1 per protected appliance for about 99.5% protection - one properly earthed 'whole house' protector to protect from all type of surges. Then spend $25 or $80 per appliance to protect mostly from a type of surge that typically causes no damage. Yes, install a tiered solution. But that is done with protection already inside each appliance, by what is required (and typically missing) in most homes (a properly earthed 'whole house' protector), and the already existing 'primary' protection layer. Protectors without the short connection to earth do not and do not claim to protect from the typically destructive surge. That other surge is typically made irrelevant by what already exists even in dimmer switches, CFL light bulbs, computers, clocks, the furnace and air conditioner, and even smoke detectors. Informed consumers are better advised to direct money into what is more important - better earthing. And either a wire connection or a 'whole house' protector connection to what actually does the protection - earth ground. Page 42 figure 8: The adjacent protector is too far from earth ground and too close to appliances. So it earths a surge 8000 volts destructively through any nearby appliance. We have seen this often (in part because we did this stuff). Distance between a protector and electronics INCREASES protection. Distance from protector to earth ground is a most critical parameter for effective protection ... from the other and typically destructive surge. Even power strip protectors need protection only possible by earthing one 'whole house' protector. Excellent information and great examples of problems. Utilities by now should have figured out a better way to protect ground wires and ground rods than plastic or wooden "protectors" and hose clamps and they ought to be required to maintain them. I suppose it will take some substantial human damage and more than a few lawsuits for someone to write a "standard" and mandated compliance. Too bad. Tomsic |
#34
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Saturday, June 22, 2013 8:10:16 AM UTC-4, westom wrote:
On Friday, June 21, 2013 11:09:59 AM UTC-4, wrote: Nonsense. Look at a phone facility for example. Not only is there protection on the incoming lines, there is also protection on the linecard boards in the system that the lines go to too. Protection on incoming lines is the 'whole house' solution. Then you agree that this, which you posted, is untrue: "A 'whole house' protector is the only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage. " Protection in a line card is equivalent to protection found inside all household appliances. All appliances (and line cards) already contain protection that would otherwise be on its adjacent power wire. All appliances (and line cards) have best protection on lines entering the facility - properly earthed 'whole house' protection. Protection on a line card, as I said, is part of a TIERED protection strategy. A strategy that can include plug-in surge protectors. See the IEEE guide. Also, still waiting all these years for the answer to how can that surge protection on a line card or inside an appliance be effective surge protectors, when there is no direct earth ground? Yet the same components, MOVs, placed inside a plug-in surge protector according to you, offer no protection or can damage eqpt. Explain that contradiction. Tiered protection strategy exists when a consumer earths a 'whole house' protector and nothing more. Now you're lying. Look at the IEEE guide. Bud gave the link for all to see. It talks about tiered protection and it is *not* just one whole house surge protector. Who should folks believe? IEEE and NIST or you? An earthed 'whole house' protector is his "secondary" protection. Each layer of protection is defined by earth ground - not by the protector.. A homeowner's "primary" protection layer is elsewhere. Really? Where would that be? Consumers should also inspect their 'primary' protection layer. A picture demonstrates that most important component: http://www.tvtower.com/fpl.html Protection is always defined by where energy dissipates. Always. Tell that to Boeing. Where do they dissipate a lightning strike that hits a 777? Yet the aircraft is protected. And tell that to yourself too, because in this very post, you acknowledge that appliance manufacturers put surge protection inside appliances. Where does that energy dissipate with no direct, nearby, earth ground? An effective protector makes a connection to what does protection. The only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage. Including telco switching centers, radio and TV broadcast stations, and even munitions dumps. The solution that rarely exists in homes because so many foolishly think that power strip protects from the other and typically destructive surge. It doesn’t. I never said MOVs adjacent to appliances are useless. They do a maybe 0.2% additional protection. Good grief dude, are you suffering from memory loss? Bud will have a good laugh at that one too, I'm sure. Many manufactures stopped putting MOVs inside appliances. Since other internal protection is often hardier. Which ones would those be? Please show us some examples. And since internal MOVs do little to protect from the other and typically destructive surge. Can they protect from all surges? No. Are they useful as part of a tiered protection strategy? Yes. That's why the are in virtually every appliance. The same is true of plug-in surge protectors, which use devices, MOVs, with a lot more capacity than those in the appliance. Which is better? Have a plug-in surge protector connected to a TV that has a medium size MOV in it, or just rely on the smaller MOV in the TV? And remember, that MOVs degrade a bit with each surge. Would you rather have a good portion of any surge go through the $25 plug-in and then have the $2000 TV deal with the rest, or all of it go to the TV? Tiered: Whole house Plug-ins Inside the appliance All appliances (and line cards) by design already have superior protection. The informed homeowner is concerned with another and typically destructive transient. A transient that can overwhelm existing protection. That transient can only be diverted by properly earthed protectors. Then why do the above line cards have surge protection at all? According to you, it's worthless because the facility already has protection on the lines where they enter the building. Why do you continue to contradict yourself? A 'whole house' solution is even necessary to protect 'point of connection' protectors ... that otherwise only protect from something that is typically not destructive. So yes, the adjacent protector does maybe an additional 0.2% protection.. And the 'whole house' protector must still exist. Spend about $1 per protected appliance for about 99.5% protection - one properly earthed 'whole house' protector to protect from all type of surges. Then spend $25 or $80 per appliance to protect mostly from a type of surge that typically causes no damage. Yes, install a tiered solution. But that is done with protection already inside each appliance, by what is required (and typically missing) in most homes (a properly earthed 'whole house' protector), and the already existing 'primary' protection layer. The nonsense repeated, because you're on what amounts to a religous crusade. Protectors without the short connection to earth do not and do not claim to protect from the typically destructive surge. That other surge is typically made irrelevant by what already exists even in dimmer switches, CFL light bulbs, computers, clocks, the furnace and air conditioner, and even smoke detectors. How is that possible? According to you there is no protection unless those smoke detectors are connected directly to a ground rod? And again, which would you prefer deal with any surges that are coming in on the cord of a $2000 TV. The small MOV in the TV, or the much bigger one in the $25 surge protector? Informed consumers are better advised to direct money into what is more important - better earthing. And either a wire connection or a 'whole house' protector connection to what actually does the protection - earth ground.. Informed consumers should read the IEEE and other links provided by Bud. They say you're wrong. Page 42 figure 8: The adjacent protector is too far from earth ground and too close to appliances. So it earths a surge 8000 volts destructively through any nearby appliance. We have seen this often (in part because we did this stuff). Distance between a protector and electronics INCREASES protection. Distance from protector to earth ground is a most critical parameter for effective protection ... from the other and typically destructive surge. Even power strip protectors need protection only possible by earthing one 'whole house' protector. No link provided, so we have no figure or context, just your interpretation. |
#35
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Saturday, June 22, 2013 8:28:01 AM UTC-4, The Daring Dufas wrote:
On 6/22/2013 7:10 AM, westom wrote: On Friday, June 21, 2013 11:09:59 AM UTC-4, wrote: Nonsense. Look at a phone facility for example. Not only is there protection on the incoming lines, there is also protection on the linecard boards in the system that the lines go to too. Protection on incoming lines is the 'whole house' solution. Protection in a line card is equivalent to protection found inside all household appliances. All appliances (and line cards) already contain protection that would otherwise be on its adjacent power wire. All appliances (and line cards) have best protection on lines entering the facility - properly earthed 'whole house' protection. Tiered protection strategy exists when a consumer earths a 'whole house' protector and nothing more. An earthed 'whole house' protector is his "secondary" protection. Each layer of protection is defined by earth ground - not by the protector. A homeowner's "primary" protection layer is elsewhere. Consumers should also inspect their 'primary' protection layer. A picture demonstrates that most important component: http://www.tvtower.com/fpl.html Protection is always defined by where energy dissipates. Always. An effective protector makes a connection to what does protection. The only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage. Including telco switching centers, radio and TV broadcast stations, and even munitions dumps. The solution that rarely exists in homes because so many foolishly think that power strip protects from the other and typically destructive surge. It doesn’t. I never said MOVs adjacent to appliances are useless. They do a maybe 0.2% additional protection. Many manufactures stopped putting MOVs inside appliances. Since other internal protection is often hardier. And since internal MOVs do little to protect from the other and typically destructive surge. All appliances (and line cards) by design already have superior protection. The informed homeowner is concerned with another and typically destructive transient. A transient that can overwhelm existing protection. That transient can only be diverted by properly earthed protectors. A 'whole house' solution is even necessary to protect 'point of connection' protectors ... that otherwise only protect from something that is typically not destructive. So yes, the adjacent protector does maybe an additional 0.2% protection. And the 'whole house' protector must still exist. Spend about $1 per protected appliance for about 99.5% protection - one properly earthed 'whole house' protector to protect from all type of surges. Then spend $25 or $80 per appliance to protect mostly from a type of surge that typically causes no damage. Yes, install a tiered solution. But that is done with protection already inside each appliance, by what is required (and typically missing) in most homes (a properly earthed 'whole house' protector), and the already existing 'primary' protection layer. Protectors without the short connection to earth do not and do not claim to protect from the typically destructive surge. That other surge is typically made irrelevant by what already exists even in dimmer switches, CFL light bulbs, computers, clocks, the furnace and air conditioner, and even smoke detectors. Informed consumers are better advised to direct money into what is more important - better earthing. And either a wire connection or a 'whole house' protector connection to what actually does the protection - earth ground. Page 42 figure 8: The adjacent protector is too far from earth ground and too close to appliances. So it earths a surge 8000 volts destructively through any nearby appliance. We have seen this often (in part because we did this stuff). Distance between a protector and electronics INCREASES protection. Distance from protector to earth ground is a most critical parameter for effective protection ... from the other and typically destructive surge. Even power strip protectors need protection only possible by earthing one 'whole house' protector. When I was doing a lot of residential HVAC work with my late friend GB, our rural customers were having problems with power surges blowing out capacitors and other parts of of their HVAC systems. We started installing hard wired surge protection on their systems and it eliminated those type failures. ^_^ TDD No.... A point of use protector that works? Why that's impossible according to Tom. You should have seen more destruction, caused by the protector, according to him. |
#36
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Saturday, June 22, 2013 9:44:30 AM UTC-4, Tomsic wrote:
"westom" wrote in message ... On Friday, June 21, 2013 11:09:59 AM UTC-4, wrote: Nonsense. Look at a phone facility for example. Not only is there protection on the incoming lines, there is also protection on the linecard boards in the system that the lines go to too. Protection on incoming lines is the 'whole house' solution. Protection in a line card is equivalent to protection found inside all household appliances. All appliances (and line cards) already contain protection that would otherwise be on its adjacent power wire. All appliances (and line cards) have best protection on lines entering the facility - properly earthed 'whole house' protection. Tiered protection strategy exists when a consumer earths a 'whole house' protector and nothing more. An earthed 'whole house' protector is his "secondary" protection. Each layer of protection is defined by earth ground - not by the protector. A homeowner's "primary" protection layer is elsewhere. Consumers should also inspect their 'primary' protection layer. A picture demonstrates that most important component: http://www.tvtower.com/fpl.html Protection is always defined by where energy dissipates. Always. An effective protector makes a connection to what does protection. The only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage. Including telco switching centers, radio and TV broadcast stations, and even munitions dumps. The solution that rarely exists in homes because so many foolishly think that power strip protects from the other and typically destructive surge. It doesn't. I never said MOVs adjacent to appliances are useless. They do a maybe 0.2% additional protection. Many manufactures stopped putting MOVs inside appliances. Since other internal protection is often hardier. And since internal MOVs do little to protect from the other and typically destructive surge. All appliances (and line cards) by design already have superior protection. The informed homeowner is concerned with another and typically destructive transient. A transient that can overwhelm existing protection. That transient can only be diverted by properly earthed protectors. A 'whole house' solution is even necessary to protect 'point of connection' protectors ... that otherwise only protect from something that is typically not destructive. So yes, the adjacent protector does maybe an additional 0.2% protection. And the 'whole house' protector must still exist. Spend about $1 per protected appliance for about 99.5% protection - one properly earthed 'whole house' protector to protect from all type of surges. Then spend $25 or $80 per appliance to protect mostly from a type of surge that typically causes no damage. Yes, install a tiered solution. But that is done with protection already inside each appliance, by what is required (and typically missing) in most homes (a properly earthed 'whole house' protector), and the already existing 'primary' protection layer. Protectors without the short connection to earth do not and do not claim to protect from the typically destructive surge. That other surge is typically made irrelevant by what already exists even in dimmer switches, CFL light bulbs, computers, clocks, the furnace and air conditioner, and even smoke detectors. Informed consumers are better advised to direct money into what is more important - better earthing. And either a wire connection or a 'whole house' protector connection to what actually does the protection - earth ground. Page 42 figure 8: The adjacent protector is too far from earth ground and too close to appliances. So it earths a surge 8000 volts destructively through any nearby appliance. We have seen this often (in part because we did this stuff). Distance between a protector and electronics INCREASES protection. Distance from protector to earth ground is a most critical parameter for effective protection ... from the other and typically destructive surge. Even power strip protectors need protection only possible by earthing one 'whole house' protector. Excellent information and great examples of problems. Utilities by now should have figured out a better way to protect ground wires and ground rods than plastic or wooden "protectors" and hose clamps and they ought to be required to maintain them. I suppose it will take some substantial human damage and more than a few lawsuits for someone to write a "standard" and mandated compliance. Too bad. Tomsic What utilities are using hose clamps to secure earth ground wires? As far as standards, they already exist. NEC, for example, defines acceptable grounding methods, materials, practices, etc. PS: Hose clamps are not allowed. |
#37
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
|
#38
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Saturday, June 22, 2013 10:18:17 AM UTC-4, wrote:
Protection on a line card, as I said, is part of a TIERED protection strategy. A strategy that can include plug-in surge protectors. As I have said repeatedly, anything that a plug-in protector might do is already done better inside appliances (or line card). Please read what I posted. Not what you want to read. We were not discussing solutions that come standard in all appliances (even dimmer switches and GFCIs). We are discussing a $3 power strip with ten cent protector parts that sell at $25, $40 or $100 for obscene profits. That protector is tiniest protection without a 'whole house' protector. And does little when a 'whole house' protector is properly earthed. I am not discussing in black and white extremist rhetoric that you are reposting. Why spend so much money on 'point of connection' protectors when that protection exists inside each appliance. Where is money better spent? To upgrade what best defines protection - the single point earth ground. One method for even better protection is Ufer grounds. Because a protector is only as effective as its earth ground. But again, that does not say the plug-in protector is useless. Just not cost effective as you would have others believe. The other and effective protector connects surge energy low impedance (ie 'less than 10 feet') to earth ground. It is not 100% protection. But the least expensive solution does most all protection. IEEE even provides perspective: "a 99.5% protection level will reduce the incidence of direct strokes from one stroke per 30 years ... to one stroke per 6000 years ... Protection at 99.5% is the practical choice." For most homeowners, that is sufficient. For facilities that cannot have damage, that is essential. Facilities that cannot have damage always use a 'whole house' solution. Even 'point of connection' protectors need that protection to avert house fires. Why are you trying to sell plug-in protector without a 'whole house' solution? Why are you promoting that scam? |
#39
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Saturday, June 22, 2013 9:44:30 AM UTC-4, Tomsic wrote:
I suppose it will take some substantial human damage and more than a few lawsuits for someone to write a "standard" and mandated compliance. Standard already exists. But some utilities have a history of worrying more about profits and less about the product. New Jersey assigned a PUC commissioner only for First Energy due to repeated reliability violations. One was not fixing compromised earth grounds. Some municipalities even had to create ordinances. A $5000 per day fine every day someone was shocked in their swimming pool or jacuzzi. Only then did First Energy permit their linemen to fix earth grounds. |
#40
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bad voltage spikes
On Sunday, June 23, 2013 10:52:25 AM UTC-4, westom wrote:
On Saturday, June 22, 2013 10:18:17 AM UTC-4, wrote: Protection on a line card, as I said, is part of a TIERED protection strategy. A strategy that can include plug-in surge protectors. As I have said repeatedly, anything that a plug-in protector might do is already done better inside appliances (or line card). Just because you repeat something that is wrong or a lie, doesn't make it true. Please read what I posted. Not what you want to read. We've all read what you've posted, many times over the years. We were not discussing solutions that come standard in all appliances (even dimmer switches and GFCIs). We are discussing a $3 power strip with ten cent protector parts that sell at $25, $40 or $100 for obscene profits. That protector is tiniest protection without a 'whole house' protector. And does little when a 'whole house' protector is properly earthed. What comes standard in an appliance is just one small part of the discussion. And if you look at the price of components, you will find that the MOVs inside a plug-in surge protector don't cost 10 cents, they cost substantially more. The ones inside the appliance, while costing less, aren't 10 cents. I am not discussing in black and white extremist rhetoric that you are reposting. Good grief! You are exactly that. I'm not the one here on a religious crusade against plug-in surge protectors. Another curious aspect. I post here on a wide variety of topics, almost daily. Why is it that we only see you here when a post has "surge protector" in it? If that isn't a sign of someone obsessed with one issue, I don't know what is. Why spend so much money on 'point of connection' protectors when that protection exists inside each appliance. So that if a 2000V surge comes along, it first arrives at the $25 plug-in protector, it starts to clamp the voltages, starts to shunt it to ground, instead of the $2000 TV. Got it now? Where is money better spent? To upgrade what best defines protection - the single point earth ground. Nobody is arguing that good grounding practices, a whole house surge protector, is not the first line of defense. But your position is like saying, locking the doors is all that one needs do to secure a house and having a safe, window bars, hiding valuables, etc is a waste. One method for even better protection is Ufer grounds. I don't believe that is true either. While they make good grounds, I haven't seen anything that says you can't have equal protection with a ground rod in suitable soil. Because a protector is only as effective as its earth ground. The lie repeated. Still waiting for that explanation. Appliances have MOVs for surge protection. The same devices, just smaller, as found in plub-in surge protectors. So, how the hell can they work with out the appliance being directly connected to an earth ground? But again, that does not say the plug-in protector is useless. Just not cost effective as you would have others believe. So, which is it? You say they are worthless. You say they actually cause damage. Now you suddenly say they are not useless. The other and effective protector connects surge energy low impedance (ie 'less than 10 feet') to earth ground. It is not 100% protection. But the least expensive solution does most all protection. IEEE even provides perspective: "a 99.5% protection level will reduce the incidence of direct strokes from one stroke per 30 years ... to one stroke per 6000 years ... Protection at 99.5% is the practical choice." Again, you're telling us what IEEE says, with no link. Funny thing that. For most homeowners, that is sufficient. For facilities that cannot have damage, that is essential. Facilities that cannot have damage always use a 'whole house' solution. Yes as part of a TIERED STRATEGY. It's *not* the only surge protection. Just like IEEE recommends. Even 'point of connection' protectors need that protection to avert house fires. Why are you trying to sell plug-in protector without a 'whole house' solution? Why are you promoting that scam? Why is it that when you have no links, no credible sources to support your claims, that you resort to accusing anyone who does, of being a paid saleperson for or connected to a surge protector company? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kinda OT.. Generators and voltage spikes | Electronics Repair | |||
Voltage spikes | UK diy | |||
Anti-Perching spikes. | UK diy | |||
Welding on rail road spikes | Metalworking | |||
Question about loose gutter spikes | Home Ownership |